Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 47 issue 9 (september 2024) : 1473-1479

​Multivariate Analysis for Identification of Heat Tolerant Superior Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes

Vikesh Tanwar1,*, Krishan Kumar1, Neeraj Kumar2, Kartik Madankar1, Pankaj1, Deepak Kaushik1, Ajeev Kumar2
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 001, Haryana, India.
2Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 001, Haryana, India.
  • Submitted22-02-2022|

  • Accepted02-09-2022|

  • First Online 12-10-2022|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4904

Cite article:- Tanwar Vikesh, Kumar Krishan, Kumar Neeraj, Madankar Kartik, Pankaj, Kaushik Deepak, Kumar Ajeev (2024). ​Multivariate Analysis for Identification of Heat Tolerant Superior Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes . Legume Research. 47(9): 1473-1479. doi: 10.18805/LR-4904.
Background: Chickpea being a winter season crop, often experiences high temperature during its reproductive phase resulting in yield losses due to the direct effect of it, on different physiological processes. Therefore, identification and development of heat stress tolerant genotypes is an important aspect in chickpea breeding especially in view of the changing climate scenario.

Methods: An experiment was conducted during Rabi season 2017-18 at pulses research field, CCS HAU, Hisar, Haryana comprising 60 genotypes in randomized block design with three replications under two environmental conditions namely, normal and late sown to find out heat stress tolerant genotypes. A total of eleven morpho-physiological yield attributes noted down under both normal and late sown conditions and various multivariate statistical methods were used to find out tolerant chickpea genotypes.

Result: The present study has led the understanding of many inter-related traits involved in the genetic variation of chickpea seed yield under normal as well as late sown conditions. This would certainly provide guidelines for selection of parents as well as effective selection of promising chickpea genotypes and also have paramount importance in formulating plant model for selection of segregating generations in chickpea breeding programmes for development of high yielding varieties.
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is the third most important pulse crop globally after common bean and field pea. This annual legume is a significant contributor to agricultural sustainability through N2-fixation and as a rotation crop allowing the diversification of agricultural production system. Chickpea being a winter season crop, often experiences abnormally high temperature ≥35°C during its reproductive phase (flowering and pod development) resulting in severe yield losses due to the direct effect of high temperatures on different physiological processes (Stoddard et al., 2006). Due to increase in 1°C of seasonal temperature there is decrease in 53 kg ha-1 of chickpea yield occurred (Kalra et al., 2008).
       
Identification and development of high temperature tolerant genotypes is an important aspect of chickpea breeding. It can be done by studying the genetic variability present in the germplasm lines of chickpea. PCV, GCV, heritability and genetic advance are important selection parameters should be used in predicting the ultimate effect for selecting high temperature tolerant varieties. Correlation and path analysis determine the association between yield and its components and also bring out the relative importance of their direct and indirect effects, thus proving an understanding of their association with yield. Principal component score strategy has been employed for the identification of a set of accessions which captures grain maximum genetic diversity of the whole collection (Gireesh et al., 2017) and has been successfully used in the germplasm evaluation of crops for understanding the relationship and correlation among the variables studied (Zafar et al., 2008).
               
Considering the above scenario, the present investigation is carried out with the objective of studying the genetic variability, diversity and trait relationship associations in chickpea genotypes for yield improvement along with identification of genotypes showing tolerance mechanism and exhibit minimum reduction in yield in heat stress condition.
A sixty chickpea genotypes included advance breeding lines, released varieties and genetic stocks taken from pulses section CCS HAU, Hisar, Haryana. The details of experimental materials mentioned in Table 1. The experiment was conducted in randomized block design (RBD) with three replications under two environmental conditions (Normal sown: 13th November, 2017 and late sown: 9th December, 2017) at Research Area of Pulses Section, during Rabi 2017-18 in a plot of 4 m length with spacing of 30 cm × 10 cm for each of the genotype.
 

Table 1: ANOVA among different yield contributing traits in both normal and late sowing condition.


               
The traits viz., days to 50% flowering (DF), days to physiological maturity (DM), plant height (PH), number of secondary branches per plant (SB), number of pods per plant (PP), number of seeds per pod (SP), 100 seed weight (SW) and seed yield (SY) were recorded under field conditions. Along with that three physiological parameters namely, Canopy temperature measurement (CTD), relative stress injury (RSI) and total chlorophyll content (CHL) were recorded. The multivariate parameters were estimated using various packages of Rstudio software (R Core Team, 2021). The analysis of variance, correlation, path analysis and regression estimated using ‘agricolae’ package (deMendiburu and Yaseen, 2020). Principle component analysis carried out using ‘factoextra’ package (Kassambara, 2017). The corrplot and box plot were constructed using ‘corrplot’ (Wei, 2010) and ‘ggplot2’ (Wickham, 2016) packages.
Anova
 
Analysis of variance indicated that the significant difference existed among the genotypes for all the eleven studied traits evaluated under both the environmental conditions (Table 2). This indicated the existence of substantial amount of genetic variability for all studied traits among 60 chickpea genotypes. These ample variations in eleven quantitative traits could be utilized for selection of superior genotypes, improvement in SY through selection, heterosis and combination breeding in chickpea germplasm. Similar findings are reported by Peerzada et al., 2014 and Bala et al., 2015.
 

Table 2: Genetic variability parameters among different yield contributing traits in both normal and late sowing condition.


 
Mean performance analysis
 
The mean performance of all the studied traits were depicted using boxplot (Fig 1). There is a high difference in flowering traits, DF and DM in both sowing condition. Flowering duration and maturity days more in normal case compared to late sown condition. It can be concluded that in late sown condition plants get less vegetative period as compared to normal sowing condition and this is clearly depicted in seed yield. SY was less in late sown condition. Flowering and podding in chickpea is known to be very sensitive to changes in external environment and drastic reduction in seed yields were observed when plants were exposed to high temperature (Bahuguna et al., 2012, Devasirvatham et al., 2012). Moving to physiological traits, CHL and CTD values more in normal sowing condition while RSI lower in normal sown condition. The same behaviour of physiological traits were also observed by Kumar et al., 2012. In case of remaining traits, performance of genotypes in normal sown higher than late sown condition.
 

Fig 1: Box-plots showing the variation of the data from the eleven quantitative traits of two seasons evaluated in 60 accessions of chickpea during rabi season 2017-18.


 
GCV and PCV
 
Table 3 showed a small difference between GCV and PCV in all studied traits indicating negligible influence of environment in expression of these traits. The traits viz, SY, PP, SW and CHL content all exhibited greater variability under both the environmental conditions. The highest variability was exhibited by SY under both condition normal as well as late sown condition followed by PP and CHL. The highest value of GCV was exhibited by SY followed by PP in case of normal sown condition but under late sown condition highest value was exhibited by CHL content followed by SW. The highest value of GCV indicated that exploitable genetic variability present for the character that can facilitate the selection.
 

Table 3: Genetic relationships and principal component analysis in elite chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for seed yield.


 
Heritability and genetic advance
 
The proportion of genetic variability which is transmitted from parents to offspring is known as heritability. The characters viz CTD, RSI, DM and CHL exhibited high heritability under both the environmental conditions. But high heritability coupled with high genetic advance was found for the character i.e. PP and SW content under normal sown condition whereas under late sown condition it was sown by PP and RSI. So special attention should be given to these characters for selection as they were controlled by additive gene action. The above report is akin with the findings of Dev et al., (2017), Paul et al., (2018) and Yucel (2020).
 
Correlation
 
Correlation is the mutual association between several variables. Under both the environmental condition SY has positive correlation with CTD, CHL, PP, SB, SW, SP and PH (Fig 2). The information on traits association with SY would be additional assistance to plant breeders in deciding the selection criteria and developing effective breeding strategy for evolving high yielding varieties.
 

Fig 2: Correlation coefficient analysis of yield and yield attributing traits in Cicer arietinum L. accessions under normal and late sown conditions.


       
Under late sown condition DF exhibited negative correlation this means that this trait by increasing the number in DF this will lead to decline in grain yield. Thus the selection of this trait for improving ST may not be rewarding. RSI exhibited negative association with SY under both the environmental condition this means that lesser the RSI higher will be the seed yield. These all results were in agreement with Jha et al., (2012) and Kumar et al., (2012).
 
Regression analysis
 
Regression analysis of SY showed that SY has positive association with DF, DM, SB, PP, number of seeds per pod, SW, canopy temperature depression, CHL under both the environmental conditions and negative with relative stress injury. Coefficient of determination gives information on how much variation of dependent variable was due to the independent variable, which gave a value of R2 = 0.88 and 0.75, indicating 88 and 75% variation of the yield parameter was due to the independent traits under normal as well as late sown conditions, respectively. The regression equation is as follow:
 
SY at normal sown condition = -15.83 + 0.02(DF) + 0.11(DM) + 0.01(PH) + 0.29 (SB) + 0.07(PP) + 1.98 (SP) + 0.18 (SW) + 0.23(CTD) - 0.43(RSI) + 1.73(CHL).
 
SY at late sown condition = -0.37 + 0.04(DF) + 0.01(DM) - 0.02(PH) + 0.23(SB) + 0.04(PP) + 1.16(SP) + 0.13(SW) + 2.49(CTD) - 0.24(RSI) + 0.74(CHL).
 
Path coefficient analysis
 
Under both the environmental conditions, the maximum positive directs effects on SY were exhibited by traits viz., total chlorophyll content, canopy temperature depression, number of seed per pod, SW, number of pod per plant and SB (Fig 3). Therefore, selection for these will likely to bring about improvement in grain yield. Maximum indirect effects on SY were exhibited by SB (0.2522) through CHL under normal sown condition, whereas in case of late sown conditions by number of secondary branches (0.2479) through RSI under both the environmental conditions.
 

Fig 3: Path diagram for SY in Cicer arietinum L. accessions.


       
A residual effect on dependent variable measures the error and unexplained variance by other possible independent variables. Residual effects were observed 0.162 and 0.226 in normal and late sown conditions for genotypic path coefficient analysis which is too low.
 
PCA analysis
 
In present investigation, PCA was performed for yield and its contributing traits in chickpea in which principal components greater than one Eigen value were selected for interpretation (Kaiser, 1958 and Jeffers,1967). Here, PCA showed the 85% total variability was explained by first five PC in both the sowing condition (Table 3). In case of normal sown, PC1 contributed for 45.97% of the total variation with SY having the highest positive and RSI with the highest negative loadings. PC2 accounted 15.79% of the total variation with PP having the highest positive and DM with the highest negative coefficients. Furthermore, 10.07% variation was explained by PC3 with SP and PH, having highest and lowest loading, respectively. The remaining two PC, i.e., PC4 and PC5 were captured 7.17% and 6.77% variability. While, in case of late sown, PC1 account for 46.64% variation to the total variation with SY having the highest positive and RSI with the highest negative loadings. Moreover, 15.79% of the total variation accounted by PC2 with DM having the highest positive and PH with the highest negative coefficients. The remaining three PC, i.e., PC3, PC4 and PC5 were captured 11.29%, 8.45% and 6.29% variability. The PC3 having the highest positive loadings for SW while, the highest negatives loadings for SP. The comparison of PC1 from both the sowing condition showed that, the highest and lowest loading present in traits, SY and RSI. Thus, it can be concluded that, these two traits tend to be very important. The results were in support with the Jha et al., 2015.
       
In both the sown condition, higher vector length was observed in most of traits indicating the presence of large variability, while SP, PH and SW in case of normal sown and SP in case of late sown had smaller vector length indicating low variability (Fig 4). The vector of SY and RSI were diverging and form a large angle (close to 180°), which indicating they were negative correlated in both the sowing condition. The vector of SY meet vectors of DF, DM and PH almost at 90° indicating non-significant or low negative association with these traits. Conversely, vectors of remaining traits forming a small angle means they were positively correlated. Same situation was observed in both sowing condition. These relationships of traits present in PCA biplot were in accordance with the pearson correlation values. Based on PCA results it found that genotype viz., HC-5, H04-87, GNG 2267 under normal sown conditions and HC-1302, CSG 8962 and HC 5 under late sown condition have highest value of seed yield. Genotype viz., H 08-71, H07-120 and H 07-75 under normal sown conditions and H 08-18 and H 08 71 under late sown conditions have higher value of number of pod per plant.
 

Fig 4: PCA biplot constructed based on eleven morpho-physiological traits left under normal sown condition (right) late sown condition.


 
Cluster analysis
 
D2 analysis grouped the germplasm lines into eight clusters under normal sown conditions and into seven clusters under late sown conditions (Fig 5). Under normal sown conditions, cluster I contain maximum number of 19 genotypes, whereas cluster II comprises 14, cluster III-5, cluster IV-6, cluster V-9, cluster VI-2, cluster VII-1 and cluster VIII have 4 genotypes but under late sown condition, cluster I comprises of 39 genotypes, cluster II-9 genotypes and cluster VI-2 genotypes whereas cluster III, cluster V and cluster VII comprises only 1 genotype this indicate huge variability also exist among the genotypes under both environmental conditions. The maximum intra cluster distance was found between the cluster V under normal sown condition whereas it was shown by cluster IV. The maximum inter cluster distance was observed between cluster IV and cluster VII. But under late sown condition it was observed between cluster VI and cluster VII. This indicated that genotypes present in this cluster group were highly divergent from each other implying large amount of diversity within and between groups, which could be exploited in breeding programmes. Genotypes GL 12003 and GNG 2300 would be consider as very rewarding on the basis of cluster mean analysis under normal sown condition because these genotypes present in cluster VI showed highest value of cluster mean of different traits. In case of late sown condition, genotype GNG 1958, GL 120 21 and HC 3 would be considering very best as these genotypes were present in cluster V and cluster VI having highest value of cluster mean for different traits. D2 statistics has been used in several crops for identifying diverse parents for hybridization programmes. These results were in agreement with Verma and Walia, 2013.
 

Fig 5: Grouping of 60 genotypes of Cicer arietinum into different clusters based on yield and yield contributing traits by D2 analysis (upper side) under normal sown conditions (lower side) late sown conditions.

The present study revealed high level of genetic variability exist for traits viz., SY, DF, DM, PH, PP, SP, SW, under normal sown conditions as compare to late sown conditions. Based upon the mean value it was found that genotypes viz H 12-29, H 12-55, H 12-17, H 08-18, H 07-120, HC 1, HC 5 and HC 3 showed less reduction in yield hence can be consider as more tolerant. SY exhibit positive and highly significant association with CTD, CHL, SB, SW, PP, SP under both the environmental conditions. Therefore, selection would be effective for increasing the yield potential of traits. Highest direct positive effects on yield were exerted by CHL, PP, CTD and SP but negative direct effects were exerted by RSI, hence the direct selection under these traits would be effective for increasing the yield of plants. PCA identified SY, PP, CHL, DF, DM, DF, in different principal components similar to D2 statistics playing a prominent role in classifying the variation existing in the germplasm genotypes. Thus, the results of the present study revealed high level of genetic variation existing in the population along with the traits contributing to this diversity, which can find immense applications in chickpea improvement programme.
All authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.

  1. Bahuguna, R.N., Shah, D., Jha, J., Pandey, S.K., Khetarpal, S., Anand, A. and Pal, M. (2012). Effect of mild temperature stress on reproductive dynamics and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Indian J. Plant Physiol. 17: 1-8.

  2. Bala, I., Kalia, R. and Kumar, B. (2015). Exploitable genetic variability and determination of selection criteria using path coefficient analysis in chickpea. Bangladesh Journal of Botany. 44(1): 139-142. 

  3. Dev, A., Verma, P. and Kumhar, B.L. (2017). Genetic character variability studies in desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes. Inernational Journal of Microbioogyl. Applied Science. 6(4): 20-25.

  4. Devasirvatham, V., Tan, D.K.Y., Gaur, P.M., Raju, T.N. and Trethowan, R.M. (2012). High temperature tolerance in chickpea and its implications for plant improvement. Crop and Pasture Science. 63(5): 419-428.

  5. deMendiburu, F. and Yaseen, M. (2020). Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. R package version 4.1.2, https://myaseen208.github.io/ agricolae/https://cran.r project. org/package=agricolae.

  6. Gireesh, C., Husain, S.M., Shivakumar, M. and Satpute, G.K. (2017). Integrating principal component score strategy with power core method for development of core collection in Indian soybean germplasm. Plant Genetic Resources. 15: 230-238.

  7. Jeffers, J.N.R. (1967). Two case studies in the application of principal component analysis. Applied Statistics. 16(3): 225-236.

  8. Jha, U.C, Singh, D.P. and Roopa Lavanya, G. (2012). Assessment of genetic variability and correlation of important yield related traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research. An International Journal. 35(4): 341-344.

  9. Jha, U.C. and Shil, S. (2015). Association analysis of yield contributing traits of chickpea genotypes under high temperature condition. Trends in Bioscience. 8: 2335-2341.

  10. Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytical rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 23: 187-200.

  11. Kalra, N., Chakraborty, D., Sharma, A., Rai, H.K., Jolly, M., Chander, S., Kumar, P.R., Bhadraray, S., et al. (2008). Effect of temperature on yield of some winter crops in north-west India. Current Science. 94: 82-88.   

  12. Kassambara, A., Mundt, F. (2017). Package “factoextra” for R: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. R Package. Version. 1-77.

  13. Kumar, A., Babu, G.S. and Lavanya G.R. (2012). Character association and path analysis in early segregating population in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research. 35(4): 337-340. 

  14. Kumar, N.E.E.R.A.J., Nandwal, A.S., Yadav, R., Bhasker, P., Kumar, S., Devi, S., Singh, S. and Lather, V.S. (2012). Assessment of chickpea genotypes for high temperature tolerance. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 17(3 and 4): 225-232.

  15. Paul, P.J., Samineni, S., Sajja, S.B., Rathore, A., Das, R.R., Chaturvedi, S.K., Lavanya, G.R., Varshney, R.K. and Gaur, P.M. (2018). Capturing genetic variability and selection of traits for heat tolerance in a chickpea recombinant inbred line (RIL) population under field conditions. Euphytica. 214(2): 22-27.

  16. Peerzada, O.H., Chaurasia, A.K. and Ahmad, N.I. (2014). Evaluation of chickpea germplasm (Cicer arietinum L.) Desi for yield and yield contributing traits. An International Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences. 9(4): 1805-1809. 

  17. R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project. org/.

  18. Stoddard, F.L., Balko, C., Erskeine, W., Khan, H.R., Link, W. And Sarker, A. (2006). Screening techniques and sources of resistence to abiotic stresses in cool season food legumes.  Euphytica. 147: 167-186.

  19. Verma, P.R.E.E.T.I. and Waldia, R.S. (2013). Genetic Divergence for Nodulation and Yield contributing traits In Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). The Journal of Rural and Agricultural Research. 13(2): 22-24.

  20. Wei, T. (2010). Corrplot: Visualization of a correlation matrix. R package version 0.2-0. Available on Comprehensive R Archive Network website; http://CRAN.R-project. org/package=corrplot. Accessed 2010.

  21. Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. springer.

  22. Yücel, D. (2020). Genotypic and phenotypic variability for yield and its components in normal and late sown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research. 43: 18-24. doi: 10.188 05/LR-505.

  23. Zafar, I., Arshad, M., Ashraf, M., Mahmood, T. and Abdul, W. (2008). Evaluation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] germplasm for some important morphological traits using multivariate analysis. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 40: 2323-2328.

Editorial Board

View all (0)