Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Multivariate Analysis for Elucidating Genetic Diversity of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Germplasm using Agro-morphological Traits

Amit Kumar1, Hitesh Kumar1,*, Chandra Mohan Singh1, Mukul Kumar1, Vijay Sharma1, Sunil Kumar1, G.S. Panwar2
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda-210 001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2Department of Agronomy, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda-210 001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Submitted30-04-2022|

  • Accepted23-09-2022|

  • First Online 04-10-2022|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4956

Background: Chickpea is grown on a large scale in India but the productivity is very low as compared to other chickpea-growing countries. Because, in India, the crop is affected by many biotic and abiotic stresses and also has a narrow genetic base in germplasm lines, which are the prerequisite of any breeding program for developing high-yield varieties. The breeding program’s success depends on genetic variation and efficient selection strategies that make it possible to exploit exist­ing genetic resources.

Methods: The agro-morphological characterization of 94 chickpea germplasm accessions including four checks viz., JG 14, JG 16, JAKI 9218 and Radhey was carried out during Rabi 2018-19. The experiment was laid out in augmented design in nine blocks. The analysis of variance was estimated with the help of statistical software SPAD and using the statistical package Windostat version 9.1.

Result: The significant variance among the germplasm lines was found for most of the studied traits. Genetic diversity analysis revealed the grouping of genotypes into eight distinct clusters irrespective of breeding centers. The maximum number of 32 genotypes was fallen in cluster II and the minimum in cluster VI which consisted of 8 genotypes, whereas clusters IV and VIII were identified as bi-genotypic clusters. Clusters VII and IV showed maximum inter-cluster distance indicating the maximum genetic diversity among the genotypes of these clusters. Principal component analysis transformed data into three variables (PCs) which contributes 97.78 percent of the total variation. The genotypes identified in this study will be utilized in chickpea improvement programs.
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is the second most important legume crop after fababean and belongs to the family Fabaceae. Globally, 14.78 million tons of chickpea grain were harvested on 14.78 million ha during 2017-18 (FAOSTAT, 2017). It is a major pulse crop in India with a production of 11.23 million tons (mt), contributing to over 46% of the total pulses production (23.95mt) during 2017-18 (Dixit et al., 2019). More than 68% area is under rainfed cultivation in the central and southern zone of the country. Despite, the highest production in India ranking first in production, productivity is still stagnant due to various biotic and abiotic factors coupled with a lack of improved cultivar. The yield potential of varieties fluctuates in different agro-climatic regions under changing climate scenarios (Sharma et al., 2019). The narrow genetic base of the developed varieties is also one of the major constraints to low productivity (Bharadwaj et al., 2011), which needs to widen by creating genetic variability (Chandra et al., 2013). Genetic diversity is essential to initiating an effective breeding program to develop cultivars with high yield potential for wider agro-climatic regions. The morphological characterization  of germplasm lines shows a significant role in the selection of diverse germplasm lines for desirable traits (Kumar et al., 2021). The genetic diversity available in germplasm lines determines the level of improvement in crop productivity per se and component traits (Mohan et al., 2019). The crosses between the parents with more genetic divergence are generally the most responsive to genetic improvement. The potential donors with novel traits in germplasm lines are one of the possible ways to broaden the genetic base in terms of yield and adaptation. Because of the above facts, the present study was conducted to estimate genetic diversity in chickpea germplasm lines through multivariate analysis.
Plant material and field experimentation
 
The plant material comprised 94 chickpea germplasm accessions including four checks. The experiment was carried out during Rabi 2018-19 at Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda, Uttar Pradesh, India (24°53¢ and 25°55'N and 80°07' and 81°34'E 123 m ASL) in augmented design (Federer, 1956). A total of 10 test genotypes were planted in each block along with repeated checks to control local experimental error. The accessions were sown in paired rows of 2 m length keeping 30cm row to row and 10cm plant to plant distance. All the recommended package of practices was followed to grow a healthy crop. The total precipitation of 19.5 mm was recorded on five rainy days from sowing to harvesting duration. Throughout the crop period, temperature ranged from 7.64°C to 33.53°C and maximum relative humidity (80.00%) in January whereas, a minimum (44.00%) was recorded in March 2019 (Fig 1).
 

Fig 1: Weekly temperature (Max. Min.), air humidity and rainfall during study period rabi 2018-19.


 
Observations recorded
 
A total of 17 yield contributing traits including yield were measured on the germplasm accessions. Among them, days to germination, early plant vigour, days to the first flower appearing on the plants, days to 50% flowering, days to 100% flowering, days to first pod appearance and days to maturity were observed on a plot basis. The plant height, height of first pod, inter-nodal distance, primary branches, secondary branches, pods per plant, seeds per pod and harvest index were recorded on five randomly selected plants on each accession.
 
Statistical analysis
 
The average trait values were analyzed as per the statistical procedure (Johnson et al., 1955) along with repeated checks to estimate adjusted mean and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the help of statistical software SPAD (Rathore et al., 2004). Further, adjusted values were subjected to calculate genetic distance using D2 (Mahalanobis, 1936) method and clustering was done by Tocher’s method (Rao, 1952) using the statistical package Windostat version 9.1. The principal component analysis (PCA) was calculated with a correlation matrix of yield and yield component traits.
Analysis of variance
 
The success of any breeding programme depends on the wide genetic variation and efficient selection strategies that make it possible to exploit exist­ing genetic resources. Thus, knowledge of genetic variability is a basic prerequisite for any crop improvement programme to develop new genotypes to meet production, protection and consumer requirements (Kumar et al., 2020). The genetic distance estimates form the basis for selecting parental combinations which leads to developing the new recombinants and scope for selection of transgressive segregates in early segregating generations (Singh et al., 2016). The analyses of variance (ANOVA) of 17 biometrical traits are presented in Table 1. The variability in germplasm showed significant differences among all the recorded traits indicating the presence of considerable variability in the breeding material, except for the number of secondary branches, number of pods per plant and number of seeds per pod. The significant differences over the blocks for days to germination, days to flower initiation, days to 50% flowering, days to 100% flowering, days to first pod appearance, days to maturity, plant height, height of first pod and grain yield were also reported by Kumar et al., (2021).
 

Table 1: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the seventeen quantitative characters in 94 genotypes of chickpea.


 
Cluster analysis
 
Based on the seventeen quantitative characters, D2 analysis grouped 94 germplasm accessions into eight clusters (Table 2). The maximum numbers of accessions (32) were grouped in cluster II followed by cluster I (28), cluster III (12), cluster VI (8), cluster V (7), cluster VII (3) and cluster IV and VIII consisted two accessions in each cluster. The intra-cluster distance indicates the similarities between germplasm lines under a single cluster for various yield traits. The forty genotypes of chickpea were clustered into four clusters reported by Qadeer et al., (2021) who found that maximumgenotypes consisted of cluster III (14). Similarly, fifteen genotypes of chickpea were also grouped into three clusters by Mahmood et al., (2018). The intra-cluster distance of clusters ranged from 279.88 to 3860.74 is presented in Table 3. Inter-cluster distance shows the dissimilarities and diversity among the clusters. The maximum inter-cluster distance (179096.9) was recorded between clusters VII and IV followed by clusters IV and III (140587.5), clusters VIII and VII (128935.5) and clusters IV and I (96556.05). Cluster IIand I showed minimum inter-cluster distance (3639.5). Similar results were reported with intra and inter-cluster distance among seven groups for thirty-six genotypes (Agarwal et al., 2018). Clusters with maximum inter-cluster distances were indicating the highest genetic diversity among the genotypes which were grouped in these clusters and could be useful for recombination breeding. The lowest inter-cluster distance shows the closeness between clusters with low diversity. The diversity analysis based on agro-morphological traits in chickpeas is a useful method to divide genotypes into different groups which could be utilized for further improvement programs (Mohammed and Tesso, 2019).
 

Table 2: Grouping of 96 chickpea germplasm lines based on D2 statistics clusters.


 

Table 3: Intra and inter-cluster distances amongst 8 clusters.


 
Cluster mean and trait contribution toward divergence
 
The mean values of clusters of yield and component traits are presented in Table 4. The mean value for days to flower initiation was highest in cluster III (77.67days) and lowest in cluster V (55.29days). The mean value for days to 50% flowering ranged from 62 to 84 days represented in clusters V and III respectively. The mean value for plant height was highest (53.22 cm) in cluster VIII and lowest (44.00 cm) in cluster VII. The lowest mean value for days to maturity (114.57) was found in cluster V and the highest (126.75) in cluster III. Cluster IV shows the highest mean value for harvest index (63.83) and the lowest (50.59) in cluster II. The highest mean values for grain yield per plant, harvest index, biological yield per plant, primary and secondary branches per plant, plant height and days to maturity showed in cluster VII (Agarwal et al., 2018). Cluster II out of four clusters showed the maximum mean value for number of pods per plant (83), 100 seed weight (31 gm), plant height (55 cm) and yield (1732 kg/ha) reported by Qadeer et al., (2021). The contributions of characters toward the genetic divergence are presented in Table 5. The maximum contribution towards total divergence was recorded for the seed yield per plant (86.82%) followed by the days to flower initiation (2.81%), days to 50% flowering (2.43%), the height of first pod (1.81%), harvest index (1.72%), days to first pod appearance (1.49%), number of seeds per pod (1.44%) and rest of the traits were very low contribution towards genetic divergence. Under the present results, previous studies have demonstrated that maximum contribution toward total divergence for seed yield per plant, 100 seed weight, number of seeds per plant and number of secondary branches (Akhil et al., 2019).
 

Table 4: Cluster mean values of seventeen traits and percent contribution of each trait towards genetic divergence.


 
Principal component analysis
 
The principal components analysis (PCA) transformed the large set of data into a small number of variables (PCs) which contribute to the maximum proportion of variance of the experimental data (Sharifi et al., 2018). The principalcomponent analysis of 90 germplasm lines of chickpea-based yield and contributing traits correlation matrix which yielded the eigenroots, eigenvectors and associated percentage of variation explained by eigenroot has been presented in Table 5. The recorded data was transformed into three principal components (PCs) which explained 97.78 percent of the total variation in which PC1, PC2 and PC3 accounted for 92.96%, 3.63% and 1.18% of the total variation, respectively (Fig 2). PCA provides a better way to understand the source of variation among the germplasm lines and is also responsible for the highest percentage of variation governed by the lower number of traits (Sharifi et al., 2018). The first principal component had the largest eigenroot values 676547.9 of total variation followed by 26487.3 and 8591.69 for the second and third principal components, respectively. Out of six principal components first two PCs with more than 1 eigenvalue were contributing 77.67% and 79.54% of the total variance (Rafiq et al., 2018; Rafiq et al., 2020).

Table 5: Eigenvector, eigenroot and associated variation for principal components analysis.



Fig 2: The three-dimensional PCA plot of 94 germplasm lines of chickpea.


       
The first principle component had the largest positive weight to days to flower initiation (0.00915) followed by days to first pod appearance (0.00673), days to 50% flowering (0.00408), early plant vigour (0.00383) and the high negative weight for seed yield per plot (-0.996), number of seeds per pod (-0.0695), seed index (-0.0304) and height of first pod (0.0212). The positive significant values for yield kg per ha, harvest index, pods per plant and 100 seed weight are exhibited by PC1 (Mahmoodet_al2018). The secondprinciple component had the highest positive weight to seed index (0.0450) followed by harvest index (0.0389), number of seeds per pod (0.0198), days to germination (0.0141) and the high negative weight for days to flower initiation (-0.566), days to 50% flowering (-0.551), days to first pod appearance (-0.496), plant height (-0.293) and days to 100% flowering (-0.234). Similarly, Qadeer et al., (2021) reported that the PC1 and PC2 show the highest positive significant value for number of pods per plant and 100 seed weight. The traits which indicate significant eigenvalue among the categorized components should be considered for selection of parents in a hybridization program (Qadeer et al., 2021; Zubair et al., 2017).
The significant differences in agro-morphological traits revealed the presence of a wide range of variability among germplasm accessions. Accessions were grouped into eight clusters indicating wider genetic diversity. The accessions grouped into different clusters showed high genetic diversity compared to those grouped under a single cluster. Similarly, the distance between the clusters shows more diversity between genotypes that came under these clusters. The genetic diversity and grouping information is useful to develop improved progenies by using the diverse parental line. The characters namely seed yield, days to flower initiation, days to 50% flowering, the height of first pod, harvest index, days to first pod appearance and number of seeds per pod were responsible for the highest diversity among the germplasm lines. Thus, it can be concluded that the genotypes which showed desire and useful diversity for studied parameters especially 50% flowering, seed and seed yield can be utilized further for hybridization programmes to develop transgrassive sergeants to increase chickpea yield and increase farmer income.
The authors acknowledge Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda for providing field facilities and the CEDA Project for providing financial support. The PAU, Ludhiana, NDUAT, Ayodhya, IIPR, Kanpur, JNKV, Jabalpur and ICRISAT, Hyderabad are also duly acknowledged for sharing the seed materials.
None.

  1. Agrawal, T., Kumar, A., Kumar, S., Kumar, A., Kumar, M. and Perween, S. (2018). Assessment of genetic diversity in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm under normal sown condition of Bihar. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 7(04): 3552-3560. 

  2. Akhil, P., Lal, G.M., Kiran, M.S. (2019). Genetic diversity studies in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm. Journal of Pharmacognosy Phytochemistry. 8(4): 2549-2552.

  3. Bharadwaj, C., Chauhan, S.K., Yadav, S., Satyavathi, T.C., Singh, R., Kumar, J., Srivastava, R. and Rajguru, G. (2011). Molecular marker-based linkage map of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) developed from desi× Kabuli cross. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science. 81(2): 12-14.

  4. Chandra, K., Lal, G.M. and Singh, C.M. (2013). Estimates of genetic variability and scope of selection for yield determinants in mutated populations of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research. 38(5): 563-569.

  5. Dixit, G.P., Srivastava, A.K. and Singh, N.P. (2019). Marching towards self-sufficiency in chickpea. Current Science. 116(2): 239-242.

  6. FAOSTAT (2017). Statistics Division of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  7. Federer, W.T. (1956). Augmented Designs. Hawaiian Planter’s Record. 55: 191-208.

  8. Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F. and Comstock, R.E. (1955). Genotypic and phenotypic correlations in soybeans and their implications in selection 1. Agronomy Journal. 47(10): 477-483.

  9. Kumar, A., Kumar, H., Kumar, S., Gupta, V. and Panwar, G.S. (2021). Phenological, morphological and yield-based characterization  of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm lines. Legume Research. LR-4582. 1-7.

  10. Kumar, A., Kumar, H., Sharma, V. and Kamalludin (2021). Estimation of genetic parameters, selection indices and association analysis of seed yield and its components traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research. DOI: 10.18805/ LR-4506.

  11. Kumar, S., Suresh, B.G., Kumar, A. and Lavanya, G.R. (2020). Genetic variability in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under heat stress condition. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 38(6): 1-10.

  12. Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. National Institute of Science of India. 49(2): 234-256.

  13. Mahmood, M.T., Ahmad, M., Ali, I., Hussain, M., Latif, A. and Zubair, M. (2018). Evaluation of chickpea genotypes for genetic diversity through multivariate analysis. Journal of Environmental and Agricultural Science. 15: 11-17.

  14. Mohammed, A. and Tesso, B. (2019). Phenotypic characterization and assessment of genetic diversity for agro morphological traits of Ethiopian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture. 2(3): 146-155.

  15. Mohan, S. and Thiyagarajan, K. (2019). Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) for yield and its component traits. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 8(05): 1801-1808. 

  16. Qadeer, Z., Akhtar, M., Khalid, M.J., Rashid, K., Mahmood, M.T., Cheema, K.L. and Hussain, A. (2021). Investigation of genetic diversity in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm and its implications for genetic advancement program. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology. 22(40): 111-117.

  17. Rafiq, C.M., Mahmood, M.T., Ahmad, M., Ali, I., Shafiq, M., Rasool, I. and Zubair, A.L.M. (2018). Exploration of genetic divergence and performance of morpho-agronomic traits of chickpea.  Science. 37(4): 202-208.

  18. Rafiq, C.M., Mahmood, M.T., Ahmad, M., Ali, I., Kaukab, S., Shafiq, M. and Saleem, M. (2020). Detection of most diverse and high-yielding strains of chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.). Life Science Journal. 17(3): 88-93.

  19. Rao, C.R. (1952). Advanced statistical methods in biometric research, John Wiley, New York. 357-369. 

  20. Rathore, A., Parsad, R. and Gupta, V.K. (2004). Computer-aided construction and analysis of augmented designs. Journal of Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics. 57: 320-344.

  21. Sharifi, P., Astereki, H. and Pouresmael, M. (2018). Evaluation of variations in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) yield and yield components by multivariate technique. Annals of Agrarian Science. 16(2): 136-142.

  22. Sharma, R.N., Johnson, P.L., Nanda, H.C., Sao, A., Sarawgi, A.K., Umesh, S.K., Prabha, N. and Singh, A.K. (2019). Genetic variability, character association and co-heritability for yield traits over the locations in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research. LR-4150: 1-5.

  23. Singh, S.K., Chhajer, S., Pathak, R., Bhatt, R.K. and Kalia, R.K. (2016). Genetic diversity of Indian jujube cultivars using SCoT, ISSR and rDNA markers. Tree Genetics and Genomes. 13(1): 12.

  24. Zubair, M., Akhtar, L.H., Minhas, R., Bukhari, M.S., Ali, I. and Sadiq, A. (2017). Performance of guar genotypes under irrigated and drought stress conditions as evaluated through PCA and Cluster analysis. International Journal of Biology and Biotechnology. 14(4): 623-628.

Editorial Board

View all (0)