Plant height and leaf stem ratio
The plant height and leaf stem ratio of fodder cowpea and maize as influenced by organic source of nutrients recorded at harvest as presented in Table 1.
The application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) through inorganic fertilizers resulted in significantly higher plant height (104.4 cm for fodder cowpea and 231.7 cm for maize) and leaf-to-stem ratio (0.66 for fodder cowpea and 0.45 for maize). Conversely, the effect of organic sources of nutrients on forage quality in both fodder cowpea and maize was found to be non-significant.
However, the application of 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through farmyard manure (FYM) + 50% RDN through vermicompost (VC) led to a significantly higher plant height (98.1 cm for fodder cowpea and 226.2 cm for maize). This can be attributed to the early availability of nutrients from inorganic sources during the initial stages, coupled with an increased nutrient supply from integrated sources in the later stages, owing to efficient nutrient utilization and gradual nutrient release. The elevated mineralization potential and continuous nutrient release by FYM and VC likely exerted a positive influence on growth characteristics. The higher nutrient content and rapid nitrogen release from organic manure may explain the observed higher plant height and leaf-to-stem ratio
(Gupta et al., 2022; Bhupenchandra et al., 2024).
Quality characters
The utilization of organic nutrient sources significantly influenced both crude protein yield and content in the fodder cowpea-maize cropping system, with detailed data presented in Table 2 and 3. Notably, the application of 50% RDN through FYM + 50% RDN through VC resulted in a significantly higher crude protein yield (19.3 q ha-1). Following closely was the treatment of 75% RDN through FYM + 25% RDN through VC, which recorded a crude protein yield of 18.06 q ha
-1. In contrast, a lower crude protein yield (14.6 q ha
-1) was observed with the application of 75% RDN through FYM. This outcome can be attributed to the increased dry matter yield and higher crude protein content associated with a higher N dose
(Harish et al., 2022a; Varatharajan et al., 2022). The assumption is that the treatment with greater nutrient content, including bio-compost and other organic nutrients, led to higher nutrient translocation within the plant system
(Dabhi et al., 2017; Patel et al., 2018).
On the other hand, the application of 100% RDF through inorganic fertilizers significantly increased the content of fiber (28 and 27.6%), Ether extract (3.0 and 3.1%), Ash (10.4 and 8.9%) and carbohydrates (30.2 and 31.6%) in fodder cowpea and maize, respectively. Organic sources of nutrients, however, did not exert a significant influence on the quality of forage in both fodder cowpea and maize.
Nevertheless, the application of 50% RDN through FYM+ 25% RDN through VC + 25% RDN through bio-compost (BC) at 30 days after sowing (DAS) recorded numerically higher crude fiber (29.8% for fodder cowpea and 29.5% for maize), ether extract (2.7% for fodder cowpea and 2.9% for maize), ash (8.9% for fodder cowpea and 8.1% for maize) and carbohydrates (28.7% for fodder cowpea and 29.6% for maize). The significant decrease in crude fiber content with increased N content in herbage is attributed to the transformation of synthesized carbohydrates into proteins
(Harish et al., 2022a). Plants rich in N content exhibit a higher proportion of water, lower dry matter content, more succulent leaves and lower crude fiber content. Elevated nitrogen content enhances meristematic activity, leading to increased absorption of mineral salts, rapid respiration, conversion of most carbohydrates into fat and active participation in protein synthesis. Nitrogen-free extract, a component of carbohydrates, is also influenced by nitrogen.
Green forage yield
The green forage yield of fodder cowpea and maize as influenced by organic source of nutrients recorded at harvest is presented in Table 4. The green forage yield of fodder cowpea exhibited a significant impact based on the organic nutrient source. Among these sources, the highest green forage yield was observed with the application of 50% RDN through FYM+ 50% RDN through BC, reaching 263 q ha
-1. Conversely, the lowest green forage yield was recorded with 75% RDN through FYM, amounting to 185 q ha
-1.
In the case of fodder maize, a significantly higher green forage yield was noted with the application of 50% RDN through FYM + 50% RDN through VC, reaching 428 q ha
-1. This result was comparable to the yield obtained with 75% RDN through FYM + 25% RDN through VC, which reached 421 q ha
-1. Conversely, the application of 75% RDN through FYMresulted in a lower green forage yield of 367 q ha
-1. The increase in green forage yield can be attributed to the taller plant height, higher leaf-to-stem ratio and rapid nutrient release from BC, contributing to improved plant growth and greater green biomass
(Rajpoot et al., 2021; Bhupenchandra et al., 2022, 2024). Among the organic sources of nutrients, the application of 50% RDN through FYM + 50% RDN through vermicompost recorded higher system productivity at 691 q ha
-1. This was comparable to the system productivity achieved with 75% RDN through FYM+ 25% RDN through vermicompost, amounting to 666 q ha
-1. In contrast, lower system productivity was observed with the application of 75% RDN through FYM, reaching 552 q ha
-1.
Dry matter yield
The dry matter production of fodder cowpea and maize was significantly affected by the application of organic nutrients and the relevant data is presented in Table 4. For fodder cowpea, the application of 50% RDN through FYM+ 50% RDN through vermicompost resulted in a significantly higher dry matter yield (46.3 q ha
-1), comparable to the yield achieved with 75% RDN through FYM+ 25% RDN through vermicompost (42.5 q ha
-1). In the case of fodder maize, the application of 50% RDN through FYM+ 50% RDN through vermicompost also led to a significantly higher dry matter yield (84.4 q ha
-1), equivalent to the yield obtained with 75% RDN through FYM+ 25% RDN through vermicompost (79.8 q ha
-1). Conversely, a lower dry matter yield was observed with 75% RDN through FYM (66.1 q ha
-1).
Among the organic sources, the application of 50% RDN through FYM+ 50% RDN through vermicompost resulted in a significantly higher system dry matter yield (130.7 q ha
-1), matching the yield achieved with 75% RDN through FYM+ 25% RDN through vermicompost (122.3 q ha
-1). The increase in dry matter yield is primarily attributed to the rise in green biomass and dry matter content. Additionally, improved partitioning and photosynthetic rates, evidenced by enhanced nutrient uptake, facilitated robust plant growth, leading to increased interception, absorption and utilization of solar radiation. This, in turn, resulted in a higher photosynthetic rate and improved partitioning, ultimately leading to increased accumulation and production of dry matter
(Suri and Choudhary, 2012).
Quantitative analysis
The descriptive statistics of growth and yield attributes are represented in Table 5. The correlation results (Table 6) showed that all the variables included in the model were positively significant at 1% level of significance and these signs emphasize all the variables would attribute to the green forage yield of cowpea and maize. The correlation coefficients between green forage yield and various factors, such as plant height (0.98), ether extraction (0.64), crude protein yield (0.93) and dry matter yield (0.99), underscore robust positive relationships among these attributes (Fig 1). In contrast, attributes like leaf stem ratio (-0.74) and crude protein content (-0.89) exerted negative influences on forage yield. Consequently, all these variables were incorporated as independent factors in the subsequent multiple linear regression model.
The goal of the multiple linear regressions was to quantitatively evaluate the relationships and clarify the extent of influence each specified parameter has on green forage yield
(Ajaykumar et al., 2023). The resulting multiple linear regression equation is as follows:
Green forage yield (q ha-1) = -4.06 + 0.37 plant height (cm) - 240.84 leaf stem ratio + 2.51 crude fiber (%) + 28.70 ether extract (%) + 1.09 ash (%) + 0.41 carbohydrates (%) - 1.86 crude protien content (%) + 26.81 crude protien yeild (q ha-1)
The coefficient of determination (R²) at 0.64 signifies a well-fitted model, indicating that the explanatory variables explain 64 per cent of the observed variation in green forage yields (Table 7). With the exception of crude fiber, ash, carbohydrates and crude protein content, all variables demonstrated statistically significant relationships. Specifically, the slope coefficient for plant height suggests that for every one-unit increase, we can anticipate a substantial 0.37 unit rise in fodder yield, assuming all other variables remain constant. Similarly, a one-percent increment in ether extract and crude protein yield results in increases of 28.70 and 26.81 units in fodder yield, respectively
(Ajaykumar et al., 2022). Conversely, a one-percent increase in leaf stem ratio leads to a decrease in fodder yield by 240.8 units. This compelling econometric evidence underscores the significant impact of variables such as plant height, leaf stem ratio, ether extract and crude protein.
Our regression model allowed us to estimate the predicted fodder yield, which we compared against field-level fodder yield (Fig 2). Additionally, we examined regression diagnostic plots to assess the model’s validity. These plots, including residual vs. fitted values, normal quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots, scale-location plots and residuals vs. leverage values, consistently show that the model maintains constant error variance, adheres to normal distribution assumptions and is free from outliers (Fig 3). These observations reinforce the reliability of our statistical model in analyzing and predicting fodder yield.