Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Nutrient Management Through Organic Sources in Chickpea

S.N. Shah1, V.D. Chaudhari1, J.C. Shroff1,*, V.J. Patel1, A.P. Patel1
1Department of Agronomy, B.A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand-388 110, Gujarat, India.
  • Submitted02-05-2023|

  • Accepted13-12-2023|

  • First Online 05-01-2024|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5165

Background: Chickpea is the third most important food legume grown globally and provides nutritious food for an increasing world population. Considering the environmentally friendly and improves and maintains soil fertility force to use organic manures. The organic amendments like composts and vermicompost have a positive influence on the quality of soil. Further, combined application of Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria along with organic manure has increased nodulation, growth and yield parameters in chickpea. In view of above consideration, the present investigation entitled “nutrient management through organic sources in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)” was carried out. 

Methods: The field experiment was conducted at Agronomy Farm, B.A. College of Agriculture, AAU, Anand during three consecutive rabi seasons of 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with four replications.

Result: Based on three years investigation data clearly brought out that significantly taller plants, higher number of branches, number of pods per plant, seed index and seed yield were recorded in application of 10 kg nitrogen through vermicompost and bio-NP 1.0 litre ha-1, but it was at par with application of 10 kg nitrogen through NADEP along with Bio NP 1.0 litre ha-1 and 20 kg nitrogen through NADEP. Among all the treatment, higher value of BCR was observed under application of 10 kg nitrogen through vermicompost along with Bio NP 1 litre ha-1.

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) is one of the most important grain legumes of the world, which is grown in 44 countries across five continents. Since legumes are vital sources of protein, calcium, iron, phosphorus and other minerals, they form a significant part of the diet of vegetarians since the other food items they consume do not contain much protein (Latham,1997). Production ranks third after beans with a mean annual production of over 11.5 million tons with most of the production centred in India. Land area devoted to chickpea has increased in recent years and now stands at an estimated 14.56 million hectares. Over 2.3 million tons of chickpea enter world markets annually to supplement the needs of countries unable to meet demand through domestic production (Bulti and Jema, 2019). Pulses are a source of supplementary protein to daily diets based on cereals and starchy food for a predominantly vegetarian population. They also provide energy, essential minerals, vitamins and several compounds considered beneficial for good health. They are a rich source of protein and by virtue of nitrogen fixing ability, plays vital role in sustaining the soil fertility.
       
However, the productivity of these crops is very low because of their cultivation on marginal and sub marginal lands having poor soil fertility, where the little attention is paid for adequate fertilization. Reliance on the increased use of chemical fertilizers and associated hazards put back attention on organic sources, which are effective in promoting health and productivity of the soil. In addition to supply of nutrients, organic sources improve the physical condition and biological health of the soil, which improves the availability of applied and native nutrients. As input requirements are seemingly much lower than that of any other cereal crops, chickpea is well suited in organic nutrient management.
       
Based on the available knowledge from the literature, the present investigation was carried out to study the nutrient management through organic sources involving Bio NP (liquid biofertilizer contain Rhizobium and PSB) to enhance the productivity of chickpea.
An investigation was carried out from 2018-19 to 2020-21 at Agronomy Farm, B.A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat on loamy sand soil having organic carbon 0.36%, available P2O528.45 kg ha-1 and K2O, 240.80 kg ha-1. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with ten treatments and four replications. The treatments were T1 - Bio NP (Azospirillum and PSB), T2 - N equivalent of 20 kg ha-1 through FYM, T3 -  N equivalent of 20 kg ha-1 through Vermicompost, T4- N equivalent of 20 kg ha-1 through NADEP compost, T5- N equivalent of 20 kg ha-1 through Castor Cake, T6- N equivalent of 15 kg ha-1 through FYM, T7 - N equivalent of 10 kg ha-1 through FYM+ Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB), T8- N equivalent of 10 kg ha-1 through Vermicompost + Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB), T9- N equivalent of 10 kg ha-1 through NADEP compost + Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB) and T10 - N equivalent of 10 kg ha-1 through Castor Cake + Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB). The Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB) will be applied @ 1.0 l ha-1 with organic sources and in treatment T5 by drenching in furrow. The Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB) were purchased from Department of Biofertilizer, Anand Agricultural University, Anand. Chickpea variety GJG 3 was sown during the first fortnight of November, 2018 and 2019 while during 2020 it was sown in first week of December in 30 cm apart rows using 60 kg seed ha-1. Entire quantity of nitrogen equivalent to different organic manures was applied in respective treatments before sowing. All other cultural practices were kept normal and uniform for all the treatments. Observations were recorded on some important plant parameters like plant height, number of branches plant-1, number of pods plant-1, seed index, seed yield and protein content of seed. Nitrogen content of the seeds was estimated using Kjeldhal method, phosphorous by Olsen method and potassium by Flame Photometer method (Jackson, 1973). Whereas, protein content of seed was estimated from N content of the seeds. The data collected were statistically analysed using analysis of variance technique and Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at 5% probability to compare the difference among the treatments means.
Effect on growth attributes
 
Results showed that plant population was not influenced significantly but plant height (cm) and number of branches per plant, were significantly influenced by different treatments (Table 1). Significantly taller plants (57.23 cm) and higher number of branches (10.50 plant-1) were recorded in application of 10 kg nitrogen through vermicompost and Bio-NP 1.0 litre/ha, but was at par with application of 10 kg nitrogen through NADEP along with Bio NP 1.0 litre/ha and 20 kg nitrogen through NADEP. The higher plant height and number of branches per plant was due inoculation of seeds with Rhizobium is known to increase nodulation and N uptake thereby increased growth of the plant in terms of plant height (Namvar et al., 2011). Similarly, Srivastava et al., (2021) stated that PSB possess the ability to bring sparingly insoluble inorganic or organic phosphates into soluble form and thus, the PSB enhances the P availability in the soil and phosphorus is essential constituent of plant cell and is also helpful in increasing the different growth characters. Significantly lower number of branches and pods per plant was observed with application of Bio NP alone, but was at par with application of FYM alone. Seeds inoculated with Bio NP showed significant results and produced higher nodule number and nodule weight per plant as compared to uninoculated seed. Biofertilizer has significant effect on nodule number and nodule activity (Mohammadi et al., 2010). Bacteria had beneficial effect on plant growth due to the fixation of atmospheric nitrogen and release auxins to the root zone thereby enhance the growth of the plant. The positive effect of Rhizobium + PSB on increasing number of nodules per plant in comparison to other inoculants in chickpea was also observed by Singh et al., (2018).
 

Table 1: Growth and yield attributes of chickpea as influenced by different treatment (Pooled data 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21).


 
Effect on yield attributes and yield
 
Number of pods per plant and seed index was recorded significantly higher under application of 10 kg nitrogen through NADEP along with Bio NP 1.0 litre ha-1 but it was at par with application of 20 kg nitrogen through vermicompost and 10 kg nitrogen through vermicompost along with Bio NP 1.0 litreha-1. Nitrogen applications along with Bio NP simultaneously have positive effects on growth indices and yield attributes of chickpea. Plants with nitrogen application in lower amount and inoculated with Bio NP showed better yield attributes including number of pods and seed index. Yadav et al., (2021) also observed higher number of pods in chickpea when crop was supplemented with Rhizobium + PSB. Seed and stover yield were also recorded significantly higher under application of 10 kg nitrogen through vermicompost along with Bio NP 1.0 litre ha-1 but it was at par with application of 10 kg nitrogen through NADEP along with Bio NP 1.0 litre ha-1 and application of 20 kg nitrogen through either vermicompost or NADEP. The higher yield might be due to the more positive effect of biofertilizer in presence of application of organic manure in the form of vermicompost or NADEP. Application of Rhizobium and PSB as Bio NP enhance the phosphorus availability and this available phosphorus enhances the number pods and thereby of seed yield. Shwetha (2009) stated that liquid organic manures meet the nutrient requirement of crops with greater nutrient use efficiency and also correct the deficiency as and when noticed under organic production system. Srivastava et al., (2021) also observed higher chickpea seed yield with application of recommended dose of nitrogen through vermicompost with bio-fertilizers (Rhizobium+PSB). Ajaykumar et al., (2022) also observed positive effect of liquid biofertilizer on growth, yield attributes and yield of black gram. Further, results showed non-significant influenced on protein content of chickpea seed.
 
Economics
 
The data on economics presented in Table 2 revealed that application of 10 kg nitrogen through vermicompost along with Bio NP 1 litre/ha registered maximum net income of ₹ 123522 ha-1 which was followed by application of 10 kg nitrogen through NADEP along with Bio NP 1 litre/ha treatment (₹ 122056 ha-1). While, higher value of BCR (6.06) was observed under application of 10 kg nitrogen through vermicompost along with Bio NP 1 litre ha-1.
 

Table 2: Yield and economics of chickpea as influenced by different treatment (Pooled data 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21).

From the results of three-year experimentations, it can be concluded that different treatments were significantly influence on seed yield of chickpea in individual years as well as in pooled results. Application of 10 kg nitrogen through NADEP mixed with Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB) 1.0 l ha-1 as soil application or 10 kg nitrogen through vermicompost mixed with Bio NP (Rhizobium and PSB) 1.0 l ha-1 as soil application produced significantly higher seed yield and better economic return.
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

  1. Ajaykumar, R., Harishankar, K., Sivasabari, K., Rajeshkumar, P., Saranraj, T., Aravind, J. and Kumaresan, S. (2022). Effect of liquid rhizobium with organic bio-stimulants on growth, yield attributes and yield of leguminous blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Research. 45(12): 1587- 1592. Doi: 10.18805/LR-4999.

  2. Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

  3. Latham, M.C. (1997). Human nutrition in the developing world (No. 29). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. p. 493-498.

  4. Merga, B. and Jema, H. (2019). Economic importance of chickpea: Production, value and world trade. Cogent Food and Agriculture. 5(1): 5-12.

  5. Mohammadi, K., Ghalavand, A. and Aghaalikhani, M. (2010). Effect of organic matter and biofertilizers on chickpea quality and biological nitrogen fixation. International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering. 4(8): 578- 583.

  6. Namvar, A., Sharifi, R.S., Sedghi, M., Zakaria, R.A., Khandan, T. and Eskandarpour, B. (2011). Study on the effects of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer on yield, yield components and nodulation state of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 42(9): 1097-1109.

  7. Shwetha, B.N., Babalad, H.B., Patil, R.K. (2009). Effect of combined use of organics in soybean- wheat cropping system. Journal of Soil and Crops. 9(1): 8-13. 

  8. Singh, A.K., Sachan, Kumar, R.K.V., Pathak, Srivastav, S. (2018). Effects of phosphorus with biofertilizers on yield and nutrient content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under central Uttar Pradesh condition. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 10(2): 2228-2234.

  9. Srivastava, A., Singh, S.S., Yadav, S., Yadav, S.K. and Zaidi, S.F.A. (2021). Effect of organic manures and biofertilizers on growth parameters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and their effect on soil health. International Journal of Chemical  Studies. 9(2): 191-195. 

  10. Yadav, S., Kumar, S., Anshuman K., Singh, N. and Srivastav, A. (2021). Studies on effect of different biofertilizer on yield and economics of chickpea. Pharma Innovation Journal. 10(4): 541-545.

Editorial Board

View all (0)