Cytogenetic Diversity and Characterization of Vicia sativa Subspecies

DOI: 10.18805/LR-567    | Article Id: LR-567 | Page : 501-507
Citation :- Cytogenetic Diversity and Characterization of Vicia sativa Subspecies.Legume Research-An International Journal.2021.(44):501-507
Address : Department of Field Crops, Agriculture Faculty, Ankara University, 06110, Ankara, Turkey.
Submitted Date : 8-05-2020
Accepted Date : 22-10-2020

Abstract

Background: Vicia sativa L. is variable genus comprised of several subspecies. Close relative species and subspecies of the cultivated species are easily usable gene sources because they have gained resistance against a wide range of biotic and abiotic stresses. The main objectives of this study are to identify and describe the cytogenetical and karyological characteristics of subspecies in the Vicia sativa complex.
Methods: The research material consisted of multiple entries collected from the five subspecies of nine taxa. All cytological observations made from root tips. Six chromosomal parameters (chromosome length, relative length, long arm length, short arm length, arm ratio and centromeric index) and five karyotype asymmetric parameters (difference in relative length, total form percentage, intrachromosomal asymmetry index, interchromosomal asymmetry index and mean centromeric asymmetry) were determined.
Result: It was determined that the chromosome number of subspecies were 2n =10-12. The haploid chromosome lengths of subspecies were 15.86-33.88 µm and the average chromosome lengths varied between 2.64-5.65 µm. According to the intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry index analysis, subsp. segetalis was the most asymmetric karyotype and subsp. sativa “Antalya” was the most symmetric karyotype. According to the interchromosomal karyotype asymmetry index analysis, subsp. angustifolia was the most asymmetric karyotype and subsp. nigra was the most symmetric karyotype.

Keywords

Asymmetry index Chromosome Karyotype Vicia sativa subspecies

References

  1. Arslan, E., Ertugrul, K. and Ozturk, A.B. (2012). Karyological studies of some species of the genus Vicia L. in Turkey. Caryologia. 65: 106-113.
  2. Celiktas, N., Can, E., Hatipoglu, R. and Avci, S. (2006). Comparison between a wild population and cultivar of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) on cytological and agronomic characteristics. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 49: 389-393.
  3. Devi, R., Mittal, R.K., Sood, V.K. and Sharma, P.N. (2020). Genetic diversity analysis of advanced breeding lines derived from interspecific and intervarietal crosses of black gram based on morphological and molecular markers. Legume Research. 43: 480-487.
  4. Donnelly E.D. and Clark E.M. (1962). Hybridization in the genus Vicia. Crop Science. 2: 141-145.
  5. El-Bok, S. Khelil, A.Z., Brahim, T., Ouji, A., Hassen, H., Lamine, O., Jabri, C., Douggari, R. and El-Gazzah, M. (2014). Chromosome number and karyotype analysis of some taxa of Vicia genus: revision and description. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 16: 1067-1074.
  6. El-Shanshoury, A.R. (2007). Characterization of infraspecific electrophoretic genetic variation within Vicia sativa subspecies sativa population. Journal of Biological Sciences. 7: 918-924.
  7. Hanelt, P. and Mettin, D. (1989). Biosystematics of genus Vicia L. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 20: 199-223.
  8. Harlan, J.R. and de Wet, J.M.J. (1971). Toward a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon. 20: 509-517.
  9. Hollings, E. and Stace, C.A. (1974). Karyotype variation and evolution in the Vicia sativa aggregate. New Phytologist. 73: 195-208.
  10. Huziwara, Y. (1962). Karyotype analysis in some genera of compositae. VIII. Further studies on the chromosomes of aster. American Journal of Botany. 49: 116-119.
  11. Kamari, G., Felber, F. and Garbari, F. (1994). Mediterranean chromosome number reports 4. Flora Mediterranean. 4: 233-301.
  12. Kanwar, R., Mehta, D.K., Sharma, R. and Dogra, R.K. (2020). Studies on genetic diversity of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces of Himachal Pradesh based on morphological traits and molecular markers. Legume Research. 43(4): 470-479.
  13. Kartal, G., Senbek, G., Karaca, M. and Acikgoz, E. (2020). Hybridization studies in Vicia sativa complex. Euphytica. 216, 29. https:/ doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-2566-3.
  14. Konichenko, E.S., Selyutina, I.Y., Dorogina, O.V. and Sandanov, D.V. (2014). Karyotype studies endemic plant species Astragalus sericeocanus Gontsch. around Lake Baikal, Siberia. Caryologia. 67: 172-177.
  15. Ladizinsky, G. (1978). Chromosomal polymorphism in wild populations of Vicia sativa L. Caryologia. 31: 233-241.
  16. Ladizinsky, G. (1981). Consequences of hybridization in Vicia sativa aggregate. Heredity. 47:431-438.
  17. Ladizinsky, G. and Temkin, R. (1978). The cytogenetic structure of Vicia sativa aggregate. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 53: 33-42.
  18. Lahuta, L.B., Rybiñski, W., Bocianowski, J., Nowosad, K. and Börner, A. (2020). Raffinose family oligosaccharides in seeds of common vetch (Vicia sativa L. ssp. sativa). Legume Research. 43(4): 512-517.
  19. Levan, A., Fredga, K. and Sandberg, A.A. (1964). Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas. 52: 201-220.
  20. Martin, E., Yýldýz, H.K., Kahraman, A., Binzat, O.K. and Eroglu, H.E. (2018). Detailed chromosome measurements and karyotype asymmetry of some Vicia taxa from Turkey. Caryologia. 71: 224-232.
  21. Mettin, D. and Hanelt, P. (1973). Über Speziationsvorgänge in der Gattung Vicia L. Kulturpflanze. 21: 25-54.
  22. Navratilova, A., Neumann, P. and Macas, J. (2003). Karyotype analysis of four Vicia species using in situ hybridization with repetitive sequences. Annals of Botany. 91: 921-926.
  23. Peruzzi, L. and Eroglu, E. (2013). Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to measure and what to measure? Comparative Cytogenetics. 7:1-9.
  24. Potokina, E.K. (1997). Vicia sativa L. aggregate in the flora of former USSR. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 44: 199-    209.
  25. Reeves, A. (2001). MicroMeasure: A new computer program for the collection and analysis of cytogenetic data. Genome. 44: 439-443.
  26. Seymour, M., Siddique, K.H., Brandon, N., Martin, L. and Jackson, E. (2002). Response of vetch (Vicia spp.) to plant density in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 42: 1043-1051.
  27. Van de Wouw, M., Maxted, N., Chabane, K. and Ford-Lloyd, B.V. (2001a). Molecular taxonomy of Vicia ser. Vicia based on amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 229: 91-105.
  28. Van de Wouw, M., Enneking, D., Robertson, L.D. and Maxted, N. (2001b). Vetches (Vicia L.) Plant genetic resources of legumes in the Mediterranean, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 134-158.
  29. Van De Wouw, M., Maxted, N. and Ford-Lyod B.V. (2003). Agromorphological characterisation of common vetch and its close relatives. Euphytica. 130: 281-292.
  30. Von Bothmer R., van Hintum, T. Knüpffer, H. and Sato, K. (2003). Diversity in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Elsevier, 280 pp.
  31. Weber, L.H. and Schifino-Wittmann, M.T. (1999). Vicia sativa L. aggregate (Fabaceae) in southern Brazil. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 46: 207-211.
  32. Yamamoto, K. (1968). On the interspecific hybrids between Vicia sativa and V. macrocarpa. Japanese Journal of Breeding. 18: 283-290.
  33. Zarco, R.C. (1986). A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. Taxon. 35: 526-530.
  34. Zhang, X. and Mosjidis, J.A. (1995). Breeding systems of several Vicia species. Crop Science. 35:1200-1202.
  35. Zohary, D. and Plitmann, U. (1979). Chromosome polymorphism, hybridization and colonization in the Vicia sativa group. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 131: 143-156.
  36. Zuo, L. and Yuan, Q. (2011). The difference between the heterogeneity of the centromeric index and intrachromosomal asymmetry. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 297: 141-145.

Global Footprints