The analysis of variance for combining ability for all the studied traits are presented in (Table 1). The mean squares for general and specific combining ability were found highly significant for all the studied traits except for traits
viz; Pod length at maturity and no. of seeds per pod indicating the additive and nonadditive components were important in the inheritance of these traits. These findings are in agreement with
Gasim and Link (2007);
Alghamdi (2009);
El-Bramawy et al., (2012); Sharma et al., (2023); Alaa et al., (2023) and
Mohamed et al., (2023). In a breeding programme, once the appropriate parents and potential crosses are identified, the next important step is to adopt a suitable breeding strategy for the management of generated variability which largely depends upon type of gene action in the population for the traits under genetic improvement (
Cockerham 1961;
Sprauge 1966). Parent Bak-3 had shown high positive and significant GCA effect for traits
viz; no. of pod/plant, green pod yield/plant and seed yield/plant, while Bak-11 also exhibited high positive and significant GCA effect for trait
i.e. plant height (Table 2). Parents Bak-3 and Bak-11 may be used as a donor parent in hybridization programme. Similar finding corroborated by
Kanhaiya et al., (2019);
Patial et al., (2020) and
Debbarma et al., (2022). The expression of heterosis in percentage over mid parent (relative heterosis) and over better parent (heterobeltiosis) as well as estimates of inbreeding depression of twenty four crosses were studied for eight characters and have been given in Table 4,5,6. Heterosis breeding has come to play a pivotal role in crop improvement programme for obtaining higher yield production. Heterosis is a complex genetic phenomena depending upon the balance of additive, dominance and interaction components as well as the distribution of the genes in the parental lines. The presence or absence of heterosis is not itself an indication of the presence or absence of any particular type of gene action or interactions. Heterosis response has been expressed as a deviation of F
1 mean from values of either mid parent or better parent or standard check variety. It may however be kept in mind that while selecting best cross combination besides heterotic response, the
per se performance of the crosses should also be given due consideration
Bhushan et al., (2021).Among lines and testers
viz; Bak-1, Bak-2 and Bak-20 were showed positive and highly significant GCA effects for traits no. of pod/plant, green pod yield(g)/plant and yield(g)/plant. It indicated that these lines are good combiner for yield and yield attributing traitsfor inclusion in the production of synthetic cultivars. Similar findings reported by
Obiadalla-Ali et al., (2013); Saad et al., (2015); Mohammed et al., (2018);
Yassien et al., (2019); Patial et al., (2020); Sharma et al., (2023); Mohammed et al., (2023);
Alaa et al., (2023) and
Mohamed et al., (2023).
The estimates of specific combining ability (SCA) effects were presented in (Table 3). Three crosses
viz, Bak-1/Bak-11, Bak-3/Bak-20 and Bak-13/Bak-5 were exhibited highly positive and significant (SCA) effects for traits number of pods/plant, green pod yield (g)/plant and seeds yield(g)/plant. Similarly cross Bak-1/Bak-5, Bak-2/Bak-11and Bak-16/Bak-20 were also exhibited highly positive and significant (SCA) effects for traits Plant height, no. of pod/plant and green pod yield (g)/plant respectively in F
2. Therefore, these crosses may be considered as the best combiner for these traits. Similar results were reported by
Mohammed et al., (2018); Yassien, et al., (2019); EL Hosary (2020);
Sharma et al., (2023); Alaa et al., (2023) and
Mohamed et al., (2023).
Significant and positive relative heterosis were observed for traits no. of seed per pod, green pod yield/plant and seed yield/plant in cross combination Bak-1/Bak-5, Bak-1/Bak-11, Bak-1/Bak-20,Bak-2/Bak-5, Bak-2/Bak-11,Bak-2/Bak-20,Bak-3/Bak-5,Bak-3/Bak-11, Bak-15/Bak-11 and Bak-16/Bak-20, while for traits days to 50% flowering and days to maturity only two crosses
viz;Bak-1/Bak-20 and Bak-15/Bak-11 were also exhibited significant and positive relative heterosis. Similarly significant and positive heterobeltiosis was also exhibited for traits
viz; no. of seed per pod, green pod yield/ plant and seed yield/ plant in cross combination Bak-2/Bak-20, Bak-3/Bak-20 and Bak-4/Bak-20 while in cross Bak-16/Bak-20 was also exhibited significant and positive heterobeltiosis for traits pod length at maturity, green pod yield/ plant and seed yield/ plant it might be due to additive gene action for expression of these characters and selection of these traits may be effective for further breeding programme. Among all the cross combinations most of the crosses were observed significant and negative relative heterosis and heterobeltiosis for traitsdays to 50% flowering and days to maturity it might be due to non-additive gene action for expression of these traits and selection of these traits may be effective for early maturity and further breeding programme similar finding corroborated by
Bishnoi et al., (2017); Lal et al., (2019); Sharma et al., (2023); Mohammed et al., (2023);
Alaa et al., (2023) and
Mohamed et al., (2023). The estimates of the inbreeding depression from F
1 to F
2 in 24 hybrids for eight characters are presented in the Table 6. Most of the cross combination were exhibited significant and positive inbreeding depression for traits days to 50% flowering (Bak-15/Bak-11, Bak-16/Bak-11 and Bak-16/Bak-20), plant height and number of pod per plant except in cross Bak-1/Bak-5 it might be due to lack of segregation of desirable genes responsible for dominance effect or tight linkage of desirable genes or phenomenon of fixing of heterozygocity in segregating generation. Similarly most of crosses were recorded significant and negative inbreeding depression for all the studied traits except for traits green pod yield and seed yield per plant in crosses Bak-3/Bak-5 and Bak-3/Bak-20. Similar findings were reported by
Poulsen and Knudsen (1980);
Nassib and Khalil (1982);
Hebblethwaite et al., (1984); Attia (1998);
Gasim and Link (2007);
EL-Harty et al., (2007); Obiadalla-Ali et al., (2015); Bishnoi et al., (2017); Sharma et al., (2023); Mohammed et al., (2023);
Alaa et al., (2023) and
Mohamed et al., (2023). In cross combination Bak-16/Bak-20 had exhibited highly significant and positive combining ability as well as inbreeding depression for traits days to 50% flowering it might be governed by non-additive gene action and this line may be selected for early maturity effect.