Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Weather Parameter’s Impact on Natural Parasitization by Campoletis chlorideae Uchida in Chickpea Ecosystem - New Alluvial Zone of West Bengal

C. Meenambigai1,*, Arunava Samanta1, Snigdha Samanta2, K. Sathees Kumar3
1Department of Agricultural Entomology, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia-741 252, West Bengal, India.
2Department of Entomology, School of Agriculture and Allied Sciences, The Neotia University, Sarisha-743 368, West Bengal, India.
3Department of Agricultural Economics, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Submitted07-06-2023|

  • Accepted22-03-2024|

  • First Online 12-06-2024|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5187

Background: A major biotic constraint in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) production is gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). However, the population of this pest is reduced to some extent by a solitary endo-larval parasitoid, Campoletis chlorideae Uchida under field conditions. Climate change has a greater impact on natural enemies’ effectiveness used in field-level pest management. Therefore, the present study was conducted to understand the impact of weather factors on C. chlorideae parasitization rate of H. armigera in chickpea grown in the new alluvial agro-climatic zone of West Bengal.

Methods: Chickpea was grown in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications during Rabi 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-2020, at Mondouri farm, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Visawavidayala, Mohanpur, West Bengal. To know the most significant weather parameter which influences C. chlorideae parasitization or parasitoid incidence, H. armigera larvae (2nd instar) collected from the field experiment were reared until cocoon formation and parasitization % was correlated with weather parameters and subsequently subjected to stepwise regression analysis.

Result: The larval endo-parasitoid, C. chlorideae marked its first appearance from 3rd SMW after the appearance of H. armigera and its activity was high (68% to 72% parasitization) during the flowering to pod initiation stage and thereafter declined gradually. Among the weather variables, only temperature (maximum and minimum) had a consistent and significant negative correlation with C. chlorideae incidence and was responsible for nearly 50% C. chlorideae incidence. An increase in 1°C temperature results in a decrease of 4% parasitoid incidence. Thus, climate change in the near future will have a considerable influence on the overall survival, development and rate of parasitization of parasitoids.

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) also known as Bengal gram or chana is one of the most important pulse crops of India and is considered as “king of pulses” (Bhatt and Patel, 2001). Though India contributes around 71% and 70% of the global chickpea area and production, respectively, the country lags in terms of productivity. Nearly around 60 insect species are known to infest chickpeas. Among that legume pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is the most important biotic constraint and an insatiable feeder of chickpea flowers, pods and developing seeds (Reed et al., 1987).  Repeated usage of conventional insecticides led to high-level resistance development in H. armigera (Kranthi et al., 2002). Despite the application of insecticides costing over US$500 million annually, H. armigera causes an estimated loss of US$325 million in chickpea which is uneconomical under subsistence farming (Sharma, 2005). Thus, biological control, an important Integrated Pest Management component, comes as a rescue. Chickpea crop harbours very few natural enemies such as Campoletis chlorideae Uchida, Carcelia illota Curran, Banchopsis ruficornis Cameron and Eriborus sp. (Srinivas and Jayaraj, 1989; Singh et al., 1991). Among that, the endo-larval parasitoid Campoletis chlorideae Uchida (Ichneumonidae: Hymenoptera) is predominant in the chickpea ecosystem. The most preferred host of C. chlorideae is H. armigera and their parasitization ranges from 8.33% to 78% (Pawar et al., 1989; Dhillon and Sharma, 2007; Gupta and Raj, 2003; Agnihotri et al., 2011).  It prefers to parasitize 4 to 5 days-old late 2nd instar H. armigera larvae (Dhembare, 1999). Survival threshold and thermal requirements influence the abundance and activity of natural enemies, which in turn influence biological control programs’ success (Butler and Lopez, 1980; Chihrane et al., 1993). As a result of climate change, the likely increase in temperature and relative humidity (RH) will have a great bearing on the effectiveness of natural enemies for pest management at the field level. For framing a future H. armigera bio-intensive management strategy in the chickpea ecosystem, quantification of H. armigera mortality by natural field parasitization of C. chlorideae and its activity in relation to changing abiotic factors are of major importance. Keeping this in view, the present study was undertaken to study the effect of the influence of weather parameters on the natural parasitization of gram pod borer by C. chlorideae in the new alluvial zone of West Bengal.
The field experiment was conducted during three consecutive Rabi seasons of 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-2020, at Mondouri farm (22°56' N, 88°32’E with an altitude of 9.75 m above the msl), Bidhan Chandra Krishi Visawavidayala (BCKV), Mohanpur, which comes under the new alluvial agro-climatic zone of West Bengal. Chickpea seeds (variety: Anuradha) were sown in a 20 m2 plot with a spacing of 30 cm × 10 cm (r-r × p-p). The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and the plots were separated by an alley  of 1 m. The crop was grown by following all the recommended agronomic practices except plant protection practices and kept free from pesticide application. From the time of larva appearance in the field, every week thirty late 2nd instar H. armigera larvae were randomly collected, brought to the laboratory and reared individually on chickpea leaves in plastic vials. The food was changed regularly as and when required until cocoon formation. Every week, parasitization % by C. chlorideae was calculated based on the total number of H. armigera larvae collected and number of cocoons formed. Observations on daily data of weather parameters viz., minimum and maximum temperatures (°C), morning and evening RH (%) and rainfall (mm) prevailed during three cropping seasons (December to April 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20) were collected from Department of Agricultural Meteorology, BCKV and then daily data were converted to standard meteorological week (SMW) weather data. C. chlorideae mean larval parasitization % (dependent variable) was correlated with the weather parameters (independent variables) and a stepwise multiple regression analysis (both forward and backward) was carried out to get the regression equation for every season. All these statistical analyses were carried out using Minitab software (version 21).
Natural parasitization (%) of H. armigera by C. chlorideae
 
During all three cropping seasons, a high parasitism level of H. armigera by its larval-endo parasitoid C. chlorideae was recorded and this parasitoid marked its 1st appearance (24% parasitization) on 3rd SMW after the appearance of H. armigera (Fig 1). During 2017-18 and 2018-19, the larval parasitization % by C. chlorideae gradually increased and reached its peak (64% and 72%, respectively) in 7th SMW (3rd week of February). From 8th SMW (4th week of February) there was a regular decline in parasitization from 20% and 40%, respectively, to 4% (11th SMW). While, during 2019-20 C. chlorideae parasitization % increased gradually and reached its peak of 68% parasitization in 6th SMW (2nd week of February). Thereafter, from 7th SMW (3rd week of February) a gradual decrease in parasitization of 60% to 4% (11th SMW). Thus, a maximum parasitization of 64% to 72% was recorded during 6th to 7th SMW i.e., flowering to pod initiation stage. During all three years, parasitization became almost nil in 12th SMW (4th week of March) (Fig 1). Jagdish et al., (2016) reported the coincidence of parasitoid activity with the crop’s flowering and pod formation stage. The maximum parasitization recorded in this study was in agreement with the findings of Ojha et al., (2017) and Divija and Agnihotri (2021) who recorded a maximum parasitization of 51.67% to 56.67% and 68% to 72%, respectively, in late sown crop. Ravi and Verma (1997) and Kaur et al., (2000) reported that in normal and late-sown crops, H. armigera parasitism by C. chlorideae was maximum in 6th and 7th SMW, respectively, which was followed by a gradual decline supports the present findings. During three years, the range of minimum - maximum temperatures and morning - evening RH of 9.7°C to 11.01°C - 27.94°C to 28.36°C and 93% to 96.71% - 43% to 50.37%, respectively, along with nil rainfall were found to be favourable for C. chlorideae population build-up. The minimum to a maximum threshold temperature and RH of 12°C to 35°C and 95%, respectively, were ideal for the survival, development and increased incidence of C. chlorideae (Kaur et al., 2000; Dhillon and Sharma, 2008). Pillai et al., (2016) documented that the minimum - maximum temperature as well as morning - evening RH in the range of 8.3°C to 9.2°C - 23°C to 24°C and 89% to 90% - 44% to 54%, respectively and nil rainfall were found to be favourable for the increased C. chlorideae incidence in Terai region of Uttarakhand.
 

Fig 1: Natural field C. chlorideae parasitization % of H. armigera during Rabi 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20.


 
Association of C. chlorideae incidence with weather variables
 
A simple correlation was worked out between the weather parameters and H. armigera parasitization % by C. chlorideae during all three Rabi seasons (Fig 2). C. chlorideae parasitization % had a significant negative correlation with maximum temperature (r= -0.71* p= 0.02; r= -0.63* p= 0.04 and r= -0.73**, p= 0.01, respectively) and minimum temperature (r= -0.71*, p= 0.02, r= -0.73**, p= 0.01, r= -0.62*, p= 0.04), While, remaining independent variables such as evening RH (r= -0.16, p= 0.64; r= -0.58, p= 0.06 and r= -0.40, p= 0.23, respectively), morning RH (r= 0.46, p= 0.16; r= -0.47, p= 0.14 and r=-0.57, p= 0.07, respectively) and rainfall (not available; r= -0.07, p= 0.84 and r= -0.48, p= 0.14, respectively) showed non-significant association with C. chlorideae parsitization (Fig 2).  Thus, among the weather variables only temperature (maximum and minimum) had a strong negative association with parasitoid incidence i.e., as the temperature increases, the parasitoid incidence (calculated based on parasitization %) decreases sharply and other weather variables did not play any significant role in influencing parasitization %. The temperature had a negative association with C. chlorideae larval and pupal periods and the parasitoid activity was found to cease at a temperature above 35°C to 40°C (Gupta and Raj, 2003; Teggelli et al., 2004; Dhillon and Sharma, 2008). Though Pillai et al., (2016) as well as Divija and Agnihorti, (2021) reported that the maximum and minimum temperatures had a significant negative association with C. chlorideae incidence, which supports the present result, they have also pointed out that there exists a positive correlation between morning/evening RH and parasitoid incidence. As per Singh et al., (2015) RH and rainfall did not play any precise function in C. chlorideae parasitization of H. armigera which is in agreement with the present findings.
 

Fig 2: Correlogram showing the association of weather variables and parasitization % C. chlorideae during Rabi (a) 2017-18, (b) 2018-19 and (c) 2019-20.


 
Stepwise regression analysis of parasitoid incidence and weather variables
 
Based on all three years of weather data, it was confirmed that multicollinearity exists i.e., a condition where explanatory/independent variables are interdependent or a high correlation is observed between independent variables (indicated inside the red colour circle) (Fig 2). Under multicollinearity conditions, one or two best explanatory variables with adequate information that appropriately explain the dependent variable were selected by dropping out other explanatory variables using stepwise regression (Farrar and Glauber, 1967). Based on both forward and backward regression analysis, during 2017-18 and 2019-20, maximum temperature was responsible for 50.28% and 52.71% variation in parasitoid incidence. While, during 2018-19 minimum temperature emerged as the best explanatory variable, responsible for 52.93% variation in parasitoid incidence. The effect of maximum temperature (2017-18 and 2019-20) and minimum temperature (2018-19) was statistically significant at 95% probability level which was evident from the t probability values (p= 0.05) (Table 1). Thus, only 50% C. chlorideae incidence was significantly influenced by temperature (maximum and minimum). Since the parasitoid incidence does not depend only on weather variables alone, some other factors such as the host density for parasitization and food availability for adults might have contributed to the remaining parasitoid population build-up. Bisane et al., (2013) reported that in pigeonpea H. armigera larva parasitization by C. chlorideae exhibited a density-dependent relationship. In contrast to the present result Gupta and Raj (2003) reported that RH and total rainfall had a significant effect of 74.15% on larval parasitism, both individually as well as in association with other abiotic factors. Pillai et al., (2016) revealed that various abiotic factors such as minimum and maximum temperatures, morning and evening RH, rainfall, sunshine hours and wind velocity were influencing 97.9% to 99.3% of parasitization. Keeping other factors constant, the model regression equation (y=a+bx) indicates that during 2017-18 and 2019-20, every 1°C decrease in maximum temperature resulted in 4.16% and 4.83% increase in the parasitoid population, respectively. During 2018-19 there was 4.78% increase in parasitoid incidence for every 1°C decrease in minimum temperature (Table 1).
 

Table 1: Estimates of the regression coefficient and t-probability for the explanatory variable selected using stepwise regression analysis of C. chlorideae incidence.

The maximum and minimum temperatures in the range of 29.14°C to 33.14°C and 12.36°C to 14.69°C, along with the gradual build of H. armigera larvae during the flowering to pod initiation stage of the crop favoured C. chlorideae population to sustain in the environment. Though H. armigera larval incidence increased throughout the cropping season, the parasitoid population declined gradually as the temperature increased. Thus, only temperature (maximum and minimum) has the most significant influence as well as being responsible for nearly 50% C. chlorideae incidence or parasitization %. An increase in 1°C of maximum and minimum temperature results in a 4% decrease in parasitoid incidence. Thus, as a result of climate change, the temperature changes may have a considerable influence on the survival, development and parasitization of C. chlorideae.
The authors thank the Department of Agricultural Entomology, BCKV for their support in carrying out the experiments. We gratefully acknowledge the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India for their financial support provided under the INSPIRE Fellowship scheme.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. Agnihotri, M., Gairola, S.C. and Anju, B. (2011). Seasonal incidence of Campoletis chloridae Uchida, a larval parasitoid of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) in chickpea. Journal of Insect Science. 24: 362-366.

  2. Bhatt, N.J. and Patel, R.K. (2001). Screening of chickpea cultivars for their resistance to gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera. Indian Journal of Entomology. 63: 277-280.

  3. Bisane, K.D., Wadaskar, R.M., and Deotale, R.O. (2013). Tritrophic interaction of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in major pulses ecosystem. Legume Research. 36: 116-124.

  4. Butler, G.D. and Jr, Lopez, J.D. (1980). Trichogramma pretiosum: development in two hosts in relation to constant and fluctuating temperatures. Annals of Entomological Society of America. 73: 671-673. 

  5. Chihrane, J., Lauge´, G. and Hawlitzky, N. (1993) Effects of high temperature shocks on the development and biology of Trichogramma brassicae (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae). Entomophaga. 38: 185-192.

  6. Dhembare, A.J. (1999). Preference of host Helicoverpa armigera by larval parasite Campoletis chlorideae Uchida. Journal of Experimental Zoology. 2: 27-28.

  7. Dhillon, M.K. and Sharma, H.C. (2007). Survival and development of Campoletis chlorideae on various insect and crop hosts: Implications for Bt-transgenic crops. Journal of Applied Entomology. 131: 179-185

  8. Dhillon, M.K. and Sharma, H.C. (2008). Influence of temperature and Helicoverpa armigera food on survival and development of the parasitoid, Campoletis chlorideae. Indian Journal Plant Protection. 36: 240-244. 

  9. Divija, S.D. and Agnihotri, M. (2021). Impact of Abiotic Factors and Dates of Sowing on Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) Parasitoid Campoletis chloridae (Uchida) under Chickpea Cropping System in Tarai Region of Uttarakhand. Legume Research.1-4. DOI:10.18805/LR-4500.

  10. Farrar, D.E. and Glauber, R.R. (1967). Multicollinearity in regression analysis: the problem revisited. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 49: 92-107.

  11. Gupta, R.K. and Raj, D. (2003). Natural parasitism by Campoletis chlorideae Uchida, a promising parasitoid of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea. Journal of Biological Control. 17: 9-12.

  12. Jagdish, J., Agnihotri, M. and Chakravarty, S. (2016). Biology and relative parasitization of larval endoparasitoid Campoletis cholrideae Uchida on Heliocoverpa armigera Hübner under sole and chickpea-coriander intercropping system.

  13. Journal of Biological Control. 30: 84-90.

  14. Kaur, S., Brar, K.S., Sekhon, B.S., Joshi, N., Shenhmar, M. and Singh, J. (2000). Role played by Campoletis chlorideae Uchida in natural mortality of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) on chickpea in Punjab. Journal of Biological Control. 14: 51-54.

  15. Kranthi, K.R., Jadhav, D.R., Kranthi, S., Wanjari, R.R., Ali, S.S. and Russell, D.A. (2002). Insecticide resistance in five major insect pests of cotton in India. Crop Protection. 21: 449-460. 

  16. Ojha, P.K., Kumari, R. and Chaudhary, R.S. (2017). Impact of abiotic and biotic factors on population dynamics of Helicoverpa armigera Hubner (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) in chickpea. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 5: 636-42.

  17. Pawar, C.S., Bhatnagar, V.S. and Jadhav, D.R. (1989). Campoletis chlorideae Uchida (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) as a parasite of Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in southwest India. Proceedings: Animal Sciences. 98: 259-265

  18. Pillai, A.K., Selvaraj, S. and Agnihotri, M. (2016). Seasonal abundance of Campoletis chlorideae Uchida (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), A larval parasitoid of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in chickpea. Legume Research. 39: 643-647.

  19. Ravi, G. and Verma, S. (1997). Seasonal incidence of chickpea pod borer Helicoverpa armigera and its larval parasitoids on chickpea crop. Indian Journal of Entomology. 59: 359-361.

  20. Reed, W., Cardona, C., Sithanantham, S. and Lateef, S.S. (1987). The chickpea insect pests and their control. The Chickpea. CAB International, Wallington, UK. pp. 283-318.

  21. Sharma, H.C. (2005). Strategies for Heliothis/Helicoverpa management: Emerging trends and strategies for future research. Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India. pp: 465-474.

  22. Singh, D., Singh, S.K. and Vennila, S. (2015). Weather parameters influence population and larval parasitization of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) in chickpea ecosystem. Legume Research. 38: 402-406.DOI:10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00111.3

  23. Singh, Y., Singh, S.P. and Mathur, K.K. (1991). Parasitization of Helicoverpa armigera on Bengal gram in Delhi. Indian Journal of Entomology. 53: 128-133. 

  24. Srinivas, P.R. and Jayaraj, S. (1989). Record of natural enemies of Heliothis armigera from Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu. Journal of Biological Control. 3: 71-72.

  25. Teggelli, R.G., Rao, K.J. and Kulkarni, K.A. (2004). Effects of temperature and relative humidity and their interaction on the development of Campoletis chlorideae Uchida. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 17: 476-478.

Editorial Board

View all (0)