Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Review Article

Legume Research, volume 47 issue 6 (june 2024) : 875-883

CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing in Legume Crops: Challenges and Opportunities: A Review

Murugavelu Girija Sangari1,2, S.R. Harish Chandar1, Subramanian Mahalakshmi3, P. Latha4, Swaminathan Amutha2, Chinnaswamy Appunu1,*
1ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore-641 007, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Avinashiligam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore-641 043, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Department of Bioinformatics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore- 641 046, Tamil Nadu, India.
4Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Tirupathi-517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India.

  • Submitted13-03-2024|

  • Accepted31-05-2024|

  • First Online 12-06-2024|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5321

Cite article:- Sangari Girija Murugavelu, Chandar Harish S.R., Mahalakshmi Subramanian, Latha P., Amutha Swaminathan, Appunu Chinnaswamy (2024). CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing in Legume Crops: Challenges and Opportunities: A Review . Legume Research. 47(6): 875-883. doi: 10.18805/LR-5321.

ABSTRACT

Legumes are an important source of protein and provide a health-rich diet for human beings. It contains essential amino acids. It mainly plays a significant role in soil enrichment. Due to their role in agriculture and human nutrition, scientists have made efforts to develop new traits. The genetic enhancement of legumes was achieved using traditional breeding over the years however, the progress is very slow. Recent developments in genome editing technologies, specifically CRISPR-Cas technology, have improved key agricultural traits in legumes and offer a wealth of opportunities for studying traits like improved seed nutrient content, enhancing productivity and resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses recently introduced in legumes. So far, the genome editing technology has been effectively used in various legume crops, mainly soybean, peanut, cowpea and chickpea. Still, the transformation and regeneration of other legumes have remained a significant hurdle to the implementation of gene editing. This review mainly highlights the use of different gene editing technologies in legumes, progress and updates of CRISPR/Cas9 tools in legumes and challenges of legume crops face during production.

INTRODUCTION

By 2050, the global populace is projected to surpass 9.5 billion, so to ensure food security, the agricultural output must be boosted by 60-100%. Cereals and legumes are the two main crops cultivated worldwide to feed billions of people. Legumes belong to the Fabaceae family of angiosperms and comprise about 19,500 species in 751 genera. It consists of small herbs and large trees. Legumes are essential for sustainable agriculture as they perform an integral function in the natural ecosystem. Legumes supports with high-quality organic matter into the soil due to their symbiotic nitrogen-fixing ability and increase soil fertility (Baloglu et al., 2022). Leguminous crops are considered as the most significant due to their various uses, including animal pasture, aquaculture feed and human food. Legumes are popular for their protein content and contain health-promoting chemicals, including lignans, folate, saponins and antioxidants (Mousavi Derazmahalleh et al., 2019). Legumes can effectively solve the issues related to nutrient deficiency. Nevertheless, global legume production is not up to the mark and various biotic and abiotic stresses heavily influence the yields (Choudhury and Rajam, 2021).
       
Advanced molecular techniques have supplanted conventional plant breeding methods, which are time-consuming and expensive, to tackle the global food shortage. It takes years to establish specific crop traits, while genetic engineering, which involves introducing foreign genetic material, creates social biosafety issues. Hence, due to the rise of advanced molecular techniques such as genome editing, the focus of targeted crop improvement has shifted towards a new path (Rasheed et al., 2022). The availability of complete genome sequence of organisms substantially contributes to the advancement of next-generation genome editing research. New-generation genome-editing experiments are more common in legumes, namely Lotus japonicus, Glycine max and Medicago truncatula, than in other family members (Baloglu et al., 2022).
       
Gene editing is an emerging process to generate precise DNA modifications at specific genomic locations. The precise gene edits can be achieved via gene editing technologies such as Transcription activator like effector nucleases (TALENs), Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and CRISPR/Cas systems. While other gene editing technologies still have their role, the emergence of CRISPR/Cas systems has significantly improved the accuracy and effectiveness of editing (Karavolias et al., 2021). In legumes, the CRISPR/Cas9 technology was first demonstrated in Soybean (Glycine max) (Wang et al., 2017). This review, primarily focus on the application of gene editing technology in legumes and the challenges of legume production.
 
Modifying the genome of legumes using genome editing technologies
 
In recent years, genome editing technologies have reformed nearly every domain of biological research fields, expanding the scope of agricultural studies. These technologies enable the creation of novel plant varieties by introducing precise mutations that modify or deactivate target gene functions. With the progression of these technologies, there has been a rise in the amount of legume genomes that have been sequenced. Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and CRISPR stand out as highly advanced tools for precise genome editing (Wang et al., 2017). At present, CRISPR genome-editing technique is being employed to address challenges in agriculture, aiming to meet the growing demand for food in the future.
       
Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) is an initially established genome editing tool that revolutionizes genome manipulation research. Its functionality is quite similar to TALEN. ZFN has two components: the DNA binding domain (housing custom-engineered Cys2-His2 (C2H2) zinc finger protein) to spot specific DNA sequences and the DNA cleavage domain (containing the Fok1 restriction enzyme) to cut the target DNA site (Urnov et al., 2005). These two domains are linked to make the ZFN functional. This DNA binding domain consists of 2 to 3 zinc finger domains, each recognising one amino acid, i.e., 3 DNA bases. ZFN is used to either knockin or knockout the gene of interest (Daniel et al., 2023). Two FokI endonuclease domains must dimerize to become active; dimerization of FokI nuclease generates a functional nuclease complex that results in double-strand breaks (DSBs). The resulting double-stranded breaks can be repaired either by homologous recombination (HR) or nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). ZFN is a complex process that might lead to off-target effects and unexpected mutations. Despite the availability of kits, producing ZFNs is still more time-consuming and less adaptable than TALENs or the CRISPR/Cas system due to target sequence suitability constraints (Puchta and Fauser, 2014). In legume plants, targeted mutagenesis was performed targeting the soybean genes DICER-LIKE (DCL) genes - DCL4a and DCL4b which underwent successful knockout by utilising both hairy root and stable Agrobacterium-mediated transformation methods to deliver ZFNs (Curtin et al., 2011).
       
Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) is also a genome editing tool similar to ZFNs. Like ZFNs, TALEN is also formed by combining the DNA binding domain of TALE protein repeats with the cleavage domain of FokI nuclease. The DNA binding domain comprises multiple repeats; however, unlike ZFNs, each DNA binding domain recognizes just one nucleotide (Christian et al., 2010). Their adherence to the target sites triggers the dimerization of the FokI nuclease domains, forming a functional complex that induces double-strand breaks (DSBs) at the designated site (Cermak et al., 2011). Currently, there are limited studies on the use of TALENs in soybeans and no advancements have been documented with other legumes. In Soybean, TALENs were employed to knock out two genes, FAD2-1A and FAD2-1B, influencing soybean oil quality. Challenges such as the complexity of creating DNA-binding modules, ineffective genome targeting and frequent off-target consequences have considerably limited the application of TALENs in legume research (Haun et al., 2014).
       
“Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)” is an advanced genome editing method to alter the crop genome to improve its traits suitable for changing environmental conditions (Fig 1). It is an adaptive immune system of prokaryotes that helps to recognize and destroy the invading phages and pathogens (Bao et al., 2020). It has been grouped into two classes depending on the organization of Cas effector module - Class I and Class II. Class I consists of type I, type III and type IV subunits, whereas Class II comprises type II, type V and type VI subunits. Among these various types, the CRISPR-Cas9 belonging to type II is an extensively used genome editing tool owing to its simplicity. CRISPR-Cas process mainly uses 2 key molecules, a Cas9 an endonuclease and a guide RNA (gRNA) to guide the Cas9 enzyme to cleave the target DNA for precise editing. Cas9 includes 2 nuclease domains, HNH and RuvC, to cleave the complementary and non-complementary target DNA strands. The Cas9 requires the presence of a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) sequence that helps the Cas9 recognize the target site. PAM sequence varies according to the Cas protein; in case of Cas 9 it is 5'-NGG-3'. The Cas9 protein is obtained from Streptocococcus pyogenes. The guide RNA is made up of a crRNA (CRISPR RNA) that attaches to the target sequences and tracrRNA (transactivating RNA) that promotes target detection and cleavage (Deltcheva et al., 2011). The Cas9 makes a double-stranded break (DSB) at that specific location which can be mended by the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway or homology-directed repair (HDR). Plants mostly repair double-strand breaks (DSBs) using the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) mechanism (Jinek et al., 2012). This route is error-prone, which typically result in base insertion or deletion. As a result, genomic changes happen at the repair site (Ahmar et al., 2020).
 

Fig 1: Genome editing for enhancement of yield and its attributing traits.


       
CRISPR-mediated gene editing has successfully modified a variety of legumes (Table 1). It has increased crop output and resilience to both biotic and abiotic challenges. Extensive research has been undertaken on the domestication of legume species and the CRISPR/Cas9 mechanism is currently being used to improve different features. Recent breakthroughs demonstrate great success in enhancing the nutritional value of legumes using CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Das and Acharjee, 2023).
 

Table 1: Traits targeted using gene-editing techniques in various legume crops.


 
Challenges in major legumes and minor legumes
 
Generally, legumes face numerous challenges during cultivation and production, including socio-economic, genetic, biotic and abiotic factors. These constraints reduce yield, ultimately limiting farmers from cultivating it in more areas (Govindaraj et al., 2015). Legumes are classified into 2 types: major and minor, depending on their value and low-cost. Major legumes are commonly used and widely recognized. These legumes possess established domestication, cultivation and agronomic practices. The major legumes include Glycine max L., Vigna unguiculata L., Arachis hypogaea L., Phaseolus vulgaris L., Pisum sativum L. and Cicer arietinum L. However, minor legumes are not popular as they are less well-known and are regarded as underutilized. The minor legumes include Psophocarpus tetragonolobus L., Cajanus cajan L., Lablab purpureus L., Phaseolus lunatus L., Canavalia sp., Vigna mungo L., Vigna subterranea L., Tylosema esculentum L., Kerstingiella geocarpa, African yam bean, Sphenostylis stenocarpa Harms and Vigna angularies L. (Popoola et al., 2019).
       
Arachis hypogaea (Peanut), an allotetraploid is one of the important promising legume crops. Originating in South America, it is now cultivated throughout the temperate and tropical regions of the world. It is rich in high oleic acid content and is globally recognized as an important oilseed crop because of its oil content, nutritional value and other industrial uses. It covers a vast expanse of 32.72 million hectares (M ha) with a 1648 kg/hectare productivity rate. The world’s major peanut producers are China, India and Nigeria. China, producing 18.36 million tons (MT), is the world’s leading peanut producer. Despite all, the peanut faces numerous challenges in yield and quality because of various biotic and abiotic stresses (You et al., 2024). Common fungal pathogens include Botrytis cinerea, Macrophomina phaseolina, Cylindrocladium crotalariae, Cetcospora arachidicola and Puccinia arachidis, which causes rot, spot and rust diseases in peanut crops. Viral diseases that affect peanut production include Peanut Bud Necrosis Virus (PBNV), Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) and Peanut Stunt Virus (PSV) (Palekar et al., 2023). A significant global challenge in peanut cultivation is aflatoxin (AFs) contamination, posing considerable concern due to the toxicological effects of these toxins. High doses of aflatoxin consumption may lead to mortality (Torres et al., 2014). Hence CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing tool can be used to develop varieties resistant to these diseases which will have an impact on the global peanut industry. Apart from this, climate change is also a main challenge that causes severe effects in groundnut yield. Increased CO2 level, unreliable rainfall and temperature fluctuations inhibit the physiology, disease tolerance, yield and fertility. To overcome these threats, it is essential to develop climate-resistant varieties with stable genetic enhancements (Gangurde et al., 2019; Ghosh et al., 2022; Puppala et al., 2023). Peanut breeding was challenging in ancient times due to its polyploid genome. However, recent advances in molecular techniques, leveraging the peanut genome, have illuminated successful strategies for its genetic improvement (Sharma et al., 2023; Sun et al., 2013).
       
Glycine max (Soybean) holds significant economic value as it contains abundant protein and oil sources for both animal and human feed (Li et al., 2019). The challenges like inefficient farming systems, pests, diseases, environmental stresses like drought and lack of disease-resistant cultivars hinder soybean production. Diseases like bacterial leaf blight, downy mildew, stem and root blight, purple seed stain, brown spot, charcoal rot and soybean mosaic virus are the common familiar diseases that affect the soybean (Ayilara et al., 2023). Soybean rust, caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi, is a most significant foliar disease worldwide. So proper control measures can make the plant survive under these adverse conditions (Nair et al., 2023). Implementing modern breeding technologies that are quick, accurate and effective is vital for obtaining varieties with good yields, quality and stress tolerance, thereby addressing agricultural challenges. Genome editing technology is a suitable and relevant method for specifically improving cultivating crops with these desirable features, making it an ideal tool for genetic improvement in soybeans. The precise modifications enabled by genome editing enhance soybean traits, ensuring better agricultural outcomes (Bao et al., 2020).
       
Vigna unguiculata (Cowpea) is a widely cultivated legume crop possesses rich nutritional benefits and is also recognised as a black-eyed pea. It was first domesticated in Africa and about 200 million people consume it in Africa. It is consumed by many people in Africa, Asia and America as a daily diet. Due to its ability for symbiotic nitrogen fixation and valuable agronomic characteristics, including resilience to limited rainfall and minimal fertilizer needs, it is regarded as the most valuable legume crop in the world. These factors have led to the attention of cowpea gene-editing techniques (Ji et al., 2019; Rasheed et al., 2022). Until 1967, the United States was one of the world’s top 10 producers of cowpea. With the expected growth in the minority population of the United States of about 47% in 2050, the consumption of cowpea is projected to increase substantially. Like other crops, cowpea productivity faces significant challenges from pests and diseases. Root-knot nematode (RKN) poses a significant threat to cowpea production in the U.S. by causing substantial damage to its root system and resulting in yield loss. Various commercial cowpea cultivars resistant to these specific RKN species have been created. Nonetheless, certain nematode populations are RK-virulent, rendering the narrow genetic resistance the RK genes provide ineffective against them (Osipitan et al., 2021). Weeds are considered one of the most serious threats to cowpea cultivation, which causes up to 76 % yield loss. Leveraging advanced technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9, endeavours have been undertaken to create varieties exhibiting resistance to herbicide, insects and diseases, significant impediments to cowpea production (Osipitan, 2017).
       
Cicer arietinum (Chickpea) is an essential legume crop cultivated worldwide. Its genome sequence has been published in 2013 (Badhan et al., 2021). It is very sensitive to saline conditions to just 25 mM NaCl in hydroponics, resulting in yield loss of about 8 to 10%. However, it remains unclear why chickpeas are particularly prone to salt sensitivity. During seed germination, some chickpeas are more resistant to 320 mM NaCl. The reason for this dissimilarity also remains unclear. So, genome editing techniques can be used to generate plants that are tolerant to saline conditions (Sobh et al., 2023). The CRISPR-Cas9 system has the capacity to enhance yield potential even when plants are under biotic and abiotic stress, leading to the development of plants with the necessary traits.
 
Challenges and opportunities in legume for genetic improvement
 
Legumes pose challenges for genetic transformation due to tissue-specific transformability and regeneration issues. Challenges in confident detection include diverse mutations induced by gene-editing proteins and target organism complexities like homolog multiplicity. Legume regeneration limitations may require screening numerous lines or tissues, demanding cost-effective and sensitive methods. While economically important legume genomes are typically not recent polyploids, gene duplications are common in this clade. Reliable interpretation of detection experiments benefits from high-quality genome assemblies, especially for assessing off-target effects (Bhowmik et al., 2021).
       
CRISPR/Cas9 technology presents a promising avenue for revolutionizing plant breeding by streamlining processes and reducing labour-intensive tasks compared to traditional methods. However, despite its potential, several challenges hinder its widespread application in plant genome editing. Major challenges in improvement of some of the legumes are given in Table 2. One such challenge involves the editing of plant organelle genomes, where precise modifications are often complex due to their unique genetic features. Additionally, ensuring transgene-free editing remains a priority for regulatory and consumer acceptance, posing technical hurdles in achieving heritable genome modifications without foreign DNA integration. Another frontier is virus-induced genome editing, where leveraging viral vectors for delivery holds promise but requires meticulous control to avoid unintended consequences. Furthermore, editing recalcitrant elite crop inbred lines, which are crucial for agricultural productivity, presents significant obstacles due to their genetic complexity and limited regeneration capacity. Addressing these challenges demands continued innovation in CRISPR/Cas9 technology and strategic collaborations across disciplines to unlock its full potential in shaping the future of plant genetic improvement (Son and Park, 2022).
 

Table 2: Major challenges of few legume crops.


       
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is predominantly used, with biolistic methods employed in plant regeneration (Yadav et al., 2017). CRISPR/Cas9 offers promise in overcoming transformation hurdles. Soybean stands out with successful CRISPR/Cas9 applications, yielding 41 cultivars (Bhowmik et al., 2021). Large-seeded legumes face rooting challenges in vitro. Stable regeneration protocols are crucial for commercial production, yet many legumes lack successful protocols due to poor rooting (Deng et al., 2022). Genetically Modified Organisms resistance hinders transformation acceptance, especially in smaller markets (Negi et al., 2021). Techniques like sonication-assisted Agrobacterium transformation enhance transformation efficiency. Optimizing explants, host-plant affinity and culture media additives can improve transformation rates. Molecular science advancements will uncover solutions for legume transformation challenges (Rasheed et al., 2022).
       
Legume research benefits from a wealth of genetic resources but grapples with the challenges of managing their diversity and complexity. A workshop identified key needs: developing strategies for storing and integrating genetic resources, standardizing data formats and metadata, recognizing the critical role of curators, implementing standardized software practices, creating tools for global plant genetic information management and centralizing database information while supporting training and outreach efforts (Bauchet et al., 2019).

CONCLUSION

Legumes are significant in the human diet as they contain several nutritional values. Legume production is affected by numerous factors, namely biotic and abiotic stresses like drought, salinity, temperature and heavy metals stress. However, the need for agricultural improvement, driven by rapid climate change and population increase, highlights the importance of thinking beyond the box. Though transgenic technology is used to create plants that are tolerant to several stresses, due to numerous regulatory concerns, commercial success is very low across the world. The emergence of genome editing tools such as ZFNs, TALENS and CRISPR/Cas allows for the rapid production of site-specific alterations in the genetic makeup of plants. For efficient genome editing, thorough knowledge of legumes genomic sequences is essential. The discovery of genes that regulate various traits in legumes, such as seed size, quality, disease resistance and ability to withstand abiotic stresses, enables the development of new and unique varieties in the future. We conclude that further research is needed on the application of CRISPR/Cas9 in legume crops to unravel successful genetic transformation. Numerous legume crops remain unexplored for effective gene editing and studies should address the challenges and difficulties associated with legume transformation. The future is likely to witness an increased use of CRISPR/Cas9, providing additional insights into the genetic enhancement of legume crops to ensure global food security.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES


  1. Ahmar, S., Saeed, S., Khan, M.H.U., Ullah Khan, S., Mora-Poblete, F., Kamran, M., Faheem, A., Maqsood, A., Rauf, M., Saleem, S. and Hong, W.J. (2020). A revolution toward gene-editing technology and its application to crop improvement. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 21(16): 5665.

  2. Akamatsu, A., Nagae, M., Nishimura, Y., Romero Montero, D., Ninomiya, S., Kojima, M., Takebayashi, Y., Sakakibara, H., Kawaguchi, M. and Takeda, N. (2021). Endogenous gibberellins affect root nodule symbiosis via transcriptional regulation of NODULE INCEPTION in Lotus japonicus. The Plant Journal. 105(6): 1507-1520.

  3. Al Amin, N., Ahmad, N., Wu, N., Pu, X., Ma, T., Du, Y., Bo, X., Wang, N., Sharif, R. and Wang, P. (2019). CRISPR-Cas9 mediated targeted disruption of FAD2-2 microsomal omega-6 desaturase in soybean (Glycine max. L). BMC Biotechnology. 19(1): 1-10

  4. Ayilara, M.S., Adeleke, B.S. and Babalola, O.O. (2023). Bioprospecting and challenges of plant microbiome research for sustainable agriculture: A review on soybean endophytic bacteria. Microbial Ecology. 85(3):1113-1135.

  5. Badhan, S., Ball, A.S. and Mantri, N. (2021). First report of CRISPR/ Cas9 mediated DNA-free editing of 4CL and RVE7 genes in chickpea protoplasts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22(1): 396.

  6. Baloglu, M.C., Celik Altunoglu, Y., Baloglu, P., Yildiz, A.B., Turkolmez, N. and Ozden Ciftci, Y. (2022). Gene-editing technologies and applications in legumes: Progress, evolution and future prospects. Frontiers in Genetics. 13: 859437.

  7. Bao, A., Chen, H., Chen, L., Chen, S., Hao, Q., Guo, W., Qiu, D., Shan, Z., Yang, Z., Yuan, S. and Zhang, C. (2019). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmSPL9 genes alters plant architecture in soybean. BMC Plant Biology. 19(1): 1-12.

  8. Bao, A., Zhang, C., Huang, Y., Chen, H., Zhou, X. and Cao, D. (2020). Genome editing technology and application in soybean improvement. Oil Crop Science. 5(1): 31-40. 

  9. Bauchet, G.J., Bett, K.E., Cameron, C.T., Campbell, J.D., Cannon, E.K., Cannon, S.B., Carlson, J.W., Chan, A., Cleary, A., Close, T.J. and Cook, D.R. (2019). The future of legume genetic data resources: Challenges, opportunities and priorities. Legume Science. 1(1): e16.

  10. Bhowmik, P., Konkin, D., Polowick, P., Hodgins, C.L., Subedi, M., Xiang, D., Yu, B., Patterson, N., Rajagopalan, N., Babic, V. and Ro, D.K. (2021). CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in legume crops: Opportunities and challenges. Legume Science. 3(3): e96.

  11. Bhowmik, P., Yan, W., Hodgins, C., Polley, B., Warkentin, T., Nickerson, M., Ro, D.K., Marsolais, F., Domoney, C., Shariati-Ievari, S. and Aliani, M. (2023). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated lipoxygenase gene-editing in yellow pea leads to major changes in fatty acid and flavor profiles. Frontiers in Plant Science. 14: 1246905.

  12. Biswas, S., Wahl, N.J., Thomson, M.J., Cason, J.M., McCutchen, B.F. and Septiningsih, E.M. (2022). Optimization of protoplast isolation and transformation for a pilot study of genome editing in peanut by targeting the allergen gene Ara h 2. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 23(2): 837.

  13. Bottero, E., Massa, G., Gonzalez, M., Stritzler, M., Tajima, H., Gomez, C., Frare, R., Feingold, S., Blumwald, E., Ayub, N. and Soto, G. (2021). Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in alfalfa using a public germplasm. Frontiers in Agronomy. 3: 661526.

  14. Braatz, J., Harloff, H.J., Mascher, M., Stein, N., Himmelbach, A. and Jung, C. (2017). CRISPR-Cas9 targeted mutagenesis leads to simultaneous modification of different homoeologous gene copies in polyploid oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Plant Physiology. 174(2): 935-942.

  15. Bridgeland, A., Biswas, S., Tsakirpaloglou, N., Thomson, M.J. and Septiningsih, E.M. (2023). Optimization of gene editing in cowpea through protoplast transformation and agroinfiltration by targeting the phytoene desaturase gene. Plos One. 18(4): e0283837.

  16. Cai, K., Yin, J., Chao, H., Ren, Y., Jin, L., Cao, Y., Duanmu, D. and Zhang, Z. (2018a). A C3HC4 type RING finger protein regulates rhizobial infection and nodule organogenesis in Lotus japonicus. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 60(9): 878-896.

  17. Cai, Y., Chen, L., Liu, X., Guo, C., Sun, S., Wu, C., Jiang, B., Han, T. and Hou, W. (2018b). CRISPR/Cas9 mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmFT2a delays flowering time in soya bean. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 16(1): 176-185.

  18. Cai, Y., Chen, L., Liu, X., Sun, S., Wu, C., Jiang, B., Han, T. and Hou, W. (2015). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in soybean hairy roots. PLoS One. 10(8): e0136064.

  19. Cermak, T., Doyle, E.L., Christian, M., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Schmidt, C., Baller, J.A., Somia, N.V., Bogdanove, A.J. and Voytas, D.F. (2011). Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting. Nucleic Acids Research. 39(12): e82-e82.

  20. Choudhury, A. and Rajam, M.V. (2021). Genetic transformation of legumes: An update. Plant Cell Reports. 40: 1813-1830.

  21. Christian, M., Cermak, T., Doyle, E.L., Schmidt, C., Zhang, F., Hummel, A., Bogdanove, A.J. and Voytas, D.F. (2010). Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics. 186(2): 757-761.

  22. Confalonieri, M., Carelli, M., Gianoglio, S., Moglia, A., Biazzi, E. and Tava, A. (2021). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of CYP93E2 modulates the triterpene saponin biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12: 690231.

  23. Curtin, S.J., Tiffin, P., Guhlin, J., Trujillo, D.I., Burghardt, L.T., Atkins, P., Baltes, N.J., Denny, R., Voytas, D.F., Stupar, R.M. and Young, N.D. (2017). Validating genome-wide association candidates controlling quantitative variation in nodulation. Plant Physiology. 173(2): 921-931.

  24. Curtin, S.J., Zhang, F., Sander, J.D., Haun, W.J., Starker, C., Baltes, N.J., Reyon, D., Dahlborg, E.J., Goodwin, M.J., Coffman, A.P. and Dobbs, D. (2011). Targeted mutagenesis of duplicated genes in soybean with zinc-finger nucleases. Plant Physiology. 156(2): 466-473.

  25. Daniel, M.A., Sebastin, R., Yu, J.K., Soosaimanickam, M.P. and Chung, J.W. (2023). Enhancing horticultural crops through genome editing: Applications, benefits and considerations. Horticulturae. 9(8): 884. 

  26. Das, D. and Acharjee, S. (2023). Application of CRISPR/Cas- Mediated Genome Editing Techniques in Leguminous Crops. A Roadmap for Plant Genome Editing. 247-258.

  27. Deltcheva, E., Chylinski, K., Sharma, C.M., Gonzales, K., Chao, Y., Pirzada, Z.A., Eckert, M.R., Vogel, J. and Charpentier, E. (2011). CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature. 471(7340): 602-607. 

  28. Deng, F., Zeng, F., Shen, Q., Abbas, A., Cheng, J., Jiang, W., Chen, G., Shah, A.N., Holford, P., Tanveer, M. and Zhang, D. (2022). Molecular evolution and functional modification of plant miRNAs with CRISPR. Trends in Plant Science. 27(9): 890-907.

  29. Du, H., Zeng, X., Zhao, M., Cui, X., Wang, Q., Yang, H., Cheng, H. and Yu, D. (2016). Efficient targeted mutagenesis in soybean by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9. Journal of Biotechnology. 217: 90-97.

  30. Feng, Y., Wu, P., Liu, C., Peng, L., Wang, T., Wang, C., Tan, Q., Li, B., Ou, Y., Zhu, H. and Yuan, S. (2021). Suppression of LjBAK1-mediated immunity by SymRK promotes rhizobial infection in Lotus japonicus. Molecular Plant. 14(11): 1935-1950.

  31. Freitas-Alves, N.S., Moreira-Pinto, C.E., Arraes, F.B., Costa, L.S.D.L., de Abreu, R.A., Moreira, V.J., Lourenco-Tessutti, I.T., Pinheiro, D.H., Lisei-de-Sa, M.E., Paes-de-Melo, B. and Pereira, B.M. (2024). An ex vitro hairy root system from petioles of detached soybean leaves for in planta screening of target genes and CRISPR strategies associated with nematode bioassays. Planta. 259(1): 23.

  32. Gangurde, S.S., Kumar, R., Pandey, A.K., Burow, M., Laza, H.E., Nayak, S.N., Guo, B., Liao, B., Bhat, R.S., Madhuri, N. and Hemalatha, S. (2019). Climate-smart groundnuts for achieving high productivity and improved quality: Current status, challenges and opportunities. Genomic Designing of Climate-Smart Oilseed Crops. 133-172.

  33. Ghosh, S., Mahadevaiah, S.S., Gowda, S.A., Gangurde, S.S., Jadhav, M.P., Hake, A.A., Latha, P., Anitha, T., Chimmad, V.P., Mirajkar, K.K. and Sharma, V. (2022). Genetic mapping of drought tolerance traits phenotyped under varying drought stress environments in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica. 218(12): 168.

  34. Govindaraj, M., Vetriventhan, M. and Srinivasan, M. (2015). Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: an overview of its analytical perspectives. Genetics Research International. 2015.

  35. Haun, W., Coffman, A., Clasen, B.M., Demorest, Z.L., Lowy, A., Ray, E., Retterath, A., Stoddard, T., Juillerat, A., Cedrone, F. and Mathis, L. (2014). Improved soybean oil quality by targeted mutagenesis of the fatty acid desaturase 2 gene family. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 12(7): 934-940. 

  36. Jacobs, T.B., LaFayette, P.R., Schmitz, R.J. and Parrott, W.A. (2015). Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Biotechnology. 15: 1-10.

  37. Ji, J., Zhang, C., Sun, Z., Wang, L., Duanmu, D. and Fan, Q. (2019). Genome editing in cowpea Vigna unguiculata using CRISPR-Cas9. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 20(10): 2471.

  38. Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A. and Charpentier, E. (2012). A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 337(6096): 816-821.

  39. Juranic, M., Nagahatenna, D.S., Salinas-Gamboa, R., Hand, M.L., Sanchez-Leon, N., Leong, W.H., How, T., Bazanova, N., Spriggs, A., Vielle-Calzada, J.P. and Koltunow, A.M. (2020). A detached leaf assay for testing transient gene expression and gene editing in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Plant Methods. 16(1): 1-17.

  40. Karavolias, N.G., Horner, W., Abugu, M.N. and Evanega, S.N. (2021). Application of gene editing for climate change in agriculture. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 5: 685801.

  41. Kim, M.C. and Jun, T.H. (2022). Gene Editing for Major Allergy Genes using Multiplex CRISPR-Cas9 System and Prime Editing in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Proceedings of the Korean Society of Crop Science Conference. 200- 200. 

  42. Li, C., Li, Y.H., Li, Y., Lu, H., Hong, H., Tian, Y., Li, H., Zhao, T., Zhou, X., Liu, J. and Zhou, X. (2020). A domestication- associated gene GmPRR3b regulates the circadian clock and flowering time in soybean. Molecular Plant. 13(5): 745-759.

  43. Li, C., Nguyen, V., Liu, J., Fu, W., Chen, C., Yu, K. and Cui, Y. (2019). Mutagenesis of seed storage protein genes in soybean using CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Research Notes. 12: 1-7.

  44. Li, Y.F., Zhang, L., Wang, J., Wang, X., Guo, S., Xu, Z.J., Li, D., Liu, Z., Li, Y.H., Liu, B. and Qiu, L.J. (2023). Flowering time regulator qFT13 3 involved in soybean adaptation to high latitudes. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 22(5): 1164–1176.

  45. Li, Z., Cheng, Q., Gan, Z., Hou, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Li, H., Nan, H., Yang, C., Chen, L. and Lu, S. (2021). Multiplex CRISPR/ Cas9-mediated knockout of soybean LNK2 advances flowering time. The Crop Journal. 9(4): 767-776.

  46. Liu, Y., Du, Z., Lin, S., Li, H., Lu, S., Guo, L. and Tang, S. (2022). CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of BnaFAE1 genes confers low-erucic acid in Brassica napus. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13: 848723. 

  47. Meng, Y., Hou, Y., Wang, H., Ji, R., Liu, B., Wen, J., Niu, L. and Lin, H. (2017). Targeted mutagenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 system in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell Reports. 36: 371-374.

  48. Michno, J.M., Wang, X., Liu, J., Curtin, S.J., Kono, T.J. and Stupar, R.M. (2015). CRISPR/Cas mutagenesis of soybean and Medicago truncatula using a new web-tool and a modified Cas9 enzyme. GM Crops and Food. 6(4): 243-252.

  49. Mousavi Derazmahalleh, M., Bayer, P.E., Hane, J.K., Valliyodan, B., Nguyen, H.T., Nelson, M.N., Erskine, W., Varshney, R.K., Papa, R. and Edwards, D. (2019). Adapting legume crops to climate change using genomic approaches. Plant, Cell and Environment. 42(1): 6-19.

  50. Nair, R.M., Boddepalli, V.N., Yan, M.R., Kumar, V., Gill, B., Pan, R.S., Wang,C., Hartman, G.L., Silva e Souza, R. and Somta, P. (2023). Global status of vegetable soybean. Plants. 12(3): 609.

  51. Neelakandan, A.K., Wright, D.A., Traore, S.M., Chen, X., Spalding, M.H. and He, G. (2022). CRISPR/Cas9 based site- specific modification of FAD2 cis-regulatory motifs in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Frontiers in Genetics. 13: 849961. 

  52. Negi, J., Rathinam, M., Sreevathsa, R. and Kumar, P.A. (2021). Transgenic Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L). Millsp.]. Genetically Modified Crops: Current Status, Prospects and Challenges. 1: 79-96.

  53. Okuma, N., Soyano, T., Suzaki, T. and Kawaguchi, M. (2020). MIR2111-5 locus and shoot-accumulated mature miR2111 systemically enhance nodulation depending on HAR1 in Lotus japonicus. Nature Communications. 11(1): 5192.

  54. Okuzaki, A., Ogawa, T., Koizuka, C., Kaneko, K., Inaba, M., Imamura, J. and Koizuka, N. (2018). CRISPR/Cas9- mediated genome editing of the fatty acid desaturase 2 gene in Brassica napus. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 131: 63-69.

  55. Osipitan, O.A. (2017). Weed interference and control in cowpea production: A review. Journal of Agricultural Science. 9(12): 11-20.

  56. Osipitan, O.A., Fields, J.S., Lo, S. and Cuvaca, I. (2021). Production systems and prospects of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] in the United States. Agronomy. 11(11): 2312.

  57. Palekar, S., Dhavale, M., Girish, N., Wagh, N. and Lakkakula, J. (2023). Mutagenesis: A Useful Tool for the Genetic Improvement of the Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Biotechnologies and Genetics in Plant Mutation Breeding: Mechanisms for Genetic Manipulation of Plants and Plant Mutants. 3: 26.

  58. Popoola, J., Ojuederie, O., Omonhinmin, C. and Adegbite, A. (2019). Neglected and underutilized legume crops: Improvement and future prospects. Recent Advances in Grain Crops Research. IntechOpen.

  59. Puchta, H. and Fauser, F. (2014). Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: Prospects for a bright future. The Plant Journal. 78(5): 727-741.

  60. Puppala, N., Nayak, S.N., Sanz-Saez, A., Chen, C., Devi, M.J., Nivedita, N., Bao, Y., He, G., Traore, S.M., Wright, D.A. and Pandey, M.K. (2023). Sustaining yield and nutritional quality of peanuts in harsh environments: Physiological and molecular basis of drought and heat stress tolerance. Frontiers in Genetics. 14: 1121462.

  61. Rasheed, A., Barqawi, A.A., Mahmood, A., Nawaz, M., Shah, A.N., Bay, D.H., Alahdal, M.A., Hassan, M.U. and Qari, S.H. (2022). CRISPR/Cas9 is a powerful tool for precise genome editing of legume crops: A review. Molecular Biology Reports. 49(6): 5595-5609.

  62. Rodas, A.L., Roque, E., Hamza, R., Gomez Mena, C., Minguet, E.G., Wen, J., Mysore, K.S., Beltran, J.P. and Canas, L.A. (2021). MtSUPERMAN plays a key role in compound inflorescence and flower development in Medicago truncatula. The Plant Journal. 105(3): 816-830.

  63. Sharma, V., Gangurde, S.S., Nayak, S.N., Gowda, A.S., Sukanth, B.S., Mahadevaiah, S.S., Manohar, S.S., Choudhary, R.S., Anitha, T., Malavalli, S.S. and Srikanth, S.N. (2023). Genetic mapping identified three hotspot genomic regions and candidate genes controlling heat tolerance-related traits in groundnut. Frontiers in Plant Science. 14: 1182867.

  64. Shu, H., Luo, Z., Peng, Z. and Wang, J. (2020). The application of CRISPR/Cas9 in hairy roots to explore the functions of AhNFR1 and AhNFR5 genes during peanut nodulation. BMC Plant Biology. 20(1): 1-15.

  65. Sobh, M., Zargar, T.B., Basal, O. and Veres, S. (2023). Evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in response to salinity stress. Acta Agraria Debreceniensis. (1): 105-110.

  66. Son, S. and Park, S.R. (2022). Challenges facing CRISPR/Cas9- based genome editing in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13: 902413.

  67. Sun, L., Hu, R., Shen, G. and Zhang, H. (2013). Genetic engineering peanut for higher drought-and salt-tolerance. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 4(6A): 7 pages. DOI: 10.4236/fns. 2013.46A001

  68. Sun, Q., Lin, L., Liu, D., Wu, D., Fang, Y., Wu, J. and Wang, Y. (2018). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing of the BnWRKY11 and BnWRKY70 genes in Brassica napus L. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 19(9): 2716.

  69. Suzuki, H., Fukushima, E.O., Shimizu, Y., Seki, H., Fujisawa, Y., Ishimoto, M., Osakabe, K., Osakabe, Y. and Muranaka, T. (2019). Lotus japonicus triterpenoid profile and characterization of the CYP716A51 and LjCYP93E1 genes involved in their biosynthesis in planta. Plant and Cell Physiology. 60(11): 2496-2509.

  70. Torres, A.M., Barros, G.G., Palacios, S.A., Chulze, S.N. and Battilani, P. (2014). Review on pre-and post-harvest management of peanuts to minimize aflatoxin contamination. Food Research International. 62: 11-19.

  71. Trujillo, D.I., Silverstein, K.A. and Young, N.D. (2019). Nodule specific PLAT domain proteins are expanded in the Medicago lineage and required for nodulation. New Phytologist. 222(3): 1538-1550.

  72. Urnov, F.D., Miller, J.C., Lee, Y.L., Beausejour, C.M., Rock, J.M., Augustus, S., Jamieson, A.C., Porteus, M.H., Gregory, P.D. and Holmes, M.C. (2005). Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nature. 435(7042): 646-651.

  73. Wang, J., Kuang, H., Zhang, Z., Yang, Y., Yan, L., Zhang, M., Song, S. and Guan, Y. (2020). Generation of seed lipoxygenase- free soybean using CRISPR-Cas9. The Crop Journal. 8(3): 432-439.                                                                                     

  74. Wang, J., Wang, X.F., Yang, W.C. and Li, H.J. (2023). Loss of function of CENH3 causes genome instability in soybean. Seed Biology. 2(1).

  75. Wang, L., Liang, J., Zhou, Y., Tian, T., Zhang, B. and Duanmu, D. (2021). Molecular characterization of carbonic anhydrase genes in Lotus japonicus and their potential roles in symbiotic nitrogen fixation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22(15): 7766.

  76. Wang, L., Rubio, M.C., Xin, X., Zhang, B., Fan, Q., Wang, Q., Ning, G., Becana, M. and Duanmu, D. (2019). CRISPR/ Cas9 knockout of leghemoglobin genes in Lotus japonicus uncovers their synergistic roles in symbiotic nitrogen fixation. New Phytologist. 224(2): 818-832.

  77. Wang, L., Wang, L., Zhou, Y. and Duanmu, D. (2017). Use of CRISPR/Cas9 for symbiotic nitrogen fixation research in legumes. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science. 149: 187-213. 

  78. Yadav, R., Mehrotra, M., Singh, A.K., Niranjan, A., Singh, R., Sanyal, I., Lehri, A., Pande, V. and Amla, D.V. (2017). Improvement in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by the inhibition of polyphenolics released during wounding of cotyledonary node explants. Protoplasma. 254: 253-269.

  79. You, Y., Liao, J., He, Z., Khurshid, M., Wang, C., Zhang, Z., Mao, J. and Xia, Y. (2024). Effects of Peanut Rust Disease (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) on Agricultural Production: Current Control Strategies and Progress in Breeding for Resistance. Genes. 15(1): 102.

  80. Zaman, Q.U., Chu, W., Hao, M., Shi, Y., Sun, M., Sang, S.F., Mei, D., Cheng, H., Liu, J., Li, C. and Hu, Q. (2019). CRISPR/ Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing of JAGGED gene in Brassica napus L. Biomolecules. 9(11): 725.

  81. Zhao, F., Lyu, X., Ji, R., Liu, J., Zhao, T., Li, H., Liu, B. and Pei, Y. (2022). CRISPR/Cas9-engineered mutation to identify the roles of phytochromes in regulating photomorphogenesis and flowering time in soybean. The Crop Journal. 10(6): 1654-1664.

  82. Zheng, M., Zhang, L., Tang, M., Liu, J., Liu, H., Yang, H., Fan, S., Terzaghi, W., Wang, H. and Hua, W. (2020a). Knockout of two Bna MAX 1 homologs by CRISPR/Cas9 targeted mutagenesis improves plant architecture and increases yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Plant Biotechnology Journal. 18(3): 644-654.

  83. Zheng, N., Li, T., Dittman, J.D., Su, J., Li, R., Gassmann, W., Peng, D., Whitham, S.A., Liu, S. and Yang, B. (2020b). CRISPR/ Cas9-based gene editing using egg cell-specific promoters in Arabidopsis and soybean. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11: 800.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)