Growth parameters
It is believed that having an ideal plant population is the key to having a higher yield. The largest plant population per unit area was produced by the 15 × 10 cm crop spacing (54) compared to the 15 × 15 cm crop spacing (36) and the 20 × 10 cm crop spacing (42). This occurred because of the plants’ 20 cm × 10 cm crop spacing, which is too close for optimal crop accommodation in comparison to the wider 30 cm × 10 cm crop spacing. But there were little variations in plant populations across all kinds. The factors’ interaction was found to be insignificant. While the germination of seeds was nearly identical for all kinds, types had no effect on the number of plants per unit area, demonstrating it as a physically regulated factor and not genetically controlled. The conditions needed for seed germination and subsequent plant growth and development were nearly identical across the field, giving all of the types an equal chance to take use of the soil and climatic resources. These findings concur with those made by
Hussain et al., (2011).
The genetic makeup of plants and environmental conditions both significantly influence plant height. Table 1 provides information on plant height at maturity of three Urdbean varieties as influenced by various crop spacing. The findings show that crop spacing and different kinds greatly impacted plant height. The tallest plants were found in MDU 1, which had an average height of 36.7 cm. At harvest, the plants in VBN (Bg) 4 and VBN (Bg) 6 had average heights of 27.3 cm and 22.0 cm, respectively. The data in Table 1 also show that the plant height was significantly affected by different crop spacing and maximum plant height was observed at a plant spacing of 30 × 10 cm (30.2 cm) while the average plant height at maturity of 20 × 15 cm and 20 × 10 cm cm crop spacing were 29.3 cm and 28.2 cm, respectively. It was determined that there was no statistically significant interaction between crop spacing and variety. In contrast to dense populations, plants were able to grow to their greatest height because they were taking full advantage of the resources and sunlight that were available. The variety MDU 1’s maximum plant height was observed; this variation may be a result of this variety’s genetic makeup for this attribute.
Maqsood et al., (1991) reported results that were almost identical.
Urdbean varieties differed significantly in nodul number as well as in nodule dry weight. The higher number and dry weight of nodule was recorded with VBN (Bg) 6 and therefore, with regards to the symbiotic efficiency, this variety had an edge over the others. The crop spacing did not significantly affect the number of nodules/plant (Table 1). Nodule dry weight was significantly influenced by crop spacing. The five crop spacing were at par but significantly superior in nodule dry weight to 20 × 10 cm crop spacing.
Although environmental factors can also affect the number of branches per plant and have a significant impact on increasing seed yield, branching is mostly a hereditary trait. Results from Table 1 show that crop spacing and variety did not significantly alter the number of branches per plant. The VBN (Bg) 6 variety produced more branches per plant (5.2), whereas the VBN (Bg) 4 variety produced the fewest branches per plant (4.2). The plant produced more branches (5.2) in response to the crop spacing of 20 × 10 cm, although this effect was not statistically significant. At a row spacing of 15 × 10 cm, the lowest number of branches per plant (4.2) was generated. The fruit-bearing branches were also impacted by the inter-row spacing, which may have been caused by the changing availability of light, nutrients,
etc. in the case of varying spacing. These results are in agreement with those of
Khan (2000).
Yield parameters
The number of pods per plant significantly influences leguminous plant production performance. The quantity of pods per plant is finally taken into account when determining the urdbean plant’s productivity. Table 2 reveals that the quantity of pods per plant varied significantly between cultivars. The VBN (Bg) 4 plant produced the most pods per plant (10.9). MDU 1 was the cultivar that produced the fewest pods per plant (8.9). The amount of pods per plant was not significantly affected by crop spacing. The quantity of pods per plant was not significantly changed by the interaction between cultivars and inter-row spacing.
One crucial element that directly contributes to maximising potential yield recovery in leguminous crops is seed weight per plant. According to data on seed weight per plant provided in Table 2, different varieties had a substantial impact on seed weight per plant, while crop spacing as well as combinations of varieties and crop spacing had a non-significant impact. Variety VBN (Bg) 6 produced the most seeds per plant (1.82), whereas variety VBN (Bg) 4 produced the fewest (1.45 seeds per pod).
The final result of many physiological, biochemical, phenological and morphological activities occurring in the plant system is dry matter production and its transformation into economic yield. A variety’s ability to produce seeds depends on how its genetic makeup interacts with the environment in which the plant grows. Results on seed yield (Table 2) showed that crop spacing, variety and combinations of these had a substantial impact on urdbean seed yield. Variety VBN (Bg) 6 produced the most seed yield (691 kg ha
-1) and produced the most pods per plant (17.33) and statistically, it was statistically equal to Variety VBN (Bg)-4, which produced an average of 17.09 pods per plant. The variety MDU 1 produced the least seed yield (536 kg ha
-1), statistically on par with VBN (Bg) 4, which produced 556 kg ha
-1. It might be brought on by genetic variations between the types. These results are remarkably consistent with those of
Abbas (2000), who noted considerable variations in the output of various cultivars. Maximum seed yield (683 kg ha
-1) was achieved from a crop sown at a crop spacing of 20 × 10 cm, whilst the lowest seed yield (423 kg ha
-1) was obtained at an inter-row spacing of 30 × 10 cm. These outcomes are consistent with what
Ali et al., (2010) found. It was discovered that there was a considerable interactive influence between crop spacing and variety. Highest seed yield was obtained when variety VBN (Bg) 6 was sown at a spacing of 20 × 10 cm. whereas the lowest seed yield recorded when sown variety MDU 1 at 30 × 10 cm. The main element affecting the yield was the number of plants per unit area. It also showed that the higher number of plants made up for the lower yields per plant in high density situations. The increased plant population and rise in the proportion of pods that generated more seed may be the cause of the higher grain production at closer spacing.
Bhairappavar et al., (2005) reported similar outcomes as well. Similar findings by
Davi et al., (1995) revealed that intra-row spacing reduction increased grain yield. Maintaining correct inter- and intra-row spacing is essential to maintaining an ideal plant population. Therefore proper plant spacing along with a sufficient plant population may boost urdbean crop output. Several researchers in the fields of soybean
(Sekhan et al., 2002) and black gramme (
Kumar and Sharma, 1989) have observed increases in seed production as population density has grown (
Graterol and Montilla, 2003).
Harvest index (%) and path analysis
The physiological productive potential of a crop variety is gauged by the harvest index. It is a crop plant’s capacity to transform dry materials into a profit. It measures the ratio of biological yield to seed yield, therefore cultivars with higher biological yield and lower seed yield than others would have higher harvest index values. The production efficiency will increase when the harvest index value increases or vice versa. The calculated values of harvest index presented in Table 2 indicate that varieties differed significantly on account of conversion efficiency of assimilates. The maximum value of harvest index (43 %) was obtained with the variety VBN (Bg) 4. The minimum harvest index value (27%) was obtained from variety MDU 1. These findings are in agreement with by
Taleei et al., (1999) who also reported significant differences in harvest index among different varieties. Crop sown at crop spacing of 20 × 10 cm gave maximum highest harvest index (37 %) while lowest harvest index (31) was obtained at crop spacing of 15 × 10 cm.
The maximum positive variety correlation was found between the harvest index and leaf area index at 100% flowering, however the direct effect of leaf area index at 100% flowering was minimal and negative (-0.172). The indirect effect of the leaf are index at 100% flowering through the leaf are index at 50% flowering accounts for 80% of this connection. Pod clusters per plant indirectly influenced these features by 19%. The correlation has decreased by 17% as a result of the negative direct effect (Table 3). The contribution of pod length and grains per pod was quite minimal, compared to the 10% indirect influence of pods per plant.
Pod length and harvest index had a 74.2 per cent correlation. Indirect contributions from grains per pod and leaf area index at 50% flowering was 47.2% and 16.3%, respectively, while the direct contribution of pod length to the harvest index was 37.1%. The indirect impact of other factors was minimal. The harvest index and grains per pod variety association was 52.6% and its direct impact was moderately positive (19.1 per cent). According to the path analysis, the primary factors impacting the harvest index in urdbean varieties, both directly and indirectly, are the leaf area index at 50% flowering.