Table 1 reveals that (FW) of radicle and hypocotyl under salinity was reduced by 62.22% and 64.23% as compared to controls respectively. It has been known that salinity reduced biomass yield seriously in plants and many papers have determined this. In the results, the pretreatment of GA
3 alleviated this value by 29.41% and 2.58 fold compared with salt stress alone. Similar to these results,
Maggio et al., (2010) reported that GA
3 induced growth in tomato plants under salinity. This could be explained by the roles of GA
3 in cell division, elongation. However, the FW of cotyledon was not affected by salt stress in this experiment. These results also agree with the reports of
Ruffino et al., (2010) who determined the less damage of salt stress on cotyledons of quinoa plants. Considering the DW of soybean organs, the highest reduction was in the radicle by 83.33% while it was 60% in the hypocotyl. In accordance with these findings,
Bai et al., (2019) determined that there was a slight reduction in DW values in soybean with salinity. Similar to the fresh weight results, DW of cotyledons also was not changed with stress. This finding indicated that cotyledons have different tolerance capacity comparing with the hypocotyl. Nevertheless, the pretreatment of GA
3 increased this value by 4 fold in radicle and 50% in the hypocotyl. In recent years,
Chauhan et al., (2019) determined that GA
3 treated seeds of oat cultivars showed a slight increase in biomass yield. From these results, it could also be said that GA
3 had a positive effect on soybean organs under salinity.
The pigment content of cotyledons was showed in Table 2. In our results, salinity inhibited photosynthetic pigments in cotyledons significant. This fact had already been proved by a researcher that salt stress had negative effects on photosynthetic mechanisms in soybean (Khan, 2018). This is also an agreement with the results of MDA and H
2O
2 contents in cotyledons (Table 3). However, treatment with GA
3 on soybean seeds improved photosynthetic capacity in cotyledons. It could be suggested that this hormone might play a role in increasing organic matter and maintain water balance in cotyledons. In parallel with this result, Al
Mahmud et al., (2019) said that exogenous GA
3 induced chlorophyll content in wheat plants under drought conditions.
In the results, MDA content was increased with salt stress (150 mM NaCl) by 11.75%, 32.53%, 48.65% in different soybean organs (cotyledon, radicle and hypocotyl) but GA
3 pretreatment reduced this levels under stress condition and the highest reduction (40.36%) was determined in hypocotyl (Table 3). It can be concluded that GA
3 lead to an improvement in hypocotyl rather than cotyledon and radicle of soybean.
The present study revealed that salt stress-induced SOD enzyme activity in each part of soybean plants. This result was the agreement with the increased MDA contents with salinity (Table 3). Fig 1 reveals that SOD enzyme activities were increased by 5.95 fold, 42.85% and 3.08 fold with salt treatment as compared to control groups in cotyledon, radicle and hypocotyl but decreased significantly by 64.7%, 50% and 59.25% with GA
3 and salt application according to salt stress alone. In accordance with our results,
Amor et al., (2019) reported that SOD enzyme activity was induced with salinity in
Cakile maritima. In the present study, GA
3 pretreated plants have decreased SOD activity according to NaCl treated ones. It is suggested that GA
3 may play a role as an antioxidant instead of SOD enzyme. These results also agree with the reports of Chakrabarti and Mukharji (2003) and Ahmad (2010) who reported that there was a decreased activity of SOD enzyme with GA
3 treatment in
Vigna radiata and mustard plants respectively. In contrast, Sofy (2016) determined that GA
3 primed soybean seeds had a higher SOD activity according to controls. This paradox can be explained with the differences in concentration of GA
3 and NaCl with different cultivars of soybean.
Similar to the results of MDA, salinity also induced H
2O
2 levels by 22.1%, 15.48% and 10.88%, while it was decreased by GA
3 before the application. This amelioration was the highest in radicle by 24.8% (Table 3). Otherwise, there was no change in APX enzyme activity in cotyledon and radicle with salinity, while it was increased remarkably by 3.33 fold in hypocotyl (Fig 2). In contrast, GA
3 treatment induced this activity in cotyledon and radicle but decreased by 33.33% in hypocotyl as compared to salt stress alone (Fig 4). Similarly,
Xie et al., (2008) and Verma and Mishra (2005) determined that salt stress did not affect the APX enzyme activity in
Brassica juncea and
Gossypium hirsutum plants. Nevertheless, there was a significant increase in APX activity as it determined by
Weisany et al., (2012) in soybean plants. However, in the present study, GA
3 treated plants under salinity showed an increased APX activity in cotyledon and radicle according to salt stress alone. This result is also agreement with the reports of Younesi and Moradi (2014) in
Medicago sativa. Also, it was determined that the GA
3 application reduced APX enzyme activity in hypocotyl while it was induced with salt stress. This result showed that GA
3 plays antagonist action with salt stress in soybean plants to increase salt tolerance.
Salt stress-induced GR enzyme activity by 86.95% in radicle but did not affect in cotyledon and hypocotyl. However, GA
3 pretreatment under stress-induced this activity in cotyledon (11.76%) and hypocotyl (3.08 fold), while decreased in radicle according to salt stress groups (Fig 3). These results also agree with the reports of the
Yassin et al., (2019) and
Srivastava et al., (2015) in bread wheat and
Sesavium portulacastrum. Otherwise, GA
3 increased GR activity under salinity in cotyledon and hypocotyl, although it was decreased in radicle. Following the evaluation of the all results, the role of GA
3 as an antioxidant (by reducing ROS level) and signal molecule (by inducing antioxidant enzymes activities) in soybean plants under salinity is observed explicitly.