Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Elucidation of Genetic Mechanism Governing Heterosis in Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]

Amit Kumar Gaur1,*, S.K. Verma1, R.K. Sharma2, Rajneesh Bhardwaj3, Charu Bisht1, Harsh Deep1, Harikant Yadav1
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, Uttarakhand, India.
2Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012, India.
3Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun-248 002, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Submitted13-05-2022|

  • Accepted24-10-2022|

  • First Online 14-11-2022|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4968

Background: The findings of the present research will provide an indepth understanding of important parameters contributing to heterosis in pigeonpea. 

Methods: Combining ability effects and heterosis of crosses were determined among 45 hybrids developed by crossing 10 elite pigeonpea genotypes in half diallel fashion. The combining abilities were estimated by using Griffing’s, Method II and Model I. 

Result: The SCA followed by MGCA (mean general combinig ability of parents) were observed as the most reliable parameters to predict heterosis. High per se performance of parents and high genetic diversity does not lead to high heterosis. The parents having high x low per se performance, good x poor GCA effects and medium genetic diversity resulted in high frequency of heterotic hybrids. The results indicated that the hybrid Paras x PA 624 exhibited maximum mid parent, better parent and standard heterosis for seed yield.
Heterosis results in more than 60% yield advantage in pigeonpea hybrids (Saxena et al., 2006).  However, the major milestone in pigeonpea hybrid breeding was achieved in the year 2010 when India released world’s first commercial pigeonpea hybrid ICPH-8 which was soon followed by release of other commercial hybrids like ICPH 3762 and ICPH 2740. These developments revealed that in pigeonpea crop sufficient heterosis is available and there is an urgent need to exploit heterosis for breaking the yield plateau (<800 kg/ha). The genetic mechanism of heterosis still remains unclear to a large extent. The magnitude of heterosis depends on the relative performance of the inbred parents (Betran et al., 2003) and hence mean yield of parents can be used as an important factor in heterosis prediction. Combining ability is widely used by several workers in pigeonpea to compare performance of lines in hybrid combinations (Singh and Singh, 2009). Heterosis may increase with increase in genetic diversity but greater divergence between parents not always results in heterosis (Moll et al., 1965). The present study was conducted with the aim to measure interrelationship between combining ability, per se performance of parents, genetic diversity and heterosis.
Experimental material and field trial
 
The 10 elite pigeonpea genotypes (Pusa 992, Paras, UPAS 120, PA 620, PA 623, PA 624, PA 625, PA 627, PA 626 and PA 622) were crossed in half diallel fashion during kharif 2017-18 at N.E.B.C.R.C. of Pantnagar to develop the 45 F1’s. Thus, the experimental material consisted of 56 genotypes including 10 parents, 45 F1 hybrids and one check (Pant A 291). The 45 hybrids along with their parents and check variety were grown during the kharif 2018-19 in randomized block design with three replications. The observations were recorded on five randomly selected competitive plants of each genotypes from each replication on characters viz., plant height (cm), number of primary branches/ plant, number of secondary branches/plant, number of pods/plant, pod length (cm), number of seed/pod, 100-seed weight (g)  and seed yield/plant (g). However, the data on number of days to 50 per cent flowering and number of days to maturity were taken on whole plot basis.

Statistical analysis
 
The combining abilities were evaluated by using Griffing’s, (1956), Method II, Model I (Fixed effects).  The GCA effects of both parents of hybrid were averaged to determine the mean GCA (MGCA) effect of the parents (Kumar et al., 2015). The mean of per se performance of both parents of a hybrid (PM) and the mean grain yield of F1’s (HMY) were also calculated. Further, heterosis over mid parent (MPH %), better parent (BPH %) and standard check variety (SH %) were estimated to determine the different types of heterosis for seed yield per plant. The data recorded for various yield and attributing attributes were subjected to the estimation of morphological genetic diversity (GD) using the D2 statistics (Mahalanobis, 1936). The clusters were prepared by following Tocher’s method as proposed by Rao (1952).  The genetic diversity classes were prepared by using method suggested by Arunachalam (1984). Parents were classified as good (G), average (A) and poor (P) combiners on the basis their overall GCA effects. If the GCA effects were significant in desirable direction then the parents were considered as good general combiner (G) and those significant towards undesirable direction were poor general  combiner (P) while non-significant effects were designated as average general combiner (A). Similarly, crosses were also classified as good (G), average (A) and poor (P). The Pearson’s correlation coefficients among PM, HMY, MGCA, SCA, GD, MPH%, BPH% and SH% were also calculated.
Estimation of combining ability and heterosis
 
The analysis of variance revealed that mean sum of squares due to GCA and SCA effects were highly significant indicating that both additive and non-additive gene action are involved in governing inheritance of seed yield (Table 1). The 𝛔2 SCA were found to be higher than 𝛔2 GCA, indicating preponderance of non-additive gene effects. The presence of non-additive gene effects indicated that heterosis breeding will be rewarding in increasing seed yield. Phad et al., (2007) also reported that dominance gene effect was involved in controlling seed yield. The results of heterosis estimation revealed that hybrid Paras × PA 624 showed maximum MPH, BPH and SH of 227.71%, 183.33% and 175.68% respectively (Table 2).
 

Table 1: The ANOVA for seed yield/plant (g) in pigeonpea.


 

Table 2: The estimates of different parameters for seed yield/plant.


 
Estimation of genetic diversity
 
The analysis of genetic diversity revealed presence of four different clusters (Table 3). The cluster I showed maximum mean for plant height (232.5), number of secondary branches (15.1), number of pods/plant (211.6) and seed yield/plant (52.1) hence the genotypes in this cluster can be used as donors for these traits. The cluster II was found to be the earliest maturing cluster (126.5) with highest number of primary branches (14.0). The cluster III was found had highest mean for pod length (5.2), number of seed per pods (4.5) and 100 seed weight (9.2).
 

Table 3: Average intra (diagonal) and inter cluster distance (D2 values) for pigeonpea parental genotypes.


 
Relationship between different parameters and heterosis
 
The MPH, BPH and SH were found to be perfectly positively correlated with each other (Table 4). The SCA effects were found to be positively and significantly correlated with the MPH (r=0.899**), BPH (r=0.918**) and SH (r=0.939**) respectively (Table 4). The significant linear regression of SCA effects and very high R2 value further revealed that SCA was good determinant of heterosis (Fig 1). The regression analysis of SCA effects on heterosis indicated that 80.90%, 84.34%, 88.17% variation in MPH, BPH and SH is due to SCA (Fig 1). A critical analysis of Table 5 indicated that out of the 45 hybrids, 42 hybrids exhibited significant MPH, BPH and SH. Out of these 42 heterotic hybrids, 21 hybrids exhibited good SCA, 13 hybrids exhibited poor SCA and 8 hybrids exhibited average SCA effects. A critical analysis of Table 6 indicated that good SCA effects showed highest heterotic frequency (50.00%) followed by poor SCA (30.95%) and average SCA (19.05%) effects.  These results clearly indicated that highest frequency of hybrids (50%) was reported in case of crosses having good SCA. The results indicated that SCA is the most important factor for determination of heterosis and is supported by Pandey et al., (2015). The MGCA effects were found to be positively and significantly correlated with MPH (r=0.504**), BPH (r=0.526**) and SH (r=0.532**) respectively. The significant linear regression of MGCA on MPH, BPH and SH and high R2 value revealed that MGCA was also a good determinant of heterosis (Fig 2). The regression analysis of MGCA effects on heterosis indicated that 25.41%, 27.73% and 28.38%, variation in MPH, BPH and SH is due to MGCA effects. The highest heterotic frequency (47.62%) was observed by crossing parents having good × poor combination while the poor × poor (7.15%) combination showed the least heterotic frequency. The good × good parental combination produce (23.81%) heterotic frequency. These results indicated that if the parents had good × poor GCA effects than it results in high heterotic frequency, however, the parents having good × good GCA effects produces a moderate level of heterotic hybrids. In present study,  the mean GCA of both parents (MGCA) also emerged as another important factor which can be used in predicting the heterosis. The present study revealed that the GCA effects of parental lines have potential application in hybrid development programmes and supported the findings of Fan et al., (2014). The SCA and MGCA emerged as the independent parameters in present study since they exhibited poor relationship (r=0.209). The parental mean (PM), was found to be negatively and non-significantly correlated with the better parent (r=-0.250) and standard heterosis (r=-0.112), however with the mid parent heterosis (r=-0.387**) it was negatively and significantly correlated. The linear regressions of PM on heterosis were also found to be non-significant. These results suggested that parental mean was not a reliable criteria to predict heterosis. The highest frequency of heterotic hybrids (59.52%) was reported when parents having high and low mean were crossed i.e. high × low combination. The negligible correlation of parental mean with all the other studied parameters further indicated that the parental mean had not exhibited any role in determination of heterosis, combining ability, genetic diversity as well as per se performance of the hybrids in pigeonpea. Hence the parental mean cannot be used as sole determinant of heterosis as well as parental selection for hybridization. These results supported the earlier findings of Hallauer, (1990); Lee et al., (2007) in maize. The genetic distance (GD) was found to be negatively and non- significantly correlated with MPH (r=-0.010), BPH (r=-0.003) while it was positively and non-significantly correlated with SH (r=0.006). The linear regressions of GD on heterosis were found to be non-significant. The highest frequency of heterotic hybrids were produced when parents having moderate amount of diversity were crossed (83.33%) while the parents having high level of genetic diversity results in very less frequency of heterotic hybrids (14.29%) and the least frequency (2.38 %)  was showed by  parents belonging to low diversity class parents.
 

Table 4: The Pearson’s correlation between different parameters for seed yield/plant.


 

Fig 1: Relation between specific combining ability (SCA) and heterosis.


 

Fig 2: Relation between Mean general combining ability (MGCA) and heterosis.

The SCA followed by MGCA emerged as most important parameters to predict the heterosis. The high parental mean and high genetic distance does not always lead to high heterosis. The parents having high × low per se performance, good × poor GCA effects and with medium genetic diversity may also results in high frequency of heterotic hybrids.
None.

  1. Arunachalam, V., Bandyopadhyay, A., Nigam, S.N. and Gibbons, R.W. (1984). Heterosis in relation to genetic divergence and specific combining ability in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica. 33: 33-39.

  2. Betran, F.J., Ribaut, J.M., Beck, D. and Leon, D.G.D. (2003). Genetic diversity, specific combining ability and heterosis in tropical maize under stress and non stress environments. Crop Science. 43(3): 797-806.

  3. Fan, X. M., Zhang, Y.D., Yao, W.H., Bi, Y.Q., Liu, L., Chen, H.M. and Kang, M.S. (2014). Reciprocal diallel crosses impact combining ability, variance estimation and heterotic group classification. Crop Science. 54: 89-97. 

  4. Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combing ability in relation to diallel crossing system. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences. 9: 463-493.

  5. Hallauer, A.R. (1990). Methods used in developing maize inbreds. Maydica. 35: 1-16.

  6. Kumar, P., Singh, N.K., Jha, S.K. (2015). Multi-environment evaluation for determining grain yield, combining ability, heterosis and their inter-relationship in maize. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics. 47(4): 366-374.

  7. Lee, E.A., Ash, M.J. and Good, B. (2007). Re-examining the relationship between degree of relatedness, genetic effects and heterosis in maize. Crop Science. 47: 629-635. 

  8. Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. Journal of Genetics. 41: 159-193.

  9. Moll, R.H., Lonquist, J.H., Velez Fortuno, J. and Johnson, E.C. (1965). The relationship of heterosis and genetic divergence  in maize. Genetics. 52: 1139-144.

  10. Pandey, P., Pandey, V.R., Kumar, A.M., Yadav, S., Tiwari, D. and Kumar, R. (2015). Relationship between heterosis and genetic diversity in Indian pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh] accessions using multivariate cluster analysis and heterotic grouping. Australian Journal of Crop Sciences. 9(6): 494-503.

  11. Phad, D.S., Madrap, I.A. and Dalvi, V.A. (2007). Study of combining ability analysis in pigeonpea under different environments for yield contributing characters. Legume Research. 30(2): 123-127.

  12. Rao, C.R. (1952). Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometrical Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 236-272.

  13. Saxena, K.B., Kumar, R.V., Latha, M. and Dalvi, V.A. (2006). Commercial pigeonpea hybrids are just a few steps away. Indian Journal of Pulses Research. 19: 7-16.

  14. Singh, O. and  Singh, M.N. (2009). Combining ability analysis in pigeonpea. Journal of Food Legumes. 22(1): 30-33.

Editorial Board

View all (0)