Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Impact of Different Sowing Dates on Growth and Pod Yield of Vegetable Pea under Sub-Himalayan Foothills Region of India

Udit Kumar1,*, Nishiprabha Behera1, K. Prasad2, Pramila1, Dharminder3, Kaushal Kishor4, R.K. Tiwari4, Bharati Upadhaya4, Sunil Kumar5, Vivek Kumar3
1Department of Horticulture, PG College of Agriculture, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa-848 125, Bihar, India.
2Department of Horticulture, Tirhut College of Agriculture, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Dholi, Pusa-848 125, Bihar, India.
3Department of Agronomy, PG College of Agriculture, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa-848 125, Bihar, India.
4Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Birauli, Samastipur-848 125, Bihar, India.
5Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Veer Kunwar Singh College of Agriculture, Buxar-802 136, Bihar, India.
  • Submitted21-04-2023|

  • Accepted14-03-2024|

  • First Online 11-04-2024|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5158

Background: The optimum sowing date is crucial among the different agronomic procedures for maximizing output. Optimizing a crop's planting time may be one of the most significant climate resilient tactics for increasing production & hence it becomes necessary to study the crop growth behaviors in changing climatic conditions. The proposed field investigations were undertaken to study the influence of different sowing dates on yield of vegetable pea.

Methods: Field investigations were undertaken during Rabi seasons of 2020-21 and 2021-22 at the Vegetable Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa (85.67oE - 25.98oN.), which comes under sub-Himalayan foothills region of India. The research study was performed in Randomized Block Design with three replications consisting of eight different sowing dates of vegetable pea. cv. Azad Pea-3 at 10 days interval between each sowing dates. Observations were made on various growth & yield attributing parameters.

Result: Results revealed that the parameters under study were substantially affected by various sowing dates. Second week of sowing in November in the years produced maximum plant height at 60 DAS (83.77cm), number of branches per plant (3.97), number of nodules per plant at flowering (26.13), number of green pods per plant (20.80), 10 pods weight (75.67g) and pod yield (52.06q/ha).

Vegetable pea (Pisum sativum L.) or green peas or vegetable peas is one of the oldest cultivated crops grown all over the world for its tender green pods and immature seeds. Pea is a major cool season vegetable crop in family Fabaceae (Leguminaceae). Due to its low requirements for water, chemicals, and fossil fuels and also its capacity to symbiotically fix atmospheric nitrogen, pea cropping has significant advantages in sustainable farming systems (MunierJolain and Carrouee, 2003). In India, vegetable pea is cultivated in an area of 567.7 thousand hectares from which annual production is 5852.5 thousand metric tonnes. In Bihar, pea is grown over 11.9 thousand hectares with 66.3 thousand metric tonnes of annual production (Anonymous, 2020; Kumar et al., 2023). Green seeds can be consumed as fresh or alternatively might be used after processing (canning, freezing and dehydration) for use during off season and has great potential in domestic and export market. Vegetable pea is typically a cool season crop of temperate and subtropical regions but can also be grown in mild climate of the tropics.

Pea, like other crops, is influenced by weather along with various climate complexities because it cannot thrive in the summer heat or lowland tropical climates, however grows well in cooler and higher altitude tropical areas (Oplinger et al., 1991). Green peas could be cultivated in temperatures ranging from 10 to 30°C, but they perform best at temperature between 13-18°C and are frost resilient for the initial vegetative growth stages, although the flowers and pods are harmed later on. Temperatures above 25.6°C during flowering and pod setting, according to Wien (1997), reduced pea flower, pod number and yield. For pea seeds germination, the ideal temperature is around 22°C. Germination can occur at temperature conditions as low as 5°C, although at a slower pace. (Sirwaiya et al., 2018). Temperatures exceeding 20°C reduce the production besides quality of immature seeds. Temperature fluctuations during germination increase plant mortality due to desiccation (Sharma et al., 1997), while higher temperatures cause plants to flower earlier, contributing to poor yield (Gajenra et al., 1995). At high temperatures seed N accumulation is significantly constrained due to a shorter seed-filling period and a lower seed dry-matter accumulation rate (Larmure and Munier-Jolain, 2019). Vegetable pea is a cool loving crop and on shortening of winter the crop may be affected in one way or the other. This has resulted in shifting of optimum sowing dates and affected the growth and phenology of crop at different stages. With the rise in global temperature, pea seed yield is decreasing and the developing seeds are shown to be aborted when exposed to high temperatures (Jeuffroy, 1990). Optimizing a crop’s planting time may be one of the most significant climate resilient tactics for increasing production and hence it becomes necessary to study the crop growth behaviours in changing climatic conditions. The goal would be to undertake sowing at a period when there is the greatest chance of receiving a favourable condition for the maturation and growth of seed. Keeping in view of the above aspects, the proposed investigation was undertaken to study the influence of different sowing dates on growth and yield of vegetable pea under sub-Himalayan foothills region of India.
The investigations were undertaken during Rabi seasons of 2020-21 and 2021-22 at Vegetable Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Dr Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, which comes under sub-Himalayan foothills region of India, situated at North latitude of 25.97°, East longitude of 85.86° and altitude of 52.05 meters above mean sea level. Throughout the period of investigations for two years, average precipitation of 135.3 mm, relative humidity (Max.94.92% and Min.61.74), average daily maximum temperature of 25.20°C, minimum temperature 13.09 0C and total sunshine hours of 803.3 was recorded. The studies were performed in randomized block design with three replications for vegetable pea cv. Azad Pea-3 at eight sowing dates viz. T1:12th Oct, T2:22nd Oct, T3:1st Nov, T4:11th Nov, T5:21st Nov, T6:1st Dec, T7:11th Dec and T8:21st Dec in the both years. 20 tonnes FYM/ha was incorporated into the soil at time of land preparation followed by application of recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O @ 60:60:60 Kg/ha at time of sowing. Vegetable pea seeds were sown at an interval of 10 days in plots of 6 m ´ 1.5 m by maintaining a spacing of 30 cm between the rows and 10 cm between the plants. Manual hand weeding at initial phase of crop growth i.e at 25 DAS and subsequently at 45 DAS was enough to keep the experimental plot was weed free. The field was irrigated during flowering and pod formation stages of crop and also according to the conditions of the soil. To assess the impact of different sowing dates, observations on various characteristics such as growth, length of various phases and pod yield related parameters were recorded during period of investigations. Within each treatment and for each replication five plants were randomly selected and tagged properly for recording of related observations from these labelled plants. The data collected on different observations for each treatment were subjected to “Analysis of variance,” as suggested by Panse and Sukhatme (1985).
Different sowing dates showed a significant impact on various growths as well pod yield and its attributing parameters.

Plant stand was influenced by different date of sowing. Mean plant stand was varied from 76.92-94.65 (Table 1). The treatment T6 exhibited maximum plant stand (94.65%) and this was statistically at par with T5 (89.35%), and T7 (91.38%) while minimum plant stand was obtained in T1 sowing (76.92%). Plant stand was noticed lower in the case of earlier planting dates. This could be on account of prevalence of high temperature during sowing to stand establishment period of crop which caused decreased germination percentage, seedling emergence, aberrant seedlings, low seedling vigour and poor radical as well as plumule development in germinated seedlings (Hasanuzzaman et al., 2013) and hence resulted in poor crop stand. Considering such effect of temperature similar results were obtained by (Singh and Kumar 1979; Weier et al., 1982; Bewley, 1997; Sharma et al., 1997; Dhall, 2017 and Lamichaney et al., 2021).

Table 1: Influence of different sowing dates on growth parameters (years 2020-21, 2021-22 and pooled).



Plant height at 60 DAS was maximum in T4 sowing (83.34 cm) which was statistically at par with T5 (80.46 cm), T3 (77.55 cm) and T6 (76.20 cm). Significantly lowest plant height (62.90 cm) was recorded in T1 sowing. This was most likely owed to more assimilates being utilised to sustain increased height of vegetative growth. Higher temperature largely affects the pace of plant development, which increases to a point and then decreases (Howarth, 2005; Wahid et al., 2007). The period of rapid vegetative growth was delayed owing to effect of lower temperature. This is in agreement to the findings of (Srivastava and Singh, 1989; Sirwaiya and Kushwah, 2018; Haq and Ahmed, 2021).

Maximum number of branches plant-1 was produced from T4 sowing (4.00) and this was found at par with T3 (3.57) and T5 (3.44) sowing. Number of branches plant-1 was recorded lowest in case of T1 sowing (1.57). This might be explained on account of prolonged vegetative period under low temperature that allowed formation of more branches along with impact of other prevailing weather conditions during the period of growth. Similar findings have been achieved by (Stanfield, 1965; Sirwaiya and Kushwah (2018).

Maximum number of nodules plant-1 at flowering was produced in T4 sowing (26.30) and this was statistically at par with T3 sowing (25.13). Meanwhile lowest was recorded in T7 sowing (17.04). The possible explanation for this might be related to increase in soil temperature from solar radiation which favoured rhizobial growth. The prevalence of low temperature significantly lowered nodule growth rate, delayed nodule formation significantly, final nodule size, nodule activity and impacted nitrogenase activity (Schweitzer and Harper, 1980; Junior et al., 2005). Similar finding was also obtained by Dung (2012).

The results from the experiment indicated that sowing dates had exerted a significant influence on the number of days to first flowing, flowering to harvest and sowing to harvest of vegetable pea plant (Table 2). For first flowering, T1 sowing took minimum number of days (29.50) and this was at par with T3 sowing (30.00) and T2 sowing (30.67) sowing. While it was maximum in case of T6 sowing (49.00). This might be because of exposure of plants to warmer temperature which induced earlier reproductive development.

Table 2: Influence of different sowing dates on reproductive parameters (years 2020-21, 2021-22 and pooled).



T1 sowing took the least number of days from flowering to harvest (37.67) and this was at par with T8 sowing (38.84), T7 sowing (38.84) and T2 sowing (39.17). Whereas T6 sowing (43.00) took the most for the same. T1 sowing took the least number of days from sowing to harvest (67.17) and this was at par with T2 sowing (68.83) and T3 sowing (70.84).Whereas T6 sowing (88.50) took the maximum number of days from sowing to harvest. This might be because of slower growth under low temperature which prolonged this duration. These observations are similar with the findings of (Nonnecke et al., 1971; Srivastava and Singh, 1989; Guilioni et al., 2003; Bueckert et al., 2015; Bhandari et al., 2016; Kuznetsov et al., 2020).

Sowing date has exerted a significant effect on the number of green pods per plant (Table 3). T4 sowing produced maximum number of green pods (20.39) plant-1 and this was statistically equivalent with T5 sowing (18.07). Significantly lowest number of green pods plant-1 was produced in T1 sowing (11.64). This might be owed to the mild temperature, longer growth duration which ultimately resulted in diversion of more energy towards more flowering and pod formation. Moreover flowering, pod formation along with its development was limited by high temperature on account of more sunshine hours during reproductive phase (Wien, 1997). The results are supported with the findings of Lambert and Linck (1958); Guilioni et al., (1997); Sadras et al., (2012); Bhandari et al., (2016); Sita et al., (2017); Jiang et al., (2020); Lamichaney et al., (2021); Haq and Ahmed (2021).

Table 3: Influence of different sowing dates on pod yield and its attributing parameters (years 2020-21, 2021-22 and pooled).



Length of pods was found to be highest in T4 sowing (9.42 cm) and this was at par with T3 (9.40 cm), T5 (9.08 cm) and T6 (8.85 cm), sowing. The pod length was shortest in case of T1 (7.37 cm) sowing.

Under Punjab conditions, Randhir et al., (1996) observed that this could be attributed to low maximum temperature experienced between the period from flowering to maturity which encounter milder temperatures, develop more slowly, grow for longer periods of time intercept more solar energy and subsequently assimilate more photosynthates towards pod and seed development. These observations are in accordance with the findings of Nonnecke et al., (1971; Jeuffroy et al., (1990); Siddique et al., (2002); Bhandari et al., (2016); Sita et al., (2017); Haq and Ahmed (2021).

The weight of 10 pods of vegetable pea was highest for T4 sowing (76.00 g) which was statistically at par with T5 (70.00 g), T6 (69.40 g) and T3 (69.13 g) and was significantly lowest for T1 (49.35 g) sowing.

Pod yield was also recorded highest for T4 sowing (52.39 q/ha) and was equivalent with T5 (49.46 q/ha), T6 (48.93 q/ha) and T3 (47.95 q/ha), while lowest pod yield hectare-1 was obtained from T1 sowing (38.86 q/ha). Pod yield is directly affected by number of branches plant-1, number of pods plant-1, pod length and pod weight which in turn are  influenced by the maximum and minimum temperature as well as bright sunshine hours prevailing during flowering to harvest period of the crop. These matches with the findings as reported by Nonnecke et al., (1971); Pumphrey et al., (1979); Randhir et al., (1996); Wien (1997); Siddique et al., (2002); Moniruzzaman et al., (2007); Gantner et al., (2008); Sita et al., (2017); Kuznetsov et al., (2020); Lamichaney et al., (2021); Haq and Ahmed (2021).
The current investigations inferred that sowing of garden pea from 1st November to 1st December was effective in providing favorable meteorological conditions required for different phenophases which eventually led to maximization of pod yield under sub-Himalayan foothills region of India.
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

  1. Anonymous, (2020). Area and Production of Horticultural Crops (Final estimates), Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, (2020-2021).

  2. Bewley, J.D. (1997). Seed germination and dormancy. The Plant Cell. 9(7): 1055-1066.

  3. Bhandari, K., Siddique, K.H., Turner, N.C., Kaur, J., Singh, S., Agrawal, S.K. and Nayyar, H. (2016). Heat stress at reproductive stage disrupts leaf carbohydrate metabolism, impairs reproductive function and severely reduces seed yield in lentil. Journal of Crop Improvement. 30(2): 118-151.

  4. Bueckert, R.A., Wagenhoffer, S., Hnatowich, G. and Warkentin, T.D. (2015). Effect of heat and precipitation on pea yield and reproductive performance in the field. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 95(4): 629-639.

  5. Dhall, R.K. (2017). Pea Cultivation. Bulletin no PAU/2017/Elec/FB/ E/29. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.

  6. Dung, N.T. (2012). Growth and Development of Peas in Response to Different Inoculation Methods and Sowing Dates  (Doctoral Dissertation, M. Sc. Thesis, Lincoln University, USA).

  7. Gajenra, S., Sing, O.P. and Sing, G. (1995). Performance of pea varieties at different seeding times. Annals of Agricultural Research. 16(3): 384-386.

  8. Gantner, R., Stjepanoviæ, M. and Gantner, V. (2008). Precipitation and temperature effects upon grain yield of field pea. Cereal Research Communications. 36: 1503-1506.

  9. Guilioni, L., Wéry, J. and Lecoeur, J. (2003). High temperature and water deficit may reduce seed number in field pea purely by decreasing plant growth rate. Functional Plant Biology. 30(11): 1151-1164.

  10. Guilioni, L., Wery, J. and Tardieu, F. (1997). Heat stress-induced abortion of buds and flowers in pea: Is sensitivity linked to organ age or to relations between reproductive organs? Annals of Botany. 80(2): 159-168.

  11. Haq, M.T. and Ahmed, M.S. (2021). Effect of sowing date on growth and yield performance of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of ELT and Education. 4(4): 75-79.

  12. Hasanuzzaman, M., Nahar, K. and Fujita, M. (2013). Extreme temperature responses, oxidative stress and antioxidant defense in plants. Abiotic Stress-plant Responses and Applications in Agriculture. 13: 169-205.

  13. Howarth, C.J. (2005). Genetic improvements of tolerance to high temperature. Abiotic stresses: Plant resistance through breeding and molecular approaches. Howarth Press Inc., New York. 277-300.

  14. Jeuffroy, M.H., Duthion, C., Meynard, J.M. and Pigeaire, A. (1990). Effect of a short period of high day temperatures during flowering on the seed number per pod of pea (Pisum sativum L). Agronomie. 10(2): 139-145.

  15. Jiang, Y., Lindsay, D.L., Davis, A.R., Wang, Z., MacLean, D.E., Warkentin, T.D. and Bueckert, R.A. (2020). Impact of heat stress on pod based yield components in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 206(1): 76-89.

  16. Junior, M.D.A.L., Lima, A.S.T., Arruda, J.R.F. and Smith, D.L. (2005). Effect of root temperature on nodule development of bean, lentil and pea. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 37(2): 235-239.

  17. Kumar, U., Bihari, C., Pramila, Prasad, K., Sinha, B.M., Ghosh, S., Patel, V.K., Dharminder and Kishor, K. (2023). Pod and seed production potential of vegetable pea (Pisum sativum L.) as influenced by different levels of sulphur and boron in calcareous soil of North Bihar. Legume Research. doi: 10.18805/LR-5009.

  18. Kuznetsov, I., Davletov, F., Anokhina, N., Akhmadullina, I. and Safin, F. (2020). Influence of weather condtion on the field peas [Pisum sativum (L.) ssp. sativum] vegetation period and yield. Agronomy Research. 18(2): 472-482.

  19. Lambert, R.G. and Linck, A.J. (1958). Effects of high temperature on yield of peas. Plant Physiology. 33(5): 347-350.

  20. Lamichaney, A., Parihar, A.K., Hazra, K.K., Dixit, G.P., Katiyar, P.K., Singh, D. and Singh, N.P. (2021). Untangling the influence of heat stress on crop phenology, seed set, seed weight and germination in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Frontiers in Plant Science. 12: 635868. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpls.2021.635868.

  21. Larmure, A. and Munier-Jolain, N.G. (2019). High temperatures during the seed-filling period decrease seed nitrogen amount in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Evidence for a sink limitation. Frontiers in Plant Science. 10: 1608. https:/ /doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01608.

  22. Moniruzzaman, M., Rahman, S.M.L., Kibria, M.G., Rahman, M.A. and Kaisar, M.O. (2007). Performances of vegetable french bean as influenced by varieties and sowing dates in rabi season. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod. 2(5): 69-73.

  23. Munier-Jolain, N. and Carrouée, B. (2003). Considering pea in sustainable agriculture: Agricultural and environmental arguments. Cahiers d’Etudes et de Recherches Francophones  Agricultures (France).

  24. Nonnecke, I.L., Adedipe, N.O. and Ormrod, D.P. (1971). Temperature and humidity effects on the growth and yield of pea cultivars. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 51(6): 479-484.

  25. Oplinger, E.S., Oelke, E.A., Kaminski, A.R., Putnam, D.H., Teynor, T.M., Doll, J.D. and Noetzel, D.M. (1991). Crambe: Alternative field crops manual. University of Wisconsin and University  of Minnesota. St. Paul, MN, 55108.

  26. Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1985). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. Publication and information division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

  27. Pumphrey, F.V., Ramig, R.E. and Allmaras, R.R. (1979). Field Response of Peas (Pisum sativum L.) to Precipitation and Excess Heat1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 104(4): 548-550.

  28. Randhir, S., Mohan, S. and Kanwar, J.S. (1996). Effect of date of sowing on growth and seed yield of early maturing pea variety Matar Ageta-6. Punjab Vegetable Grower. 31: 35-36.

  29. Sadras, V.O., Lake, L., Chenu, K., McMurray, L.S. and Leonforte, A. (2012). Water and thermal regimes for field pea in Australia and their implications for breeding. Crop and Pasture Science. 63(1): 33-44.

  30. Schweitzer, L.E. and Harper, J.E. (1980). Effect of light, dark and temperature on root nodule activity (acetylene reduction) of soybeans. Plant Physiology. 65(1): 51-56.

  31. Sharma, V.K., Soroch, K. and Singh, C.M. (1997). Influence of time of sowing on yield of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under dry temperate zone of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 42(2): 320-322.

  32. Siddique, A.B., Wright, D. and Mahbub, S.M. (2002). Effects of sowing dates on the phenology, seed yield and yield components of peas. Journal of Biological Sciences. 2(5): 300-303.

  33. Singh, H. and Kumar, A. (1979). Germination studies on vegetable crops [onion, pea and spinach]. Journal of Research- Punjab Agricultural University (India).

  34. Sirwaiya, S. and Kushwah, S.S. (2018). Assessment of different sowing dates and varieties on growth, yield and quality of seed in garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 7(3): 1387-1396.

  35. Sirwaiya, S., Kushwah, S.S., Bain, R.P. and Mandale, P. (2018). Study of combined effect of sowing dates and varieties on growth attributes in Garden Pea (Pisum sativum L.).  The Pharma Innovation. 7(5): 709-711.

  36. Sita, K., Sehgal, A., Rao, B.H., Nair, R.M., Vara Prasad, P.V., Kumar, S. and Nayyar, H. (2017). Food legumes and rising temperatures: Effects, adaptive functional mechanisms specific to reproductive growth stage and strategies to improve heat tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8: 1658. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01658.

  37. Srivastava, K.B. and Singh, R.P. (1989). Morpho-phystological response of garden pea to sowing dates. Ii-growth analysis. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 46(3): 382-389.

  38. Stanfield, B. (1965). Effects of temperature on the growth and development of Pisum sativum L. cultivar Dark Skin Perfection (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia).

  39. Weier, T.E., Stocking, C.R. and Barbour, M.G. (1982). Botany, an introduction to plant biology. ISBN 10: 047101561X / ISBN 13: 9780471015611. Published by Wiley, 1982.

  40. Wahid, A., Gelani, S., Ashraf, M. and Foolad, M.R. (2007). Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 61(3): 199-223.

  41. Wien, H.C. (1997). The physiology of vegetable crops. CAB International.

Editorial Board

View all (0)