Grain yields of soybean and safflower
After the 17
th years of crop cycle, the impact of fertilizers and manure on mean grain yields of soybean and safflower crops were monitored in soybean- safflower cropping system under
Vertisols. Pooled data on grain yields of soybean and safflower tabulated in (Table 1) showed significantly highest in treatment 100% NPK+5 t FYM ha”1and produced higher mean grain yields of 9.37 per cent of soybean and 11.22 per cent of safflower over treatment 100% NPK, respectively and found significantly superior to all other treatments. Results indicated that the application of 100% N alone had increased the grain yield by 18.81 per cent of soybean and 24.01 per cent of safflower respectively, over control. Treatment 100% NP enhanced the grain yield of soybean and safflower by 107.59 per cent and 99.73 per cent respectively over the treatment 100% N. Further, the deficiency of S noticed itself through yield reduction of 3.15 per cent and 2.85 per cent in grain yields of soybean and safflower, respectively over treatment 100% NPK. Increase in yield might be due to beneficial effects of FYM on nutrient availability.
Shirale et al., (2014) and
Arbad et al., (2011) have also reported similar results. Further,
Meshram et al., (2016) showed that the yield by NPK with FYM application could be attributed to enhanced population of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. Treatment 100% NPK+Zn produced highest soybean and safflower mean grain yield increased by 3.98% and 5.70% over treatment 100% NPK, respectively. The significant positive response of Zn application with 100% NPK could be attributed to the development of Zn deficiency in soil due to continuous soybean-safflower crops over the last 17
th years, as reported by
Narendra et al., (2024); Meshram et al. (2016). Treatments 100% NPK+HW and 100% NPK+Zn were statistically comparable with each other in grain yields of soybean and safflower.
Microbial population
Treatment 100% NPK+5 t FYM ha
-1 recorded (Table 2) highest population of bacteria (57.75 cfux10
6 g
-1) and actinomycetes (49.79 cfux10
5 g
-1) after harvest of crops, respectively. However, fungal population was observed significantly highest in treatment FYM @ 10 t ha
-1 (13.62 cfux10
-4). Treatments 50% NPK, 100% N, 100% NP and 100% NPK-S recorded significantly lower population of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in soil than treatment 100% NPK.
Khandare et al., (2020) and
Tejada et al., (2009) reported depletion in native pools of plant nutrients in soil under these treatments, which caused reduction in plant biomass production (carbon substrate) and addition in soil (
Suresh et al.,1999). Treatment 150% NPK was comparable to treatment 100% NPK in soil microbial population and suggested that supply of inorganic nutrients higher than at optimum level without manure cannot support microbial population in soil
(Selvi et al., 2004; and
Ingle et al., 2014). The treatments of 100% NPK+Hand weeding, 100% NPK+Zn were statistically comparable with 100% NPK in recording mean counts of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes after soybean and safflower; however, these treatments gave significantly lower counts than 100% NPK+5t FYM ha
-1 indicating that manure has greater positive effect on microbial population in soil. The lowest microbial population was observed in control and 100% N treatment due to unavailability of organic sources.
Microbial biomass C and organic C in soil
It is evident from (Table 2) significantly maximum microbial biomass C and soil organic carbon were observed in treatment 100% NPK+5 t FYM ha
-1 (361.62 μg g
-1soil, 6.99 g kg
-1) and significantly at par with 150% NPK (339.50 μg g
-1 soil 6.71 g kg
-1), this may be attributed to FYM as a food material for stimulating microbial growth, resulting in higher microbial biomass C and soil organic carbon.
Patil and Puranik (2001) reported the beneficial effects of integrated use of fertilizers with FYM. However, application of FYM ensured the balanced supply of nutrients and carbon, which in-turn might have supported the higher population of microorganisms in soil
(Basak et al., 2012; Lal 2021). Treatment 100%NPK and 150% NPK were comparable in microbial biomass C and organic C and lowest was observed in treatment 50% NPK. Similarly, continuous use of 100% N, 100% NP and 100% NPK (-S) resulted in significantly lower soil microbial biomass C and organic C than 100% NPK possibly due inadequate and imbalanced supply of nutrients for microbial utilization in soil.
Enzyme activity
The enzyme activities were monitored for good biological health indicator of soil and represent the overall metabolic status and have been widely used as an index of microbial activity. Treatment 100% NPK+5t FYM ha
-1 gave significantly maximum dehydrogenase (145.05 ug TPF g
-1 soil 24 hr
-1), acid (62.98 μg PNP g
-1 h
-1) and alkaline phosphatase enzyme (65.58 μg PNP g
-1 h
-1) activity in soil and was found significantly superior to all other treatments (Fig 1). A relatively more pronounced effect of FYM on soil enzyme activities in comparison to fertilizers has also been reported earlier and these results are in conformity with the findings of
Bhattacharyya et al., (2008), who reported a four times increase in dehydrogenase activity in soil due to application of FYM in combination with NPK. Imbalanced and inadequate application of fertilizers in treatments 50% NPK, 100% NP and 100% N resulted significant decrease in dehydrogenase, acid and alkaline phosphatase enzyme activities. Simillarly, dehydrogenase, acid and alkaline phosphatase enzyme activities were significantly low in treatment 100% N as compared to all other treatments, which can be attributed to the presence of nitrate and nitrite that serve as alternative electron acceptors reported by
Kukreja et al., (1991). The significantly lower enzyme activity in soil was observed in 100% NPK-S treatment in comparison to 100% NPK Treatments of 100% NPK and 150% NPK were at par and gave significantly higher acid phosphatase activity, by 41.9% and 50.5% and alkaline phosphatase activity, by 38.5% and 51.3%, increased over 50% NPK treatment for soybean and safflower, respectively.