Morphological diversity
Morphological data obtained for all the traits during the study were analyzed using ANOVA. It revealed statistically significant differences between the genotypes (Table 3). The findings imply that there is significant variation among the lentil genotypes investigated and selection might be used effectively taking into account these traits in practical lentil breeding programmes as suggested in earlier study by
Gupta and Sharma (2006). Similar findings were reported earlier on morphological traits-based diversity in lentil including plant height, days to flower initiation, days to maturity, numbers of primary branches per plant, number of pods per plant etc.
(Sharma et al., 2022; Pawar et al., 2022). According to these findings the number of pods and the number of branches per plant are the important morphological traits that can be used for selecting high-yielding lentil germplasm (
Sakthivel et al., (2019).
Molecular diversity
All 37 lentil genotypes were subjected to SSR marker analysis. Only clear and sharp alleles (Fig 1) were considered for scoring. Total 31 alleles (Table 4) were obtained with a mean of 3.60 alleles per locus. The highest gene diversity was shown by the marker SSR 80 (0.79) followed by SSR 130 and SSR 34-2 (0.75), SSR 33 (0.73), SSR 99 and SSR 213 (0.67) SSR 19, SSR 90, SSR 336 and SSR 207 (0.50) with a mean value of 0.63. To ascertain the information of every marker and its capability for differentiation, the polymorphic information content (PIC) was used for each locus. The PIC value is said to be evidence of diversity among the evaluated varieties
(Pervaiz et al., 2009). The PIC value can also be evaluated based on its alleles and can be different for every SSR locus. In the present study, the highest PIC value was observed for SSR 80 (0.77) followed by SSR 130 and SSR 34-2 (0.70), SSR 33 (0.69), SSR 99 (0.59) and SSR 213 (0.59) and lowest by SSR 207, SSR 19, SSR 90 and SSR 336 (0.37) with an average of 0.67. The results of genetic diversity and PIC values are consistent with the conclusions of
Saidi et al., (2022) where SSR markers were used to evaluate genetic diversity among lentil genotypes. The studied markers were divided into three categories based on PIC values. The markers with a PIC value greater than 0.50 was considered highly informative whereas the markers with a PIC value between 0.26-0.49 were considered moderately informative and the markers with PIC values less than 0.25 were considered less informative. This variation helps assess the diversity of a marker/gene/DNA segment in a population which will help in understanding the evolutionary pressure and mutations on the locus over a while.
The number of alleles per primer varied from 2 to 5 with an average of 3.60 alleles per primer similar to the results of
Gleridou et al., (2022). The sizes of scoring bands ranged from 179 to 244 bp. The maximum numbers of alleles (5) were produced by the marker SSR 80. Most of the other primers SSR 33, SSR 336, SSR 99, SSR 130, SSR 90 and SSR 34-2 produced four alleles each. Three alleles were produced by SSR 19 marker while, SSR 207 and SSR 213 produced only two alleles respectively. The number of alleles produced per primer depends on multiple factors like the primer used, the genotype of the plant and the resolution of the amplified product. Shannon’s information index revealed the values in a range of 0.42 (SSR 213) to 1.42 (SSR 80) with an average of 0.92. Expected heterozygosity revealed a range of values from 0.25 (SSR 213) to 0.74 (SSR 80) with an average of 0.52. Observed heterozygosity showed values ranging from 0.14 for SSR 33, SSR 213 and SSR 90 to 0.97 in SSR 80 with an average of 0.42 per primer. The same outcomes have been documented by
Yadav et al., (2016) and
Dikshit et al., (2015).
Scored alleles were used to prepare data input file for the software and a dendrogram was created using the UPGMA method (Fig 2). To choose suitable genotypes for breeding programmes, it is crucial to consider the most diverse genotypes. Dendrogram grouped all thirty-seven lentil genotypes into two main clusters i.e., cluster I and cluster II. Cluster I was further divided into two sub-groups IA and IB and IA was differentiated into IA-1 and 1A-2. Cluster IB was further subdivided into two subgroups i.e., IB-1 and IB-2. ASHA, LLS 21-126, LLS 21-216, LLS 21-128, LLS 21-124, LLS 21-132, LLS 21-130 and VL 4 genotype belongs to IA-1 sub-cluster and in IA-2 sub-cluster include genotype LLS 21-207, LLS 21-205, LLS 21-202, LLS 21-211, LLS 21-199, LLS 21-197, LLS 21-194 and VL 103. IB- cluster is divided into two sub-clusters IB-1 includes JL 3, DPL 15, PL 406 and SUBRATA genotypes while, IB-2 includes genotypes LLS 21-204, LLS 21-200 and LLS 21-133 respectively. This demonstrated that the genotypes under study exhibited significant diversity. Out of thirty-seven genotypes, 27 genotypes belong to cluster I. Cluster II was divided into two subgroups IIA and IIB. Cluster II A includes 8 genotypes, while cluster II B includes 6 genotypes. Cluster IIA 1 comprises genotype PL 5, NDL 1, LLS 21-215, LLS 21-209 and LLS 21-206. Cluster II A 2 includes LLS 21-198, LLS 21-195 and LLS 21-193. Cluster II B includes 6 genotypes, Cluster II B is sub-divided into Cluster IIB 1 comprises genotypes LLS 21-125, LLS 21-218 A, LLS 21-129, LLS 21-127 and JL 1. Cluster II B 2 has a single genotype
i.e., LLS 21-131 genotypes. Similar grouping based on SSR markers was reported earlier by
Mekonnen et al., (2016) and
Singh et al., (2016) these research groups also compared the dissimilarity indices across lentil cultivars employing SSR markers and found nearly identical results.