Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 42 issue 5 (october 2019) : 680-683,   Doi: 10.18805/LR-494

A Study on the Silage Properties of Hungarian Vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) and Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Grass Mixtures in Different Rates

G
G. Bengisu
1<div>Harran University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department&nbsp;of Field Crops, Sanliurfa, Turkey.</div>

  • Submitted14-04-2019|

  • Accepted11-08-2019|

  • First Online 04-10-2019|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-494

Cite article:- Bengisu G. (2019). A Study on the Silage Properties of Hungarian Vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) and Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Grass Mixtures in Different Rates. Legume Research. 42(5): 680-683. doi: 10.18805/LR-494.

ABSTRACT

This study was carried out in Harran University of Turkey during 2017-2018 in November-May growing season in order to investigate the effect of sole and mixed Hungarian vetch and Barley grass silage properties. In the study, 100% Hungarian vetch (H), 100% barley (B), “75% H + 25% B”, “50% H + 50% B”, “25% H + 75% B” mixtures were used. When the physical properties of silages were examined, it is observed that the silage quality increased as the barley ratio in the mixture increased, where the highest quality was obtained at sole barley silage. In terms of chemical properties of silages; the lowest acid detergent insoluble fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent insoluble fiber (NDF) and the highest protein content values were obtained from the “75% H + 25% B” silage mixture. It was concluded that the most suitable silage mixture for high silage quality was “75% H + 25% B”.

REFERENCES

  1. Altýnok S.(2002). Farklý Karýþým Oranlarýndaki Arpa, Koca Fið ve Tüylü Fiðin Silaj Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araþtýrma. Tarým Bilimleri Dergisi. 8 (3): 232237.
  2. Anonymous.(1993). Bestimmung des pH-Wertes. In: Die chemischen Untersuchungen von Futtermitteln. Teil 18 Silage. Abschnit 18.1 Bestimmung des pH-Wertes. Methodenbuch Bd. III., VDLUFAV Verlag, Darmstadt. 
  3. Akyýldýz, A.R. (1984). Yemler Bilgisi Laboratuvar Kýlavuzu. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayýnlarý. 893: 213, Ankara
  4. Aykan, Y., Saruhan, V. (2018). Farklý Oranlarda Silolanan Yembezelyesi (Pisum sativum L.) ve Arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) Karýþýýmlarýnýn Silaj Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi, Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 11(2):64-70.
  5. Bulgurlu Þ, Ergül M. (1978). Yemlerin Fiziksel, Kimyasal ve Biyolojik Analiz Metotlarý. E Ü. Basýmevi, Yayýn No: 127, Ýzmir. 176s.
  6. Carr, P.M., Horsley, R.D., Poland, W.W. (2004). Barley, oat and cereal–pea mixtures as dryland forages ýn the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal. 96(3): 677–684 
  7. Comberg, G.(1974). Gärfutter: Betriebswirtschaft, Erzeugung, Verfütterung, Verlag Eugen Ulmer Stuttgart, Gerokstraße 19, Printed in Germany, ISBN:3-8001-4321-6, 260s
  8. Doðan, S. (2010). Van koþullarýnda yem bezelyesi (Pisum arvense L.) ve arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) karýþýmlarýnýn ot verimi ve silaj kalitesine etkisi. Yüzüncü Yýl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü YLT. 37s.
  9. Demirel, R., Saruhan, V., Baran, M.S., Andiç, N., Demirel, D.Þ. (2010). Farklý Karýþým Oranlardaki Ak Üçgül Ve Arpanýn Silolanma Özelliklerinin Tespit Edilmesi. Yüzüncü Yýl Üniversitesi Tarým Bilimleri Dergisi. 20 (1): 26-31. 
  10. Ergün, A., Tuncer, Þ.D., Çolpan, Yalçýn, S., Saçaklý, P. (2013). Yemler, Yem Hijyeni ve Teknolojisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Geniþletilmiþ 5. Baský, Ankara.
  11. Geren, H., Kavut, Y.T.(2009). Ýkinci Ürün Koþullarýnda Yetiþtirilen Bazý Sorgum (Sorghum spp.) Türlerinin Mýsýr (Zea mays L.) ile Verim ve Silaj Kalitesi Yönünden Karþýlaþtýrýlmasý Üzerine Bir Araþtýrma, Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 46(1): 9-16.
  12. Kýlýç, A. (1986). Silo Yemi Öðretim, Öðrenim ve Uygulama Önerileri. Bilgehan Basýmevi, Ýzmir.
  13. Kalaycý, M. (2005). Örneklerle Jump Kullanýmý ve Tarýmsal Araþtýrma için Varyans Analizi Modelleri, Anadolu Tarýmsal Araþtýrma Enstitüsü Yayýnlarý, no:21
  14. Morrison, J.A. (2003). Hay and pasture managment, chapter 8. extension educator, crop systems rock ford extension center. (http:// iah.aces.uiuc.edu/pdf/Agronomy_HB/08chapter.pdf), (Access date: 19.11.2018).
  15. Ýptaþ, S., Avcýoðlu, R. (1996). Silajda Fermantasyon Ürünleri ile Nitelik Belirleme Yöntemleri Arasýndaki iliþkiler. Türkiye 3. Çayýr-    Mera Yem bitkileri Kongresi 17-19 Haziran 1996, Erzurum. S: 775–781.
  16. Petterson, K. (1988). Ensiling Of Forages: Factors Affecting Silage Fermantation And Quality. Swedish University Of Agricultural Sciences, Department Of Animal Nutrition And Management, Uppsala, 46p.
  17. Pereira-Crespo, S., Fernández-Lorenzo, B., Valladares, J., González-Arráez, A., Flores, G. (2010). Effects of seeding rates and harvest date on forage yield and nutritive value of pea-triticale intercropping. Options Méditerranéennes, A, (92): 215-218.
  18. Rohweder, D.A., Barnes, R.F., Jorgensen, N. (1978). Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science. 47(3): 747-759.
  19. Seydosoglu, S. (2019). Effects of different mixture ratios of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) on quality of silage. Legume Research, DOI:10.18805/LR-468 (in press).
  20. Seydosoglu, S., Gelir, G. (2019). Farklý Oranlarda Karýþtýrýlan Mürdümük (Lathrus sativus L.) ve Arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) Hâsýllarýnýn Silaj Özellikleri Üzerinde Bir Araþtýrma, Iðdýr Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 9(1): 397-406.
  21. Seydosoglu, S., Saruhan, V. (2017). Mýsýr Bitkisinde (Zea mays L.) Ekim Zamaný ve Çeþidin Silaj Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi, Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 54 (3):361-366.
  22. Uzun, A., Aþýk, F.F. (2009). Bezelye+yulaf karýþýmýnda farklý karýþým oranlarý ile biçim zamanlarýnýn otun verimi ve kalitesi üzerine    etkisi. Türkiye 8. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 19-22 Ekim, Hatay, 584–588.
  23. Yýlmaz, Þ., Þanverdi, M., Kaya, Þ.(2007). Silaj Sorgumxsudanotu Melezlerinde Ekim Zamanýnýn Silaj Kalitesine Etkisi. Türkiye VII. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 25-27 Haziran, 289292. Erzurum.
  24. Yücel, C., Avcý, M., Yucel, H., Sevilmiþ, U., Hatipoðlu, R. (2018a). Effects of seed mixture ratio and harvest time on forage yield and silage quality of intercropped berseem clover with triticale, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 27 (8): 5312-5322. 
  25. Yýlmaz, Þ., Özel, A., Atak, M., Erayman, M. (2014). Effects Of Seeding Rates On Competition Ýndices of Barley and Vetch Ýntercropping    Systems in East Mediterranean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 39: 135–143.
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 42 issue 5 (october 2019) : 680-683,   Doi: 10.18805/LR-494

    A Study on the Silage Properties of Hungarian Vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) and Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Grass Mixtures in Different Rates

    G
    G. Bengisu
    1<div>Harran University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department&nbsp;of Field Crops, Sanliurfa, Turkey.</div>

    • Submitted14-04-2019|

    • Accepted11-08-2019|

    • First Online 04-10-2019|

    • doi 10.18805/LR-494

    Cite article:- Bengisu G. (2019). A Study on the Silage Properties of Hungarian Vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) and Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Grass Mixtures in Different Rates. Legume Research. 42(5): 680-683. doi: 10.18805/LR-494.

    ABSTRACT

    This study was carried out in Harran University of Turkey during 2017-2018 in November-May growing season in order to investigate the effect of sole and mixed Hungarian vetch and Barley grass silage properties. In the study, 100% Hungarian vetch (H), 100% barley (B), “75% H + 25% B”, “50% H + 50% B”, “25% H + 75% B” mixtures were used. When the physical properties of silages were examined, it is observed that the silage quality increased as the barley ratio in the mixture increased, where the highest quality was obtained at sole barley silage. In terms of chemical properties of silages; the lowest acid detergent insoluble fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent insoluble fiber (NDF) and the highest protein content values were obtained from the “75% H + 25% B” silage mixture. It was concluded that the most suitable silage mixture for high silage quality was “75% H + 25% B”.

    REFERENCES

    1. Altýnok S.(2002). Farklý Karýþým Oranlarýndaki Arpa, Koca Fið ve Tüylü Fiðin Silaj Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araþtýrma. Tarým Bilimleri Dergisi. 8 (3): 232237.
    2. Anonymous.(1993). Bestimmung des pH-Wertes. In: Die chemischen Untersuchungen von Futtermitteln. Teil 18 Silage. Abschnit 18.1 Bestimmung des pH-Wertes. Methodenbuch Bd. III., VDLUFAV Verlag, Darmstadt. 
    3. Akyýldýz, A.R. (1984). Yemler Bilgisi Laboratuvar Kýlavuzu. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayýnlarý. 893: 213, Ankara
    4. Aykan, Y., Saruhan, V. (2018). Farklý Oranlarda Silolanan Yembezelyesi (Pisum sativum L.) ve Arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) Karýþýýmlarýnýn Silaj Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi, Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 11(2):64-70.
    5. Bulgurlu Þ, Ergül M. (1978). Yemlerin Fiziksel, Kimyasal ve Biyolojik Analiz Metotlarý. E Ü. Basýmevi, Yayýn No: 127, Ýzmir. 176s.
    6. Carr, P.M., Horsley, R.D., Poland, W.W. (2004). Barley, oat and cereal–pea mixtures as dryland forages ýn the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal. 96(3): 677–684 
    7. Comberg, G.(1974). Gärfutter: Betriebswirtschaft, Erzeugung, Verfütterung, Verlag Eugen Ulmer Stuttgart, Gerokstraße 19, Printed in Germany, ISBN:3-8001-4321-6, 260s
    8. Doðan, S. (2010). Van koþullarýnda yem bezelyesi (Pisum arvense L.) ve arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) karýþýmlarýnýn ot verimi ve silaj kalitesine etkisi. Yüzüncü Yýl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü YLT. 37s.
    9. Demirel, R., Saruhan, V., Baran, M.S., Andiç, N., Demirel, D.Þ. (2010). Farklý Karýþým Oranlardaki Ak Üçgül Ve Arpanýn Silolanma Özelliklerinin Tespit Edilmesi. Yüzüncü Yýl Üniversitesi Tarým Bilimleri Dergisi. 20 (1): 26-31. 
    10. Ergün, A., Tuncer, Þ.D., Çolpan, Yalçýn, S., Saçaklý, P. (2013). Yemler, Yem Hijyeni ve Teknolojisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Geniþletilmiþ 5. Baský, Ankara.
    11. Geren, H., Kavut, Y.T.(2009). Ýkinci Ürün Koþullarýnda Yetiþtirilen Bazý Sorgum (Sorghum spp.) Türlerinin Mýsýr (Zea mays L.) ile Verim ve Silaj Kalitesi Yönünden Karþýlaþtýrýlmasý Üzerine Bir Araþtýrma, Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 46(1): 9-16.
    12. Kýlýç, A. (1986). Silo Yemi Öðretim, Öðrenim ve Uygulama Önerileri. Bilgehan Basýmevi, Ýzmir.
    13. Kalaycý, M. (2005). Örneklerle Jump Kullanýmý ve Tarýmsal Araþtýrma için Varyans Analizi Modelleri, Anadolu Tarýmsal Araþtýrma Enstitüsü Yayýnlarý, no:21
    14. Morrison, J.A. (2003). Hay and pasture managment, chapter 8. extension educator, crop systems rock ford extension center. (http:// iah.aces.uiuc.edu/pdf/Agronomy_HB/08chapter.pdf), (Access date: 19.11.2018).
    15. Ýptaþ, S., Avcýoðlu, R. (1996). Silajda Fermantasyon Ürünleri ile Nitelik Belirleme Yöntemleri Arasýndaki iliþkiler. Türkiye 3. Çayýr-    Mera Yem bitkileri Kongresi 17-19 Haziran 1996, Erzurum. S: 775–781.
    16. Petterson, K. (1988). Ensiling Of Forages: Factors Affecting Silage Fermantation And Quality. Swedish University Of Agricultural Sciences, Department Of Animal Nutrition And Management, Uppsala, 46p.
    17. Pereira-Crespo, S., Fernández-Lorenzo, B., Valladares, J., González-Arráez, A., Flores, G. (2010). Effects of seeding rates and harvest date on forage yield and nutritive value of pea-triticale intercropping. Options Méditerranéennes, A, (92): 215-218.
    18. Rohweder, D.A., Barnes, R.F., Jorgensen, N. (1978). Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science. 47(3): 747-759.
    19. Seydosoglu, S. (2019). Effects of different mixture ratios of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) on quality of silage. Legume Research, DOI:10.18805/LR-468 (in press).
    20. Seydosoglu, S., Gelir, G. (2019). Farklý Oranlarda Karýþtýrýlan Mürdümük (Lathrus sativus L.) ve Arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) Hâsýllarýnýn Silaj Özellikleri Üzerinde Bir Araþtýrma, Iðdýr Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 9(1): 397-406.
    21. Seydosoglu, S., Saruhan, V. (2017). Mýsýr Bitkisinde (Zea mays L.) Ekim Zamaný ve Çeþidin Silaj Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi, Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 54 (3):361-366.
    22. Uzun, A., Aþýk, F.F. (2009). Bezelye+yulaf karýþýmýnda farklý karýþým oranlarý ile biçim zamanlarýnýn otun verimi ve kalitesi üzerine    etkisi. Türkiye 8. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 19-22 Ekim, Hatay, 584–588.
    23. Yýlmaz, Þ., Þanverdi, M., Kaya, Þ.(2007). Silaj Sorgumxsudanotu Melezlerinde Ekim Zamanýnýn Silaj Kalitesine Etkisi. Türkiye VII. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 25-27 Haziran, 289292. Erzurum.
    24. Yücel, C., Avcý, M., Yucel, H., Sevilmiþ, U., Hatipoðlu, R. (2018a). Effects of seed mixture ratio and harvest time on forage yield and silage quality of intercropped berseem clover with triticale, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 27 (8): 5312-5322. 
    25. Yýlmaz, Þ., Özel, A., Atak, M., Erayman, M. (2014). Effects Of Seeding Rates On Competition Ýndices of Barley and Vetch Ýntercropping    Systems in East Mediterranean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 39: 135–143.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)