Legume Research-An International Journal

Effect of Planting Times Growth and Yield of White Lupen (Lupinus albus L.)

DOI: 10.18805/LR-549    | Article Id: LR-549 | Page : 432-435
Citation :- Effect of Planting Times Growth and Yield of White Lupen (Lupinus albus L.).Legume Research-An International Journal.2020.(43):432-435
Dilara Akil, Mustafa Okant mokant63@yahoo.com
Address : Harran University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
Submitted Date : 13-01-2020
Accepted Date : 2-05-2020
First Online:

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different sowing times on growth and yield characters of white lupine (Lupinus albus L.). The experiment was carried out in the Field Crops Experimen Station at Eyyubiye campus of Harran University during 2017-2018 semi-arid season. In the study, four different sowing times (30 October, 15 November, 30 November and 15 December) were evaluated in randomized complete blocks design with 4 replications. The results revealed that the impact of different sowing times on fresh herb and hay yield, 100 seed weight (gr) and seed yield of white lupine plant was statistically significant, but did not impact on crude protein, hay, crude protein in the seed, plant height and number of branches per plant. Overall, the results suggested that white lupen planted at the end of November could successfully be grown in Þanlýurfa  conditions.

Keywords

Crude protein Lupinus albus L Sowing date White Lupen Yield

References

  1. Abel, H., Sommer, W. and Weiss, J. (2003). Ýnhaltstoffe, futterwert und einsatz von ackerbohnen in der nutztier fütterung, UFOP Praxisinformation.
  2. AOAC. (1990). Association of Official Analytical Chemists - Official Method of Analysis. 15th. Ed. Washington. DC. USA. pp. 66-88.
  3. Aydýn, B. and Yorgancýlar, M. (2015). Investigation of effects of fe and mn on growth of seedling lupin (Lupinus albus L.) at ýn vivo conditions. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences. 2(1):42-52.
  4. Badina, G.V. (1972). Productivity of Forage Lupin Under the Conditions of NorthWestern Zone, Herbage Abstracts. 42 (4): S:392.
  5. Blanco, G.O. (1980). Genetic variability of tarwi (Lupinus mutabilis sweet.) agricultural and nutritional aspects of lupines (34-    49) Lima, Cuzco, Peru.
  6. Erbas, M., Certel, M. and Uslu, M. K. (2005). Some chemical properties of white lupin seeds (Lupinus albus L.). Food Chem. 89:341-345.
  7. Gatel, F. (1994). Protein Quality of Legume Seeds for Nonruminant Animals: A Literature Review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 45(3-4): 317-348.
  8. Georgieva, N. Atalia A., Kosev,V.I., Genov, N. G. and Butnariu, M. (2018). Morphological and biological characteristics of white lupine cultivars (Lupýnus albus l.). Romanian Agricultural Research. 35(35): 20-30.
  9. Hakký, E.Þ., Yorgancýlar, M., Atalay, E., Uyar, S. and Babaoðlu, M. (2007). Determination of genetic variation in local lupen genotypes (Lupinus albus L.) by simple repetitive sequence polymorphism (BTDAP = ISSR) Technique. Journal of Herbal Research. 2: 1-5. 
  10. Khrenikov, A.A. (1972). Cultivation of Fodder Lupin in the Kursk Province, Herbage Abstracts. 42(3): S:239.
  11. Kokten, K, Kaplan, M., Seydosoglu, S., Yýlmaz H.S. and Ucar R. (2018). Determination of herbage yield and quality of some bitter vetch [Vicia ervilia (L.) Willd] genotypes in Bingol ecological conditions. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research. 5(3): 236-245.
  12. Kokten, K., Kaplan, M., Seydosoglu, S., Tutar, H. and Ozdemir, S. (2019). Determination of seed yield, straw yield and quality of some bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia L. Willd) genotypes in Bingol ecological conditions. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University. 56 (1): 27-33. 
  13. Kosev, V. and Vasileva, V. (2019). Comparatýve býologýcal characterýstýc of whýte lupýn (lupinus albus L.) varýetýes. Genetika. 51(1): 275-285. 10.2298/GENSR1901275K.
  14. Okuyucu, F., Akdemir, H., Kýr, B., Okuyucu, B. R. and Baylan, M. (2004). Untersuchungen fiber den ertrag und den futterwert einiger gelber (Lupinus luteus L.) und blauer (Lupinus angustifolius L.) süsslupinen sowie weisser (Lupinus albus L.) bitterlupinen unter den anbaubedingungen von Odemiþ. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University. 41(3): 89-98.
  15. Sator, C. (1983). In Vitro Breeding of Lupins, Perspectives for Peas and Lupins As Protein Crops, (R Thomson and R Casey, eds.) In Proc. Int. Symp. Protein Production from Legumes in Europe, Sorrento, Italy. pp.79-87.
  16. Seydosoglu, S. and Kokten, K. 2019. Some characters of rangeland vegetation in Batman province. Harran Journal of Agricultural and Food Science. 23(1): 60-68.
  17. Seydosoglu, S., Cacan, E. and Sevilmis, U. (2019). Determinatýon of botanical composition, yield and pasture quality ratings of ýnfertile pastures ýn kozluk district of Batman province of Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 28 (4A): 3388-3394.
  18. Seydoþoðlu, S., Saruhan, V. and Kökten, K., (2015). Researches on determination yield and yield components of some bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia L. Willd) genotypes in ecological conditions of Diyarbakýr. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University. 32 (2): 107-115.
  19. Williams, W. (1979). Studies on the development of lupins for oil and protein. Euphytica. 28: 481-488.
  20. Yorgancýlar, M., Babaoðlu, M., Hakký, E.E. and Atalay, E. (2007). Investigation of lime resistance and genetic kinship relationships of different origin Lupen (Lupinus sp.) Genotypes. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey. Project No: TOVAG-105O034. Ankara. 

Global Footprints