Different sowing dates showed a significant impact on various growths as well pod yield and its attributing parameters.
Plant stand was influenced by different date of sowing. Mean plant stand was varied from 76.92-94.65 (Table 1). The treatment T6 exhibited maximum plant stand (94.65%) and this was statistically at par with T
5 (89.35%), and T
7 (91.38%) while minimum plant stand was obtained in T
1 sowing (76.92%). Plant stand was noticed lower in the case of earlier planting dates. This could be on account of prevalence of high temperature during sowing to stand establishment period of crop which caused decreased germination percentage, seedling emergence, aberrant seedlings, low seedling vigour and poor radical as well as plumule development in germinated seedlings
(Hasanuzzaman et al., 2013) and hence resulted in poor crop stand. Considering such effect of temperature similar results were obtained by
(Singh and Kumar 1979; Weier et al., 1982; Bewley, 1997; Sharma et al., 1997; Dhall, 2017 and
Lamichaney et al., 2021).
Plant height at 60 DAS was maximum in T
4 sowing (83.34 cm) which was statistically at par with T
5 (80.46 cm), T
3 (77.55 cm) and T
6 (76.20 cm). Significantly lowest plant height (62.90 cm) was recorded in T1 sowing. This was most likely owed to more assimilates being utilised to sustain increased height of vegetative growth. Higher temperature largely affects the pace of plant development, which increases to a point and then decreases
(Howarth, 2005; Wahid et al., 2007). The period of rapid vegetative growth was delayed owing to effect of lower temperature. This is in agreement to the findings of
(Srivastava and Singh, 1989; Sirwaiya and Kushwah, 2018; Haq and Ahmed, 2021).
Maximum number of branches plant
-1 was produced from T
4 sowing (4.00) and this was found at par with T
3 (3.57) and T
5 (3.44) sowing. Number of branches plant
-1 was recorded lowest in case of T
1 sowing (1.57). This might be explained on account of prolonged vegetative period under low temperature that allowed formation of more branches along with impact of other prevailing weather conditions during the period of growth. Similar findings have been achieved by
(Stanfield, 1965; Sirwaiya and Kushwah (2018).
Maximum number of nodules plant
-1 at flowering was produced in T
4 sowing (26.30) and this was statistically at par with T
3 sowing (25.13). Meanwhile lowest was recorded in T
7 sowing (17.04). The possible explanation for this might be related to increase in soil temperature from solar radiation which favoured rhizobial growth. The prevalence of low temperature significantly lowered nodule growth rate, delayed nodule formation significantly, final nodule size, nodule activity and impacted nitrogenase activity
(Schweitzer and Harper, 1980; Junior et al., 2005). Similar finding was also obtained by
Dung (2012).
The results from the experiment indicated that sowing dates had exerted a significant influence on the number of days to first flowing, flowering to harvest and sowing to harvest of vegetable pea plant (Table 2). For first flowering, T
1 sowing took minimum number of days (29.50) and this was at par with T
3 sowing (30.00) and T
2 sowing (30.67) sowing. While it was maximum in case of T6 sowing (49.00). This might be because of exposure of plants to warmer temperature which induced earlier reproductive development.
T
1 sowing took the least number of days from flowering to harvest (37.67) and this was at par with T
8 sowing (38.84), T
7 sowing (38.84) and T
2 sowing (39.17). Whereas T
6 sowing (43.00) took the most for the same. T
1 sowing took the least number of days from sowing to harvest (67.17) and this was at par with T
2 sowing (68.83) and T
3 sowing (70.84).Whereas T
6 sowing (88.50) took the maximum number of days from sowing to harvest. This might be because of slower growth under low temperature which prolonged this duration. These observations are similar with the findings of
(Nonnecke et al., 1971; Srivastava and Singh, 1989; Guilioni et al., 2003; Bueckert et al., 2015; Bhandari et al., 2016; Kuznetsov et al., 2020).
Sowing date has exerted a significant effect on the number of green pods per plant (Table 3). T
4 sowing produced maximum number of green pods (20.39) plant
-1 and this was statistically equivalent with T
5 sowing (18.07). Significantly lowest number of green pods plant
-1 was produced in T
1 sowing (11.64). This might be owed to the mild temperature, longer growth duration which ultimately resulted in diversion of more energy towards more flowering and pod formation. Moreover flowering, pod formation along with its development was limited by high temperature on account of more sunshine hours during reproductive phase
(Wien, 1997). The results are supported with the findings of
Lambert and Linck (1958); Guilioni et al., (1997); Sadras et al., (2012); Bhandari et al., (2016); Sita et al., (2017); Jiang et al., (2020); Lamichaney et al., (2021); Haq and Ahmed (2021).
Length of pods was found to be highest in T
4 sowing (9.42 cm) and this was at par with T
3 (9.40 cm), T
5 (9.08 cm) and T
6 (8.85 cm), sowing. The pod length was shortest in case of T
1 (7.37 cm) sowing.
Under Punjab conditions,
Randhir et al., (1996) observed that this could be attributed to low maximum temperature experienced between the period from flowering to maturity which encounter milder temperatures, develop more slowly, grow for longer periods of time intercept more solar energy and subsequently assimilate more photosynthates towards pod and seed development. These observations are in accordance with the findings of
Nonnecke et al., (1971; Jeuffroy et al., (1990); Siddique et al., (2002); Bhandari et al., (2016); Sita et al., (2017); Haq and Ahmed (2021).
The weight of 10 pods of vegetable pea was highest for T
4 sowing (76.00 g) which was statistically at par with T
5 (70.00 g), T
6 (69.40 g) and T3 (69.13 g) and was significantly lowest for T
1 (49.35 g) sowing.
Pod yield was also recorded highest for T
4 sowing (52.39 q/ha) and was equivalent with T
5 (49.46 q/ha), T6 (48.93 q/ha) and T
3 (47.95 q/ha), while lowest pod yield hectare
-1 was obtained from T
1 sowing (38.86 q/ha). Pod yield is directly affected by number of branches plant
-1, number of pods plant
-1, pod length and pod weight which in turn are influenced by the maximum and minimum temperature as well as bright sunshine hours prevailing during flowering to harvest period of the crop. These matches with the findings as reported by
Nonnecke et al., (1971); Pumphrey et al., (1979); Randhir et al., (1996); Wien (1997); Siddique et al., (2002); Moniruzzaman et al., (2007); Gantner et al., (2008); Sita et al., (2017); Kuznetsov et al., (2020); Lamichaney et al., (2021); Haq and Ahmed (2021).