Determination of Quality and Chemical Composition of Silages Obtained from Narbonne Vetch (Vicia narbonensis) and Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Composition 

DOI: 10.18805/LR-545    | Article Id: LR-545 | Page : 688-692
Citation :- Determination of Quality and Chemical Composition of Silages Obtained from Narbonne Vetch (Vicia narbonensis) and Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Composition.Legume Research-An International Journal.2020.(43):688-692
Nizamettin Turan
Address : Department of Field Crops, Forage Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey.
Submitted Date : 25-12-2019
Accepted Date : 27-02-2020


Research was conducted to determine the quality and chemical composition of silages obtained by mixing in different ratios of narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grown in rabi season of 2017-2018 in Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. In the study we studied the pure sowings of barley and narbonne vetch and their mixtures (20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80% of narbonne vetch (N) + 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20% of barley (B). The values of ADF (acid detergent fiber), NDF (neutral detergent fiber), DDM (digestible dry matter), DMI (dry matter intake), DM (dry matter), CP (crude protein) and RFV (relative feed value) of silages of analyzed were respectively 33.38, 33.73, 62.89, 3.57, 24.69, 15.50%, 174.64. We also founded that LA (lactic acid), AA (acetic acid), BA (butyric acid), PA (propionic acid) and Ca, P, Mg, K and pH of silages investigated were respectively 1.60, 0.57, 0.42, 0.06, 1.17, 0.53, 0.25, 3.51% and 3.80. Our results shows that silages with high narbonne vetch were higher quality values for CP, ADF, NDF, DM, RFV, DDM, DMI, Ca, Mg, LA which determined chemical composition and feeding quality of silages. As a result, it is suggested that mixture silages with narbonne vetch (80%) and the barley ratio (20%) have important advantages for some properties of silages. 


Cereal Chemical composition Legume Mixture Silage Quality


  1. Alcicek, A., Ozkan, K. (1996). Determination of milk acid, acetic acid and butyric acid by distillation in silage feeds. Ege University, Journal of Agriculture Faculty. 33: 191-198 (in Turkish).
  2. AOAC, (1990). Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists. 15th Edn. Vol.1, Washington, D.C.
  3. Aykan, Y., Saruhan, V. (2018). Determination of silage quality features field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mixtures ensiling at different rates. Dicle University, The Journal of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. 11: 64-70 (in Turkish).
  4. Basaran, U., Gulumser, E., Mut, H., Copur Dogrusoz, M. (2018). Determination of silage yield and quality of grasspea + cereal intercrops. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology. 6: 1237-1242 (in Turkish).
  5. Bengisu, G. (2019). A study on the silage properties of hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grass mixtures in different rates. Legume Research. 42: 680-683.
  6. Bergen, W.G., Byrem, T.M., Grand, A.L. (1991). Ensiling character- -istics of whole-crop harvested at milk and dough stages. Journal Animal Science. 69: 1766-1774.
  7. Bolsen, K.K. (1995). Silage Basic Principles. In Forages Vol. II. The Science Grassl and Agriculture. (R.F. Barnes, D.A. Miller, C.J. Nelson Eds.), Iowa Stat. Univ. Pres, Ames, Iowa, USA, p: 163-176.
  8. Cacan, E., Kokten, K. (2017). Determination of optimum sowing date for common and narbonne vetch cultivars in Bingol conditions. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences. 6:19-23
  9. Canale, A., Valente, M.E., Ciotti, A. (1984). Determination of volatile carboxylic acids (C1-C5i) and lactic acid in aqueous acid extracts of silage by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal Science Food Agriculture. 35: 1178-1182.
  10. Holmes, W. (1980). Grasses. Its production and utilization. The British Grassland Society by Black Well Scientific Public- -ations. Oxford, London, Edinburg, Boston, Melbourne, p. 295.
  11. Hoy, M.D., Moore, K.J., George, J.R., Brummer, E.C. (2002). Alfalfa yield and quality as influenced by establishment method. Agronomy Journal. 94: 65-71.
  12. Kilic, A. (2006). Determination of Quality in Forage. Hasad Publishing, Ýstanbul (in Turkish).
  13. Kidambi, S.P., Matches, A.G., Gricgs, T.C. (1989). Variability for Ca, Mg, K, Cu, Zn and K/(Ca + Mg) ratio among 3 wheat grasses and sainfoin on the southern high plains. Journal of Range Management. 42: 316-322.
  14. Kung, L.J.R., Stokes, M.R., Lin, C.J. (2003). Silage additives. In: Buxton, D.R., Muck, R.E., Harrison, J.H. (Eds.), Silage Science and Technology. Agron. Monogr. 42. ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 305-360.
  15. Polan, C.E., Stieve, D., Garrett, J. (1998). Protein preservation and ruminal degradation of ensiled forage treated with heat, formic acid, ammonia or microbial inoculant. Journal of Dairy Science. 81:765-776.
  16. Rohweder, D.A., Barnes, R.F., Jorgensen, N. (1978). Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science. 47: 747-759.
  17. SAS, (1998). User’s Guide. Statistical Analysis Systems. SAS, Cary, NC, USA.
  18. Seydosoglu, S., Kokten, K. (2019). Some characters of rangeland vegetation in Batman province. Harran Journal of Agri- -cultural and Food Science. 23:27-33 (in Turkish)
  19. Seydosoglu, S. (2019). Effects ofdifferent mixture ratios of grass pea (Lathyrus sativusL.) and barley (Hordeum vulgareL.) on quality of silage. Legume Reserach. 42: 666-670.
  20. Woolford, M.K. (1984). The Silage Ferment. Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, England, p. 350.

Global Footprints