Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Study of Heterosis and Combining Ability of Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)

Anuj Kumar Choudhary1,*, Shanti Bhushan2
1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Bhola Paswan Shastri Agricultural College, Purnea-854 302, Bihar, India.
2Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Veer Kunwar Singh College of Agriculture, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Dumraon-802 119, Buxar, Bihar, India.
  • Submitted13-12-2023|

  • Accepted19-06-2024|

  • First Online 04-09-2024|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5284

Background: Faba bean is used as a green vegetable as well as pulse which meet the requirementof protein in human diet. It can grow in a wide range of agro climatic conditions because faba bean least affected by biotic, abiotic stress and having the ability to fix ample amount of atmospheric nitrogen in the soil.

Methods: The present investigation was conducted during 2020-21 and 2021-2022 at Bhola Paswan Shastri Agricultural College, Purnea. Bihar. The experimental material was based on a line x tester mating design comprising 24 hybrids (F1’s) developed by crossing 8 lines (females) and 3 tester. The 24 F2’s along with their parents were evaluated during 2021-2022 in randomized block design with two replications row to row and plant to plant distance was maintained at 45 and 15 cm respectively.

Result: The analysis of variance for combining ability for all the studied traits is highly significant except for traits viz; Pod length at maturity and No. of seeds per pod. The estimates of specific combining ability (SCA) effects among all the cross combinations were observed significant and negative relative heterosis and heterobeltiosis for traits days to 50% flowering and days to maturity it might be due to non-additive gene action for expression of these traits and selection of these traits may be effective for early maturity and further breeding programme. Days to 50% flowering were exhibited significant and positive inbreeding depression for traits days to 50% flowering (Bak-15/Bak-11, Bak-16/Bak-11 and Bak-16/Bak-20), plant height and number of pod per plant except in cross Bak-1/Bak-5.

Faba bean also known as bakala, (Vicia faba L.) belongs to the family fabaceae and has a long history of cultivation in the human civilization. It is an annual diploid (2n= 2x= 12) cropit is a self-pollinating plant with significant levels of out-cross and inter-cross, ranging from 20 to 50% depending on genotype and environmental effect (Suso and Moreno, 1999, Bishnoi et al., 2015). The rate of out crossing depends on the genotype, environmental factors, row space and the number of pollinating insects, especially honeybees. Faba bean is world’s fourth most important legume crop after pea, chickpea and lentil, widely cultivated for human food, animal feed and fodder. It plays an important role in world agriculture because of its high seed protein content which ranges from 20 to 40% depending upon the genotype and the environmental conditions in which it has been grown (Kaur et al., 2014). It is an efficient nitrogen fixer and improves soil fertility through symbiotic nitrogen fixation. It can grow well on high fertility soil to N-deficient marginal lands. Faba bean can withstand salinity conditions especially chloride and sulphate salts to a greater extent than chickpea. It has a potential yield of 60-75 quintals per hectare and average yield of 40-45 quintals per hectare (Bishnoi, 2016). It is grown as a Rabi crop in India in Bihar and adjoining states where its raw pods are eaten as a vegetable (Kumar et al., 2017). Faba bean has been recognized as a potential grain legume and included in the All India Coordinated Research Network on Potential crops (Kumar et al., 2016). It has also been identified as one of the eight major food legumes by the CGIAR research programme for priority focus and gaining importance as a grain legume for protein security of demographically expanding and climatically changing world (Bishnoi, 2016). Unrealized yield potential and yield instability are the major constraints in faba bean cultivation. The increased yield caused by heterozygosity due to out-crossing is well documented in faba bean. Therefore, heterosis, resulting from the combined action and interaction of allelic and inter-allelic genes is effective in faba bean and improved yield can be obtained by hybrid combinations (Bishnoi et al., 2012). The heterotic effects in Vicia faba may range from significantly positive to significantly negative for different traits depending on the genetic makeup of the parents. Exploitation of heterosis in the form of hybrid varieties may contribute in the improvement of yield and its component traits (Bishnoi et al., 2015). The present study was carried out with an objective to estimate heterosis, inbreeding depression,types of gene action for earliness and yielding ability in some bakala crosses which may be utilized further in breeding programmes.
The present investigation was conducted during 2020-21 and 2021-2022 at Bhola Paswan Shastri Agricultural College, Purnea. Bihar. The experimental material was based on a line x tester mating design comprising 24 hybrids (F1’s) developed by crossing 8 lines (females) viz;Bak-1, Bak-2, Bak-3, Bak-4, Bak-12, Bak-13, Bak-15 and Bak-16with 3 testers (males) viz., Bak-5, Bak-11and Bak-20. The 24 F2’s along with their parents were evaluated during 2021-2022in randomized block design with two replications row to row and plant to plant distance was maintained at 45 and 15 cm respectively.Data were collected based on 5 randomly selected plants for 8 characters viz., days to 50 per cent flowering, days to maturity, plant height (cm), number of pods per plant, pod length at maturity (cm),number of seeds per pod,Green pod yield(g)/plant and Seed yield(g)/plant. The combining ability analysis was done using the line x testers procedure as suggested by Cochran and Cox (1957) and Kempthorne (1957). Heterosis was calculated as the percentage of increase as decrease relative to better parent. Significance of heterosis was tested according to Wynne et al., (1970).
The analysis of variance for combining ability for all the studied traits are presented in (Table 1). The mean squares for general and specific combining ability were found highly significant for all the studied traits except for traits viz; Pod length at maturity and no. of seeds per pod indicating the additive and nonadditive components were important in the inheritance of these traits. These findings are in agreement with Gasim and Link (2007); Alghamdi (2009)El-Bramawy et al., (2012); Sharma et al., (2023); Alaa et al., (2023) and Mohamed et al., (2023). In a breeding programme, once the appropriate parents and potential crosses are identified, the next important step is to adopt a suitable breeding strategy for the management of generated variability which largely depends upon type of gene action in the population for the traits under genetic improvement (Cockerham 1961Sprauge 1966). Parent Bak-3 had shown high positive and significant GCA effect for traits viz; no. of pod/plant, green pod yield/plant and seed yield/plant, while Bak-11 also exhibited high positive and significant GCA effect for trait i.e. plant height (Table 2). Parents Bak-3 and Bak-11 may be used as a donor parent in hybridization programme. Similar finding corroborated by Kanhaiya et al., (2019); Patial et al., (2020) and Debbarma et al., (2022). The expression of heterosis in percentage over mid parent (relative heterosis) and over better parent (heterobeltiosis) as well as estimates of inbreeding depression of twenty four crosses were studied for eight characters and have been given in Table 4,5,6. Heterosis breeding has come to play a pivotal role in crop improvement programme for obtaining higher yield production. Heterosis is a complex genetic phenomena depending upon the balance of additive, dominance and interaction components as well as the distribution of the genes in the parental lines. The presence or absence of heterosis is not itself an indication of the presence or absence of any particular type of gene action or interactions. Heterosis response has been expressed as a deviation of F1 mean from values of either mid parent or better parent or standard check variety. It may however be kept in mind that while selecting best cross combination besides heterotic response, the per se performance of the crosses should also be given due consideration Bhushan et al., (2021).Among lines and testers viz; Bak-1, Bak-2 and Bak-20 were showed positive and highly significant GCA effects for traits no. of pod/plant, green pod yield(g)/plant and yield(g)/plant. It indicated that these lines are good combiner for yield and yield attributing traitsfor inclusion in the production of synthetic cultivars. Similar findings reported by Obiadalla-Ali et al., (2013); Saad et al., (2015); Mohammed et al., (2018); Yassien et al., (2019); Patial et al., (2020); Sharma et al., (2023); Mohammed et al., (2023); Alaa et al., (2023) and Mohamed et al., (2023).
 

Table 1: Analysis of variance of F1 hybrids for qualitative and quantitative traits of hybrids.


 

Table 2: General combining ability of Bakala genotypes for qualitative and quantitative traits.


 

Table 3: Specific combining ability of Bakala genotypes for qualitative and quantitative traits.


 

Table 4: Relative heterosis (%) of Bakala genotypes for qualitative and quantitative traits.


 

Table 5: Heterobeltiosis (%) of Bakala genotypes for qualitative and quantitative traits.


 

Table 6: Inbreeding depression from F1 to F2 generation for qualitative and quantitative traits.


       
The estimates of specific combining ability (SCA) effects were presented in (Table 3). Three crosses viz, Bak-1/Bak-11, Bak-3/Bak-20 and Bak-13/Bak-5 were exhibited highly positive and significant (SCA) effects for traits number of pods/plant, green pod yield (g)/plant and seeds yield(g)/plant. Similarly cross Bak-1/Bak-5, Bak-2/Bak-11and Bak-16/Bak-20 were also exhibited highly positive and significant (SCA) effects for traits Plant height, no. of pod/plant and green pod yield (g)/plant respectively in F2. Therefore, these crosses may be considered as the best combiner for these traits. Similar results were reported by Mohammed et al., (2018); Yassien, et al., (2019); EL Hosary (2020); Sharma et al., (2023); Alaa et al., (2023) and Mohamed et al., (2023).
       
Significant and positive relative heterosis were observed for traits no. of seed per pod, green pod yield/plant and seed yield/plant in cross combination Bak-1/Bak-5, Bak-1/Bak-11, Bak-1/Bak-20,Bak-2/Bak-5, Bak-2/Bak-11,Bak-2/Bak-20,Bak-3/Bak-5,Bak-3/Bak-11, Bak-15/Bak-11 and Bak-16/Bak-20, while for traits days to 50% flowering and days to maturity only two crosses viz;Bak-1/Bak-20 and Bak-15/Bak-11 were also exhibited significant and positive relative heterosis. Similarly significant and positive heterobeltiosis was also exhibited for traits viz;  no. of seed per pod, green pod yield/ plant and seed yield/ plant in cross combination Bak-2/Bak-20, Bak-3/Bak-20 and Bak-4/Bak-20 while in cross Bak-16/Bak-20 was also exhibited significant and positive heterobeltiosis for traits pod length at maturity, green pod yield/ plant and seed yield/ plant it might be due to additive gene action for expression of these characters and selection of these traits may be effective for further breeding programme. Among all the cross combinations most of the crosses were observed significant and negative relative heterosis and heterobeltiosis for traitsdays to 50% flowering and days to maturity it might be due to non-additive gene action for expression of these traits and selection of these traits may be effective for early maturity and further breeding programme similar finding corroborated by Bishnoi et al., (2017); Lal et al., (2019); Sharma et al., (2023); Mohammed et al., (2023); Alaa et al., (2023) and Mohamed et al., (2023). The estimates of the inbreeding depression from F1 to F2 in 24 hybrids for eight characters are presented in the Table 6. Most of the cross combination were exhibited significant and positive inbreeding depression for traits days to 50% flowering (Bak-15/Bak-11, Bak-16/Bak-11 and Bak-16/Bak-20), plant height and number of pod per plant except in cross Bak-1/Bak-5 it might be due to lack of segregation of desirable genes responsible for dominance effect or tight linkage of desirable genes or phenomenon of fixing of heterozygocity in segregating generation. Similarly most of crosses were recorded significant and negative inbreeding depression for all the studied traits except for traits green pod yield and seed yield per plant in crosses Bak-3/Bak-5 and Bak-3/Bak-20. Similar findings were reported by Poulsen and Knudsen (1980); Nassib and Khalil (1982); Hebblethwaite et al., (1984); Attia (1998); Gasim and Link (2007); EL-Harty et al., (2007); Obiadalla-Ali et al., (2015); Bishnoi et al., (2017); Sharma et al., (2023); Mohammed et al., (2023); Alaa et al., (2023) and Mohamed et al., (2023). In cross combination Bak-16/Bak-20 had exhibited highly significant and positive combining ability as well as inbreeding depression for traits days to 50% flowering it might be governed by non-additive gene action and this line may be selected for early maturity effect.
The analysis of variance for combining ability for  all the studied traits is highly significant except for traits viz; Pod length at maturity and No. of seeds per pod.The estimates of specific combining ability (SCA) effects among all the cross combinations were observed significant and negative relative heterosis and heterobeltiosis for traitsdays to 50% flowering and days to maturityit might be due to non-additive gene action for expression of these traits  and selection of these traits may be effective for  early maturity and further breeding programme. Days to 50% flowering were exhibited significant and positive inbreeding depression for traits days to 50% flowering (Bak-15/Bak-11, Bak-16/Bak-11 and Bak-16/Bak-20), plant height and number of pod per plant except in cross Bak-1/Bak-5.
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. Alaa, A.S., Manar, I.M.,  Mosalam, A.M., Zeinab, E.G., Shafik D.I., Medhat, R., Haitian, Yu. and Yuhua, He. (2023). The Potential genetic effect for yield and foliar disease resistance in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) assessed via morphological and SCoT markers. Plants. 1-19.

  2. Alghamdi, S.S. (2009). Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel cross of eight faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes. Asian J. Crop Sc. 1: 66-76.

  3. Attia, S.M. (1998). Performance of some faba bean genotypes and hybrids and reaction to orobanche. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. Agric., Cairo University. Egypt.

  4. Bhushan, S., Kumar, S., Kumar, S., Choudhary, V.K., Choudhary, A.K. and Ram, S. (2021). The study of heterosis and inbreeding depression for seed yield and its attributes in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal. 10(10): 2265-2270.

  5. Bishnoi, S.K. (2016). Genetic diversity in relation to heterosis and combining ability in faba bean (Vicia faba L.): A thesis submitted to CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

  6. Bishnoi, S.K., Hooda, J.S. and Sharma, P. (2015). Heterotic responses heterosis and inbreeding depression in yield component traits in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) Forage Res. 41(3): 152-159.

  7. Bishnoi, S.K., Hooda, J.S., Sharma, P. and Kumar P. (2017). Heterosis and inbreeding depression in yield component traits in faba bean (vicia faba L.). The Bioscan. 12(4): 1845-1850.

  8. Bishnoi, S.K., Hooda, J.S., Yadav, I.S. and Panchta, R. (2012). Advances in heterosis and hybrid breeding in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) Forage Res. 38(2): 65-73.

  9. Cochran, W.G. and G.M. Cox (1957). Experimental Designs. Asia Publication House, Bombay.

  10. Cockerham, C. (1961). Implications of genetic variances in a hybrid breeding programme. Crop Science. 1: 47-52.

  11. Debbarma P., Kant R., Mishra B.S., Lal, B.J., Rojaria V., Barman, M. (2022). Combining Ability and Heterosis Studies in Blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Research. 45(6): 676-682. doi: 10.18805/LR-4709.

  12. EL, Hosary, A.A.A. (2020). Estimation of Gene Action and Heterosis in F1 and F2 Diallel Crosses among Seven Genotypes of Field Bean. J. of Plant Production. 11(12):1383-1391.

  13. El-Bramawy, M.A.S., Osman, M.A.M. (2012). Diallel crosses of genetic enhancement for seed yield components and resistance to leaf miner and aphid infestations of Vicia faba L. Int. J. Agron. Agric. Res. 2(2): 8-21.

  14. EL-Harty, E.H., Shaaban, M., Omran, M.M. and Ragheb, S.B. (2007). Heterosis and genetic analysis of yield and some characters in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) Minia J. Agric. Res. Develop. 27(5): 897-913.

  15. Gasim, S. and Link, W. (2007). Agronomic performance and the effect of self-fertilization on german winter faba beans, J. Cent. Eur. Agr. 8: 121-128.

  16. Gasim, S. and Link, W. (2007). Agronomic performance and the effect of self-fertilization on German winter faba beans, J. Cent. Eur. Agr. 8: 121-128.

  17. Hebblethwaite, P.D., Scott, R.K., Kogbe, G.O.S. (1984). The effect of irrigation and bees on the yield and yield components of Vicia faba L, in: P.D. Hebblethwaite, T.C.K. Dawkins, M.C. Health, G. Lockwood (Eds.), Vicia faba: Agronomy, physiology and breeding, MartinusNijhoff/ W. Junk, The Hague. PP.71-94.

  18. Kanhaiya Lal, Yadav, C.B. Nath, S.  Dwivedi, D.K.  (2019). combining ability, components of genetic variance and heterotic response in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Legume Research. 44(9): 995-1008. doi: 10.18805/LR-4173.

  19. Kaur, S., Noel, O.I.C., John, W.F. and Jeffrey, G.P. (2014). Assessment of genetic diversity in faba bean based on single nucleotide polymorphism. Diversity. 6: 88-101.

  20. Kempthorne, O. (1957). An Introduction to Genetic Studies. John Willey and SonsInc, New York, USA.

  21. Kumar, P., Bishnoi, S.K. and Kaushik, P. (2017). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for seed yield and other agromorphological traits in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes of different origin, Trends in Biosciences. 10(4): 1246-1248.

  22. Kumar, P., Hooda, J.S., Singh, B., Sharma, P. and Bishnoi, S.K. (2016). Genetic diversity and relationship study in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes of indian and exotic origin. The Bioscan. 11(3): 2003-2006.

  23. Lal, Kanhaiya, Yadav, C.B., Nath, S. and Dwivedi, D.K. (2019). heterotic responses for yield and its components in faba bean (Vicia Faba L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 8(6): 662-677.

  24. Mohamed A. Ibrahim, Gehan G., Abo-Zaid Salwa M. Mostafa. (2023). Estimation of some genetic parameters using six populations mean analysis in three faba bean crosses exposed to natural infection of foliar diseases.

  25. Mohammed, S., Abd EL-Aty, Mahmoud, A., El-Hity, Tharwat, M., Abo Sen, Ibrahim, A.E., Abd El-Rahaman, O., Ibrahim, M., Al-Farga, A. and M.El-Tahan, A. (2023). Generation mean analysis, heterosis and genetic diversity in five egyptian faba beans and their hybrids. Sustainability. 15(16):1-17.

  26. Mohammed, S.M., Abd EL-ATY , Mahmoud A. EL-Hity , Tharwat M. Abo Sen and Ibrahim A.E. Abd EL-Rahaman. (2018). Estimation of Heterosis Combining and Ability in Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) by Line X Tester Technique Annals of Agric. Sci. 56(4): 975-986.

  27. Nassib, A.M. and Khalil, S.A. (1982).Population improvement in faba bean, G. Hawtin, C. Webb (Eds.), Faba Bean Improvement, ICARDA, PP.71-74.

  28. Obiadalla-Ali, H.A., Naheif, E.M.M. and Abdelsabour, G.A.K. (2015). Inbreeding, outbreeding and RAPD markers studies of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) crop, J. Adv. Res. 6(6): 859- 868.

  29. Obiadalla-Ali, H.A., Naheif, E.M., Mohamed, Ahmed A., Glala and Mohamed H.Z. Eldekashy (2013). Heterosis and nature of gene action for yield and its components in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science. 5(3): 34-40.

  30. Patial Ranjana, Mittal R.K., Sood V.K., Ahmed Shahnawaz (2022). Studies on Combining Ability for Seed Yield and Its Related Traits in Blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Legume Research. 45(3): 292-298. doi: 10.18805/LR-4187.

  31. Poulsen, M.H. and Knudsen J.C.N. (1980).Breeding for many small seeds/pod in Vicia faba L. FABIS Newsletter. 2: 26-28. 

  32. Saad, E., Hussein, Z. and Atef P.S. (2015). Assessment of heterosis and features of gene activity for yield and its components in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 5(4): 676-681.

  33. Sharma, A., Yadav, R., Sheoran, Kaushik, M.T.K., Sharma, K., Yadav, A., Dhanda, S.P. and Kaushik P. (2023). Estimation of Heterosis and the Combining Ability Effect for Yield and Its Attributes in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Using PCA and GGE Biplots.

  34. Sprague JM. (1966). Interaction of cortex and superior colliculus in mediation of visually guided behavior in the cat. Science. 23;153(3743):1544-7. doi:10.1126/science.153.3743.1544. PMID: 5917786.

  35. Suso, M.J. and Moreno, M.T (1999). Variation in outcrossing rate and genetic structure on six cultivars of Vicia faba L.as affected by geographic location and year.

  36. Wynne, J.C., Emery, D.A. and Rice, P.W. (1970). Combining ability estimates in Arachis hypogaea L. II. Field performance of F1 hybrids. Crop Sci., 10: 713-715.

  37. Yassien, H.E., Abd-El Zaher, I.N., Haridy, M.H. and Sadik, T.A. (2019). Estimate of Heterosis and Combining Ability in Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.). J. Plant Production. 10(7): 543-845.

Editorial Board

View all (0)