Analysis of variance and heritability
Analysis of variance revealed significant differences among accessions for most of the traits (DG, DFF, D50F, NBP, NNMB, NFP, PH, LL, NPP, PL, PW, BY, EY, HI, DPF, SI, DM, YPH). This confirms substantial genetic variation. LW and NSP showed moderate variation (P<0.05). Replication effects were non-significant (Table 1), indicating that differences were mostly due to genotypes.
Reproductive traits (DFF, D50F, NFP, NPP) and morphological traits (PH, LL, PL, PW, HI) showed strong effects from genotypes, making them useful for selection. Broad-sense heritability was high (>60%) for most of the traits. LW had a moderate value of 38.1%, while NSP was also moderate; PW had the highest value at 98.2%. No traits fell in the low heritability range.
The frequency distribution (Fig 1) showed that most accessions yielded 32-36 g/plant, with only four exceeding 37 g/plant. Seventeen accessions flowered at 60-62 days, with four flowering earlier. Nine accessions produced the highest number of flowers (25-28) and seven matured early (~110 days), while most matured around 120 days.
D2 clustering and cluster trait variation
D² cluster analysis grouped the 45 accessions into four clusters based on 20 traits (Fig 2). Cluster I included 13 accessions, such as IVT HB18-10, IVT HB19-10 and the check Vikrant. Cluster II had 11 accessions, including IVT HB19-12, AVT I HB16-15 and the check HFB-2 (Table 2). Both Cluster I and Cluster II showed lower average values for yield traits. Cluster III had 9 accessions, while Cluster IV contained 11 accessions. Clusters III and IV recorded higher averages, with Cluster IV surpassing the others in biomass yield, grain yield, flowering, maturity and harvest index. This highlights its potential for high yield (Fig 3).
The variation within clusters was highest in Cluster IV (7.68) and Cluster II (7.66) and lowest in Cluster III (4.23). The largest differences between clusters happened between Cluster I and Cluster IV (7.68) and between Cluster I and Cluster III (6.91). The smallest difference was between Cluster II and Cluster I (4.3) (Fig 4). These results show clear differences in traits, with Cluster III being the smallest and Cluster IV exhibiting the most tremendous internal variation.
Correlation
Correlation analysis of morphological characteristics in faba bean demonstrated that morphological characteristics were differently associated with flowering, pod and yield characteristics, as illustrated in (Fig 5). The days to first flowering had a strong positive and significant correlation with days to maturity (r = 0.45), but a negative and non-significant correlation with the pod weight (r = -0.45). Days to fifty percent flowering is positively correlated and highly significant with the biological yield (r= 0.99) and the economic yield (r = 0.66). There were positive and significant relationships between days to maturity and the number of pods per plant (r = 0.87), pod length (r = 0.91) and number of Seeds per pod (r = 0.59).
Pod length is negatively correlated with pod width (r = -0.02) and highly significantly correlated positively with the number of seeds per pod (r = 0.63) and seed index (r = 0.86). Pod width is negatively correlated with the number of pods per plant (r=-0.04). The number of seeds per pod is highly significant and positively correlated with the seed index (r = 0.86), as well as showing a positive correlation with both biological yield (r = 0.29) and economic yield (r = 0.15). Biological yield is positively correlated with yield per hectare (r = 0.07). Biological yield is positively correlated with the number of branches per plant (r=0.24), number of flowers per plant (r=0.15), leaf length (r = 0.18), leaf width (r=0.14) and number of pods per plant (r=0.16).
Selection of superior faba bean accessions
MGIDI analysis identified nine top accessions (GP RFBGP-42, GP RFBGP-79, HFB-1, RFB-48, GP FLRP-20, GP FLRP-31, GP RFBGP-44, GP FLRP-29, GP FLRP-23) that closely matched the ideal profile. These accessions combine early maturity, favorable pod and seed traits and strong plant structure (Fig 6). They are promising choices for yield stability and genetic improvement in breeding programs.
Principal component analysis (PCA) found that the first five principal components (PCs) explained 79.2% of the total variation, with PC1 contributing 44.3% (Table 3). Factor analysis (mean communality = 0.79; grouped traits into five factors: FA1 (DG, PL, NBP, NFP, NPP, SI) related to yield potential; FA2 (D50F, BY); FA3 (HI, EY); FA4 (NNMB, PW); and FA5 (LW, PH) (Table 4 and Fig 7).
Selection differential analysis showed positive genetic gains in NBP, NFP, NPP, PL, SI, YPH, HI, PH and LW, which support breeding goals. In contrast, traits like DFF, DPF, DM, D50F and BY displayed negative differentials. The MGIDI rankings (Table 5) incorporated these patterns to prioritize accessions with the best trait combinations.
Statistical significance
Faba bean accessions exhibited highly significant genotypic variations for most of the traits, highlighting the presence of substantial genetic variability within the studied panel-a fundamental requirement for selection and crop improvement. Similar findings were previously reported by
Toker (2004), who consistently observed high heritability values for yield-related traits in diverse faba bean germplasm. The predominance of high heritability estimates (>60%) in this study suggests that many traits are primarily governed by additive genetic factors, making them suitable for direct phenotypic selection. Comparable results were also demonstrated by
Hamza and Hussein (2024), who identified high heritability for plant height, pods per plant and seed weight in Sudanese faba bean landraces.
By contrast, traits with moderate heritability, such as leaflet width and number of seeds per pod, appear to be more environmentally influenced, necessitating evaluation across multiple environments and seasons. This aligns with the findings of
Hiywotu et al., (2022), who reported that genotype × environment interactions play a critical role in shaping trait heritability and selection efficiency in Ethiopian faba bean accessions.
Clustering signifies the phenotypic trait variation
The clustering by Mahalanobis D
2 revealed distinct groups of accessions, reflecting strong phenotypic influence that can be strategically exploited in breeding. Accessions from clusters separated by large inter-cluster distances are particularly valuable for crossing because they maximize the potential for heterosis and recovery of transgressive segregants. At the same time, clusters with higher intra-cluster variability provide opportunities for effective within-cluster selection. Comparable findings were reported by
Dewangan et al., (2022), who observed clear cluster differentiation among faba bean lines, with distant clusters offering the best parental combinations for yield improvement. Similarly,
Upadhyay and Pandey (2025) demonstrated that clusters with superior mean performance for seed yield and related traits are prime candidates for hybridization, thereby broadening the genetic base and enhancing productivity.
Correlation across the morphological traits
The patterns of correlation between flowering, maturity, pod characteristics and yield highlight the intricate relationship between faba bean productivity. In line with
Mishra et al., (2023), who found that harvest index and biological yield had a significant direct impact on seed yield, positive correlations between reproductive timing and yield components imply that enhancing one can improve others. However, the existence of both positive and negative correlations highlights the importance of careful selection in balancing trade-offs.
Hiywotu et al., (2023) reported similar results, showing that traits related to pods and seeds had a significant impact on grain yield through direct and indirect effects, indicating their usefulness as selection criteria.
Superior faba bean accessions selection
Using the MGIDI framework enabled simultaneous, balanced selection across phenology, yield and architecture while controlling for multicollinearity via factor analysis; by ranking genotypes on their distance to an agronomic ideotype, MGIDI prioritizes accessions that deliver multi-trait gains without over-weighting redundant, correlated traits (
Olivoto and Lúcio, 2021;
Olivoto et al., 2022). The analysis captured by the leading principal components together with high trait communalities supports the reliability of the multivariate signal underlying the MGIDI ranking; comparable patterns-where the first PCs explain most agronomic variation and clearly separate superior, often earlier and higher-yielding faba bean genotypes-are reported in recent faba bean multivariate studies
(Soliman et al., 2024). In this context, positive selection differentials for pod-and seed-related traits alongside negative differentials for flowering and maturity are consistent with ideotype-based improvement that jointly targets sink capacity and earliness, as advocated in faba bean PCA-guided selection and in cross-crop MGIDI applications (
Olivoto and Lúcio, 2021;
Olivoto et al., 2022).