Effect on growth characters
Different drip irrigation and fertigation treatments significantly influenced the growth characters of greengram during both the years of investigation and the data was given in the Table 3. Higher plants height, DMP, were observed in the summer 2020 and the
kharif 2021 with drip fertigation @ 125% RDF, 100% PE with FFW (2 times), (T
11) (60.7 and 57.3 cm) and (4463 kg ha
-1 and 4169 kg ha
-1), respectively, at harvest stage
(Srinivasan et al., 2019; Balaji et al., 2019; Kumar et al., 2020). Similarly, the days to 50% flowering varied from 30.3 to 39.6 and 31.0 to 39.3 days, during summer 2020 and
kharif 2021respectively. Among treatments, DF @ 125% RDF, 100% PE with FEP (2 times) (T
12) took more days for 50 % flowering (39.6 and 39.3 days during both the years) over all the treatments. Among different levels of drip fertigation practices, DF @ 125% RDF, 100% PE with FFW (2 times) (T
11) registered significantly higher LAI of 3.75 during summer 2020; 3.96 during
kharif 2021 at peak flowering stage.
Different levels of drip fertigation in greengram significantly influenced the Chlorophyll meter reading (SPAD value), Crop growth rate, relative growth rate (RGR) between 30 and 45 DAS and 40 DAS and harvest during summer 2020 and
kharif 2021 (Table 4). Among the treatments, significantly more SPAD values (T
11) (43.2 and 45.3 during summer 2020 and 42.8 and 45.9 during
kharif 2021 at 30 and 45 DAS, respectively) was observed under DF @ 125% RDF, 100% PE with FFW (2 times), similarly same treatment registered higher CGR 14.29 g m
-2 day
-1 during summer 2020 and 16.38 g m
-2 day
-1 during
kharif 2021 at 45 DAS- harvest stage. Different levels of drip fertigation in greengram significantly influenced the relative growth rate (RGR) between 40 DAS and harvest during summer 2020 and
kharif 2021. Among the treatments, significantly higher RGR was measured in treatments T
7 (DF @ 75% RDF, 100% PE with FEP, 2 times) and T
12 (DF @ 125% RDF, 100% PE with FEP, 2 times) during summer 2020 and T
10 (DF @ 100% RDF, 100% PE with FEP, 2 times) and T
1 (DF @ 75% RDF, 75% PE with FFW, 2 times) during
kharif 2021 between 45 DAS and harvest stage, respectively than all other treatments.
The reason for increased CGR, RGR and Chlorophyll meter reading among the treatments could be due to frequent fertigation with water soluble fertilizers which would have provided a well aerated condition at root zone with adequate soil moisture content leading to supply of sufficient concentration of nutrients that did not fluctuate between wet and dry extremes contributes to optimum growth. Similar results were validated with
Badr et al., (2010).
Effect on yield attributes and yield
The yield attributes
viz, Number of pods per plant, Number of seeds per pod, Number of seeds per plant, were significantly influenced by the different drip irrigation and fertigation levels are furnished in Table 5. Among treatments, DF @ 125% RDF, 100% PE with FFW (2 times) (T
11) produced increased number of pods (35.6 pant
-1 and 26.9 pant
-1), number of seeds per pod (7.6 pod
-1 and 11.4 pod
-1) and higher number of grains plant
-1 of 269 and 308 during summer 2020 and
kharif 2021) over other treatments tested in the field investigation
(Srinivasan et al., 2021; Srinivasan et al., 2022). There was no significant difference in 100 grain weight (g) due to different drip irrigation and fertigation levels.
It might be due lower soil moisture supply, availability of nutrients also low which leads to low photosynthetic accumulation and results the increased in chaffy grains. These results are in confirmation with the results of
Sudhir et al., (2011).
The seed and haulm yield were significantly influenced by the treatments imposed in both the years of experimentation (Table 6). Among the drip irrigation and fertigation levels, DF @ 125% RDF, 100 % PE with FFW (2 times) (T
11) recorded higher seed and haulm yield (1352 kg ha
-1 and 2512 kg ha
-1) during summer 2020 and (1291 kg ha
-1 and 2403 kg ha
-1) during
kharif 2021, respectively. However, harvest index did not show any significant impact on harvest index of greengram which ranged from 0.31 to 0.36 during summer 2020 and 0.34 to 0.37 during
kharif 2021. These results are in line with the findings of
Jayakumar et al., (2014) and
Ajaykumar et al., (2022a).
Correlation analysis
The correlation findings were listed in Table 7 of the research. The study’s results indicated that, at the 1% level of significance, every variable in the model was positively significant. This indicates that every variable would have an impact on the greengram’s grain yield. The correlation coefficients between the grain yield and the plant height (0.97), DMP (0.98), LAI (0.99), number of pods plant
-1 (0.97), number of seeds pod
-1 (0.94) and test weight (0.24) revealed that all the attributes were positively related, which strongly suggests that when these variables are increased, the greengram yield will keep increasing Similar results were observed by
Ajaykumar et al., (2022b).
System productivity
Higher system productivity was observed under the DF @ 125% RDF, 100% PE with FFW (T
11) in both 2019-20 and 2021 (23 and 23 kg ha
-1 day
-1 respectively) and this was closely followed by DF @ 125% RDF, 100% PE with FEP (T
12) (22 and 22 kg ha
-1 day
-1 respectively). The lowest system productivity was registered with DF @ 75% RDF, 75% PE with FEP (T
2) (15 and 15 kg ha
-1 day
-1) during both the years of study are presented in the Table 8 and 9. The higher system productivity recorded due to higher production of rice and greengram increased the rice equivalent yield that leads to higher system productivity. This is in conformation with the findings of
Ramadass and Ramanathan (2017) and
Ray et al., (2019).