The total number of demonstrations laid in the year 2021 to 2023 was 150. Improved technologies adopted as the cultivation and the crop was supervised by the scientists of KVK from time to time particularly during critical growth stages. The data (Table 3) revealed that demonstration’s yield was significantly higher than the check yield during all the three years under study. The average yield of blackgram was 10.7, 10.2 and 9.7 kg ha
-1 for the three consecutive years respectively. As compared to check yield the demo yield was 50.70, 47.83 and 59.02 per cent higher for the year 2021, 2022 and 2023 respectively. Similar findings have also been observed by
Singh et al., (2018), Devi et al., (2018) and
Tiwari et al., (2021) where results from demonstrations plots observed to be higher in black gram crop. The data indicated the positive effect of CFLD over the existing practices towards increasing the yield of blackgram. The major differences were observed between demonstration package and farmers’ practices may be due to introduction of improved seed and seed treatment, line sowing and time of sowing, fertilizer doses and method of its application and plant protection measures. It is evident from the data that yield in demo plots out-performed the farmer practice under the similar environmental conditions. Farmers were motivated by the results of demonstration and agro-technologies applied in the cluster front line demonstration. These findings are in corroboration with the finding of
Devi et al., (2018) and
Singh et al., (2018).
The technology gap, extension gap and technology index is presented in the Table 3. Technology gap is the gap between demonstration yield and potential yield and for present study was 3.3, 3.8 and 2.3 q/ha for 2021, 2022 and 2023 respectively. The reasons for technology gap may be due to the difference in soil fertility, availability of low soil moisture content, sowing time and climatic hazards
etc. The difference in agro-ecological conditions between technology evolved and technology adoption at farmer’s field also contributed to technology gap.
Location specific agro-techniques and package of practices as per agro-ecological conditions may reduce the technology gap. The Extension gap should be assigned to adoption of improved transfer of technology in demonstrations practices, resulted in higher grain yield than traditional farmer practices. The extension gap for the present study was 3.6, 3.3 and 3.6 q ha
-1 for the year 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively. The similarly observations were also obtained in Black gram crop as reported by
Mahalingam et al., (2018). There is a need to decrease this wider extension gap through latest techniques. The technology index signifies the practicability of technology at farmers¢ field. A lower technology value indicates the higher feasibility of variety among the farmers. In the present study it varies from 19.2 per cent to 27.1 per cent. Technology index is variable due to uneven and erratic rainfall and vagaries of weather conditions during study period in the area. This result is in line with the findings of
Dhaka et al., (2016), Sandhu and Dhaliwal (2016),
Gourav et al., (2023) and
Duary et al., (2024).The economics of blackgram for the three consecutive years under study has been given in Fig 1. The data indicates demonstration plots under CFLD recorded higher gross return and B:C ratio as compared to check plots. The gross return under CFLD was Rs. 93090, 93840 and 97000 per hectare for the year 2021, 2022 and 2023 respectively. Whereas in check plots the gross return was mere Rs. 49700, 49680 and 48800 per hectare for the same years under study. Similarly, the B:C ratio under CFLD plots was 2.22, 2.20 and 2.23 as compared to 1.28, 1.26 and 1.23 for the year 2021,2022 and 2023. The net returns per hectare and benefit cost ratio in demonstrated plots was higher due to of higher yield obtained under improved technologies as compared to farmer’s practices during the experimental year. The higher economic returns under CFLD plots were also documented by
Tiwari et al., 2021, Gourav et al., 2023 and
Jayaramasoundari (2024).