Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Leveraging Extended Range Weather Forecast for Groundnut Bud Necrosis Disease Forewarning: A Data-driven Approach

G. Senbagavalli1, Ga. Dheebakaran1,*, N.K. Sathyamoorthy1, P. Renukadevi2, Balaji Kannan3, K.P. Ragunath4, S. Kokilavani1
  • https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6035-2329, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0603-192X, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-4808, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-1681, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-0893, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7851-4437s, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3548-6146
1Agro Climate Research Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
4Centre for Water and Geospatial Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Submitted31-07-2024|

  • Accepted05-11-2024|

  • First Online 30-11-2024|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5393

Background: Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.), a globally prominent oilseed crop, is experiencing significant losses due to the Groundnut Bud Necrosis Virus (GBNV). The extended range weather forecast (ERWF) provides timely weather information and protects crops from weather-induced biotic and abiotic risks. 

Methods: An ERWF-based GBNV disease forewarning study was conducted at Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu in 2023 and 2024. The ERWF output from Weather Research and Forecasting (WRFv4.4) with two microphysics (WSM3 and Kessler) were leveraged to forewarn the GBNV disease, using the thumb rule as adapted in Tamil Nadu Agricultural University-Agro Advisory Service (TNAU - AAS): Web cum Mobile App, which is maximum temperature (>33oC), relative humidity (40-70%), wind speed (>5 kmph) and rainfall (0 mm).

Result: Among the two microphysics options, the WSM3 performed better and provided more usable ERWF than the Kessler scheme. The WSM3 based ERWF usability percentage was 50 to 100 for rainfall and 80-100 for all other weather variables. The higher performance of ERWF resulted in a more precise forewarning of thrips and GBNV. The first and peak activity of thrips and GBNV incidence was well correlated (70-80%) with the ERWF based forewarning. 

Weather significantly impacts crop production, both directly (accounting for 50%) and indirectly (30%) by influencing pest and disease dynamics. Various pest and diseases respond differently to environmental conditions, particularly at the microclimate level. For a plant disease to develop, three factors viz., a virulent pathogen, a susceptible host and a suitable environment must coincide (Mead et al., 2022). Climate change has the potential to alter the prevalence of existing diseases and their economic significance and may introduce new diseases in specific areas (Zayan, 2019).

Recent advancements in meteorological forecasting methods offer new prospects for predicting disease outbreaks in crops including groundnut. In this study, the interplay between weather variables, the groundnut host, thrips and tospovirus spread are explored. The insights gained will contribute to the development of a robust tospovirus outbreak prediction model, enhancing disease management strategies.

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.), commonly known as the “poor man’s nut,” globally ranked 13th among the plant foods consumed in tropical, subtropical and temperate zones (Anonymous, 2023a). It is a principal oilseed crop (Kandakoor et al., 2012), ranking first in India’s oilseed acreage and second in production.  Among the Indian states, Karnataka has the highest acreage (1.65 lakh ha) followed by Andhra Pradesh (0.81 lakh ha), Tamil Nadu (0.94 lakh ha), Telangana (0.93 lakh ha) and Odisha (1.10 lakh ha) (Anonymous, 2023b). Groundnut is vulnerable to the negative effects of climate change, including increased CO2 levels, unpredictable rainfall patterns, high temperatures and moisture stress, which have a negative impact on physiology, disease resistance, fertility and productivity (Sudhalakshmi et al., 2022).

Groundnut bud necrosis virus (GBNV), also known as Peanut Bud Necrosis Virus is foliar disease which is significantly affecting groundnut productivity in India. Interestingly, GBNV also impacts tomato crop. Singh and Srivastava (1995) reported that GBNV infection accounts for 70-90% of groundnut losses in India, with an average incidence of 0 to 98%. Thrips, tiny insects belonging to the order Thysanoptera, are economically harmful pests affecting various crops used for food, feed and fibre (Riley et al., 2011). Thrips serve as circulative and propagative hosts for tospoviruses (Mandal et al., 2012). Managing thrips-tospovirus remains challenging due to its presence in both thrips and host plants. Despite efforts, insecticides and host plant resistance have proven ineffective (Mahanta et al., 2022). Since 2015, a variety of insect pests, particularly sucking pests, have significantly lowered groundnut productivity (Reddy et al., 2024).

Environmental factors determine the disease’s breakout and can be employed to predict the severity of the disease (Vijaykumar et al., 2024). Developing an effective plant disease forecasting system necessitates an understanding of host factors, pathogen dynamics and environmental influences. An attempt was made to use Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to establish a relationship between weather variables and thrips occurrences. PCA is a multivariate statistical technique that reduces related p-variables to new, smaller dimensions while minimizing information loss. In agricultural ecosystems, weather significantly influences crop disease incidence and severity. This study explores the synergy between epidemiological research and weather forecasts as a powerful tool for predicting groundnut bud necrosis disease and empowering farmers with preventive measures to protect crops.
Study location and period
 
The study was conducted successively for two years during the summer (January-May) of 2023 and 2024 in groundnut crops to understand the incidence of thrips and GBNV. The groundnut fields in four different villages (L1: Viraliyur, L2: Narasipuram, L3: Thondamuthur and L4: Devarayapuram) of Thondamuthur block (Table 1) at Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, India (Fig 1) were taken for the study, which is in the Western Agro Climatic Zone of Tamil Nadu.

Table 1: Coordinates of study locations.



Fig 1: Study area of ERWF based forewarning of GBNV in groundnut.



Coimbatore receives an annual rainfall of 728 mm from 47 rainy days and benefits mostly from the North East Monsoon (NEM, 358 mm). The study location is within a 10 km perimeter of Western Ghat, a rain shadow area to South West Monsoon (SWM, 198 mm) rains. The summer and winter contribute 152 and 20 mm, respectively. The elevation of WZ varies from mean sea level to 427 m. The mean monthly maximum and minimum temperature of the study location were 31.9°C and 21.9°C, RH morning and evening was 85 and 50% and the average wind speed was 7.7kmph (TNAU Observatory, Coimbatore, 2024).

ERWF development
 
ERWF for the experimental location was developed during the study period by using the high-resolution mesoscale numerical weather prediction model “Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model” version 4.4. The Linux-based open-source WRF model developed at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) was downloaded from “GitHub” (https://github.com/wrf-model/WRF) and installed in a physical server with 32 processors and 128 GB RAM. The name list of the WPS (WRF Preprocessing System) and WRF model was altered for two nested domains (9 km and 3 km). The six hourly Global Forecasting System (GFS) data for the next 16 days (GRIB2 format, 0.25 resolution, 12-hour cycle, gfs.t12z.pgrb2.0p25.f000 to 384) was downloaded at weekly intervals and employed as input for the Weather Research and Forecasting - Advanced Research WRF (WRF - ARW) v4.4 model. The WRF model endures several kinds of processes in its workflow as depicted in Fig 2.

Fig 2: WRF ARW modelling system workflow diagram.



The parent and nested domain centroid in namelist were fixed as 11°N and 78.5°E. The parent domain was spaced @ 9 km, consisting of 200 grids on both NS and EW directions, covering an area of 1800x1800 km. The nested domain with a finer resolution had 225 grids in the NS direction and 165 grids in EW directions, spaced at 3 km intervals and covering an area of 645x498 km. In this study, two microphysics options that are widely used for tropical conditions viz., Kessler scheme (warm rain scheme-mp1) (Kessler, 1969) and WRF single moment 3 class schemes (suitable for mesoscale grid sizes-mp3) (Hong et al., 2004), were tested for their performance in ERWF usability.

Final output from the WRF model for each microphysics was generated for 35640 grids @ 3 km resolution. The geographical centre point of all four study location was 10.98895°N and 76.80745°E. The ERWF output (15 days, 18 hours) of nine nearby grids that surround the four experimental fields was extracted separately, averaged and used for the study.

The forecast output included the weather variables such as maximum temperature (Tmax,°C), minimum temperature (Tmin, °C), relative humidity morning (RHm, %), relative humidity evening (RHe, %), windspeed morning (WSm, kmph), windspeed evening (WSe, kmph) and daily rainfall (RF, mm). The standard weekly temperature (maximum and minimum), relative humidity (morning and evening.), wind speed (morning and evening) and cumulative rainfall were calculated for the Standard Meteorological Week (SMW) which fall in the study period. The observed weather variables during the study period of 2023 and 2024 are depicted in Fig 3a and 3b.

Fig 3: Observed weather during the study period Jan-May 2023(a) and 2024(b).


 
Epidemiology
 
The epidemiology of thrips and GBNV disease in groundnut was studied in four experimental locations by observing thrips population dynamics and GBNV disease by roving survey at weekly intervals for the entire cropping season. Thrips population was recorded in the top three leaves of randomly selected 20 plants and repeated in three points (40 sqm) for each location.
 
 
                                                         
The percentage of disease incidence (PDI) was calculated by recording the number of plants showing GBNV disease symptoms such as chlorotic and necrotic spots, chlorotic and necrotic ring spots on leaves, chlorosis of plant, axillary shoot formation, malformation of bud, drooping of leaf, bud chlorosis, terminal bud necrosis and stunted growth of the plant. The percentage of GBNV incidence was estimated by using the formula (Suganyadevi et al., 2018).
 
 
                           
Correlation between weather parameters, thrips population and GBNV disease incidence was carried out using the “R” programme to assess the pest-disease and weather relationship.
 
Principal component analysis
 
 
 
 
 
Where:
Eigen vectors- aij and x1, x2…xk - Original variables in data matrix.

A versatile statistical technique known as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) can be used to distil a cases-by-variables data table down to its principal components, or key elements. A small number of linear combinations of the original variables, known as principal components, can account for the majority of the variance in all the variables. Using just these few key elements, the method approximates the original data table in the process (Greenacre et al., 2022). PCA was performed using the R statistical package (version R-4.4.0).
 
Forewarning of thrips and disease incidence
 
The daily values of 15 days of weather forecast values from the WRF v4.4 model were converted into week 1 (1-7 days) and week 2 (8-14 days) by averaging (temperature, wind speed and relative humidity) and cumulated rainfall. The 2nd week values were then utilized to develop ERWF-based forewarning of thrips infestation. The thumb rule for thrips infestation, as adopted in TNAU - AAS: web cum Mobile App (Geethalakshmi et al., 2019) was referred for this purpose. Thumb rule suggests that the thrips infestation may occur when the air temperature exceeds 33°C, the wind speed of above 5 km and the average relative humidity falls between 40 and 70 per cent. Additionally, this risk will be heightened when there is zero mm rainfall.
 
Verification of ERWF-based forewarning
 
The usability of ERWF-based forewarning was assessed by monitoring the thrips population count and GBNV incidence at weekly intervals in groundnut (Fig 4).

Fig 4: An illustration showing ERWF-based GBNV forewarning in groundnut.



In this study, forewarning efficiency was assessed by comparing the ERWF (both WSM3 and Kessler) based forewarning and observed weather-based hindcast forewarning. If the values were aligned with the thump rule, scored as “Y”; otherwise received an “N” score. Based on the real observation in the field, if thrips infestation is observed, increasing trend, decreasing trend and not observed were scored as “Y”, “Y+”, “Y-” and “N”, respectively. All the scores were tabulated and calculated for match cases between forewarning based on ERWF (both WSM3 and Kessler) and actual observation, hindcast forewarning based on observed weather and actual observation. 
Verification of ERWF with different microphysics
 
Understanding the performance differences between WRF microphysics schemes is crucial for improving weather forecasts and enhancing our ability to provide accurate advisories. The forecast usability percentage (FUP) of ERWF generated with two different microphysics options viz., WSM3 and Kessler schemes for the period from February to May 2023 and 2024 were presented in Fig 5.

Fig 5: Forecast usability percentage of ERWF during two years study period.



The ERWF generated with the WSM-3 scheme consistently outperformed the Kessler scheme in terms of FUP (Correct+Usable) during both 2023 and 2024 (Fig 5). Similar results were reported by Dheebakaran et al. (2022) when examining the effects of WRF’s microphysics options on the village level medium range rainfall forecast in Tamil Nadu. In their study, WSM3 produced better forecast with higher FUP compared to Kessler, WSM5 and WSM6. Interestingly, Zaidi and Gisen (2018) found contrasting results that WSM6 outperformed WSM3 in rainfall forecast, which might be attributed to spatial variability across different regions of study. Among the weather parameters considered, the FUP was ranked in the order of Tmax, Tmin, RH, wind speed and rainfall. Both the schemes tended to overestimate the rainfall and RH, while underestimating Tmax and Tmin. Additionally, the wind speed forecast lacked consistency. The WSM3-based ERWF usability (correct+usable) percentage was 60-100 per cent for rainfall, 80-100 per cent for Tmax, 90-100 per cent for Tmin and 100 for wind speed and RH. Comparing this study with the earlier study of Dheebakaran et al. (2022) in Tamil Nadu with Medium Range Weather Forecast (MRWF), the accuracy of ERWF was higher. The MRWF usability was assessed for daily rainfall, while the ERWF usability calculations were made for weekly cumulative rainfall.
 
Relationship between weather variables, thrips and GBNV incidence
 
The groundnut crop was observed with silvery appearance due to thrips feeding on the epidermal cells content and symptoms observed such as necrosis, bud necrosis, chlorosis and stunted growth due to GBNV infection. Basavaraj et al. (2017) also noted comparable symptoms.

Selected weather variables were examined for correlation between thrips, GBNV and weather parameters. The rainfall was excluded from correlation and PCA during 2024, since rain didn’t occur during that specific time frame. During 2023 (Fig 6), the thrips population showed the highest positive correlation with Tmax (0.768, significant at 0.1% (p-value<0.01)) and the GBNV incidence had the highest negative correlation with Tavg (0.879, significant at 0.1% (p-value<0.01)). Between Thrips and GBNV, there was a correlation of 0.633 (significant at 5%).

Fig 6: Correlation among weather variables, thrips and GBNV during the year 2023.



Thrips occurrences showed both positive and negative association with weather variables. Heavy downpours resulted in mechanical washing-off thrips, while light rainfall alternated with dry days supported the thrips multiplication. Vijayalakshmi et al. (2017) also noted that the rainfall has a beneficial impact on the number of thrips at Coimbatore on groundnut.

Fig 7: Correlation among weather variables, thrips and GBNV during the year 2024.



During the year 2024 (Fig 7), the thrips population showed the highest positive correlation with Tmax (0.185, Non-significant) while the GBNV incidence had the maximum positive correlation with Tmin [(0.814, significant at 1% (p-value<0.01)]. But non-significance was observed between Thrips and GBNV (0.546). According to Vijayalakshmi et al. (2017) the thrips population exhibited a negative association with morning and evening RH. A positive correlation with sunshine hours, rainfall, Tmax and Tmin respectively, in the kharif and rabi seasons. There was a positive correlation for GBNV incidence with morning RH, rainfall, SSH and evening RH, but a negative correlation with Tmin and evening RH.

The PCA diagram (Fig 8 and 9) showed that the Tmax, Tmin, Tave, RH, WS, Rainfall and Thrips count were in the order of significant influence on the GBNV, which showed the importance of weather variables on the GBNV forewarning.

Fig 8: Weather variables contribution to PDI (%) during 2023.



Fig 9: Variables contribution to PDI (%) during 2024.



 Forewarning of thrips and GBNV
 
Population of thrips was counted individually from the four study locations and the first incidence of thrips was observed in the 10th and 9th SMW during the years 2023 and 2024. The population of thrips reached above ETL (<=5 nos. / plant) during 12 to 16th SMW in 2023 (5-10 nos. in top 3 leaves), while it was 5-12 in top 3 leaves during 10 to 16th SMW in 2024.  Percent disease incidence (PDI) was calculated from four locations based on the GBNV symptoms. In 2023, the GBNV incidence was observed during the 11th SMW, while it was a week earlier (10th SMW) during 2024. The PDI reached its highest during the 16th SMW during the year 2023 (60%), whereas it was 15-16th SMW during the year 2024 (70%) (Fig 10 and 11).

Fig 10: Thrips population and GBNV incidence observed in the study year 2023.



Fig 11: Thrips population and GBNV incidence observed in the study year 2024.



The favourable weather particularly, higher temperatures without rainy days might be the reason for early thrips infestation, long peak periods and higher number of thrips count during the year 2024, compared to 2023. Early incidence of GBNV was also observed in the study year 2024 as a result of the early occurrence of thrips. The incidence of GBNV was notably higher in 2024 than in 2023 possibly as an effect of the increased virus inoculum.

The fluctuations in the thrips population and PDI percentage were observed due to observation in random sampling and the exclusion of completely withered plants (Fig 10 and 11). According to Vijayalakshmi et al. (2017), the incidence of GBNV observed with a mean thrips population at top bud leaves was 3.4 - 6.4 numbers per plant during kharif and 3.2 - 7.1 numbers per plant during in rabi. Sunkad et al. (2012) noted that the disease incidence vacillated from 1 to 44 per cent during kharif 2007 and it was between 1 and 84 per cent during rabi 2007.  The substantial variation in thrips populations was evident because of the increased influence of biotic and abiotic factors such as weather on these two characteristics.
 
Verification of forewarning
 
Comparison results of thrips forewarning verification (Table 2) revealed that the WRF-WSM3 scheme based forewarning performed equally well as that of observed weather-based forewarning. There were 8 matches during 2023 and 5 matches during 2024 in WRF-WSM3-based forewarning against 9 and 5 matches in observed weather-based hindcast forewarning. The WRF-Kessler scheme-based forewarning resulted with 5 match cases during both the 2023 and 2024 experiments. Similar study was done by Olatinwo et al., (2012) employed the high-resolution WRF model to forecast favourable infection circumstances to control early leaf spots in peanuts.

Table 2: Verification of forewarning given by microphysics options.

Thrips, along with the tospovirus transmit, pose a significant threat to groundnut production in India. Understanding meteorological variables like maximum temperature is essential to forecast thrips, which has a strong correlation with thrips incidence. Warmer climates accelerate thrips development, while drier environments enhance their fecundity. As thrips population grow, their impact becomes more pronounced. Moderate to heavy rains can wash away vectors, reducing thrips populations. The Extended Range Weather Forecast (ERWF) provides valuable insights by predicting the start and peak periods of thrips incidence and Groundnut Bud Necrosis Virus (GBNV) incidence two weeks in advance, with a 50-80% confidence level. Armed with this information, timely control measures can be scheduled to mitigate the impact on groundnut productivity. Spatial and temporal variation significantly impact forecast accuracy. To develop robust forewarning models and applications, integrating the ERWF with epidemiological studies across diverse climate, crops, pests and diseases would facilitate the farmers to gain the ability to anticipate and mitigate the consequences of pests and diseases in crop production.

Future research could explore ERWF applications for other pest and diseases of multiple crops with a focus on diverse agro-climatic regions in Tamil Nadu and developing algorithm for pest and disease forewarning of GBNV with management strategies.
The present study was not supported by any schemes.
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

  1. Anonymous, (2023a) fao.stat.org. 

  2. Anonymous, (2023b) Groundnut Outlook-March (2023). Agricultural Market Intelligence Centre, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University.

  3. Basavaraj, Mandal, B., Gawande, S.J., Renukadevi, P., Holkar, S.K., Krishnareddy, M. and Jain, R.K. (2017). The occurrence, biology, serology and molecular biology of tospoviruses in Indian agriculture. A century of plant virology in India. 445-474.

  4. Dheebakaran, G., Geethalakshmi, V., Ramanathan, S.P., Ragunath, K.P. and Kokilavani, S. (2022). WRF’s microphysics options on the temporal variation in the accuracy of cluster of village level medium range rainfall forecast in Tamil Nadu. Journal of Agrometeorology. 24(2): 133-137.

  5. Geethalakshmi, V., Dheebakaran, Ga., Panneerselvam, S., Kokilavani, S., Ramanathan S.P., Suganaya kanna, S., Johnson, I., Balasubramanian, R. (2019). Agro advisories for weather induced pest and diseases. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. ISBN: 978-93-88932-08-0.

  6. Greenacre, M., Groenen, P.J., Hastie, T., d’Enza, A.I., Markos, A. and Tuzhilina, E. (2022). Principal component analysis. Nature Reviews Methods Primers. 2(1): 100.

  7. Hong, S. Y., Dudhia, J. and Chen, S. H. (2004). A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. Monthly weather review. 132(1): 103-120.

  8. Kandakoor, S.B., Khan, H.K., Gowda, G.B., Chakravarthy, A.K., Kumar, C.A. and Venkataravana, P. (2012). The incidence and abundance of sucking insect pests on groundnut.

  9. Kessler, E. (1969). On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations. In On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society. pp. 1-84. 

  10. Mahanta, D.K., Jangra, S., Priti, Ghosh, A., Sharma, P.K., Iquebal, M.A. and Chander, S. (2022). Groundnut bud necrosis virus modulates the expression of innate immune, endocytosis and cuticle development-associated genes to circulate and propagate in its vector, Thrips palmi. Frontiers in Microbiology. 13: 773-238.

  11. Mandal, B., Jain, R.K., Krishnareddy, M., Krishna Kumar, N.K., Ravi, K.S. and Pappu, H.R. (2012). Emerging problems of tospoviruses (Bunyaviridae) and their management in the Indian subcontinent. Plant Disease. 96(4): 468-479.

  12. Mead, H.L., Kollath, D.R., Teixeira, M.D.M., Roe, C.C., Plude, C., Nandurkar, N. and Barker, B.M. (2022). Coccidioidomycosis in Northern Arizona: An Investigation of the Host, Pathogen and Environment Using a Disease Triangle Approach. Msphere. 7(5): e00352-22.

  13. Olatinwo, R.O., Prabha, T.V., Paz, J.O. and Hoogenboom, G. (2012). Predicting favorable conditions for early leaf spot of peanut using output from the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model. International Journal of Biometeorology. 56: 259-268.

  14. Reddy, B.K.K., Sadhineni, M., Johnson, M., Reddy, K., Modem, R.K., Rani, K.S. and Madhavi, G.T. (2024). Evaluation of integrated pest management module against pests of ground nut and productivity, profitability analysis under open field conditions. Legume Research-An International Journal. 47(4): 628-636. doi:10.18805/LR-5278.

  15. Riley, D.G., Joseph, S.V., Srinivasan, R. and Diffie, S. (2011). Thrips vectors of tospoviruses. Journal of Integrated Pest Management. 2(1): I1-I10.

  16. Singh, A.B. and Srivastava, S.K. (1995). Status and Control Strategy of Peanut Bud Necrosis Disease in Uttar Pradesh. In Recent studies on peanut bud necrosis disease: Proceedings of a Meeting. 20: 65-68.

  17. Sudhalakshmi, C., Rani, S., Sathyamoorthi, N.K., Meena, B., Ramanathan, S.P. and Geethalakshmi, V. (2022). Microclimate modification through groundnut-pigeon pea intercropping system and its effect on physiological responses, disease incidence and productivity. Legume Research-An International Journal. 45(9): 1122-1129. doi:10.18805/IJARe.AF-869.

  18. Suganyadevi, M., Manoranjitham, S.K., Senthil, N., Raveendran, M. and Karthikeyan, G. (2018). Prevalence of bud blight of tomato caused by groundnut bud necrosis virus in Tamil Nadu, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 7(11): 734-742.

  19. Sunkad, G., Nagoji, B. and Srinivasaraghavan, A. (2012). Survey for the incidence and sources of field resistance against peanut bud necrosis disease of groundnut in north eastern Karnataka. The Bioscan. 7(3): 387-390.

  20. Vijayalakshmi, G., Ganapathy, N. and Kennedy, J.S. (2017). Influence of weather parameters on seasonal incidence of thrips and Groundnut bud necrosis virus (GBNV) in groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 5(3): 107-110.

  21. Vijaykumar, K.N., Kulkarni, S., Kambrekar, D.N. and Shashidhar, T.R. (2024). Impact of Weather Parameters and Time of Sowing on Severity of Powdery Mildew in Cluster Bean. Legume Research-An International Journal. 1: 5. doi:10.18805/ LR-5275.

  22. Zaidi, S.M. and Gisen, J.I.A. (2018). Evaluation of Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Microphysics single moment class- 3 and class-6 in Precipitation Forecast. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences. 150: 03007. 

  23. Zayan, S.A. (2019). Impact of climate change on plant diseases and IPM strategies. In Plant Diseases-Current Threats and Management Trends. IntechOpen.

Editorial Board

View all (0)