Growth and yield characters of blackgram
The demonstrations showed a 21.9% higher yield as compared to the local practices, which recorded 6.8 q/ha. On average, the yield from the demonstrations was higher than that of the check variety. The average yield during the 2017 season was 8.15 q/ha and during the 2018 season, it was 8.36 q/ha. The benefit cost ratio of the demonstrations was 3.46 in 2017 and 3.32 in 2018 (Table 2). These results are in agreement with the findings of
Rupesh et al., (2017), who reported benefit: cost ratios of 2.18 and 2.22 for conventional varieties in 2017 and 2018, respectively. The data indicated a positive impact of cluster frontline demonstrations on increasing blackgram yields in the Salem district in Tamil Nadu. The benefit:cost ratio was consistently higher under the demonstration conditions as compared to control in all the study years, with an average increase of 18.24% over the control. Throughout the study period, there was a strong emphasis on educating farmers through various techniques to adopt improved agricultural practices, aiming to reduce the extension gap (
Tiwari and Saxena, 2001). Different physiological parameters were observed in samples collected from various farmers’ fields. The demonstration samples exhibited a higher germination percentage as compared to the check plots. The average field emergence percentage for the demonstration samples was 79.69%, representing a 12% increase over the check variety’s 67.17% (Table 3).
An increase in plant height was observed in the demo samples as compared to the check plots. The average plant height of the demo samples was 44.79 cm, while the check plots had an average height of 35.72 cm (Table 3). Similar increases in plant height have been reported in lettuce using
Pseudomonas bio-fertilizer
(Rostaminia et al., 2020; Santana Fernandez et al., 2021). Furthermore, spraying with Pulse Wonder increased plant height in blackgram (
Kamaleshwaran and Karthiga, 2021). The number of pods per plant was also higher in the demo samples (50.93) than in the check plots (41.07) (Table 3) directly influencing seed yield. Similar results were reported in blackgram by foliar application of Pulse Wonder at 5 kg/ha during flowering and 15 days after the first DAS spray. This treatment resulted in significantly higher plant height, number of pods per plant, seeds per pod, seed yield (q/ha), straw yield (q/ha), harvest index (%), net return (Rs) and benefit: Cost ratio as compared to other foliar spray treatments (
Devaraju and Senthivel, 2018).
Molla et al. (2012) demonstrated increased plant height, number of fruits per plant, individual fruit sizeand enhanced yield in tomatoes through the application of
Trichoderma viride bio-fertilizer. Similar results were reported in wheat by
Mahato et al., (2018). Marimuthu and Surendran (2015) reported that application of 100% recommended dose of NPK + DAP 2% + TNAU Pulse Wonder 5.0 kg/ha recorded significantly higher plant growth, number of pods per plant, yield of blackgramand benefit:cost ratio over control.
Sujatha and Ambika (2016) reported that designer seeds fortified with 1% KCl for 6 hours followed by polymer coating at 3 ml/kg, carbendazim at 2 g/kg, imidacloprid at 2 ml/kg,
Trichoderma viride at 4 g/kg, enhanced plant growth and yield. This treatment increased number of pods per plant, pod yield per plot (g)and seed yield per plant (g), with fewer days to 50% flowering and reduced pest and disease incidence. Similar results were also observed in paddy (
Sujatha and Ambika, 2018) and cotton (
Sujatha and Ambika, 2020).
The increases in plant growth and yield might be due to higher supply of nutrients at flower initiation and pod formation stages, leading to efficient translocation of photosynthates from source to sink through foliar application of nutrient spray like Pulse Wonder (
Kamaleshwaran and Karthiga, 2021;
Devaraju and Senthivel, 2018). Additionally, the designer seeds provide protection during initial stages of establishment from seed-borne pathogens and improve nutrient use efficiency via bio-fertilizer.
Trichoderma and
Pseudomonas bio-fertilizers assist in the solubilization and sequestration of essential plant nutrients such as P, Mn, Fe and Zn, thereby enhance plant growth
(Lal et al., 2013). The increased root biomass, accumulation of nitrogen and production of plant growth hormones such as gibberellins and cytokinins by these inoculants promote seedling growth. These results positively influenced the benefit: Cost ratio.
To estimate the yield gap, the potential yield of the crop was compared with the yield from the demonstration plots. The yield gap analysis was assessed using the technology index, extension gap and technology gap. The extension gap, which illustrates the variation in yield between the farmer’s plots and the demonstration plots, ranged from 1.25 to 1.89 q/ha over the investigation period, with an average of 1.49 q/ha over three years (Table 4). This gap highlights the need to educate and train farmers in adopting yield-maximizing technologies to close this significant practice gap. Extension yield gaps indicate a lack of awareness and adoption of improved farm technologies among farmers
(Vedna et al., 2007). The new technologies will eventually convince farmers to discontinue the old technology and to adopt new technology. This finding is in corroboration with the findings of
Hiremath and Nagaraju (2010) and Upesh
Kumar et al., (2023) in blackgram.
Technology gap
The technology gap representing the difference between the potential yield of the crop and the demonstration yield, ranged from 0.05 to 0.56 q/ha, with an average of 0.39 q/ha (Table 4). Farmers are negatively impacted by the technology gap due to insufficient extension efforts and a lack of demonstrations of improved technologies. This gap can be attributed to various factors, including crop suitability, soil fertility status, fluctuations in sowing dates and meteorological conditions. This can also be attributed to lack of irrigation, uneven rainfall, variations in soil fertility, cultivation on marginal lands, unfavorable weather conditions and specific crop management challenges. These issues hinder the ability to fully harness the yield potential of crop cultivars
(Choudhary et al., 2009). These observations highlight the urgent need for location-specific crop management practices to bridge the gap between potential and actual yields in demonstration plots
(Vedna et al., 2007), along with strengthening of irrigation infrastructure in the region (
Choudhary, 2009). Similar findings were also reported by
Singh et al., (2021) in summer mungbean.
Technology index
Technology index indicates the feasibility of generated farm technologies in the farmers’ fields under prevailing agro climatic situations
(Vedna et al., 2007). A lower technology index value suggests greater feasibility. This index is a percentage (%) based on the technology gap, where a higher value indicates lower adoption of improved technologies by farmers. The three-year technology index in demonstrations averaged 26.41%, ranging from 0.57% to 6.43% (Table 4). The low technology index is attributed to the interventions by KVK scientists and the adoption of yield-maximizing practices for blackgram by the farmers. Timely and need-based recommendations from KVK scientists and extension staff along with favorable climate conditions and a low fpests and diseases incidence supported the lower technology index.
Economics
Yield, variable costsand the difference between market price and minimum support price are the primary determinants of economic returns. Input costs and labor wages fluctuated over time. The economic viability of enhanced methods over traditional farmers’ practices was determined based on the input and output costs at the time of the study as compared to traditional practices. Where the average cost of cultivation, gross returns and net returns were Rs. 28,160/ha, Rs. 56,531/ha and Rs. 28,371/ha, respectively, with an average benefit:cost ratio of 2.01. Improved practices recorded a higher average cost of cultivation (Rs. 30,490/ha), gross returns (Rs. 68,913/ha) and net returns (Rs. 38,423/ha) (Table 5). Similar economic benefits owing to adoption of improved technology interventions were also reported by
Meena et al., (2021) and
Reager et al., (2020). Additionally, on an average of five years, the improved practices generated an additional gross return of Rs. 12,382/ha as compared to traditional practices, with a benefit:cost ratio of 2.26 (Table 5). Higher benefit:cost ratio in demonstrations could be the result of higher yield due to adoption of improved practices which were missing in local check plots.
Singh et al., (2017) observed similar results in mungbean and
Kantwa et al., 2024 in chickpea, however,
Kumar and Boparai (2020) observed a B:C ratio in the range of 1.92 to 2.44 during their study period.