Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 44 issue 4 (april 2021) : 431-438

Determination of Effective Method of NPK Fertilization in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Cultivars Grown in Pakistan

Muniza Sarfraz1, Khalid Hussain1,*, Khalid Nawaz1, Ghulam Yasin2, Zhide Geng3, Muhammad Sajjad4, Sana Parveen1
1Department of Botany, University of Gujrat, Pakistan.
2Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
3Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China.
4Department of Biosciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Submitted31-05-2020|

  • Accepted15-08-2020|

  • First Online 09-11-2020|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-570

Cite article:- Sarfraz Muniza, Hussain Khalid, Nawaz Khalid, Yasin Ghulam, Geng Zhide, Sajjad Muhammad, Parveen Sana (2020). Determination of Effective Method of NPK Fertilization in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Cultivars Grown in Pakistan . Legume Research. 44(4): 431-438. doi: 10.18805/LR-570.
Background: Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) are amongst the fundamental macronutrients, which are crucial for the growth and development plants. There is lack of information for the most effective method for NPK fertilization in pea cultivars grown in Pakistan. In most of the cases, NPK is applied as soil application rather than foliar spray. 

Methods: Experiments were conducted to find out the most effective method of NPK fertilization i.e. soil application or foliar spray on three pea cultivars (Aleena, Climax and Meteor). Experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design with 4 replicates and data was recorded at different growth stages.

Result: Soil and foliar spray of NPK showed significant results for the enhancement of root and shoot development, foliage growth, relative growth rate (RGR), net assimilation rate (NAR), photosynthetic pigments, total carbohydrate contents and soluble proteins. Antioxidant activities i.e. catalases (CAT), peroxidase (POD) and yield attributes increased significantly with NPK applications. NPK foliar application showed better result only for the higher relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR). It was noted that NPK soil applications were more effective for the improvement of growth, quality and yield of pea as compared to foliar spray. Climax and Aleena cultivars were better in relation to growth, quality and yield than Meteor with soil NPK application. Changes in antioxidant activities by NPK significantly increased the defense mechanism in plants resulted improved in plant metabolism that increased the growth, yield and quality of pea. It was concluded that soil application of NPK was more effective for higher productivity of pea than foliar use. 
Pea (Pisum sativum L.) belongs to family Fabaceae producing high quantity of edible proteins (23-33%) along with vitamins and carbohydrates. Peas are also rich in carbohydrates with range of 21-25% in addition to supplementary nutrition (Gatti et al., 2011). Pea ranks fourth in the world amongst legumes subsequent to soybean, French beans and groundnut on production basis (Jarosalva et al., 2011). 
 
Nitrogen, phosphorus and potash (NPK) fertilizers are important source of nutrients that is obtained by plant from the soil (Tanimu, 2013). Vegetative growth is considerably increased with the adequate supply of NPK and these nutrients are also helpful in photosynthesis because NPK is involved in chlorophyll synthesis (Futuless et al., 2011). NPK are amongst the essential macronutrients, which plays crucial role for the enhancement of growth in the plants. Nitrogen enhance the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments, modifies the molecular structure of protein and some specific amino acids (Khalid, 2013). Potash is very important component that significantly improve the growth of the plants. P considerably increased the root growth and it also promoted the plant maturity (Akhtar et al., 2003). K also enhances the root functioning such as uptake of water and permeability of soil and also works as a regulator of stomata for opening of guard cells and played an important role in improving the use of water proficiency (Tsegaye et al., 2018).
 
There are different opinions about the method of NPK application in plants. According to few researchers, various factors affect the effectiveness of foliar sprays, such as environmental factors that can effect on the absorption of foliar nutrient (Khalid, 2013). According to Fernandez and Eichert (2009), plants can uptake nutrients through rooting medium in a form of small molecules having no electric charge on it and translocation normally occurs by roots. However, fertilizers in the form of foliar spray can only be used when the availability of nutrients in the soil is limited. It was revealed from different studies that soil application produced higher NPK accumulation in underground storage organs that was helpful for attaining better growth and yield in plants than foliar fertilization (Fernandez et al., 2013).
 
In the view of above mentioned literature, this research was carried out to find the best method of NPK application for higher crop productivity in pea cultivars that are extensively grown in Pakistan.
This experiment was carried out at botanical garden of University of Gujrat, Pakistan during 2018-19. Seeds of three pea cultivars (Aleena, Climax and Meteor) were obtained from Punjab Agriculture Department, Gujranwala, Pakistan. Seeds were sown during October, 2019 in sandy loam soil. After 21 days of sprouting treatments of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) were applied:
 
T0 = Control.
T1 = NPK foliar application (18:18:18% W/V).
T2 = NPK soil application (18:18:18% W/W).
  
Experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design with 4 replicates. Four sets of plant samples were collected for recording observations at vegetative (21 days after treatment) and maturity (42 days after treatments) on like root and shoot lengths, fresh and dry weights, number of leaves, leaf area, leaf area ratio, activities of catalase and peroxidase, contents of chlorophyll and carotenoid, relative growth rate (RGR), net assimilation rate (NAR), carbohydrates and proteins contents in seeds. Number of pod, seeds per pod and weight of seeds were determined at maturity.
 
Leaf area was determined with portable Handheld Leaf Area Meter (CI-203 Laser scanner). Chlorophyll a, b, total chl and carotenoids were determined by the method of Arnon (1949). For determination of carbohydrate, 10 ml of 80% ethanol was used to grind fresh seeds (1g), extract was diluted with water and final volume was made up to 10 ml. Concentrated H2SO4 (96%) was added in test tubes (5ml) and gently shaked and incubated it at room temperature for 40 min. About 1 ml of 5% phenol was added to each tube and reading was taken from spectrophotometer at 490 nm. Fresh seeds (1g) were ground with 50 mM of potassium phosphate buffer having pH 7.8 in a cool environment. Centrifugation was done at 10,000 RPM at 4°C for about 15 min. Bradford reagent (2 ml) was mixed with 0.1ml of centrifuged extract and the reading was taken at 590 nm using spectrophotometer.
 
Estimation of catalases (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) activities were determined by the procedure of Chance and Maehly (1955). Fresh pea leaves (5g) were crushed with the volume of 5ml of 50mM cooled Phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) which was then placed in an ice bath for the accurate extraction of antioxidant enzymes. After that crushed samples were centrifuged at 15,000 RPM at 4°C for 20minutes. For the determination of enzymes activities supernatant was used. A solution of (3ml) was prepared to determine the antioxidant enzyme activity by adding 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 5.9 Mm H2O2 and 0.1ml extract. A change in the absorbance of CAT solution was determined at 240 nm. To characterize one unit activity of CAT absorbance change of 0.01 units per minute was utilized. Peroxidase dismutase (POD) solution of (3 ml) was made with 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 5.0), 20 mM guaicol in addition with 40 mM H2O2 and with 0.1 ml enzymes extract to check the antioxidant activity. Changes in the absorbance of the solution was determined at 470 nm.
 
COSTAT computer software package was used to determine ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) and means were compared done by Duncan’s New Multiple Range test at probability level of 5% (Steel and Torrie, 1986).
Root development
 
Data obtained from the trial suggested that root development of pea at vegetative and maturity stages showed that the main effect of foliar spray and soil application of NPK on root length, its fresh and dry weights was significant (Table 1). Higher root length was observed in cultivar climax when NPK applied in soil medium at both growth stages (Fig 1A). Maximum increase in root fresh weight at both growth stages was recorded in Aleena cultivar when NPK was applied in soil (Fig 1B). It was noted that cultivars Aleena and Climax produced higher root dry biomass at vegetative and maturity stages with soil application of NPK (Fig 1C).
 

Table 1: Mean squares (MS) from analysis of variance (ANOVA) for root development in pea due to NPK application.


 

Fig 1: Development of root in pea due to foliar and soil application of NPK.


 
Shoot development
 
Effect of foliar spray as well as soil application of NPK was highly significant on shoot development of pea (Table 2). Higher shoot length was observed in cultivar Aleena at vegetative stage and at maturity, cultivar Climax had higher shoot length with the soil application of NPK (Fig 2A). It was noted that Aleena had higher shoot fresh weight at vegetative stage while at maturity cultivar Climax produced higher shoot fresh weight with soil NPK application (Fig 2B). For shoot dry weight, cultivar Aleena showed the higher increase in dry weight with the soil application of NPK (Fig 2C).
 

Table 2: Mean squares (MS) from analysis of variance (ANOVA) for shoot development in pea due to NPK application.


 

Fig 2: Development of shoot in pea due to foliar and soil application of NPK.


 
Foliage growth
 
Analyzed data for number of leaves, leaf area and leaf area ratio of pea showed that soil and foliar application of NPK had highly significant effects on these attributes (Table 3). Higher number of leaves was counted in Aleena at both stages when NPK was applied in soil medium (Fig 3A). It was observed that cultivars Climax and Aleena had higher area with soil application of NPK (Fig 3B). In case of leaf area ratio, cultivar Meteor showed the higher values as compared to other cultivars with foliar application of NPK (Fig 3C).
 

Table 3: Mean squares (MS) from analysis of variance (ANOVA) for foliage growth in pea due to NPK application.


 
Antioxidant activities
 
Soil application of NPK had highly significant results for catalases (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) activities, whereas, with foliar application results were significant at both stages (Table 4). CAT activity was considerably enhanced with the soil application of NPK in Climax at vegetative stage while at maturity cultivar Aleena had higher CAT activity at both stages (Fig 4A). Significant increase in POD activity was observed in climax at vegetative stage with soil NPK and at maturity with foliar spray of NPK (Fig 4B).
 

Table 4: Mean squares (MS) from analysis of variance (ANOVA) for antioxidant activities in pea due to NPK application.


 

Fig 4: Antioxidant activities in pea due to foliar and soil application of NPK.


 
Photosynthetic pigments
 
There was a significant result of NPK (soil and foliar spray) on chlorophyll a and b contents in pea, while it was highly significant in case of total chlorophyll and carotenoids (Table 5). Chlorophyll a and b contents significantly increased in Aleena and Climax at both stages when NPK was applied in soil medium. (Fig 5A-B). Higher increase in total chlorophyll content was observed in Climax at vegetative stage with soil application while at maturity, Aleena had higher total chlorophyll contents with the foliar spray (Fig 5C). Carotenoids content was significantly enhanced in climax at vegetative stage with soil NPK while at maturity, Aleena had higher carotenoids with foliar spray of NPK (Fig 5D).

Table 5: Mean squares (MS) from analysis of variance (ANOVA) for photosynthetic pigments in pea due to NPK application.


 

Fig 5: Concentrations of photosynthetic pigments in pea due to foliar and soil application of NPK.


 
Physiological activities
 
Effect of soil application of NPK had significant result on RGR (relative growth rate) and NAR (net assimilation rate) of pea (Table 6), whereas the interaction between foliar and soil application was non-significant. Higher RGR of pea was noted with the foliar application of NPK in Aleena (Fig 6A). Maximum increase in NAR of pea was observed in Aleena with foliar spray of NPK (Fig 6B).
 

Table 6: Means square (MS) from analysis of variance (ANOVA) for physiological activities, quality and yield of pea due to NPK application.


 

Fig 6: Physiological activities in pea due to foliar and soil application of NPK.


 
Biochemical attributes
 
It was noted that NPK soil application had highly significant effects on carbohydrate contents in pea seeds. While, NPK applied as foliar spray had significant results on total carbohydrate contents (Table 4). Higher carbohydrate content was found in Aleena with foliar spray of NPK (Fig 7A). Soil application of NPK had highly significant effects on total soluble proteins, while there was significant results with foliar spray of NPK. Maximum increase in total soluble protein was recorded in Climax (Fig 7B).
 
@figure7
 
Yield attributes
 
It was observed that different yield attributes i.e. number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and total seeds weight per plant were highly significant in the foliar and soil application of NPK (Table 6). Pea yield significantly increased by NPK soil application. Higher increase in the pea pods production was observed with soil application of NPK in Climax (Fig 8A). Soil application of NPK also extensively increased the seeds number per pod in Aleena and Climax (Fig 8B). Higher seed weight was recorded in cultivar Aleena with soil application of NPK (Fig 8C).
 
@figure8
 
It was observed that both methods of NPK application were effective for enhancement of pea productivity but soil application was more effective for higher growth and yield. It may be due to that roots system have the specialized structure that works efficiently in plant for the uptake of nutrients from soil rather than absorption of nutrient through foliage treatments (Fernandez and Eichert, 2009).
 
Various factors can effect on the effectiveness of foliar nutrient sprays, such as environmental factors have an effect on the absorption and assimilation of foliar nutrient sprays by influencing their responses on plant (Fernandez et al., 2013). Plants can absorb and translocate nutrients through root via soil application in a form of molecules having no electric charge. Translocation of nutrient in plants normally occurs by roots, however, fertilizers in the form of foliar spray can only be used when the availability of nutrients in the soil is limited (Khalid, 2013). It was noted that soil NPK application was helpful for attaining better growth, yield and quality in plants than foliar fertilization (Fernandez et al., 2013).
 
Similarly, Omotoso and Shittu (2007) confirmed that NPK applied in rooting medium significantly improved the growth attributes of okra including length of shoot and root, its fresh and dry weights and its yield. Okonwuh and Mensah (2012) described that NPK in soil application increased the leaf area, root, shoot fresh and dry weight and no. of leaves. RGR and NAR values were gradually increased with NPK fertilizer in pepper and eggplant (Balliu et al., 2007).
 
It was also noted that NPK had significant effects on photosynthetic pigments and antioxidant activities of pea. Peyvast et al., (2008) reported that significant increase in the production of chlorophyll a, b and total chl in plants was noted with the use of NPK. Abbas and Ali (2011) demonstrated that with the utilization of NPK through roots enhanced the total carbohydrates contents in roselle plant. NPK in soil application increased the total soluble protein contents in pea (Tisdale et al., 1995). It was already described that NPK in soil considerably improved the antioxidant activities of (POD and CAT) enzymes (Gurgul and Herman, 1994). Due to the soil application of NPK, yield of pea increased because root system helped efficiently to uptake the nutrients from soil. According to Jaipaul et al., (2011) NPK in soil medium, considerably increased the number of pods and total seed yield of garden pea.
It was concluded that soil application of NPK was more effective for higher productivity of pea than foliar use. Climax and Aleena cultivars were best in relation to growth, quality and yield than Meteor with soil NPK application. NPK was useful for the enhancement of pea productivity.

  1. Abbas, M.K. and Ali, A.S. (2011). Effect of foliar application of NPK on some growth characters of two cultivars of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). American Journal of Plant Physiology. 6: 220-227.

  2. Akhtar, N., Amjad, M., Anjum, M.A. (2003). Growth and yield response of pea (Pisum sativum L.) crop to phosphorus and potassium application. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 40: 3-4.

  3. Arnon, I.D. (1949). Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology. 24: 1-15.

  4. Balliu, A., Sallaku, G. Kuci, S., Cota, E., Kaciu, S. (2007). The effect of major nutrients (NPK) on the growth rate of pepper and eggplant seedlings. Acta Horticulturae. 729: 341-347.

  5. Chance, B. and Maehley, A.C. (1955). Assay of catalase and peroxidases. Methods Enzymology. 2: 764-755.

  6. Fernandez, V. and Eichert, T. (2009). Uptake of hydrophilic solutes through plant leaves: current state of knowledge and perspectives of foliar fertilization. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 28: 36-68.

  7. Fernandez, V., Sotiropoulos, T., Brown, P. (2013). Foliar Fertilization: Scientific Principles and Field Practices. Publisher, International Fertilizer Industry Association. Paris, France. Pp 5-141.

  8. Futuless, K.N., Toungos, M.D., Bagale, P.M. (2011). Influence of soya bean cultivars and plant arrangement in sorghum- soya bean intercropping in Northern Guinea Sahanna. International Journal of Crop Sciences. 3: 12-15.

  9. Gatti, I., Esposito, M.A., Almiron, P., Cravero, V.P., Cointry, E.L. (2011). Diversity of pea (Pisum sativum) accessions based on morphological data for sustainable field pea breeding in Argentina. Genetic and Molecular Research. 10: 3403-3410.

  10. Gurgul, E. and B. Herman. (1994). Influence of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on chemical composition and activity of some enzymes in celery during its growth. Biologia Plantarum. 36: 261-265.

  11. Jaipaul, S. Sharma, A.K. Dixit and A.K. Sharma. (2011). Growth and yield of capsicum (Capsicum annum) and garden pea (Pisum sativum) as influenced by organic manures and biofertilizers. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 81(7): 637-42.

  12. Jarosalva, C., Smykal, P., Dockalova, Z., Hanacek, P., Prochazka, S., Hybl, M., Griga, M. (2011). Molecular evidences of genetic diversity changes in pea (Pisum sativum L.) germplasm after long-term maintenance. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 58: 439-451.

  13. Khalid, A.K. (2013). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on morphological and biochemical traits of some Apiaceae crops under arid region conditions in Egypt. Nusantara Bioscience. 5: 15-21.

  14. Okonwuh, K. and Mensah, S.I. (2012). Effects of NPK (15:15:15) fertilizer on some growth indices of Pumpkin. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research. 6: 137-143.

  15. Omotoso, S.O. and Shittu, O.S. (2007). Effect of NPK fertilizer rates and method of application on growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L., Moench). International Journal of Agricultural Research. 2: 614-619.

  16. Peyvast, G.H., Olfati, J.A., Kharazi, R., Tahernia, P.S., Shabani, H. (2008). Effect of organic fertilizer on nitrate accumulation by vegetables. Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology. 49: 58-62.

  17. Steel, R.G. and Torrie, H.J. (1986). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biological Approach. McGraw-Hill, 315-321.

  18. Tanimu, J., Uyovbisere, E.O., Lyocks, S.W.J., Tanimu, Y. (2013). Effects of Cow Dung on the growth and development of Maize crop. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 3: 371-383.

  19. Tisdale, S.L., W.L. Nelson, J.D. Beaton and J.L. Haulin. (1995). Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. (3rd Ed). Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi. Pp. 68-73.

  20. Tsegaye, T., Tewodros, A., Hussien, M.B. (2018). Combined application of bioslurry and inorganic fertilizers on quality traits of cabbage and soil properties. Asian Journal of Biological Sciences. 11: 24-32.

Editorial Board

View all (0)