Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 44 issue 7 (july 2021) : 793-797

The Relationship between Seed Vigor and Germination Performance under Various Chloride Salts in Pea

G. Kaya1,*
1The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Provincial Directorate of Eskisehir, Eskisehir-Turkey.
  • Submitted20-03-2020|

  • Accepted27-02-2021|

  • First Online 31-03-2021|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-559

Cite article:- Kaya G. (2021). The Relationship between Seed Vigor and Germination Performance under Various Chloride Salts in Pea . Legume Research. 44(7): 793-797. doi: 10.18805/LR-559.
Background: Salinity is a severe abiotic stress resulting in inhibiting germination, seedling growth of crop plants. Germination performance under salinity depends on seed vigor and genotypic factors. This study aimed to determine if there was a relationship between germination and seedling growth of eight pea cultivars subjected to three chloride salts and the results of seed vigor tests. 

Methods: Pea cultivars Ambassador, Bolero, Electra, Esprit, Puccet, Rainer, Utrillo and Winner were germinated in the medium with three chloride salts of NaCl, MgCl2 and CaCl2 with the electrical conductivity (EC) of 20 dS m-1. Also germination percentage, mean germination time, controlled deterioration (CD) and electrical conductivity (EC) test were evaluated. 

Result: The seed vigor of pea cultivars was significantly different and salinity led to a significant decline in parameters of the cultivars. The most hazardous salt was MgCl2, while the least harmful was NaCl. Germination percentage was negatively related with MGT and EC values and EC test was strongly correlated with CD test. Utrillo and Winner were the most sensitive cultivars to MgCl2 and CaCl2. Although germination percentage of Rainer under non-saline was the lowest with 76%, it showed better performance under salinity than Utrillo and Winner. Germination percentage and CD gave a negative significant correlation with NaCl, but MGT and EC associated positively with NaCl. It was concluded that seed vigor should be considered as an indicator for the germination performance of pea seeds under NaCl, whereas genotypic factors play a key factor for tolerance to salinity during germination and early development stages. 
Fresh beans and grains of peas (Pisum sativum) are commonly used as vegetable and canning industry in Turkey (Bozoglu et al. 2004). It is an important crop as cheap protein sources with 20-30% protein content in seeds (Öz and Karasu, 2010). It is a cool season food legume that allows early sowing in spring to produce high fresh bean and dry grains under arid and semi-arid conditions (Kelly, 1987). Because pea is particularly sensitive to drought (Wilson et al. 1985) and salinity stresses (Lal, 1985) during early growth stages, tolerant varieties provide considerable advantages under these conditions (Dudhe and Kumar, 2018). The pea cultivars had significant variation for salinity tolerance during germination and early seedling development (Cerda et al. 1982 and Okçu et al. 2005). 
       
A single individual pea plant produces different seeds in their appearance and spatial heterogeneity of the pod position causes considerable variations in shape, size, weight, maturity and color of the seeds (Fenner, 1993; Coste et al. 2005). These differences may affect the physiology and viability performance of the seeds (Kahn et al. 1996). Atak et al. (2008) reported that the seed vigor of pea cultivars changed with seed color in the cultivars and they tested the seed vigor by electrical conductivity and accelerated ageing tests. The electrical conductivity (EC) test has been recommended for garden peas by ISTA (2003) as a vigor test. It is a simple, quick and effective method measuring indirectly the cellular membrane damage due to seed deterioration by determining electrolytes leakage from seeds immersed in distilled water. Taweekul et al. (1998) and Atak et al. (2008) determined a negative relationship between electrical conductivity values and seed vigor in pea. Also, controlled deterioration (CD) is another vigor test permitting the seeds to increase their moisture content up to 20-24% before the seeds expose to high temperatures between 40 and 45°C for 24 h or above. This test showed the superiority for distinguishing seed vigor in several plants such as onion by Rodo and Marcos Filho (2003), in cabbage by Mathews et al. (2009) and in wheat by Modarresi and Van Damme (2003).
       
The relative importance of seed vigor in salinity tolerance during germination in pea is not clearly understood and this study was arranged to find the relationship between seed vigor and germination and seedling development of pea under chloride salts.
The certified seeds of pea cultivars Ambassador, Bolero, Esprit, Electra, Puccet, Rainer, Utrillo and Winner were used in the study. They were obtained from commercial seed suppliers and were produced in 2016 under Eskişehir conditions to have uniform seeds in terms of seed vigor. Three salt types, sodium chloride (NaCl), magnesium chloride (MgCl2) and calcium chloride (CaCl2) with the electrical conductivity of 20 dS m-1 were arranged at temperature of 20°C by the conductivity meter WTW 3.15i (Germany) at Seed Science and Technology Laboratory, Field Crops Department, Eskişehir Osmangazi University. The control treatment was exposed to distilled water (~0 dS m-1).
 
Germination test
 
Four replicates of 50 seeds (totally 200 seeds) were used for each cultivar and salt type. Fifty seeds were inserted into three layers of filter papers with dimension of 20 × 20 cm moistened with 21 mL of the solutions. The papers were renewed every 2 days to avoid the accumulation of salt (Kaya et al. 2008). After the papers were rolled, they were embedded a sealed polyethylene bag to prevent water evaporation. The seeds were incubated at 20±1°C in the darkness for 10 days. A 2 mm of root protrusion was evaluated as germination criterion. Germination speed was calculated for the mean germination time (MGT) as described by ISTA (2003) rules with the following formula:
 
MGT = Σ(Dn) /Σn

Where,
D is the number of newly germinated seeds on each day and n is days of counting.
       
Ten seedlings emerged from the seeds were randomly sampled for determination of seedling growth at 10 days after sowing. The seedlings were separated from seed residuals (cotyledons) and seedling fresh weight was measured. Seedling dry weight was determined after the seedlings were dried at 70°C for 48 h in an oven.The protocol of two seed vigor tests was described below.
 
Electrical conductivity test
 
Two replicates of 50 seeds from each pea cultivar were firstly weighed and then immersed in deionized water of 250 mL at 20°C for 24 h (ISTA 2003). After the incubation period, the electrical conductivity of soaked water was read by a conductivity meter. The results were divided to seed weight and it was expressed in μS cm-1 g-1 to evaluate the variability in seed weight among pea cultivars.
 
Controlled deterioration test
 
After the initial seed moisture content was determined, 50 g of seeds from each cultivar were placed into a plastic box with volume of 150 mL. Seed moisture content was increased to 20% by adding water. The amount of water requirement was calculated by the formula of ISTA (2003). Water volume (mL) = Seed weight (g) × [(100-Initial moisture content) / (100-Desired moisture content)]. Each box was tightly sealed and gently shaken three times during one hour and then the boxes were transferred to an incubator at 10°C for 24 h to allow slow and even imbibition by the seeds. They were then put into 45°C for a further 48 h in order to deteriorate the seeds. The standard germination test was subsequently conducted on the deteriorated seeds using 4 replicates with 50 seeds.
       
The experiment was established as a two factor completely randomized design (CRD). The chloride salts (NaCl, CaCl2 and MgCl2) were placed to first factor and the cultivars to second factor. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done by using the MSTAT-C computer software, version 2.10 (Michigan State University, v.2.10, USA). Significant differences among the means were compared by Duncan’s Multiple Range test (p<0.05).
Changes in seed moisture content, one hundred seed weight and protein content of eight pea cultivars showed in Table 1. Significant differences were determined among the pea cultivars for all parameters except for moisture content (p<0.05). The seed weight and protein content of pea cultivars were significantly different and the highest seed weight and protein content were recorded in Utrillo with 35.8 g and 26.8%, respectively.
 

Table 1: Initial seed characteristics of the investigated pea cultivars.


       
Germination percentage, mean germination time, electrical conductivity and controlled deterioration test results of pea cultivars showed significant variation (Table 2). The lowest germination was counted in Electra (86.0%) and Utrillo (88.5%). The speed of germination was evaluated by mean germination time and it was significantly changed among the cultivars. The slowest germination was recorded in Utrillo with 5.10 days. Electrical conductivity and controlled deterioration tests suggested that the seed vigor of pea cultivars was considerably different from each other.
 

Table 2: Germination and seed vigor performance of the investigated pea cultivars.


       
The EC values of the cultivars ranged from 19.2 to 60.6 μS cm-1 g-1 and the germination percentage after CD test changed between 0.0% and 93.0%. The higher electrical conductivity resulted in the lower germination after CD. These tests confirmed that Esprit and Puccet had the vigorous seeds while the weakest seeds were observed in Rainer.
       
Several significant correlations among the investigated parameters in eight pea cultivars were calculated. However, germination percentage under CaCl2 and in MgCl2 conditions were not associated with seed vigor tests (Table 3,4). Negative and significant correlation coefficients were determined for germination percentage in NaCl with EC and MGT, while germination percentage and CD test were related to NaCl. Also, germination percentage was negatively correlated with MGT and EC test. The EC and CD tests were only correlated with germination percentage under NaCl stress.
Germination and seedling growth changed with chloride salts. The sodium chloride salt has the least adverse effect, while magnesium chloride salt has more deleterious effect than the others. Similar results were reported by Abd El-Samad and Shaddad (2008) in pea. The chickpea genotypes also showed different responses to chloride salts and NaCl was the lowest hazardous salt among chloride salts (Özaktan et al. 2018). Our results showed that pea genotypes exhibited different responses to different salts. Among the cultivars, Winner was more sensitive to CaCl2 and MgCl2 while Utrillo was susceptible to MgCl2. Yildirim et al. (2008) and Shadid et al. (2012) also found different sensitivity levels to salinity stresses during early growth stage.
 

Table 3: Germination and seedling growth of pea cultivars subjected to distilled water and chloride salts of CaCl2, MgCl2 and NaCl solutions in equilibrium with 20 dS m-1.


 

Table 4: Pearson’s correlation coefficients among seed vigor tests and germination percentage of pea under chloride salts.



The electrical conductivity test is the suitable seed vigor test for pea as suggested by ISTA (2003). The results of the present study showed that EC test successfully ranked the seed vigor of the pea genotypes. EC test showed that the most vigorous seeds were obtained from Esprit and Puccet. Our EC test results are in collaboration with the findings of Hampton et al. (2004), Panabianco et al. (2007) and Atak et al. (2008) who used the EC test to distinguish the pea seed lots as weak and vigorous seeds. Moreover, controlled deterioration test classified the seeds of pea cultivars in terms of seed vigor and its results confirmed the results of EC test; resulting in Esprit and Puccet were the most vigorous pea cultivars. We argued that the controlled deterioration test may be useful for pea seeds, but this test should be conducted with a lot of pea seed lots. However, germination and seedling performance of pea cultivars were different under chloride salt stresses, Bolero showed the superiority under CaCl2, but Esprit and Bolero were better in MgCl2 and NaCl conditions.
 
The relationship between seed vigor tests and germination performance of pea cultivars under chloride salt conditions revealed that germination, MGT, EC and CD related with germination under NaCl stress. The highest significant and positive correlation was found in CD test, while the EC test gave negative and strong relationship under NaCl. The vigor tests did not significantly correlate with the germination under calcium and magnesium chloride stresses.
It was concluded that salinity tolerance in pea is primarily depended on genotypic factors; however, this study showed that seed vigor secondarily affected it. Pea genotypes showed different responses to chloride salts, but the cultivars with vigorous seeds showed better performance than the seeds with low vigor. For these reasons, it is strongly suggested that the newly harvested vigorous seeds must be used for production under salt infected areas to get uniform and sufficient plant emergence. Moreover, CD and EC tests’ results should be only used for an indicator germination performance of pea under NaCl, further seed vigor tests should be searched for MgCl2 and CaCl2 stresses.
The author thanks to Alfa Tohum Seed Company for supplying seeds samples of pea cultivars and to Prof.Dr. M.D. Kaya, Department of Field Crops, Eskişehir Osmangazi University for allowing his laboratory for this study.

  1. Abd El-Samad, H. and Shaddad, M.A.K. (2008). Comparative effect of sodium carbonate, sodium sulphate and sodium chloride on the growth and related metabolic activities of pea plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 19: 717-728.

  2. Atak, M., Kaya, M.D., Kaya, G., Kaya, M. and Khawar, K.M. (2008). Dark green seeds increase the seed vigor and germination ability in dry green pea (Pisum sativum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany. 40(6): 2345-2354.

  3. Bozoglu, H., Peksen, E. and Gulumser, A. (2004). Effect of row spacing and potassium humate application on yield and some traits of peas. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 10(1): 53-58.

  4. Cerda, A., Caro, M. and Fernandez, F.G. (1982). Salt tolerance of two pea cultivars. Agronomy Journal. 74: 796-798.

  5. Coste, F., Raveneau, M.P. and Crozat, Y. (2005). Spectrophotometrical pod colour measurement: a non-destructive method for monitoring seed drying? Journal of Agricultural Science. 143: 183-192.

  6. Dudhe, M.Y. and Kumar, J. (2018). Combining ability studies under salinity stress and unstressed condition in chickpea. Legume Research-An International Journal. (41): 239-245.

  7. Fenner, M. (1993). Enviromental influences of seed size and composition. Horticultural Review. 13: 183-213.

  8. Hampton, J.G., Brunton, B.J., Pemberton, G.M. and Rowarth, J.S. (2004). Temperature and time variables for accelerated ageing vigour testing of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed. Seed Science and Technology. 32: 261-264.

  9. ISTA, (2003). International Rules for Seed Testing. Edition 2003, International Seed Testing Association, Bassersdorf.

  10. Kahn, M., Cavers, P.B., Kane, M. and Thomsan, K. (1996). Role of pigmented seed coat of proso millet (Paniacum miliaceum L.) in imbibition, germination and seed persistence. Seed Science Research. 7(1): 21-25.

  11. Kaya, M., Kaya, G. Kaya, M.D., Atak, M., Saglam, S., Khawar, K.M. and Ciftci, C.Y. (2008). Interaction between seed size and NaCl on germination and early seedling growth of some Turkish cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B. 9(5): 371-377.

  12. Kelly, M.J. (1987). Field Pea Cultivars. (Peas: Management for Quality, Ed: Jermyn WA, Wratt GS) 57-61.

  13. Lal, R.K. (1985). Effect of salinity applied at different stages of growth on seed yield and its constituents in field peas (Pisum sativum L. var. arvensis). Indian Journal of Agronomy. 30: 296-299.

  14. Matthews, S., Demir, I., Celikkol, T., Kenanoglu, B.B. and Mavi, K. (2009). Vigour tests for cabbage seeds using electrical conductivity and controlled deterioration to estimate relative emergence in transplant modules. Seed Science and Technology. 37(3): 736-746. 

  15. Modarresi, R. and Van Damme, P. (2003). Application of the controlled deterioration test to evaluate wheat seed vigour. Seed Science and Technology. 31: 771-775.

  16. Okçu, G., Kaya, M.D. and Atak, M. (2005). Effects of salt and drought stresses on germination and seedling growth of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 29: 237-242.

  17. Öz, M. and Karasu, M. (2010). Determination of seed yield and yield components of some pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 5(1): 44-49.

  18. Özaktan, H., Çiftçi, C.Y., Kaya, M.D., Uzun, S., Uzun O. and Akdoğan, G. (2018). Chloride salts inhibit emergence and seedling growth of chickpea rather than germination. Legume Research-An International Journal. 41(1): 60-66.

  19. Panobianco, M., Vieira, R.D. and Perecin, D. (2007). Electrical conductivity as an indicator of pea seed aging of stored at different temperatures. Scientia Agricola (Piracicaba, Braz.). 64(2): 119-124. 

  20. Rodo, A.B. and Marcos-Filho, J. (2003). Accelerated ageing and controlled deterioration for the determination of the physiological potential of onion seeds. Scientia Agricola. 60: 465-469.

  21. Shahid, M.A., Pervez, M.A., Balal, R.M., Abbas, T., Ayyub, C.M., Mattson, N.S., Riaz, A. and Iqbal, Z. (2012). Screening of pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes for salt tolerance based on early growth stage attributes and leaf inorganic osmolytes. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 6: 1324-1331.

  22. Taweekul, N., Hill, G.D., MaKenzie, B.A. and Hill, M.J. (1998). Field performance of field pea seeds with varying vigour levels. Proc. of Agronomy Soc. of New Zealand. 28: 99-105.

  23. Wilson, D.R., Jamieson, P.D., Jermyn, W.A. and Hanson, R. (1985). Models of growth and water use of field pea (Pisum sativum L.). (The Pea Crop, UK: Ed. Hebblethwaite PD, Heath MC, Dawkins TCK). 

  24. Yildirim, B., Yasar, F., Özpay, T., Türközü, D., Terzioglu, Ö. and Tamkoç, A. (2008). Variations in response to salt stress among field pea genotypes (Pisum sativum sp. arvense L.). Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 7(8): 907-910. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)