Anova
Analysis of variance indicated that the significant difference existed among the genotypes for all the eleven studied traits evaluated under both the environmental conditions (Table 2). This indicated the existence of substantial amount of genetic variability for all studied traits among 60 chickpea genotypes. These ample variations in eleven quantitative traits could be utilized for selection of superior genotypes, improvement in SY through selection, heterosis and combination breeding in chickpea germplasm. Similar findings are reported by
Peerzada et al., 2014 and
Bala et al., 2015.
Mean performance analysis
The mean performance of all the studied traits were depicted using boxplot (Fig 1). There is a high difference in flowering traits, DF and DM in both sowing condition. Flowering duration and maturity days more in normal case compared to late sown condition. It can be concluded that in late sown condition plants get less vegetative period as compared to normal sowing condition and this is clearly depicted in seed yield. SY was less in late sown condition. Flowering and podding in chickpea is known to be very sensitive to changes in external environment and drastic reduction in seed yields were observed when plants were exposed to high temperature
(Bahuguna et al., 2012, Devasirvatham et al., 2012). Moving to physiological traits, CHL and CTD values more in normal sowing condition while RSI lower in normal sown condition. The same behaviour of physiological traits were also observed by
Kumar et al., 2012. In case of remaining traits, performance of genotypes in normal sown higher than late sown condition.
GCV and PCV
Table 3 showed a small difference between GCV and PCV in all studied traits indicating negligible influence of environment in expression of these traits. The traits
viz, SY, PP, SW and CHL content all exhibited greater variability under both the environmental conditions. The highest variability was exhibited by SY under both condition normal as well as late sown condition followed by PP and CHL. The highest value of GCV was exhibited by SY followed by PP in case of normal sown condition but under late sown condition highest value was exhibited by CHL content followed by SW. The highest value of GCV indicated that exploitable genetic variability present for the character that can facilitate the selection.
Heritability and genetic advance
The proportion of genetic variability which is transmitted from parents to offspring is known as heritability. The characters
viz CTD, RSI, DM and CHL exhibited high heritability under both the environmental conditions. But high heritability coupled with high genetic advance was found for the character
i.e. PP and SW content under normal sown condition whereas under late sown condition it was sown by PP and RSI. So special attention should be given to these characters for selection as they were controlled by additive gene action. The above report is akin with the findings of
Dev et al., (2017), Paul et al., (2018) and
Yucel (2020).
Correlation
Correlation is the mutual association between several variables. Under both the environmental condition SY has positive correlation with CTD, CHL, PP, SB, SW, SP and PH (Fig 2). The information on traits association with SY would be additional assistance to plant breeders in deciding the selection criteria and developing effective breeding strategy for evolving high yielding varieties.
Under late sown condition DF exhibited negative correlation this means that this trait by increasing the number in DF this will lead to decline in grain yield. Thus the selection of this trait for improving ST may not be rewarding. RSI exhibited negative association with SY under both the environmental condition this means that lesser the RSI higher will be the seed yield. These all results were in agreement with
Jha et al., (2012) and
Kumar et al., (2012).
Regression analysis
Regression analysis of SY showed that SY has positive association with DF, DM, SB, PP, number of seeds per pod, SW, canopy temperature depression, CHL under both the environmental conditions and negative with relative stress injury. Coefficient of determination gives information on how much variation of dependent variable was due to the independent variable, which gave a value of R
2 = 0.88 and 0.75, indicating 88 and 75% variation of the yield parameter was due to the independent traits under normal as well as late sown conditions, respectively. The regression equation is as follow:
SY at normal sown condition = -15.83 + 0.02(DF) + 0.11(DM) + 0.01(PH) + 0.29 (SB) + 0.07(PP) + 1.98 (SP) + 0.18 (SW) + 0.23(CTD) - 0.43(RSI) + 1.73(CHL).
SY at late sown condition = -0.37 + 0.04(DF) + 0.01(DM) - 0.02(PH) + 0.23(SB) + 0.04(PP) + 1.16(SP) + 0.13(SW) + 2.49(CTD) - 0.24(RSI) + 0.74(CHL).
Path coefficient analysis
Under both the environmental conditions, the maximum positive directs effects on SY were exhibited by traits
viz., total chlorophyll content, canopy temperature depression, number of seed per pod, SW, number of pod per plant and SB (Fig 3). Therefore, selection for these will likely to bring about improvement in grain yield. Maximum indirect effects on SY were exhibited by SB (0.2522) through CHL under normal sown condition, whereas in case of late sown conditions by number of secondary branches (0.2479) through RSI under both the environmental conditions.
A residual effect on dependent variable measures the error and unexplained variance by other possible independent variables. Residual effects were observed 0.162 and 0.226 in normal and late sown conditions for genotypic path coefficient analysis which is too low.
PCA analysis
In present investigation, PCA was performed for yield and its contributing traits in chickpea in which principal components greater than one Eigen value were selected for interpretation (
Kaiser, 1958 and
Jeffers,1967). Here, PCA showed the 85% total variability was explained by first five PC in both the sowing condition (Table 3). In case of normal sown, PC1 contributed for 45.97% of the total variation with SY having the highest positive and RSI with the highest negative loadings. PC2 accounted 15.79% of the total variation with PP having the highest positive and DM with the highest negative coefficients. Furthermore, 10.07% variation was explained by PC3 with SP and PH, having highest and lowest loading, respectively. The remaining two PC,
i.e., PC4 and PC5 were captured 7.17% and 6.77% variability. While, in case of late sown, PC1 account for 46.64% variation to the total variation with SY having the highest positive and RSI with the highest negative loadings. Moreover, 15.79% of the total variation accounted by PC2 with DM having the highest positive and PH with the highest negative coefficients. The remaining three PC,
i.e., PC3, PC4 and PC5 were captured 11.29%, 8.45% and 6.29% variability. The PC3 having the highest positive loadings for SW while, the highest negatives loadings for SP. The comparison of PC1 from both the sowing condition showed that, the highest and lowest loading present in traits, SY and RSI. Thus, it can be concluded that, these two traits tend to be very important. The results were in support with the
Jha et al., 2015.
In both the sown condition, higher vector length was observed in most of traits indicating the presence of large variability, while SP, PH and SW in case of normal sown and SP in case of late sown had smaller vector length indicating low variability (Fig 4). The vector of SY and RSI were diverging and form a large angle (close to 180°), which indicating they were negative correlated in both the sowing condition. The vector of SY meet vectors of DF, DM and PH almost at 90° indicating non-significant or low negative association with these traits. Conversely, vectors of remaining traits forming a small angle means they were positively correlated. Same situation was observed in both sowing condition. These relationships of traits present in PCA biplot were in accordance with the pearson correlation values. Based on PCA results it found that genotype
viz., HC-5, H04-87, GNG 2267 under normal sown conditions and HC-1302, CSG 8962 and HC 5 under late sown condition have highest value of seed yield. Genotype
viz., H 08-71, H07-120 and H 07-75 under normal sown conditions and H 08-18 and H 08 71 under late sown conditions have higher value of number of pod per plant.
Cluster analysis
D
2 analysis grouped the germplasm lines into eight clusters under normal sown conditions and into seven clusters under late sown conditions (Fig 5). Under normal sown conditions, cluster I contain maximum number of 19 genotypes, whereas cluster II comprises 14, cluster III-5, cluster IV-6, cluster V-9, cluster VI-2, cluster VII-1 and cluster VIII have 4 genotypes but under late sown condition, cluster I comprises of 39 genotypes, cluster II-9 genotypes and cluster VI-2 genotypes whereas cluster III, cluster V and cluster VII comprises only 1 genotype this indicate huge variability also exist among the genotypes under both environmental conditions. The maximum intra cluster distance was found between the cluster V under normal sown condition whereas it was shown by cluster IV. The maximum inter cluster distance was observed between cluster IV and cluster VII. But under late sown condition it was observed between cluster VI and cluster VII. This indicated that genotypes present in this cluster group were highly divergent from each other implying large amount of diversity within and between groups, which could be exploited in breeding programmes. Genotypes GL 12003 and GNG 2300 would be consider as very rewarding on the basis of cluster mean analysis under normal sown condition because these genotypes present in cluster VI showed highest value of cluster mean of different traits. In case of late sown condition, genotype GNG 1958, GL 120 21 and HC 3 would be considering very best as these genotypes were present in cluster V and cluster VI having highest value of cluster mean for different traits. D
2 statistics has been used in several crops for identifying diverse parents for hybridization programmes. These results were in agreement with
Verma and Walia, 2013.