Generally, cluster bean is a sun-loving crop that requires 7-8 hours of direct sunlight. The results related to its biological and yield parameters are discussed here.
Number of flowers/clusters
Considering the interaction with varieties and field condition, a significantly maximum number of flowers/clusters was observed in T1V1 (11.63) followed by T1V2 (10.20) whereas the minimum was recorded in T3V3 (6.60), owing to increased light availability and reduced competition from other plants (Table 1). The recorded variation in the number of flowers per cluster in cluster beans may also be attributed to the open field condition and genetic differences among the various cultivars. Similar findings have been reported by
Heindl and Brun (1983), who noted flower abscission in soybeans under shaded conditions and by
Bhusara et al., (2018), who observed fewer green gram flowers in intercropped plots with
Melia composita compared to open plots.
Number of pods/clusters
The number of pods/ cluster in different ecosystems varied remarkably at harvest as this parameter is highly influenced by the genetic make-up of the crop cultivars and the light conditions. Among the treatments, T1V1 recorded the significantly higher number of pods per cluster (31.82), likely due to increased light availability enhancing the net assimilation rate in open conditions. In contrast, T3V3 had the lower number of pods per cluster (25.79), attributed to increased shading from larger crowns and genetic differences among the varieties. These results closely align with those quoted by
Patel (1995),
George and Nair (1987) in cowpea,
Mahajan (2001) in
Trigonella foenum-graecum,
Sreerekha and Dhurua (2009) in pigeon pea and soybean and
Ahir et al., (2019) in various pulse crops, including green gram, cowpea, black gram, Indian bean and pigeon pea.
Number of seeds/pods
The data on the number of seeds/pods at harvest are illustrated in Fig 1. Among the treatments, the maximum number of seeds per pod in cluster bean was observed in T1V1 (8.83), followed by T1V2 and T2V1 (8.40), likely due to high light interaction and high photosynthesis rate in open-field conditions while the minimum seed set was recorded in T3V3, possibly due to reduced shade tolerance, which negatively impacted seed production. Similar findings were reported by
Sreerekha and Dhurua (2009). The seed counts in T1V2 and T2V1 were comparable at 8.40, with T1V1 outperforming T3V3. Comparable results were also recorded by
Lal et al., (2014) and
Ahir et al., (2019).
Pod length (cm) and pod width (cm)
The pod length and width of cluster beans were measured at harvest and were significantly influenced by the three ecosystems (Table 2). On comparing the different treatments of cluster bean, the maximum pod length and pod width was recorded in the T1V1 (16.80 and 1.10 respectively) compared to other treatments. In contrast,
Sharma et al., (2023) found significantly higher pod length and pod width in aonla-based agroforestry systems with soybean compared to open cropping, likely due to the compatibility between aonla and soybean, which creates favourable growing conditions. The results align with
Bhutia et al., (2015) in
Pisum sativum under peach trees and
Haitham et al., (2017) in pea plants under
Sesbania sesban.
Yield / ha
Among the different treatments for growing cluster bean, the highest yield of cluster bean was recorded in T1V1 (11.58 tonnes), followed by T1V2 (10.61 tonnes) compared to other treatments (Table 3). When water and nutrients are sufficient, plant production mainly depends on the radiant energy intercepted by leaves. In three-year-old
Melia dubia plantation, the light intensity recorded by cluster beans was reduced to 78.12% (65,000 lumen per square metre) for MDU 1, 76.44% (63,600 lumen per square metre) for Pusa Navbahar and 74.51% (62,000 lumen per square metre) for Sonali when compared to the control. In agroforestry systems, factors such as Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR), temperature, species combinations, canopy structure, tree age, height and leaf area influence biomass growth
(Jose et al., 2004). This trend may be reflected in this study. The similar yield reduction peculiarity recorded in pulses intercropped with trees was recorded by
Bhusara et al., (2018), Pandey et al., (2019) and
Ajaykumar et al., (2022). Jia et al., (2021) and
Zhang et al., (2019) also reported a similar yield decrease in wheat when intercropped under walnut (
Juglans regia) and ber (
Ziziphus jujuba) trees respectively.
However, the yield performance of cluster bean under the treatment T2V1 and T2V2 is comparable with T1V1 and T1V2. This is due to trait plasticity, which helps crops adapt to shaded conditions while sustaining light absorption and biomass productivity similar to monocultures
(Arenas-Corraliza et al., 2018).
Benefit cost ratio (BCR)
The BCR for cluster bean cultivation under the
M.
dubia agroforestry system was evaluated to assess the economic viability of this system, with the results are shown in Table 4. As expected, higher BCR (1.83 for MDU 1 and 1.68 for Pusa Navbahar) values were recorded under open field conditions without tree component.
Ashalatha et al., (2015) reported similar findings in their study to develop
M.
dubia-based agroforestry model for yield enhancement. However, the BCR (1.61) recorded in MDU 1 under three-year-old
M.
dubia plantation was comparable with the higher BCR recorded in MDU 1 and Pusa Navbahar under open field conditions. Agroforestry systems may create a beneficial microclimate, promote nutrient recycling and enhance topsoil organic matter through
M.
dubia leaf fall, which likely minimized differences between open-field and intercropping conditions. This is because MDU1 offers the best option for intercropping with
M.
dubia. The local origin of MDU1 may have provided it with an advantage, allowing it to outperform other varieties even under shaded conditions and also maximum light interception and photosynthetic activity as reported by
Miah et al., (2001) and
Hossain et al., (2020).