Weed density, weed dry weight and weed control efficiency
The mean value of three years (Rice fallow seasons of 2021-22, 2022-23 and 2023-24) result is presented (Table 1) and discussed here under. Significant influence of treatments was observed on weed density, weed dry weight and weed control efficiency. Among the microbial seed inoculation treatments, rhizobium + PSB (local) (A
2) recorded the lowest total weed density (19.04 weeds m
-2), which was statistically similar to the LSMR 1 + RB3 microbial consortia (A
3) treatment. The lowest weed dry weight (12.10 g m
-2) was observed with the LSMR 1 + RB3 microbial consortia (A
3) treatment, which was also comparable to the rhizobium + PSB (local) (A
2) treatment. Early plant vigour and higher biomass due to seed treatment would have enabled blackgram to act as a cover crop and supress the weeds. Among the various weed management practices, applying fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl at 220 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS had lower weed density of 15.46 weeds m
-2, which was comparable with propa-quizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% ME at 125 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS. Similarly, application fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl at 220 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS resulted in weed dry weight of 9.77 g m
-2 and was comparable with propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% ME @ 125 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS. Conse-quently, higher weed control efficiency of 70.15% was registered with fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl at 220 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS and it was followed by propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% ME at 125 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS. The higher weed control efficiency was due to lower weed density and lower weed dry weight following effective weed control. A similar result was reported by
Yadav et al., (2022). Rhizobium + PSB (local) (A
2) had the lowest total weed density (19.04 weeds m
-2), which was comparable to the LSMR 1 + RB3 microbial consortia (A
3) treatment. Similarly, the LSMR 1 + RB3 microbial consortia (A
3) treatment recorded the lowest weed dry weight (12.10 g m
-2), which was on par with the rhizobium + PSB (local) (A
2) treatment. The LSMR 1 + RB3 microbial consortia (A
3) treatment showed the highest weed control efficiency among the microbial treatments, achieving 49.83%, followed closely by the Rhizobium + PSB (local) (A2) treatment. In com-parison, chemical treatments demonstrated significantly higher efficiency: fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl at 220 g ha
-1 applied 15-20 DAS recorded the highest weed control efficiency at 70.15%, followed by propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75 ME at 125 g ha
-1, also applied at 15-20 DAS. Spraying of 19:19:19 NPK @ 2 % had the higher weed control efficiency of 47.25 % and it was followed by nano urea spray @ 0.25 % (C2) treatment (Table 1). The interaction effect was not statistically significant.
Growth parameters
Seed inoculation with LSMR1 + RB3 microbial consortia resulted in taller plants of 35.4 cm and it was on par with rhizobium + PSB (local) (Table 2). Similar finding was also reported by
Dhyani et al., (2011). Application of post emergence herbicide fomesafen + fluzifop-b-butyl @ 220 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS effectively reduced weed density and weed dry weight resulting in the tallest plants of 35.5 cm. The least plant height was observed with weedy check. Foliar spraying of 19:19:19 NPK @ 2% at flower initiation and pod initiation stage significantly increased the plant height recording 37.7 cm at harvest stage. The increase in plant height might be due to the internodal elongation and the vigorous root growth of the crop. Similar result was reported by
Kumar et al. (2018). The interaction effect was not statistically significant.
Yield attributes
Seed inoculation with LSMR1 + RB3 microbial consortia resulted in more number of pods plant
-1 (24.4). Application of fomesafen + fluzifop-b-butyl @ 220 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS resulted in more number of pods (23.6 plant
-1). Among the foliar nutrient application, the higher number of pods plant
-1 (23.4) was with spraying of 19:19:19 NPK @ 2% at flower initiation and pod initiation stage. Timely supply of nutrients through foliar spray during peak nutrient demand might have reduced the shedding of flowers resulting in higher number of pods. Similar result was earlier reported by
Ashraf et al., (2024). Seed inoculation with LSMR1 + RB3 microbial consortia recorded significantly higher number of seeds pod
-1 (6.03) followed by rhizobium + PSB (local). Application of fomesafen + fluzifop-b-butyl @ 220 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS resulted in highest number of seeds pod
-1 of 5.35 followed by propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75 ME @ 125 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS. Spraying of 2% 19:19:19 NPK at flower initiation and pod initiation stage recorded significantly higher number of seeds pod
-1 of 5.46.
The foliar nutrients might have supplemented the nutrient demand of the crop at the critical stage, resulting in better growth and development of the crop and ultimately enhanced the yield attributing characters and promoted a positive source sink gradient of photosynthates translocation guaranteeing seed formation and better grain filling
(Manivannan et al., 2002). The highest test weight of 4.86 g was recorded with LSMR1 + RB3 microbial consortia. Among the different herbicides tested, application of fomesafen + fluzifop-b-butyl @ 220 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS (B3) treatment resulted the highest test weight of 4.45 g and it was followed by propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75 ME @ 125 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS. Among the foliar nutrition, spraying of 2% 19:19:19 NPK at flower initiation and pod initiation stage had the highest test weight of 4.47 g which could be attributed to the production of bold seeds. The interaction effect was not statistically significant.
Grain yield
Among the seed inoculation, LSMR1 + RB3 microbial consortia resulted in higher grain yield of 856 kg ha
-1 though it was comparable with rhizobium + PSB. Yield enhance-ment in blackgram following seed treatment with combined application of rhizobium and PSB was also reported by
Kant et al., (2016). The higher grain yield of 854 kg ha
-1 was obtained with application of fomesafen + fluzifop-b-butyl @ 220 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS, which was on par with propa-quizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75 ME @ 125 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS. The application of new generation herbicides at early growth stage of blackgram might have resulted in lesser crop-weed competition for nutrients, which ultimately increased the yield. Similar result was also reported by
(Patidar et al., 2023). The lowest grain yield was recorded with weedy check (B
1) treatment. Among the foliar nutrition, spraying of 2% 19:19:19 NPK at flower initiation and pod initiation stage (C
3) resulted in higher grain yield of 862 kg ha
-1. The yield increase was mainly due to significant improvement in number of pods plant
-1 and test weight. The result was in accordance with
Vijayakumar et al., (2021). The lowest grain yield was recorded with water spray (F1) (Table 2). The interaction effect was not statistically significant.
Economic analysis
Seed inoculation with LSMR1 + RB3 microbial consortia (A
3) resulted in higher gross income (Rs.64200 ha
-1), net income (Rs.43618 ha
-1) and benefit cost ratio of 3.12 mainly due to higher grain yield of blackgram. Application of fomesafen + fluzifop-b-butyl @ 220 g ha
-1 at 15-20 DAS (B
3) enhanced the gross income (Rs.64050 ha
-1), net income (Rs.43375 ha
-1) and benefit cost ratio of 3.10. The higher gross income (Rs.64650 ha
-1), net income (Rs.44130 ha
-1) and benefit cost ratio (3.15) were obtained with spraying of 2% 19:19:19 NPK at flower initiation and pod initiation stage (C
3) (Table 3).