Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Management of Sclerotinia Rot of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Incited by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) De Bary

M.K. Sheshma1,*, D.R. Kumhar1, S.L. Godara1, A.L. Yadav1, Dinesh Kumar1, Prahlad1
1Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand, Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner-334 006, Rajasthan, India.
  • Submitted30-08-2022|

  • Accepted12-07-2023|

  • First Online 27-07-2023|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5034

Background: Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Barry is a soil-borne plant pathogen, capable of infecting more than 500 host plant species worldwide and plays a crucial role in reducing the yield of economically important crops.

Methods: A field experiment was conducted to manage Sclerotinia rot of chickpea using bioagents, fungicides, soil amendments and plant extract for two crop seasons using variety GNG-1581 in field under artificial inoculation conditions. Observations on Sclerotinia rot incidence were recorded periodically. The grain yield was also recorded at harvest. 

Result: A combination of seed (5+5 g/kg seeds) as well as soil (5+5 kg/ha) application of T. harzianum + P. fiuorescens and foliar spray of carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2 per cent was found to be most effective reducing Sclerotinia rot (84.59%) and in enhancing grain yield  (87.50%).
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important grain legume in the Indian subcontinent, West Asia and Africa and Central and South America. It is known by other names like gram, spanish pea, chestnut bean (English) and Chana (Hindi) etc. On global basis, chickpea is the third most important grain legume after common bean and pea (Anwar et al., 2009). Asia covers 89.7 per cent in Oceania, 2.9 percent in America and 0.4 per cent in Europe (Gaur et al., 2010).
       
India ranks first in terms of chickpea production and consumption in the world. About 65 per cent of the global area with 68 per cent of global production is contributed by India (Reddy and Mishra, 2010). The major chickpea producing countries are India, Pakistan, Ethiopia, Burma, Turkey, Mexico and Australia.
       
It accounts for 70 per cent cultivated Rabi pulses in India. The major chickpea growing states in India are Madhya Pradesh (41%) followed by Maharashtra (16%), Rajasthan (15%), Karnataka (6%), Andhra Pradesh (5%), Uttar Pradesh (5%) and other remaining states and UTs of India (12%). The total area under chickpea cultivation in India is about 10.56 million ha with annual production of 11.23 million tonnes. The average productivity of chickpea is 1063 kg/ha. (Anonymous 2017-18a). 
       
In Rajasthan, the major chickpea growing districts are Bikaner, Churu, Jhunjhunu,  Hanumangarh, Sri Ganganagar, Jaipur, Sikar and Ajmer. The total area and production of chickpea in Rajasthan is 1.57 million ha and 1.67 million tonnes, respectively, having productivity of 1062 kg/ha (Anonymous 2017-18b). 
       
Chickpea is a protein rich supplement to all cereal based diets, especially for vegetarians. Its protein is rich in lysine and has low sulphur containing amino acid. Hence, it is widely appreciated as healthy food. On an average, chickpea contains protein (12.4 to 31.5%), carbohydrate (48.2 to 67.6%) and fat (6%) (Anwar et al., 2009). The mineral component is high in chickpea as it contains phosphorus (340 mg/100 g), calcium (190 mg/100 g), iron (7 mg/100 g), zinc (3 mg/100 g) and vitamin B in considerable amounts (Anonymous 2008).
       
Stem rot was initially observed at ARS Ummedganj, Kota in the year 1993-94 and thereafter, it has been appearing continuously in mild to severe form. The pathogen infects collar region, stem and foliage leading to mortality of the plants. The fungus characterized by the formation of hard blackish sclerotia, which on germination produce cup shaped brown colored apothecia.
       
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary is a necrotrophic pathogen with cosmopolitan distribution and wide host range (Purdy, 1979) and belongs to the family Sclerotiniaceae (Whetzel, 1945) class Ascomycetes. It produces sclerotia and apothecia but lacks conidial stage.
       
The disease has been reported from different parts of India and causing considerable losses. Its occurrence was first reported from Himachal Pradesh with considerable yield losses (Grewal and Pal, 1986). The extent of damage ranged from 21.3% to 46.7% at pod bearing stage of the crop (Sharma, 1995). In Jammu and Kashmir, the disease incidence varied from 18.7% (Udhampur) to 32.2% (Jammu). (Vaid et al., 2005).
       
Affected plants first wilted and rapidly die, often without turning yellow. Later, as the plant dries out, the leaves turn straw color. On the surface of the root, just below ground level, small black fungal bodies called sclerotia, which are irregular in size and shape, can sometimes be seen mingled with white cottony fungal mycelium.
               
A number of fungicides were evaluated against the pathogen and some of them were found effective in reducing the losses caused by the pathogen in canola crop (Bradley et al., 2006). However, use of chemicals alone is not economical and eco-friendly for such disease. Since the pathogen is soil borne and perpetuates through its sclerotia, hence its management by the use of chemicals alone becomes impracticable. Various fungal bio-control agents and soil amendments have been evaluated by various workers against S. sclerotiorum (Sharma et al., 1999).
A field experiment was conducted to manage chickpea Sclerotinia rot using bioagents, fungicides, soil amendments and plant extract for two consecutive seasons 2016-17 and 2017-18 using variety GNG-1581.
 
Through bioagents
 
Talc based formulations of two bioagents viz., Trichoderma harzianum (Th-BKN) and Pseudomonas fluorescens (PF- BKN) were used individually @ 10 g/kg seed as well as combinations of both bioagents (5+5) g/kg for seed treatment, respectively. Similarly, for soil application these were used individually @ 10 kg/ha and in combination of both bioagents @ (5+5) kg/ha with farm yard manure (FYM) @ 250 kg/ha uniformly applied in field before sowing.
 
Through fungicides
 
Three fungicides viz., tebuconazole 2 DS (0.1%) carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% (0.2%), tebuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% (75 WG) (0.1%) were used for seed treatment and foliar spray.
 
Through soil amendments
 
Two soil amendments viz., neem and castor cake were used @ 500 kg/ha as soil application. Soil amendments were applied five days before sowing of seed.
 
Through plant extract
 
Garlic extract was prepared with the help of mortar and pestle by crushing dried plant parts and adding sterilized distilled water (1:1 W/V). The extract was filtered through double layer of muslin cloth. The appropriate amount of garlic extract was mixed in sterilized distilled water (W/V) to make the desired concentration of 10 % by dissolving 10 g of garlic clove extract in 100 ml of sterilized water, respectively.
       
Total twenty one treatments including control were tested in Randomized Block Design having plot size 4×3 m. Each treatment was replicated two times. The trial was conducted under artificial soil infestation conditions. For this purpose, sand maize meal inocula of S. sclerotiorum was applied at 50 g per plot (4×3 m) thoroughly on top surface soil using a hand rack. Standard agronomic practices recommended for cultivation of chickpea crop in this region were followed. In case of control, the untreated seeds were sown in unammended plots. Observations on Sclerotinia rot incidence were recorded periodically. The grain yield was also recorded at harvest.
 
Details of treatments used for managing Sclerotinia rot
 
T1: Seed treatment (ST) with T. harzianum @ 10 g/kg + Soil application (SA) with T. harzianum @ 10 kg/ha
T2: ST with P. fluorescencs @ 10 g/kg + Soil application (SA) with P. fluorescencs @ 10 kg/ha
T3: ST with T. harzianum @ 5 g/kg  + ST with P. fluorescencs @ 5 g/kg + SA with T. harzianum @ 5 kg/ha  + SA with P. fluorescencs @ 5 kg/ha
T4: T1 + SA of castor cake @ 500 kg/ha.
T5: T1 + SA of neem cake @ 500 kg/ha.
T6: T2 + SA of castor cake @ 500 kg/ha.
T7: T2 + SA of neem cake @ 500 kg/ha.
T8: T3 + SA of castor cake @ 500 kg/ha.
T9: T3 + SA of neem cake @ 500 kg/ha.
T10: T4 + Foliar spray (FS) of garlic extract @ 10%.
T11: T5 + FS of garlic extract @ 10%.
T12: T6 + FS of garlic extract @ 10%.
T13: T7 + FS of garlic extract @ 10%.
T14: T8 + FS of garlic extract @ 10%.
T15: T9 + FS of garlic extract @ 10%.
T16: ST with carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2% + FS with carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2%.
T17: ST with tubuconazole 2 DS @ 1.5 g/kg + FS with tubuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% @ 0.1%.
T18: T1 + FS with carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2%.
T19: T2 + FS with carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2%.
T20: T3 + FS with carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2%.
T21: Control.
In this study, five treatment combinations were tested under field condition viz.,
(I) Seed treatment @ 10 g/kg seed + Soil application of bioagents @ 10 kg/ha (T. harzianum and P. fluorescencs) individually as well as combination of both the bioagents.
(II) Seed treatment + Soil application of T. harzianum and P. fluorescencs individually as well as combination of both the bioagents + Soil application of neem cake and castor cake @ 500 kg/ha.
(III) Seed treatment + Soil application of T. harzianum + P. fluorescencs individually as well as combination of both the bioagent + Soil application of neem cake and castor cake along with foliar spray of garlic extract @ 10%.
(IV) Seed treatment with carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2% + Foliar spray (FS) with carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2% and Seed treatment with tubuconazole 2 DS @ 1.5 g/kg + Foliar spray (FS) of tubuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% @ 0.1%.
(V) Seed treatment + Soil application of T. harzianum and P. fluorescencs individually as well as combination of both the bioagent + Foliar spray of carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2%   
       
Treatment combination, with T. harzianum + P. fluorescencs @ 5+5 g/kg seed + with T. harzianum + P. fluorescencs @ 5+5 kg/ha found superior with 27.75% disease incidence and 12.05 kg/ha yield as compared to the treatments where bioagents were applied alone.
       
Treatments combination, ST with T. harzianum + P. fluorescencs @ 5+5 g/kg seed + with T. harzianum + P. fluorescencs @ 5+5 kg/ha + SA of neem cake @ 500 kg/ha was found superior having the disease incidence of 19.90% and 14.30 kg/ha yield as compared to other treatment combination where bioagents were applied individually along with neem cake and castor cake or combination of both the bioagents along with castor cake.
       
Treatments combination, ST with T. harzianum + P. fluorescencs @ 5+5 g/kg seed + SA with T. harzianum + P. fluorescencs @ 5+5 kg/ha + SA of neem cake @ 500 kg/ha + FS of garlic extract @ 10% was found superior with minimum disease incidence of 13.10% and higher grain yield of 16.85 kg/ha as compared to others treatments where bioagents were applied individually with neem cake and castor cake or combination of both the bioagents with castor cake along with foliar spray of garlic extract @ 10%.
       
In these three types of combinations, bioagents and soil amendments were used to produce organic product these can minimize the disease by organic products.
       
Treatments combination where only fungicides were used, as ST with tubuconazole 2 DS @ 1.5 g/kg seed + FS of tubuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% @ 0.1% was found superior with the disease incidence of 8.95% and grain yield of 18.50 kg/ha.
       
Treatment combination, where bioagents and fungicidal treatments used and found that seed treatment with T. harzianum + P. fluorescencs @ 5+5 g/kg + SA of T. harzianum + P. fluorescencs @ 5+5 kg/ha + FS of carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2% was found superior with minimum disease incidence of 6.10% and highest grain yield of 19.50 q/ha.
       
The chickpea grain yield was significantly enhanced when bioagents used as seed treatment and soil application along with foliar spray of fungicides. The highest grain yield of 19.50 q/ha was recorded in seed treatment with T. harzianum plus P. fluorescencs @ 5+5 g/kg seed + soil application with T. harzianum plus P. fluorescencs @ 5+5 kg/ha along with foliar spray of carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2% followed by the treatment comprising seed treatment with T. harzianum @ 10 g/kg seed + SA of T. harzianum @ 10 kg/ha along with foliar spray of carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% with 18.95 q/ha, both the treatments were statistically at par as compared to control where 10.40 q/ha grain yield was recorded (Table 1).
 

Table 1: Efficay of bio-agents, organic amendments and fungicides in controlling Sclerotinia rot of chickpea.


       
The present finding on the management of chickpea Sclerotinia rot is in conformity with findings of those reported by Pandey et al., (2011) who had reported that Trichoderma harzianum plus vermi-compost was the most effective in reducing the disease incidence in chickpea. Meena et al., (2014) evaluated the efficacy of different treatments including talc based formulations of four Trichoderma harzianum isolates used as seed treatment @ 5 g/kg seed and soil application with farm yard manure @ 2 g/kg. The highest reduction of the Sclerotinia rot (69.0%) was achieved by T. harzianum isolates GR over control. Patel et al., (2011) tested the efficacy of P. fluorescens isolates against Sclerotinia rot of chickpea both in vitro and in vivo condition and reported that seed treatment with strains of Pseudomonas fluorescencs significantly reduced the disease incidence of stem rot  in all  treatments  in comparison to uninoculated control. Kumawat et al., (2018) tested some fungicides viz., carbendazim and carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% against S. sclerotiorum under field condition as seed application, foliar application and seed cum foliar application. They reported that carbendazim was found most effective in reducing the disease intensity followed by carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% WP. Bairwa et al., (2015) tested different fungicides viz., metalaxyl 8% + mancozeb 64% @ 0.2% and ST with carbendazim 50 WP @ 2 g/kg seed + 2 FS of carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2% and concluded that seed treatment with carbendazim 50 WP at 2 g/kg seed followed by two sprays of carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% mixture (0.2%) and removal of three lower leaves followed by foliar spray of metalaxyl 8% + mancozeb 64% WP (0.2%) minimizes the major diseases and maximized the yield of mustard.
       
The chickpea grain yield was significantly enhanced when bioagents used as seed treatment and soil application along with foliar spray of fungicides. The highest grain yield of 19.50 q/ha was recorded in seed treatment with T. harzianum plus P. fluorescencs @ 5+5 g/kg seed + Soil application with T. harzianum plus P. fluorescencs @ 5+5 kg/ha alongwith foliar spray (FS) of carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 0.2% followed by the treatment comprising seed treatment with T. harzianum @ 10 g/kg seed + SA of T. harzianum @ 10 kg/ha alongwith foliar spray of carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% with 18.95 q/ha, both the treatments were statistically at par as compare to control where 10.40 q/ha grain yield was recorded.
               
Similarly, combination of chemical as well as biological methods for obtaining the optimum yield with minimum losses have also reported by several workers. Meena et al., (2011) observed that T. harzianum and P. fluorescens did not differ significantly in controlling stem rot in mustard. Similar results were observed by treating the seeds with garlic bulb extract, T. harzianum and spraying of P. fluorescens. Sharma et al., (2017) evaluated the efficacy of carbendazim as seed treatment and foliar spray against S. sclerotiorum and recorded maximum reduction in infection (88%) with increased pooled mean grain yield (2439 kg/ha). Senjaliya et al., (2016) tested the efficacy of the bioagents, fungicides and soil amenmends and found that castor cake as soil organic amendment significantly reduce the disease with minimum disease incidence of 2.6% and the pod yield of 1773.67 kg/ha.
The combined effect of seed (5+5 g/kg seeds) as well as soil (5+5 kg/ha) application of  T. harzianum + P. fiuorescens  and foliar spray of carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% (0.2%) was found most effective in reducing Sclerotinia rot  (84.59%) and in enhancing grain yield  (87.50%).
None.

  1. Anonymous, (2008). Economic Survey, Government of India, New Delhi, pp.156.

  2. Anonymous, (2017-18a). Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Govt. of India, New Delhi. www.agricoop.nic.in.

  3. Anonymous, (2017-18b). DOA, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur, www. krishi.rajasthan.gov.in.

  4. Anwar, F., Sharmila, P. and Saradhi, P.P. (2009). No more hurdle: in vitro chickpea rooting and per cent transplantation. Aust. J. Appl. Sci. 3(3): 2491-2496.

  5. Bairwa, S.K., Dasharath, P., Shekhawat, U.S., Rai, P.K. and Koli, R. (2015). Disease management in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) through integrated approaches. Ann. Agric. Res. New Series. 36(3):251-257.

  6. Bradley, C.A., Lamey, H.A., Endres, G.J., Hensen, R.A., Mc Kay K.R., Halvorson, M., Le Gare, D.G., Porter, P.M. (2006). Efficacy of fungicides for control of Sclerotinia stem rot of canola. Pl. Dis. 90: 1129-1134.

  7. Gaur, P.M., Tripathi, S., Gowda, C.L.L., Ranga Rao, G.V., Sharma, H.C.Pandle, S. and Sharma, M. (2010). Chickpea seed production manual. ICRISAT. Pp: 28.

  8. Gaur, R.B., Sharma, R.N., Gautam, V.S. and Dangi, R.P. (2010). Management of Sclerotinia rot of mustard through bioagents, Indian Phytopathol. 63(4): 392-397.

  9. Gerwal, J.S. and Pal, M. (1986). Fungal Disease Problems of Chickpea. In: Vistas in Plant Pathology, [Varma, A. and Verma, J.P. (eds)]. MPH, New Delhi, pp: 157-170.

  10. Kumawat, R., Godika, S., Sharma, J. and Goyal, S.K. (2018). Efficacy of fungicides against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum causing Sclerotinia rot of Fennel. Res. J. Chem. Env. Sci.  6(3): 31-34.

  11. Meena, P.D., Awasthi, R.P., Godika, S., Gupta, J.C., Kumar, A., Sandhu, P.S., Sharma, P., Rai, P.K., Singh, Y.P, Rathi, A.S., Prasad, R., Rai, D. and Kolte, S.J. (2011). Eco-friendly approaches managing major diseases of Indian mustard. World Appl. Sci. J. 12(8): 1192-1195.

  12. Meena, P.D., Chattopadhyay, C., Meena, P.S., Goyal, P., Kumar, Vijay, R. (2014). Shelf life and efficacy of talc-based bio- formulations of Trichoderma harzianum isolates in management of Sclerotinia rot of Indian mustard (Brassica  juncea). Ann. Pl. Prot. Sci. 127-135.

  13. Pandey, P., Kumar, R. and Mishra, P. (2011). Integrated approach for the management of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, causing stem rot of chickpea. Indian Phytopath. 64(1): 37-40. 

  14. Patel, D.P., Singh H.B., shroff, S. and sahu, J. (2011). Antagonistic efficiency of pseudomonas strains against soil borne disease of chickpea crop under in vitro and in vivo. Elixir Agriculture. 30: 1774-1777.

  15. Purdy, L.H. (1979). Sclerotinia sclerotiorum history, disease and symptomatology, host range, geographic distribution and impact. Phytopathology. 69: 875-880.

  16. Reddy, A. and Mishra, D. (2010). Growth and Instability in chickpea production in India. Pp: 256-266.

  17. Senjaliya, B.D., Nathawat, B.D.S., (2016). Integrated treatment of organic amendment, fungicide and Trichoderma sp. on stem rot of groundnut. Ann. Pl. Protec. Sci. 24(1): 189-190.

  18. Sharma, P., Meena, P.D., Singh, S. and Rai, P.K. (2017). Efficacy of Micro-Nutrients, fungicides and bio-Agents against Sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) of Indian Mustard. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 6(10): 620-626.

  19. Sharma, S.K., Verma, B.R. and Sharma, B.K. (1999). Biocontrol of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum causing stem rot of chickpea. Indian Phytopathol. 52(1): 44-46.

  20. Sharma, S.K. (1995). Management of stem rot of gram caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, M.Sc. Thesis, Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur. 87p.  

  21. Vaid, A., Kalha, C.S., Razban, V.K., Tewari, A.K. and Gupta, S. (2005). Stem rot of chickpea, its prevalence and management through host resistance in Jammu Division, In Abstract book of 1st J & K State Science Congress. Pp: 209.

  22. Whetzel, H.H. (1945). A synopsis of the genera and species of the Sclerotineaceae, a family of stromatic inoperculate discomycetes. Mycologia. 37: 648-71.

Editorial Board

View all (0)