Response of Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) to Different Management Practice under North Eastern Transition Zone of Karnataka

Feeding a projected population of 9 billion by the mid-century constitutes one of the most fundamental challenges facing humanity (Calicioglu et al., 2019). Globally, agricultural production more than tripled between 1960 and 2015. This was initially facilitated, in part by Green Revolution technologies to increase yields and profits compared to traditional techniques (Grigg, 2001). Due to the resultant intensive, high-input agriculture that relies on synthetic chemicals for irrigation, fertilisers and pesticides, there is evidence of environmental degradation and adverse health effects from exposure to these chemicals (Pimentel, 1996; Bhattacharyya et al., 2015; Agoramoorthy, 2008). Hence, more environmentally focused solutions have arisen, such as sustainable intensification and agroecology. Such solutions have been promoted as alternative approaches to agricultural production that aligns more closely to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In India, 48% of the land surface was classified as degraded in 2005, driven by processes such as erosion, acidification and salinization. As a result, a number of agricultural systems have been developed that are intended to be more sustainable alternatives to high-input conventional farming systems. By 2015, India will become the most organic producer country among all countries (Willer and Lernoud, 2017). There are around 835,000 organic certified farms across the states of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Sikkim and Tamil Nadu, which all have state-level organic farming polices, with Sikkim being declared the first all-organic state in the world (Meek and Anderson, 2020). In principle, organic farming has the potential to address environmental concerns, through reduced use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides compared to conventional techniques. However, conversion of conventional systems to organic agriculture can result in a reduction of yield and lower temporal yield stability. This raises the issue of food security and whether organic farming can feed the world without expansion of croplands into natural ecosystems (Kirchmann et al., 2008).
       
In addition, socio-economic impacts associated with conventional farming may not be alleviated by organic farming in India. The involvement of agribusiness companies in controlling the market for organic food, fertilizers and seeds reduces the potential socio-economic benefits of organic farming over conventional systems. Along with becoming codified in regulatory and third-party certification, agribusiness in farming has favored larger farming enterprises, often leaving smallholders disadvantaged due to access or cost. This has resulted in high levels of farmer debt, which has forced farmers to get suicides in India (Mariappan and Zhou, 2019). The subsequent focus on developing sustainable and equitable approaches to agriculture underpin the Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) approach, which aims to address both environmental and socio-economic concerns within the agricultural sector.
       
The decline in crop production and productivity over 3-4 decades of green revolution and also reduction in soil productivity in terms of nutritional disorders, micronutrient deficiencies, poor soil physical condition, salinity and alkalinity, poor soil biological activity and the  livelihood supporting systems. In view of these, natural and organic agriculture systems emerged as an alternative to the chemical oriented agriculture systems.   
       
‘Zero Budget’ refers to lower use of purchased inputs and reduced involvement of agribusiness, reducing debt incurred by farmers. ‘Natural Farming’ refers to the use of homemade amendments from readily available ingredients. These inputs are intended to promote soil health, close nutrient cycling loops and provide greater water retention in soil, alongside integrated pest management and intercropping (Keerthi et al., 2018).
       
The long term studies conducted under All India Network Project on Organic Farming (ICAR), indicated that groundnut, soybean, chickpea, lentil, French bean, peas, cowpea, sorghum, lowland rice, rainfed wheat, maize, cotton and dolichos bean under organic cultivation resulted in higher yields and returns over chemical farming. The studies carried out in UAS, Raichur also showed on par yields of red gram, jowar (Rabi), sunflower, bengal gram, desi cotton apart from higher monetary returns and improved soil fertility status with organic cultivation when compared with recommended package of practice.
       
The cost of crop production is increasing year after year due to high production costs of inputs, the volatile market prices of crops, the rising costs of fossil fuel based inputs and  private seeds. Debt is a major problem for farmers of all sizes in India. The technical advisory committee of consultative group on international agriculture research also emphasizes on efficient management of natural resources, enhance the quality of environment and conservation of the natural resources in the process to meet our food demand. 
       
In view of all the above facts experiments were carried out to evaluate comparative performance of different management practices on productivity and economics of blackgram.

Experimental site
 
Field experiments were conducted during the kharifseason of 2019, 2020 and 2021 at Agricultural Research Station, Janawada farm, Bidar, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, India. The details of experimental site characteristics are presented in Table 1, physiochemical properties of soil is furnished in Table 2, details of treatment is presented in Table 3 and meteorological data of study area is  presented in Table 4.
 

 

 

 

 
Experimental design and treatment details
 
The experiment on black gram comprising of 4 treatmentsviz., T₁: Zero Budget Natural Farming Method, T₂: Organic Farming Practice, T₃: Package of Practice (UASR) and T₄: Farmers Practice was conducted in randomized block design with five replications. Row spacing of 30 cm was adopted for sowing of crop with an intra row spacing of 10 cm and seed rate of 18 kg ha^-1. A common fertilizer dose of 25:50:00 (N: P₂O₅:K₂O kg ha^-1, respectively) to black gram applied as basal dose to crop at the time of sowing in package of practice treatments. The cultivar of black gram used in the study was TAU-1.
 
Collection of data on growth, yield and its components of blackgram
 
The observation on growth parameters like the plant height, number of leaves per plant, number of branches per plant, total dry matter production and yield parameters viz,the number of pods per plant, seeds per pod, seed yield, haulm yield and biological yield and production efficiency were recorded at the time of harvest by adopting agronomic standard procedure. Grain and straw yield was calculated based on the yield obtained from each net plot and converted into to kg ha^-1. The rain water use efficiency was calculated using formula i.e., amount of yield produced by a crop to amount of rainfall received during the entire growth season.    
       
Production efficiency was calculated by as per the formula given by (Kumawat et al., 2012).
   
Statistical analysis
 
The data were statistically analyzed one way using SPSS v.18 and graphs were plotted using Origin Pro software v.21.

Effect on growth attributes of black gram
 
Pooled data presented in Table 5, revealed that package of practice recorded significantly higher growth attributes viz., plant height (95.78 cm), number of leaves per plant (59.04), number of branches per plant (7.23) and total dry matter production (5.79 g plant^-1) followed by organic farming (87.83 cm, 55.20, 6.48 and 5.40 g plant^-1, respectively) and farmers practice (86.94 cm, 49.15, 6.51 and 5.13 g plant^-1, respectively). Significantly the lowest growth attributes were recorded in zero budget natural farming treatment (84.51 cm, 45.50, 6.11 and 4.87 g plant^-1, respectively) at 60 DAS (Table 5).
 

       
The increase in various parameters can be attributed to increased nutrient availability during the early stages of the crop through seed treatment. During later stages because of slower mineralization of nutrients the nutrients were available for longer period of time. The pest and diseases were managed efficiently with chemical methods. Hence there will be higher growth in package of practice treatments. The findings corroborate with those of Ghulam et al., (2011), Meena (2013) and Singh and Singh (2017).
 
Yield attributes and yields of blackgram
 
Significantly the highest yield attributes viz., number of seeds per pod (6.61), number of pods per plant (50.43) and grain, stover and biological yield (1364, 1704 and 3068 kg ha^-1) were recorded in package of practice treatment followed by organic farming and farmers practice. While the lowest yield attributes (5.94 and 41.52, respectively) and yields (1084, 1404 and 2488 kg ha^-1, respectively) on pooled basis (Table 6).
 

       
It is stated that the poor production potential of black gram attributed to poor photosynthetic efficiency, lack of partitioning of photosynthates to pods and seed setting (Dixit and Elamathi, 2007). Pests and diseases were controlled at economic threshold level hence crop growth was favoured. This improved the synthesis of carbohydrates and protein and their transportation to the site of seed formation.
       
Further decreased flower drop and senescence and increased pod set, which increased the yield attributes and yield of blackgram. This can also be attributed to slow release pattern of nutrients and precautionary application of organic plant protection chemicals.
       
The improved rate of photosynthesis, which also contributed to larger assimilate supply to the pods and subsequently increased seed weight, is primarily responsible for the higher yield features in the practise treatment package (Table 4 and 5). The results were in accordance to the results obtained by Yakadri and Thatikunta Ramesh (2002), Meena (2005), Kumawat et al., (2013) and (Dhaka et al., 2016).
 
Efficiency and economics of blackgram production
 
Production efficiency
 
The maximum production efficiency (15.68 kg day^-1 ha^-1) was recorded in T₃ which was significantly higher compared to all other treatments. On the other hand. The minimum production efficiency (12.46 Kg day^-1 ha^-1) was recorded in treatment T₁ (Table 5) on pooled basis. This might be because of increase in grain yield under T₃ which also enhanced production efficiency per day. These results are in conformity with the results of Choudhari et al., (2001) and Subramani and Solaimalai (2000).
 
Rainwater use efficiency
 
Practice package reported maximum rainwater use efficiency (8.31 kg ha^-1 mm^-1) compared to the other treatments and the natural farming treatment had the lowest efficiency (6.60 kg ha^-1 mm^-1) Table 6. This may be caused by increased rainfall during the growing season and increased yield in the practise treatment package. These results are in line with findings of Meena (2009) in clusterbean and sesamum pigeonpea.
 
Economics
 
Higher gross, net returns and B: C ratio Rs.85,102, 41,1357 ha^-1 and  1.97, respectively )was found in package of practice treatment (on pooled basis (Table 5). However, B: C ratio was found on par with natural farming (1.91) due to its lower cost of inputs and less cost of cultivation. The higher returns in package were directly related to the yields. These observations were supported with the findings of Quddus et al., (2012) and also by Choudhary et al., (2018).

From the results of experiments (3 years data) it can be inferred that package of practice performed the best results with respect to growth, yields and economics and natural farming was next best in terms of benefit cost ratio over the years. Thus it can be concluded that, for achieving higher productivity and profitability package of practice followed by natural farming can be adopted over the years in North Eastern Transition Zone of Karnataka.

Authors are grateful to Department of Agriculture, Government of Karnataka and University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur Karnataka for providing facilities in smooth conduct of the experiments.

None.