Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 47 issue 5 (april 2024) : 795-802

Evaluating the Soil Quality Indicators in Various Yield Zones of Pulses in Tamil Nadu, India

B. Bhakiyathu Saliha1,*, R. Indrani1, A. Anuratha1, T. Sherene Jenita Rajammal1, A.H. Syed Hussainy1, R. Murugaragavan1
1Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kovilpatty, Thoothukudi-628 501, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Submitted02-07-2023|

  • Accepted22-02-2024|

  • First Online 05-04-2024|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5202

Cite article:- Saliha Bhakiyathu B., Indrani R., Anuratha A., Rajammal Jenita Sherene T., Hussainy Syed A.H., Murugaragavan R. (2024). Evaluating the Soil Quality Indicators in Various Yield Zones of Pulses in Tamil Nadu, India . Legume Research. 47(5): 795-802. doi: 10.18805/LR-5202.

Background: In recent years, there is growing demand for pulses in Tamil Nadu and the government has implemented various schemes and programmes to promote cultivation. However, the evaluation and categorization of soils for pulse production is crucial in determining the suitability of land for pulse cultivation and offer improvement through the adoption of improved crop management practices.

Methods: A systematic soil quality assessment survey was taken up during 2020-2022 in the major pulse growing blocks of Virudhunagar district viz., Sattur, Aruppukottai and Thiruchuli based on past ten years yield data and it was classified into three categories viz., low yielding (< 400 kg ha-1), medium (400 to 700 kg ha-1) and high yielding (>700 kg ha-1) categories. Three hundred samples were collected from these zones.

Results: The positive effects of soil physical, chemical, and biological qualities on the yield of pulse crops were justified through the yield data of the high yielding zone which ranged from 769 to 989 kg ha-1 with an average pulse yield of 880 kg ha-1. This may be attributed to more favourable soil physical environment in terms of soil texture (sandy clay loam), higher mean percentage of water stable aggregates (51%) and a favourable pH of 7.52. These parameters coupled with lower bulk density (1.23 Mgm-3), optimum infiltration rate (1.76 cm hr-1) and maximum mean organic carbon status (1.38 mg kg-1) contributed to higher range of soil cation exchange capacity (28.7 to 47.2 cmol p+ kg-1). In addition, the presence of avilable nitrogen and phosphorus, potassium, sulphur and availability of mean micronutrient contents viz., DTPA iron and DTPA zinc resulted in better quality of these soils contributing to maximum pulse productivity in this zone. Soil respiration rate with mean respiration rate of 4.48 mg CO2 kg-1 d-1 in high yield category compared to that of 2.34 mg CO2 kg-1 d-1 in low yield category, which is well correlated with better soil organic matter content in the former than the latter group of soil. Therefore, this study formulates a clear understanding of the variations in soil quality parameters for adopting efficient nutrient management practices towards obtaining maximum productivity of pulse crops. 

Pulses are the essential sources of proteins, vitamins and minerals, popularly known as “poor man’s meat” and “rich man’s vegetable” that contribute significantly to nutritional security and are valued as soil-building crops as they have a positive influence on soil quality (Singh et al., 2015). The production of pulses in India during 2019-20 is 22.14 million tonnes and is projected to be about 39 million tonnes by 2050, which necessitates an annual growth rate of 4.0%. The pulses’ current productivity varies from 700-790 kg ha-1 in India and 710 kg ha-1 in Tamil Nadu state, which is still well below the world’s average productivity (840 kg ha-1) (Hosamani et al., 2017). An increase in yield per hectare of legumes was observed only ~1.4 times compared with ~3.0 times increase in cereals. The yields can be maximized only when the soil has the capacity to supply sufficient nutrients in a balanced proportion, which requires optimum fertilizer application, that is, soil application of a recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) along with micronutrients (Yadav et al., 2007).

Further, root exudates released by pulses and organic matter added to the soil make unavailable soil nutrients in plant-available forms. In general pulse crops remove about 30-50 kg N, 2-7 kg P2O5, 12-30 kg K2O, 3-10 kg Ca, 1-5 kg Mg, 200-500 g Mn, 5 g B, 19 g Cu and 0.5 g Mo from soil for producing one tonne of biomass. The nutrient imbalance is one of the major abiotic constraints limiting the productivity of pulses (Shukla et al., 2012). Furthermore, 90% area under pulses and more than 75% area under oilseed are in rainfed conditions.

Since the poor soils are low in organic matter content, organic manures play a vital role in improving soil physical condition, providing essential plant nutrients and maintaining the soil’s long-term productivity (Saliha et al., 2020). The crisis of shortage of pulses has aggravated the problem of malnutrition (Hussainy and Vaidyanathan, 2019). Thus, there is an urgent need to increase pulses production to meet the requirement by manipulating production technologies appropriately.

In order to restore the quality of degraded soils and to prevent them from further degradation, it is of paramount importance to evaluate the soil quality in terms of physical, chemical and biological characteristics and to standardize a set of soil quality criteria for improving the productivity of pulses in various yield zones of Tamil Nadu.

The present research study aims to evaluate the soil properties and fertility status in low, medium and high yield zones and compare the productivity of pulse crops mainly blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) and greengram (Vigna radiata L.) followed by red gram (Cajanus cajan L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) among these zones in relation to the soil parameters.
Description of the study area
 
Geographically the study area is located in Virudhunagar district lying at the foot of Western Ghats between 90°20’ and 90°72' North latitude and 77°20' and 78°70' East longitude. It is bounded by Madurai district in the north, Sivagangai and Ramanathapuram in the east, Thoothukudi and Tirunelveli districts in the south and Kerala state in the west. The past decade weather information indicated a bimodal rainfall pattern with mean annual rainfall of 805.5 mm. The mean minimum, mean maximum and average air temperatures are 38.5, 30.2 and 34.5°C, respectively. The details of blocks and villages covered for assessing soil quality is given in Table 1.

Table 1: Details of blocks and villages covered for assessment of soil quality in Pulse growing areas of Virudhunagar district.


 
Survey and collection of soil samples
 
The present investigation was conducted during 2020-2022 at the Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai.

Based on the yields of the pulse crops (Blackgram and Greengram) for the past ten year and farmers database the sampling area for soil quality assessment and leaf nutrient analysis was divided into three categories viz., low yielding (<400 kg ha-1), medium yielding (400 -700 kg ha-1) and high yielding (>700 kg ha-1) which are also indicated as low, medium and high soil quality categories.

About 50 surface samples (0-15 cm) for each zone @ 50 samples per block in two replications were collected from three blocks covering the low, medium and high yielding zones amounting to 300 number of soil samples representing the variability in soils of the pulse growing regions of Virudhunagar district.

For fixing the sample size (25) in the different category of low, medium and high fertility soil samples the “proportionate to size sampling method” was used by adopting the formula as given below:
ni = (Ni/N) × n
Where,
i= Unit sample size.
Ni = Unit sample population size.
N = Population size.

Soil bulk density (ρb), particle density, aggregate stability and infiltration rate
 
The bulk density and particle density of soil surface samples (0-15 cm) were determined from the apparent and true volumes of the soil measured by adding a known quantity of water to a measuring cylinder containing a weighed quantity of soil (Baruah and Barthakur, 1997). Using the Mass-Volume relationship, the bulk density and particle density of soil were calculated (Blake and Hartge, 1986).

The soil aggregate stability was determined by wet sieving method (Yoder, 1936) where 50 g soil was placed on a nest of three sieves with apertures of 2.0, 1.0 and 0.5 mm, respectively. The percentage aggregate stability was calculated by using the equation:
   
 
Infiltration rate or water intake rate of the soil samples were measured by using double ring infiltrometer (Blake, 1965).
 
Soil pH, organic carbon, calcium carbonate and cation exchange capacity
 
The pH of the sample was determined in 1:2 soil-water suspension using a combined pH meter (Jackson, 1973). The representative soil samples from the study area were air dried, finely ground and passed through 0.2 mm sieve for organic carbon estimation. The organic carbon present in organic matter of the soil sample was determined by the chromic acid wet digestion method of (Walkley and Black, 1934).

Ten gram of soil sample was treated with an excess standard 0.2 N HCl and back titrated the unreacted acid with standard alkali to determine the presence of free calcium carbonate (Piper, 1966).The cation exchange capacity of soil was determined by using Neutral Normal Ammonium Acetate solution in which the quantity of cations (NH4+) adsorbed by the soil was estimated by distillation (Bower et al., 1952) and the CEC was expressed as cmol (p+) kg-1 soil.
 
Soil available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulfur and micronutrients
 
For estimating the available N content, a known weight of the soil was treated for with excess of alkaline potassium permanganate and distilled in the presence of sodium hydroxide as per Subbaiah (1956) method. Phosphorus content of the soil was extracted using 0.5 M sodium bicarbonate and measured colorimetrically using a red filter at 660 nm (Olsen, 1954). The available potassium in the soil was extracted by using Neutral Normal NH4OAc and the concentration of K ions in the solution was determined using flame photometer (Stanford and English, 1949). Available sulphur in the soil samples was extracted with 0.15 per cent CaCl2.2H2O and estimated by turbidimetric method (Cottenie et al., 1979).

Available micronutrients in the soil viz., Fe and Zn were extracted using DTPA (Diethylene Triamine Penta Acetic acid) and subsequent measurement of micronutrient concentrations in the filtrate by using an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Lindsay and Norvell, 1978).
 
Soil respiration and dehydrogenase activity
 
Soil respiration was determined by CO2 evolution method in which 25°C field moist soil was placed in a 50 mL beaker and incubating the sample in dark for 10 days in a one litre airtight sealed jar containing 10 mL of 1 M NaOH (Anderson, 1982). The activity of dehydrogenase in soils was assayed according to the method prescribed by Cassida et al. (1964).
 
Statistical analysis
 
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare the effect of different soil quality categories on soil properties. All statistical analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS, 2013). Statistical significance was determined at α=0.05 level (McLean, 1982). The relationship between soil properties were determined by Pearson’s correlation matrix using RStudio 1.1.453 (Allaire, 2012).
Soil bulk density, particle density, aggregate stability and infiltration rate
 
Data on soilbulk density, particle density, aggregate stability and infiltration rate for low, medium and high soil quality categories are presented in Table 2. The significantly low bulk density (1.23 Mgm-3) of high soil quality category at p<0.05 indicated better soil physical environment for pulse crop growth compared to the other two zones. Potential root restriction occurred in soils with bulk density >1.4 Mg m-3 for clay and >1.6 Mg m-3 for sand (Sakin, 2012). The water stable aggregate percentage was significantly influenced by medium and high-quality soils (48.4 and 51.1, respectively).

Table 2: Soil bulk density (rb), particle density, water stable aggregates (WSA) and infiltration rate of various soil quality categories under pulses production.



Infiltration rate of any soil type is prerequisite for soil quality assessment. Soils with less than 0.5, 0.5 to 2.0 and 2.0 to 4 cm hr-1 are considered to have slow, moderately slow and moderate infiltration rates, respectively. Soil organic matter is a key attribute of soil quality that impacts soil aggregation and water infiltration (Franzluebbers, 2002).
 
Soil pH, organic carbon, calcium carbonate content and cation exchange capacity
 
Data on soil pH, SOC, CaCO3 and CEC for low, medium and high soil quality sites are presented in Table 3. The significant influence of soil pH was observed in the high soil quality (7.51) followed by medium soil quality (8.10) and low soil quality zones (8.58). In the low-quality zone of this study, 88 per cent soil samples are under alkaline pH, which may tend to decrease the availability of nutrients creating an unfavourable condition for plant growth as already reported by Meena et al. (2006).

Table 3: Soil pH, organic carbon (SOC), calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and cation exchange capacity (CEC) of various soil quality categories under pulses production.



The mean soil organic carbon (SOC) content (6.52 g kg-1) was significantly high in high soil quality zone, which was 12 and 55 % more than the medium (2.92 g kg-1) and low soil quality (1.72 g kg-1) categories, respectively. The data on CaCO3 content indicate that all the soil samples collected from the high yielding pulse farms were free from calcareousness (<2%). The cation exchange capacity of soil depends on two main parameters, namely the soil organic matter content and soil texture, particularly the amount and nature of clay. An optimum CEC of 18 cmol (p+) kg-1 is considered favourable for pulse cultivation (Hati et al., 2007), but the average CEC was significantly low (11.9 c mol (p+) kg-1) in the low soil quality zone.
 
Available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulphur, iron and zinc
 
Data in Table 4 represent the available N, P, K, S, Fe and Zn for the three soil quality categories. Soil with less than 280, 281 to 450 and >450 kg per hectare of N is considered as low, medium and high in available N status, respectively (www.agritech.tnau.ac.in).

Table 4: Soil available nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), sulfur (S), iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) content of various soil quality categories under pulses production.



The mean available N content in the low soil quality zone (139 kg ha-1) was significantly low by 20 and 50% from the medium (227 kg ha-1) and high (283 kg ha-1) soil quality zones, respectively. This might be due to improper N fertilization, insufficient application of organic manures and ignorance of soil-test based N management practices. Lakshmi et al. (2015) reported similar results while assessing the response of pulse crops to nutrient management.

Phosphate compounds in plant are called ‘energy currency’ and for pulses, it plays an important role in root proliferation and initiate nodule formation (Liu et al., 2018). Soil containing below 11, 11 to 22 and >22 kg available P2O5ha-1 are considered as low, medium and high in P supply (agritech.tnau.ac.in), respectively. The available P content in the soils of low soil quality zone was significantly low (3.8 kg ha-1).

The mean available K in the soils of low soil quality zone was significantly low (168 kg ha-1) relative to other two zones, which may be due to the insufficient application or complete avoidance of K application by the farmers. Similar observation has been made by (Singh, 2017). The critical limit of available sulphur status is 10 kg ha-1, below and above which are considered as deficient and sufficient in available S respectively (Tandon, 2005).

Among the micronutrients, Fe and Zn were found to be of serious concern in Tamil Nadu (Shukla et al., 2014). The available Fe content analysed for the low soil quality zone registered deficiency in 72% soil samples. The critical limit for available zinc is 1.2 mg kg-1. The relatively higher deficiency in the low soil quality category may be due high pH, presence of CaCO3 and low SOC content. These observations were in accordance with the findings of (Chahal et al., 2005).
 
Soil respiration rate and dehydrogenase activity
 
The soil respiration rate in the surface soil samples of pulse crops is given in Fig 1. The high soil quality zone recorded significantly higher respiration rate of 4.48 mg CO2 kg-1 d-1 that indicated the favourable influence of soil organic matter.

Fig 1: Soil respiration rate (mg CO2 kg-1 d-1) of low, medium and high soil quality categories under pulses production.



The dehydrogenase activity in the soil samples of the low, medium and high yielding pulse growing soils of Virudhunagar district is given in Fig 2. The mean values of dehydrogenase activity in the low and medium soil quality zones in this study were 32 and 64 TPF µg g-1 of dry soil hr-1, respectively. The average dehydrogenase activity in any fertile soil varies between 80-95 TPF µg g-1 of dry soil hr-1 (Sharma and Mandal, 2009).

Fig 2: Dehydrogenase activity (TPF µg g-1of dry soil h-1) of low, medium and high soil quality categories under pulses production.


 
Yield of pulse crop
 
Pulse crops which are cultivated by the farmers of this study area over five decades are recently facing yield reduction in major pulse growing zones which is mainly attributed to soil fertility decline that prompted this research study. The pulse predominant zones were classified into three categories viz., low yielding (less than 400 kg ha-1), medium (400 - 700 kg ha-1) and high yielding (more than 700 kg ha-1) and the yields were recorded from the farms involved in the soil quality assessment survey (Fig 3).

Fig 3: Crop yield (kg ha-1) of low, medium and high soil quality categories under pulses production.



Accordingly, the yield range of pulses in low, medium and high soil quality categories were 143 to 390, 413 to 721 and 769 to 989 kg ha-1, respectively. The soil quality indicators assessed in the low soil quality zone recorded significantly higher mean bulk density (1.44 Mgm-3), lesser percentage of water stable aggregates (48%), significantly lower CEC (12.20 cmol (p+) kg-1), which created a relatively poor physico-chemical environment that constrained the availability of nutrients in terms of significantly low N status (138 kg ha-1), moderate K status (168 kg ha-1), low availability of P and S (3.84 and 8.51 kg ha-1) and deficiency in Zn (0.85 mg kg-1).

On the contrary, the positive effects of soil physical, chemical and biological properties on the yield of pulses were well proved through the yield data of the high soil quality zone which ranged from 769 to 989 kg ha-1 with a mean pulse yield of 880 kg ha-1. Moderate N and P status of 316 and 12.4 kg ha-1 respectively, significantly high available potassium (367 kg ha-1) and sulphur status (21.8 kg ha-1). The micronutrient contents viz., DTPA Fe (9.18 mg kg-1) and DTPA Zn (2.07 mg kg-1) in high quality soils were well above the critical limits revealed better quality of these soils contributing to maximum pulse productivity in this zone.
 
Correlation of parameters
 
The mean maximum pore space (41.3%) in the high soil quality zone is also ascribed to the lower bulk density values in these soils as evidenced in the correlation studies (r = -0.309*) indicating the importance of soil densities as a parameter for determining soil porosity (Table 5). The higher CEC in high soil quality zones may be due to relatively higher soil organic matter content (r= 0.505**) and higher clay content (r= 0.289*) which in turn might have contributed to better availability of nutrients for crop uptake and thus higher yield of pulses. A significant positive relationship was also established between available P status and crop yield. Similar observation was made by (Harisudan et al., 2009).

Table 5: Correlation co-efficient between important soil quality parameters of the pulse growing soils (0-15 cm) of Virudhunagar district, Tamil Nadu.

From this study, it could be concluded that higher values of soil attributes such as aggregate stability, cation exchange capacity, organic carbon, available nitrogen, available potassium and extractable micronutrients corresponded well with the high soil quality category and aid in improving the pulse productivity in low yield zones. Adoption of TNAU recommended dose of fertilizers viz., 12.5:25:12.5:10 kg N, P2O5, K2O and S per hectare or soil test-based application of nutrients along with regular and integrated application of enriched farmyard manure at 750 kg ha-1, Azospirillum at 2 kg ha-1 and pulse wonder in high quality zone contribute for better soil quality for obtaining higher yield in pulses.
Financial support for this work was provided by the Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers limited, Mumbai and ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Virudhunagar (grant no. RCF/NRM/MDU/AC/2013/R001).
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. 

  1. Allaire, J. (2012). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Boston. MA 770: 394.

  2. Anderson, J. (1982). Soil Respiration. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, (methods of soilan2).

  3. Baruah, T. and Barthakur, H. (1997). A Textbook of Soil Analysis Vikas Publishing House PVT LTD. New Delhi.

  4. Blake, G. (1965). Bulk density. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling. 9: 374-390.

  5. Blake, G. and Hartge, K. (1986). Particle density. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 5: 377-382.

  6. Bower, C.A., Reitemeier, R. and Fireman, M. (1952). Exchangeable cation analysis of saline and alkali soils. Soil Science. 73(4): 251-262.

  7. Cassida, J.R., Klein, D.A.L. and Santoro, T. (1964). Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science. 98(6): 371-376.

  8. Chahal, D., Sharma, B. and Singh, P. (2005). Distribution of forms of zinc and their association with soil properties and uptake in different soil orders in semi arid soils of Punjab, India. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 36(19-20): 2857-2874.

  9. Cottenie, A., Velghe, G., Verloo, M. and Kiekens, L. (1979). Analytical methods for plants and soils. Laboratory of Analytical and Agrochemistry, State University, Ghent, p 29.

  10. Franzluebbers, A. (2002). Soil organic matter stratification ratio as an indicator of soil quality. Soil and Tillage Research. 66(2): 95-106.

  11. Harisudan, C., Latha, K., Subbian, P., Vaidyanathan, R. and Manivannan, V. (2009). Nutrient management for rainfed pulses-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 30(3): 224-228.

  12. Hati, K.M., Swarup, A., Dwivedi, A., Misra, A. and Bandyopadhyay, K. (2007). Changes in soil physical properties and organic carbon status at the topsoil horizon of a vertisol of central India after 28 years of continuous cropping, fertilization and manuring. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 119(1-2): 127-134.

  13. Hosamani, V., Chittapur, B., Hosamani, V. and Hiremath, R. (2017). Sustained nutrient management practice for pulse production: A Review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 6(11): 3773-3786.

  14. Hussainy, S.A.H. and Vaidyanathan, R. (2019). Relative performance of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) based intercropping systems under different irrigation levels. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 22: 841-48.

  15. Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis-advanced course: A manual of methods useful for instruction and research in soil chemistry, physical chemistry of soils, soil fertility and soil genesis. UW-Madison Libraries Parallel Press.

  16. Lakshmi, C., Rao, P.C.,Sreelatha, T.,Madhavi,M., Padmaja, G.and Rao, P. (2015). Residual effect of organic and inorganic nutrient sources on macro and micro nutrient status of rabi greengram under rice-greengram cropping system. Legume Research: An International Journal. 38(4): 496- 502. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00113.7.

  17. Lindsay, W.L. and Norvell, W.A. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 42(3): 421-428.

  18. Liu, A., Contador, C.A. and Fan, K. and Lam, H.M. (2018). Interaction and regulation of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus metabolisms in root nodules of legumes. Frontiers in Plant Science. 9: 1860. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpls.2018.01860.

  19. Meena, H., Sharma, R. nd Rawat, U. (2006). Status of macro-and micronutrients in some soils of Tonk district of Rajasthan. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science. 54(4): 508-512.

  20. Mclean, E.O. (1982). Soil pH and Lime Requirement. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. [Page, A.L. (Ed.)], Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison. 199-224.

  21. Olsen, S.R. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture.

  22. Piper, C. (1966). Soil and plant analysis, Hans. Pub. Bombay. Asian Ed. 368-374.

  23. Sakin, E. (2012). Organic carbon organic matter and bulk density relationships in arid-semi arid soils in Southeast Anatolia region. African Journal of Biotechnology. 11(6): 1373-1377.

  24. Saliha, B., Priyanka, C.B. and Mahendran, P.P. (2020). Assessment of biological indicators of soil quality to enhance productivity of pulse crops. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 8(5): 1214-1216.

  25. Sharma, K. and Mandal, B. (2009). Soil quality and its relevance for sustainable agriculture. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 57(4): 572-586.

  26. Shukla, A.K., Behera, S.K.,Shivay, Y.,Singh, P. and Singh, A. (2012). Micronutrients and field crop production in India: A review. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 57(3s): 123-130.

  27. Shukla, A.K., Tiwari, P.K. and Prakash, C. (2014). Micronutrients deficiencies vis-a-vis food and nutritional security of India. Indian Journal of Fertilizers. 10(12): 94-112.

  28. Singh, A.K., Singh, S.Prakash, V., Kumar, S. and Dwivedi, S. (2015). Pulses production in india: Present status, sent status, bottleneck and way forward. Journal of Agri Search. 2(2): 75-83.

  29. Singh, D. (2017). Effect of potassium and sulphur on performance of green gram (Vigna radiata) in alluvial soil. Annals of Plant and Soil Research. 19(2): 223-226.

  30. Stanford, G. and English, L. (1949). Use of the flame photometer in rapid soil tests for K and Ca. Agronomy Journal. 41(9): 446-447.

  31. Subbaiah, B. (1956). A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Current Science. 25: 259-260.

  32. SAS (Statistical Analysis Systems), (2013). The SAS System for Windows, Release 9.4. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC, 556 p.

  33. Tandon, H.L.S. (2005). Methods of analysis of soils, plants, waters, fertilisers and organic manures. Fertiliser Development and Consultation Organisation.

  34. Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science. 37(1): 29-38.

  35. Yadav, A.K., Varghese, K. and Abraham, T. (2007). Response of biofertilizers, poultry manure and different levels of phosphorus on nodulation and yield of greengram (Vigna radiata L.) cv. K-851. Agricultural Science Digest. 27(3): 213-215.

  36. Yoder, R.E. (1936). A direct method of aggregate analysis of soils and a study of the physical nature of erosion losses 1. Agronomy Journal. 28(5): 337-351.

Editorial Board

View all (0)