Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Geographical Distribution and Molecular Characterization of Begomovirus Infecting Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in Northern Hills and North Western Plains of India

T. Aravind1,*, K.P. Singh2, Kumari Surbhi2, Pooja Bhatt2, Shivani Aravind2, Himani Jeena2
1Department of Plant Pathology, M.S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Gajapati-761 211, Odisha, India.
2Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Submitted14-09-2023|

  • Accepted23-01-2024|

  • First Online 08-03-2024|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5247

Background: Yellow mosaic disease (YMD) is one of the most severe and widespread constraint for the cultivation of soybean. Given that no comprehensive data on the status of soybean yellow mosaic disease in Northern Hills and North Western Plains of India is present, a detailed investigation was undertaken for three years to study the prevalence of the disease in the region and to characterize the pathogen.

Methods: Towards Kharif end, a three year (2018-2020) farmer field survey (76 villages) was carried out to assess the YMD distribution in the major soybean growing areas Northern Hills and North Western Plains of India. The variability of yellow mosaic virus associated with YMD of soybean was studied based on molecular characterization of partial DNA-A coat protein gene and DNA-B movement protein with subsequent nucleotide sequencing and phylogenetic tree construction.

Result: The results revealed that YMD is prevalent in the plains, whereas the disease was undetectable in the Hills. In the plains, the mean disease incidence ranged from 25.40% in 2019 to 16.78% in 2020. Moreover, disease incidence (r = -0.748) had negative and significant (p<0.0001) correlation with altitude. The phylogenetic studies revealed that the virus inciting the yellow mosaic in soybean in Tarai region had closest relationship with Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus (MYMIV). It shared more than 96 per cent sequence identity with other MYMIV isolates reported earlier within the country and abroad and hence, was designated as an isolate of MYMIV.

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] is one of the oldest crops grown and is popularly known as “Miracle Crop or Golden Bean” owing to its multiple uses. The crop is susceptible to many abiotic and biotic stresses which account for huge losses for the farmers. Among the different biotic stresses, the crop is highly susceptible to the whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Genn.) transmitted yellow mosaic disease (YMD) (Yadav et al., 2018). It is prevalent in almost all the major soybean growing areas and is a serious threat to soybean cultivation, especially, in the Central and the North Western Plain Zones of India (Singh and Aravind, 2019). It has been reported to cause more than 80 per cent yield loss in soybean if plants are infected at an early stage (Amrate et al., 2020). In 2015 yellow mosaic epidemic was observed in soybean during R1-R3 stage in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh (Silodia et al., 2018). In the pulse crops, yellow mosaic disease is caused by four different virus species belonging to the genera Begomovirus (Family: Geminiviridae) viz., Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus (MYMIV), Mungbean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV), Dolichos  yellow mosaic virus and Horsegram yellow mosaic virus (Quazi et al., 2007). Of these, MYMV and MYMIV are mostly reported to be associated with yellow mosaic in soybean (Girish and Usha, 2005; Ramesh et al., 2016).
 
In India, soybean is grown under rainfed condition in diverse agro-ecological zones and among them, agroclimatic conditions in hills are the most challenging and highly variable (Bhartiya et al., 2017). North Western Plains (NWP) and Northern Hills (NH) zones of India are one of the most significant contributors of soybean production in the country. Management of YMD is often linked with control of the vectors by spraying insecticides which often leads to environmental pollution and health hazards (Naik et al., 2023). The exact disease prevalence data is a prerequisite for adoption of stringent disease management strategies especially in the hills as the farmers mainly resort to the non-chemical means of disease management in the region. Given that no comprehensive data on the status of soybean yellow mosaic disease in Uttarakhand is present, a detailed investigation was undertaken for three years to study the prevalence of the disease in the region and to characterize the pathogen. The expected outcome of the investigation is updated information on geographic distribution and molecular diversity of the Begomovirus inciting YMD of soybean in the region.
Survey area
 
A random roving survey was carried out during three consecutive crop seasons of 2018 to 2020 from September to October to know the incidence of yellow mosaic disease in the major soybean growing areas of Northern Hills and North Western Plains of India. The survey route followed a roadmap cutting across the major soybean growing areas in the region. Depending on their geographical location and altitude, the survey locations were divided in to two broad groups viz., Hills and Plains (Tarai region). A total of 76 villages (22 in Plains and 54 in Hills) were visited during the survey. From each village two fields were randomly selected for the recording disease parameters.
 
Disease prevalence
 
In each field, 25 plants were randomly chosen at all four corners and center for recording disease incidence. Disease severity was recorded on 25 plants per field (five plants each at all four corners as well as center of the field). The disease severity assessment was made using the standard key described by Singh and Singh (2000) and expressed as percent disease index as described by Wheeler (1969). The data on the latitude, longitude and altitude was also recorded at each location. The data recorded during the field survey were used to prepare maps for the prevalence of YMD in the region with the help of ARCGIS version 10.2.2.
 
DNA extraction and PCR amplification
 
The molecular characterization was done at Department of Plant Pathology, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India. The total genomic DNA was extracted from infected leaves by Gem-CTAB method given by Rouhibakhsh et al., (2008) with some modifications. Polymerase chain reaction was carried out in 25 µl of reaction mixture containing 1X PCR reaction buffer, 10 µM of each primer (Table 1) , 10 mM of each dNTPs, 2.5 mM of MgCl2 and 2.5 U/µl of Taq DNA polymerase (Genei Laboratories, Bangalore, India). 100 ng of DNA template was used per reaction. The amplification was performed in a thermocycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, California, USA). The amplified products were separated in 1.5% agarose gel in 0.5X TBE buffer at 60 V and was documented through gel documentation system.

Table 1: Primers used for amplification of selected regions of yellow mosaic virus infecting soybean.


 
Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis
 
The PCR products were sequenced at Biologia Research India Pvt Ltd., New Delhi, India. Sequences were compared with other respective viral sequences of the NCBI database using ‘Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST)’. The phylogenic neighbor-joining trees and evolutionary analysis were conducted using MEGA X software package (Tamura et al., 2004). Per cent identity matrix and nucleotide alignments were done with Bio-Edit software (Hall 2005). The pair wise sequence identity of the isolate under study with other legume infecting begomoviruses was performed using the Sequence Demarcation Tool (SDT v1.2) (Muhire et al., 2014).
 
Statistical analysis
 
One-way ANOVA was performed to determine the differences in the foresaid disease and whitefly parameters during the three study years. Significance was considered to be p<0.05 for all tests. Disease distribution maps were generated through the Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolation technique using the ARCGIS (10.3.1) software. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 for Windows.
Disease incidence and severity
 
The YMD was present in moderate to severe form in all the survey locations in the Tarai region but was not detected in the hills during the three consecutive years of survey. There was significant difference among sites for disease severity (p =0.016) and incidence (p = 0.005) during the three years in the Tarai region. The mean disease incidence in the region was 25.40, 20.04 and 16.78 percent in 2019, 2018 and 2020, respectively with an overall mean of 20.84 (Table 2; Fig 1). Highest mean disease incidence and severity was observed in Udham Singh Nagar (24.54% and 20.44%) followed by Dehradun (19.07% and 14.83%) and Nainital Districts.  Similar trend was observed for disease severity as well. Disease incidence (r = -0.748) had negative and significant (p<0.0001) correlation with altitude.

Table 2: Prevalence of soybean yellow mosaic disease and its vector in Northern Hills and North Western Plains of India.



Fig 1: Distribution of soybean yellow mosaic disease in Northern Hills and North Western Plains of India.


 
Overall disease incidence and severity for the three years of study varied during different years of survey and from site to site within a year in the Tarai region. This variation in the disease incidence shows that the agro-ecological factors play a critical role in host-pathogen interactions apart from the routine crop management practices. Similar studies on the variation in prevalence of YMD in soybean among the different years of study and locations have been reported from other parts of the country by Silodia et al., (2017) and Ashok et al., (2018). There was more than 30 per cent disease incidence at Pantnagar (Udham Singh Nagar Dist.) during all the three years of survey and hence, the location can be considered as a hotspot for YMD and can be utilized for varietal screening and development of management strategies. The AICRP soybean annual reports 2017-2019 and Singh and Aravind (2019) have also emphasised Pantnagar to be a hotspot for YMD where the disease is present in moderate to severe form every year irrespective of the date of sowing and other climatic conditions.
 
Molecular characterization and diversity analysis
 
PCR with Begomovirus DNA A specific primers RUGEMF1 and RUGEMR1 amplified the expected 500 bp amplicon from all the 22 symptomatic samples collected during the survey while no amplification was obtained in asymptomatic healthy leaf samples. The results indicated the presence of whitefly transmitted Begomovirus. The PCR amplicons of the Pantnagar isolate were sequenced and sequence analysis showed more than 97 per cent similarity with MYMIV isolates reported in India and abroad. Two different MYMIV specific primers targeting the coat protein gene on DNA A and movement protein in DNA B was used to amplify 500 bp and 1000 bp long amplicons, respectively (Fig 2). The PCR products were purified and sequenced for further analysis. These partial sequences were deposited in NCBI Genebank database under accession number MZ267790 (movement protein) and MZ267791 (coat protein).

Fig 2: PCR amplification of MYMIV from infected soybean samples using MYMIV-MP-F/R, RUGEMF/R and MYMIV-CP-F/R primers.



BLAST analysis of partial coat protein gene revealed highest sequence identity (97.29%) with MYMIV isolate Mb04 coat protein gene (GQ387504) reported from India which is higher than the 91 per cent similarity required for species delineation of Begomovirus. The Begomovirus under study shared 79.401, 80.001-80.501 and 72.501-74.701 percent identity with selected isolates of MYMV, HgYMV and DoYMV previously reported (Fig 3). The phylogenetic analysis revealed that the isolate under study formed clad with MYMIV group which showed closest relationship (Fig  4).  The blast analysis of partial movement protein gene revealed highest sequence identity (96.48%) with Indian isolate of MYMIV infecting soybean (MT232630). It shared 80.3 to 93.1, 77.0 to 78.8, 67.5-67.9 percent similarity with DNA B of MYMV, HgYMV and DoYMV, respectively. The phylogenetic analysis of partial movement protein gene showed close relationship with MYMIV DNA B components (Fig 5).

Fig 3: SDT matrix of pairwise identity scores generated by alignment of partial coat protein gene of MYMIV_SB [Pant] with legume infecting Begomovirus isolates in Genebank.



Fig 4: Phylogenetic tree derived from partial coat protein gene sequences of MYMIV_SB [Pant] with other legume infecting Begomovirus isolates in Genebank.



Fig 5: Phylogenetic tree derived from partial movement protein gene sequences of MYMIV_SB [Pant] with other legume infecting Begomovirus isolates in Genebank.



The coat protein ORF (CP or AV1) is the only Begomovirus sequence approved by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses for ascertaining the identity of a Begomovirus and the sequence comparison has been used to identify and classify geminiviruses (Padidam et al., 1995; Brown et al., 2001). In our investigation, we have observed more than 96 per cent identity of partial coat protein and movement protein sequences of our isolate with other legume infecting MYMIV   isolates. It showed less than 90 per cent sequence identity with other legume infecting begomoviruses viz., MYMV, DoYMV and HgYMV. Thus, based on high sequence identities and phylogenetic relationships of partial DNA-A (in particular) and DNA-B genome with MYMIV isolates, the Begomovirus isolate under study could be designated as an isolate of MYMIV. These results are in agreement with the earlier published reports of Srinivasaraghavan (2014) who studied Begomovirus infecting different pulse crops in Uttarakhand and identified the presence of MYMIV in soybean in Pantnagar. Based on DNA polymorphism and nucleotide diversity of the legume infecting begomoviruses in India, Begomovirus inciting yellow mosaic disease in soybean in northern and central parts of the country has been reported to be MYMIV (Girish and Usha, 2005; Ramesh et al., 2016). The soybean infecting MYMIV have more than 89 percent identity with other MYMIV isolates (Usharani et al., 2004).However, more detailed investigation based on whole genome sequencing of the DNA-A is necessary for the final confirmation of the Begomovirus under study as an isolate of MYMIV.

As per the obtained results, it can be concluded that the YMD in soybean is prevalent in North Western Plains of the country and is causing huge economic loss to the farmers in the region. An integrated strategy, using the disease resistant varieties and vector management, has to be deployed for effective management of the disease to effectively manage the disease the region.
This study provides an updated status of the YMD and its pathogen in major soybean areas in NH and NWP zones of the country. According to the results obtained, it can be concluded that the YMD in soybean is prevalent in the plains and is causing huge economic loss to the farmers in the region. An integrated strategy, using the disease resistant varieties and vector management, needs to be devised to effectively manage the disease and overcome the threat posed by it in the NWPZ. In lieu with the earlier reports on the presence of Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus (MYMIV) inciting the yellow mosaic in the northern parts of the country, the causal agent of the YMD in soybean in Tarai region has also exhibited closest relationship with MYMIV. Hence, the soybean genotypes that have resistance to MYMIV can be deployed in the Tarai region as well.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

  1. Agnihotri, A.K., Mishra, S.P., Ansar, M., Tripathi, R.C., Singh, R. and Akram, M. (2019). Molecular characterization of mungbean yellow mosaic India virus infecting tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Australasian Plant Pathology. 48: 159- 165.

  2. Amrate, P.K., Shrivastava, M.K., Pancheshwar, D.K. (2020). Yield reduction and efficacy of antiviral product against yellow mosaic virus disease in soybean. Journal of Oilseed Research. 37: 229-230. 

  3. Ashok, K., Mathur, K., Mali, B.L., Shah, R. (2018). Survey on yellow mosaic disease of soybean in Rajasthan. International Journal of Agricultural Science. 10: 6916-6919.

  4. Bhartiya, A., Chandra, N., Pal, R.S., Aditya, J.P. and Bajeli, J. (2017). Comparative yield gaps, economic impact and constraint analysis in front line demonstrations of soybean and black soybean in Uttarakhand hills. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 51(5): 483-487. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4715.

  5. Brown, J.K., Torres-Jerez, I., Idris A.M., Banks, G.K., Wyatt, S.D. (2001). The core region of the coat protein gene is highly useful for establishing the provisional identification and classification of begomoviruses. Archives of Virology. 146: 1581-1598.

  6. Chaitanya, B.H., Reddy, B.V.B. and Prasanthi, L. (2017). RCA-PCR assay is more effective than traditional PCR assay for detecting begomoviruses in greengram. Environment and  Ecolology. 35(3A): 1932-1935.

  7. Girish, K.R. and Usha, R. (2005). Molecular characterization of two soybean-infecting begomoviruses from India and evidence for recombination among legume-infecting begomoviruses from South-East Asia. Virus Research. 108: 167-176.

  8. Hall, T. (2005). http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/RNaseP/info/programs /BIOEDIT /bioedit.html.

  9. Muhire, B.M., Varsani, A., Martin, D.P. (2014). SDT: A virus classification tool based on pairwise sequence alignment and identity calculation. Plos One. 9(9): e108277. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0108277.

  10. Naik, D.V.K., Reddy, B.V., Srividhya, A., Devi, R.S.D., Prashanthi, L. and Vemireddy, L.R. (2023). Quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection and validation of linked markers associated with yellow mosaic virus resistance in urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 57(3): 283-287. doi: 10.18805/ IJARe.A-5895.

  11. Padidam, M., Beachy, R.N., Fauquet, C.M. (1995). Classification and identification of geminiviruses using sequence comparisons. Journal of General Virology. 76: 249-263.

  12. Quazi, J., Ilyas, M., Mansoor, S., Briddon, R.W. (2007). Legume yellow mosaic viruses: Genetically isolated begomoviruses. Molecular Plant Pathology. 8: 343-348.

  13. Ramesh, S., Chouhan, B., Gupta, G., Ramteke, R., Chand, S., Husain, S. (2016). Molecular diversity analysis of coat protein gene encoded by legume begomoviruses and PCR assay to detect yellow mosaic viruses infecting soybean in India. British Biotechnology Journal. 12: 1-10. 

  14. Rouhibakhsh, A., Priya, J., Periasamy, M., Haq, Q.M.L., Malathi, V.G. (2008). An improved DNA isolation method and PCR protocol for efficient detection of multicomponents of Begomovirus in legumes. Journal of Virological Methods. 147: 37-42. 

  15. Silodia, K., Bhale, U., Bhale, M.S. (2017). Epidemic of mungbean yellow mosaic virus disease of soybean: A potential threat in changing weather under agro-climatic conditions of Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. International Journal of Bio- resource and Stress Management. 8: 827-831.

  16. Silodia, K., Bhale, U., Bhale, M.S. (2018). Status and evaluation of soybean varieties against Mungbean Yellow Mosaic (MYMV) disease under changing climatic conditions of Kaymore plateau zone, Madhya Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52(6): 686-690. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5041.

  17. Singh, A.K. and Singh, K.P. (2000). Screening for disease incidence of yellow vein mosaic virus in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] treated with gamma rays and EMS. Vegetable Science. 27: 72-75.

  18. Singh, K.P. and Aravind. T. (2019). Identification of resistant sources against soybean yellow mosaic and soybean mosaic diseases in field evaluation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes. Indian Phytopathology. 72: 519-523.

  19. Srinivasaraghavan, A. (2014). Molecular diversity, epidemiology, host plant resistance and management of mungbean yellow mosaic virus infecting mungbean and urdbean. Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India.

  20. Tamura, K., Nei, M., Kumar, S. (2004). Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101: 11030-11035.

  21. Usharani, K.S., Surendranath, B., Haq, Q.M.R., Malathi, V.G. (2004). Yellow mosaic virus infecting soybean in northern India is distinct from the species infecting soybean in southern and western India. Current Science. 86: 845-850.

  22. Wheeler, B.E.J. (1969). An Introduction to Plant Diseases. The English Language Book Society and John Wiley and Sons Limited, London, pp 386.

  23. Yadav, B.K., Sangeeta, R., Jaiswal, R.K., Patel, S., Singh, A.K. (2018). Molecular characterization of Begomovirus infecting soybean crop in central India. International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences. 8: 419-431.

Editorial Board

View all (0)