Seasonal incidence of S. litura in field correlated with weather parameter
Seasonal incidence of
S. litura was studied soybean germplasm in the
kharif-2021 by counting the population of pest at weekly interval also correlated with some environmental factors like temperature and relative humidity (Table 1) as from previous study it effects incidence of the pest the most
(Suyal et al., 2018). The field results depicts that initially the pest populations arise during 36
th standard metrological week (SMW) which gradually increases till 39
th SMW where it is on peak. On 39
th SMW the incidence of
S. litura was ranging from 0.23 (RSC 11-03) to 3.06 (NRC 131) per meter row length (mrl) and lowest on 42
th SMW (Fig 2). The weather prevailing during that week were found maximum (33.4°C), minimum (24.2°C) and average (28.8°C) while the morning (91%), evening (61%) and average (76%) relative humidity. Results also depicts that four soybean germplasm (BAUS 102, DSB34, MACS 1493 and RSC 11-03) were resistant towards the
S. litura while NRC131 and RSC 11-07 were highly susceptible in comparison to susceptible check (JS-335). The correlation between pest population (larvae/mrl) and weather parameter are presented in Table 1. The larvae/mrl in different soybean germplasm showed positive correlation with minimum temperature, maximum temperature and maximum (morning) humidity but shows negative correlation with minimum (evening) humidity (except for BAUS 102, DSB 34 and MACS 1493 which shows positive correlation) (Fig 3 i, ii, iii). Similar results were provided by
Punithavalli et al., (2014) who studied the pest incidence for three consecutive years and found that
S. litura larvae shows maximum infestion in soybean during early and mid September. Similarly,
Brahman et al., (2018) reported that the peak larval population was recorded during third week of September and the larval incidence was positively correlated with maximum temperature. The more or less similar results were reported by
Sundar et al., (2018) who stated that the correlation coefficient between abiotic factors and larval population was non-significant. They also reported a positive correlation between larval population and a negative correlation with relative humidity.
Pal et al., (2023) also reported the similar conclusion that abiotic factors are the main determining factors of the incidence of pest population. Similarly,
Umbarkar et al., (2010) investigated the seasonal incidence of
H. armigera in
kharif-2018 and found out the highest incidence was observed at 31
st standard week which exhibit highly significant negative correlation with minimum temperature and evening relative humidity.
Evaluation of antixenotic resistance through non-choice and free-choice feeding assay
The intensity of damage by
S. litura was observed through non-choice and free-choice tests and found a range of differences among the germplasm. From free-choice experiment it was concluded that the larvae moves towards those plants only which were highly preferable while do not feed or only took a taste bite from the undesirable germplasm. This undesirability is known as antixenosis resistance. Table 2 indicate the mean leaf area consumed (MLAC) by larvae in both no-choice and free-choice assay. From the table it was concluded that germplasm RSC 11-03 shows minimum area consumption in both no-choice and free-choice assays (1.43±0.11 and 1.25±0.08) followed by BAUS 102 (1.87±0.04 and 1.59±0.14), DSB34 (1.94±0.04 and 1.40±0.14) and MACS 1493 (2.00±0.20 and 1.52±0.10) while maximum consumption was found in NRC131 (6.13±0.08 and 6.51±0.12) and in RSC 11-07 (5.84±0.11 and 6.45±0.13). By comparing these results with the C-value, it was found that the soybean germplasm RSC 11-03, BAUS 102, DSB34, MACS 1493 have 0.06, 0.15, 0.14 and 0.18 C-value which depicts that these are extremely antifeedent to
S. litura, while on the other hand NRC 131 and RSC 11-07 have 1.11 and 1.06 C-value shows extremely preferred germplasm by the pest as compared to the check (JS-335). The results are in complete agreement with the field screening where, these four germplasm were also resistant towards pest incidence. The results were in partial agreement with
Gaur et al., (2018) where several germplasms were screened for antixenosis and results shows that the preference and non preference soybean germplasms was based on the antixenosis mechanism of resistance.
Sulistyo and Inayati (2016) performed an experiment on soybean germplasm to establish the antixenotic resistance through free-choice and no-choice assay. Similarly,
Boica Junior et al., (2015) reported that the largest consumption of the leaf (high MLAC) shows that the genotype is susceptible to the pest while resistance in plant creates difference in consumption by pest. Studies were in partial agreement with
Senthilraja and Patel (2021) who performed free-choice test against pulse beetle (
Callasobruchus maculates) to find out the morphological attributes associated with resistance. They found out that egg deposition by beetle is less on rough surface than the seed possess smooth surface.
Trichome density conferring the resistance factor in soybean germplasm
The results of density and length of trichomes on different germplasms shows that trichome act as a great physical barrier of the soybean germplasm and provide antixenotic resistance to the plant. The data on trichome density and length shows a negative relation with feeding property (C-value) (Fig 4). The graph depicts that the extremely antifeedent germplasm RSC 11-03 have high trichome density and length (3.63 and 5.73) having low C-value meanwhile, the NRC 131 have lowest value of trichome density and length (2.35 and 4.81) and have high C-value. Thus, the trichome density and length are greatly affects the pest feeding. The results are in agreement of
Gowthish et al., (2018) who worked on Black gram to find out the antixenotic resistance against
S. litura and reported that trichome density is the significant factor for antixenotic resistance as resistant accession contains high trichome on both adaxial and abaxial surfaces while susceptible have low trichome density.
De Queiroz et al., (2020) also supported the results by reporting that antixenosis is a mechanism of resistance and mediated by various factor including trichome density.