Verification of ERWF with different microphysics
Understanding the performance differences between WRF microphysics schemes is crucial for improving weather forecasts and enhancing our ability to provide accurate advisories. The forecast usability percentage (FUP) of ERWF generated with two different microphysics options
viz., WSM3 and Kessler schemes for the period from February to May 2023 and 2024 were presented in Fig 5.
The ERWF generated with the WSM-3 scheme consistently outperformed the Kessler scheme in terms of FUP (Correct+Usable) during both 2023 and 2024 (Fig 5). Similar results were reported by
Dheebakaran et al. (2022) when examining the effects of WRF’s microphysics options on the village level medium range rainfall forecast in Tamil Nadu. In their study, WSM3 produced better forecast with higher FUP compared to Kessler, WSM5 and WSM6. Interestingly,
Zaidi and Gisen (2018) found contrasting results that WSM6 outperformed WSM3 in rainfall forecast, which might be attributed to spatial variability across different regions of study. Among the weather parameters considered, the FUP was ranked in the order of Tmax, Tmin, RH, wind speed and rainfall. Both the schemes tended to overestimate the rainfall and RH, while underestimating Tmax and Tmin. Additionally, the wind speed forecast lacked consistency. The WSM3-based ERWF usability (correct+usable) percentage was 60-100 per cent for rainfall, 80-100 per cent for Tmax, 90-100 per cent for Tmin and 100 for wind speed and RH. Comparing this study with the earlier study of
Dheebakaran et al. (2022) in Tamil Nadu with Medium Range Weather Forecast (MRWF), the accuracy of ERWF was higher. The MRWF usability was assessed for daily rainfall, while the ERWF usability calculations were made for weekly cumulative rainfall.
Relationship between weather variables, thrips and GBNV incidence
The groundnut crop was observed with silvery appearance due to thrips feeding on the epidermal cells content and symptoms observed such as necrosis, bud necrosis, chlorosis and stunted growth due to GBNV infection.
Basavaraj et al. (2017) also noted comparable symptoms.
Selected weather variables were examined for correlation between thrips, GBNV and weather parameters. The rainfall was excluded from correlation and PCA during 2024, since rain didn’t occur during that specific time frame. During 2023 (Fig 6), the thrips population showed the highest positive correlation with Tmax (0.768, significant at 0.1% (p-value<0.01)) and the GBNV incidence had the highest negative correlation with Tavg (0.879, significant at 0.1% (p-value<0.01)). Between Thrips and GBNV, there was a correlation of 0.633 (significant at 5%).
Thrips occurrences showed both positive and negative association with weather variables. Heavy downpours resulted in mechanical washing-off thrips, while light rainfall alternated with dry days supported the thrips multiplication.
Vijayalakshmi et al. (2017) also noted that the rainfall has a beneficial impact on the number of thrips at Coimbatore on groundnut.
During the year 2024 (Fig 7), the thrips population showed the highest positive correlation with Tmax (0.185, Non-significant) while the GBNV incidence had the maximum positive correlation with Tmin [(0.814, significant at 1% (p-value<0.01)]. But non-significance was observed between Thrips and GBNV (0.546). According to
Vijayalakshmi et al. (2017) the thrips population exhibited a negative association with morning and evening RH. A positive correlation with sunshine hours, rainfall, Tmax and Tmin respectively, in the
kharif and
rabi seasons. There was a positive correlation for GBNV incidence with morning RH, rainfall, SSH and evening RH, but a negative correlation with Tmin and evening RH.
The PCA diagram (Fig 8 and 9) showed that the Tmax, Tmin, Tave, RH, WS, Rainfall and Thrips count were in the order of significant influence on the GBNV, which showed the importance of weather variables on the GBNV forewarning.
Forewarning of thrips and GBNV
Population of thrips was counted individually from the four study locations and the first incidence of thrips was observed in the 10
th and 9th SMW during the years 2023 and 2024. The population of thrips reached above ETL (<=5 nos. / plant) during 12 to 16
th SMW in 2023 (5-10 nos. in top 3 leaves), while it was 5-12 in top 3 leaves during 10 to 16th SMW in 2024. Percent disease incidence (PDI) was calculated from four locations based on the GBNV symptoms. In 2023, the GBNV incidence was observed during the 11th SMW, while it was a week earlier (10
th SMW) during 2024. The PDI reached its highest during the 16
th SMW during the year 2023 (60%), whereas it was 15-16
th SMW during the year 2024 (70%) (Fig 10 and 11).
The favourable weather particularly, higher temperatures without rainy days might be the reason for early thrips infestation, long peak periods and higher number of thrips count during the year 2024, compared to 2023. Early incidence of GBNV was also observed in the study year 2024 as a result of the early occurrence of thrips. The incidence of GBNV was notably higher in 2024 than in 2023 possibly as an effect of the increased virus inoculum.
The fluctuations in the thrips population and PDI percentage were observed due to observation in random sampling and the exclusion of completely withered plants (Fig 10 and 11). According to
Vijayalakshmi et al. (2017), the incidence of GBNV observed with a mean thrips population at top bud leaves was 3.4 - 6.4 numbers per plant during
kharif and 3.2 - 7.1 numbers per plant during in
rabi.
Sunkad et al. (2012) noted that the disease incidence vacillated from 1 to 44 per cent during
kharif 2007 and it was between 1 and 84 per cent during
rabi 2007. The substantial variation in thrips populations was evident because of the increased influence of biotic and abiotic factors such as weather on these two characteristics.
Verification of forewarning
Comparison results of thrips forewarning verification (Table 2) revealed that the WRF-WSM3 scheme based forewarning performed equally well as that of observed weather-based forewarning. There were 8 matches during 2023 and 5 matches during 2024 in WRF-WSM3-based forewarning against 9 and 5 matches in observed weather-based hindcast forewarning. The WRF-Kessler scheme-based forewarning resulted with 5 match cases during both the 2023 and 2024 experiments. Similar study was done by
Olatinwo et al., (2012) employed the high-resolution WRF model to forecast favourable infection circumstances to control early leaf spots in peanuts.