Analysis of variance revealed significant difference among all the among parents and their hybrid combinations for the nine quantitative traits studied. The interaction between parent and hybrids was found to be significant for the all the nine traits (Table 1). The combining ability is of two types, general and specific for the quantitative genetics. General combining ability (GCA) reveals the average performance of a parental lines in a series of crosses which indicates the additive gene effect (main effect). Whereas the specific combining ability (SCA) is the deviation in the performance of hybrids from the parents which indicates the presence of non-additive (interaction effect) effect may be due to dominance or epistasis interaction
(Kumari et al., 2015).
The analysis of variance for combining ability revealed that the GCA and SCA effects were highly significant for all traits. except with trait WP indicating for SCA (Table 1). The estimates of GCA effects for parental lines were presented in Table 2. The parents AP-1 and AP3 were showed positive significant GCA effects for more than six traits hence they can be considered as good general combiners. The parents AP-3, PC-531 and AP-1 showed significantly high positive GCA effect for SYP and they can be used as good general combiners for seed yield. VL-7 proved to be a good general combiner for plant height and length of the pod. PC-531 and AP-1 are good combiners for DF 50% as they report highly significant GCA effect in positive direction in contrast to Kashi Nandini and Kashi uday showed for DF 50% in negative direction. AP-3, VL-7, AP-1 and PC-531 were good combiners for NPP because they had a significant GCA effect in the positive direction. AP-3, PC-531 and PMR-53 were good combiners for NSP and had a significant positive GCA effect. These good general combiners can be used in specific breeding programs by the breeder for the genetic improvement of pea varieties.
The lines with high GCA mostly due to additive gene effect have good breeding value with significant genetic gains with larger adaptability. Moreover, high GCA have less environmental effect and less gene interaction and therefore can be used for the selection of desired parents (
Griffing, 1956). Earlier, in a similar investigation
Dagla et al., (2013) stated that variance due to
gca was highly significant for DF-50%, PH, NPP and SYP in Pea, indicating the importance of both the additive and non-additive genetic components variation. Similar studies were reported earlier in pea by
Nageshwar et al., (2020), Katoch et al., (2019),
Shivaputra et al., (2018),), Suman et al., (2017), Dar et al., (2017), Joshi et al., (2015), Kumari et al., (2015), Mishra et al., (2014), Patel (2012) and
Sharma et al., (2007).
The estimates of SCA effects for twenty-eight crosses were presented in the Table 3. The SCA effects represents dominance or epistasis interaction used for the particular cross combination can be used for the exploitation of heterosis. For SYP, eleven cross (AP-3 × Kashi-Nandini, AP-3 × Arkel, AP3 × Kashi-uday, Kashi-Nandini × PC-531, Arkel × VL-7, Arkel × PMR-53, Arkel × AP1, VL- 7 × PMR-53, VL-7 ×PC-531, PMR-53 × AP-1, Kashi-uday ×AP-1) exhibited significant SCA effect in positive direction and they can be used as good specific combiners for SYP. Among them Kashi-Nandini × PC-531 showed with the highest SCA effects, can be used as best specific combination for SYP. The crosses AP-3× Kashi-uday and VL-7 and PMR-53 exhibited significant positive SCA effect for all traits except for DF 50%. Twelve crosses showed significant negative SCA effect for DF 50% and among them the cross Arkel x VL-7 showed highest SCA effect in negative direction and can be used as good specific combiner with desirable traits. VL-7 × PMR 53 was good specific combiner for NPP and NSP with high SCA effect in positive direction. Recently,
Moses et al., (2020) also noticed a high positive significant SCA effects for SYP in pea. The SCA effect on yield and its related characteristics has previously been reported by
Nageshwar et al., (2020), Katoch et al., (2019),
Halil et al., (2019), Suman et al., (2017), Kumari et al., (2015), Cehyan et al., (2008), Ceyhan (2003). For SYP, the cross AP-3 × Arkel showed high significant positive SCA effect (high × low GCA) that showed the additive and epistatic interaction. The cross Kashi-Nandini × PC-531 and PMR-53 × AP-1 also showed significant positive GCA effect (low × high GCA) that implies the epistatic × additive interaction. Moreover, Arkel × PMR-53 (low × low GCA interaction) showed the dominance × dominance type of interaction with high positive significant SCA affect. These cross combinations can be used as good specific combiners for the seed yield.
The estimate of heterosis over superior parent and mid-parent for 9 characters in parents and F
1 hybrids for yield and its contributing traits (Tables 4 and 5.). For SYP wider range of heterobeltiosis ranged from -2.00% to 8.77%, respectively and mid-parent heterosis ranged from -0.75% to 14.10%, respectively was recorded. Arkel × VL-7 and Arkel ×PMR-53 exhibited positive significant maximum heterosis for SYP over better parent and mid-parent, respectively. Significant and negative heterosis was regarded as desirable for DF 50%, whereas positive and significant heterosis was regarded as desirable for other characters. DF 50% showed broad range of heterobeltiosis (-0.88% to 27.10%) and mid heterosis (-0.41% to 7.08%). VL-7 × PMR-53 and Arkel ×VL-7 were significantly negative for DF-50%, over better parent and mid-parent respectively. VL-7 × PMR-53 exhibited positive significant maximum heterosis for LP and NPP over better parent and mid-parent respectively in positive direction. In addition, VL-7 × PMR-53 also showed high significant positive heterosis for NSP over both better parent and mid-parental heterosis. Previously,
Rebika (2017) also observed heterobeltiosis and standard heterosis for seed yield along with most of its yield components in pea which have the immense potential to exploit hybrid vigour or to isolate desirable segregants. Similar findings in pea have been reported by
Nageshwar et al., (2020), Katoch et al., (2019), Halil et al., (2019) and
Kumari et al., (2015).
SYP is controlled by additive gene effect and the dominance component (H1) and dominance component (H2) were found to be significant for all the characters except plant height. The value of Additive variance (D) was observed higher than the H1 and H2 for all traits except for NFFN, LP and NSP (Table 6). The proportion of genes with positive and negative effects of parents (h
2/4h
1) showed that all traits showed the positive direction. The no. of groups of controlling factors and exhibiting dominance were shown more in LP. The proportion of dominant genes to receive genes was more than a unity in DF-50%, NSP and SYP. All the traits high heritability (h
2) except NFFN and LP. The estimates of additive genetic component (D) were found to be significant for all the characters except NFFN, LP and NSP. Previously,
Singh et al., (2019) found significant estimates of both additive (D) and dominance (H) components for all pea characters except pod length. Similar findings in pea have been reported by
Katoch et al., (2019), Halil and Uzun (2019),
Kumari et al., (2015) and
Cehyan et al., (2008).