Soil properties
The interaction between the CS and the NM options was found to be non-significant in studied soil properties for both the soil depths. The main factors and sub-factor were also not influenced the pH and electrical conductivity at both depths of soil. The bulk density and particle density were not influenced by the cropping systems. In case of WHC, The B-M cropping system resulted in significant higher WHC content (49.12% and 47.19%) than F-C cropping system (48.09% and 47.19%), respectively at both depths of soil. Similarly, B-M cropping system had potassium content which is significantly 2.5% higher than F-C cropping system. The crop cultivation during both seasons received nutrients as compared to the single crop in a year, further, the cultivation of pulses crops supported to improvement in soil fertility
(Stagnari et al., 2017), hence irrespective of the treatments improvement in soil properties were visible in both treatments in comparison to initial status. Cropping systems, B-M cropping system had better porosity at depth (15-30 cm) while improved WHC at both depths as compared the F-C cropping system. It might me because of soil cover for longer period due to two crops, thereby higher roots activity improved the porosity and WHC than single crop grown in F-C cropping system. Similar finding was also narrated by
(Meena et al., 2016 and
Babu et al., 2020). The B-M cropping system had significantly higher potassium content than the F-C cropping system in both depths. Application of potassium fertilizers in both the seasons and the application microbial inoculants positively maintained that potassium level of soil solution (
Hassan 2016 and
Nawaz et al., 2023).
In case of NM options, the treatments where 125%-75% inorganic fertilizers along with FYM and microbial inoculants were applied estimated similar porosity content and significantly higher than sole application of the inorganic fertilizers treatments (Control, NPK and NPK+Zn). Moreover, 50% reduction in inorganic fertilizer had statistically similar porosity content than NPK+FYM, NPK+Zn and75% NPK+FYM+M and was found statistically superior over control and RD. In case of WHC, At both the soil depths, treatment 125%NPK+FYM+M (51.04%) and 75%NPK+FYM+M (51.08%) was statistically similar and recorded significantly higher values of WHC, while at sub-surface depth treatment 125% NPK+FYM+M, 75% NPK+FYM+M and 50% NPK+F+M were statistically similar and superior over other treatments .The results ascribed that the use of organic manures and microbial inoculants (MI) improved the soil aggregation and other physical properties and also enhancement in soil organic carbon status which resulted in improvement of soil porosity and WHC. The results were in line of the confirmation of
(Ahmad et al., 2017 and
Meena et al., 2020).
Further, the potassium content of the soil was significantly higher in with 125%NPK+FYM+M and 75% NPK+FYM+M over the control and 50% NPK +FYM +M while remaining other treatments was similar K content in both the depths (Table 1). Increased available K because of organic manure use may be attributed to the decreased K-fixation and more release of K due to interaction of organic matter with clays, besides the direct K addition to the soil (
Sharma and Sepehia 2014 and
Sawarkar et al., 2013).
Phosphorus fractions
In case of surface soils, the interaction between CS and NM was found to be non significant. Further Al-P was not detectable in our soils hence data is not given in manuscript. The inorganic fraction of phosphorous, organic phosphorous, available P and total P are as expected higher in surface soil (0-15 cm) than sub-surface (15-30 cm) irrespective of the treatments (Table 2 and Fig 2). It is might be due to surface soil was more affected by the agronomic practices, addition of phosphatic fertilizer, addition of organic manures, microbial inoculants and roots activities than the subsurface soils. Similarly, (
Sawarkar et al., 2013 and
Dubey et al., 2016) reported that the higher phosphorus fraction in surface layer might be due to addition of phosphatic fertilizer, organic residue and microbial activity.
CS, it is evident from the data, the crop grown in both wet and dry season
i.e. B-M cropping system had significantly higher phosphorus fractions compared to F-C cropping system except Fe-P and Ca-P. The B-M cropping system had 2.85 %,8.13 %, 6.07 %, 3.99 %, 2.51 %, 2.29 % and 2.55 % higher phosphorus fractions available P, saloid-P, Reductant Soluble-P, occluded-P, Ca-P, Inorganic-P, mineral-P, organic-P and total-P than F-C cropping system, respectively (Fig 1). The B-M mustard cropping system had higher all P fractions as well as total P except Fe-P and Ca-P than mono cropping. This trend might be due to cultivation of two crops in year received phosphate fertilizers both the seasons and better root activity. Further, initially the phosphorus content of soil is very low but due to practice of continuous application of phosphatic fertilizers along with FYM and microbial inoculants improves the content of different fraction of the phosphorous of the soil. Similar results (
Motavalli and Miles, 2002 and
Zhang et al., 2020) also reported that synthetic inorganic fertilizer and organic manure could increase the inorganic and organic P fractions of the soils. Further,
(Khadka et al., 2024) also reported that cropping system influenced the different fractions of the phosphorus.
In case of NM options, the similar trend was observed with available P and loosely bound P
i.e. saloid- P, inorganic, organic and total-P for both the depths and Ca-P for 0-15 cm application of inorganic fertilizers 75%, 100% and 125% + FYM + microbial inoculants estimated similar phosphorus fractions and significantly superior than the sole application of inorganic fertilizers in control and RD (Fig 2 and Table 2). Further 50 % NPK+F+M was also similar the RDF alone or RDF with FYM or Zn application. The results were in close conformity with the findings of other scientist, who stated that incorporation of FYM with RDF enhance available P content of soil
(Bagde et al., 2023) increased saloid-P and Ca-P content
(Dubey et al., 2016 and
Sawarkar et al., 2013), increases in iron-P and occluded-P
(Sawarkar et al., 2013 and
Qiong et al., 2022). The reductant soluble-P recorded lower values of P fraction in comparison to Ca-P and increased with the inclusion of organics in combination with RDF
(Dotaniya et al., 2014). In case of organic-P the use of FYM enhances the organic carbon status in soil which is positive relationships with organic-P, thereby increases its fraction in soil
(Kumar et al., 2013 and
Manimaran 2015).
System productivity (chickpea equivalent yield)
As expected, B-M cropping system produced higher chickpea equivalent yield as compared to F-C cropping system. It was 67.6% higher than F-C cropping system. In case of sub treatments 125% NPK+FYM+M-75% NPK+FYM+M treatments had significantly higher chickpea equivalent yield than the C, RD and 50% NPK+F+M treatments (Table 3). It might be due to adequate supply of the nutrient from the inorganic and organic sources. The FYM and microbial inoculants could be improved beneficial microbes in the soil, which improved soil chemical properties and resulted better mean equivalent yield in (125% NPK+FYM+M-75% NPK+FYM+M) plots. Similar result also reported by the (
Tomar and Singh, 2025 and
Arya et al., 2007) the application of FYM and microbial inoculants with inorganic fertilizer improved the productivity of pulses crop.