In vitro evaluation of fungicides
The effect of nine systemic, contact and combi fungicides were tested at 50, 100, 150, 200 ppm concentrations by poison food technique on growth of
C. canescens under
in vitro conditions. Observations on average colony diameter and per cent inhibition of linear growth over control are presented in (Table 1 and Plate 1). The results revealed that all the fungicides were significantly reduced the mycelial growth of
C. canescens over control. Among the fungicides, the combi fungicide trifloxystrobin 25% + tebuconazole 50% WG was found more effective and inhibited mycelial growth of
C. canescens (76.40%, 87.34%, 94.84% and 100.00%) at 50, 100, 150 and 200 ppm concentrations followed by carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% WP (68.28%, 80.46%, 88.28% and 100.00%) respectively over control. The fungicide propiconazole 25% EC also effective against
C. canescens and per cent inhibition (67.81%, 76.56%, 85.31% and 96.71%) at 50, 100, 150 and 200 ppm. Similarly, the next fungicide fluopyram 250 SC + trifloxystrobin 250 SC was also found effective and inhibited the growth of
C. canescens (50.62%, 63.90%, 75.15% and 85.78%) followed by mancozeb 50% WP (50.46%, 60.15%, 68.59% and 77.25%) respectively at 50, 100, 150 and 200 ppm concentrations. Similarly, hexaconazole 4% + zineb 68% WP, pyraclostrobin 20% WG + azoxystrobin 23% SC and thiophanate methyl 15% + copper oxychloride 40% WP were not effective against mycelial growth of test pathogen at 50 ppm concentration 48.28%, 45.46% and 42.96% respectively but found effective at 100 ppm (58.43%, 54.21% and 50.78%), 150 ppm (68.28%, 61.25% and 61.09%), 200 ppm (74.84%, 71.09% and 70.62%) concentrations respectively. All formulations of fungicides were found highly effective against test pathogen at 200 ppm concentration over control. However, these fungicides were less effective at lower concentration but reversible to increasing concentration of fungicides but chlorothalonil 75% WP fungicides was less effective against the per cent inhibition of mycelial growth of pathogen (14.00%, 21.56%, 31.40 and 42.03%) at 50 and 100, 150 and 200 ppm concentrations.
These findings are conformity with work of
Kumar et al., (2016) reported that tebuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% WG, carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% WP and propiconazole 25% EC at 200 ppm concentration showed complete (100%) per cent inhibition of mycelial growth of fungus. Another similar findings were also reported by
Kavyashree et al., (2017) under laboratory conditions evaluation of different fungicides against
Cercospora canescens of greengram revealed that hexaconazole 5 EC (0.1%), carbendazim (25%) + mancozeb (50%) WS (0.05%) or mancozeb 75 WP (0.1%) and propiconazole 25 EC and trifloxystrobin (25%) + tebuconazole (50%) w/w (0.05%) resulted into 100 per cent inhibition of mycelial growth.
In vivo evaluation of fungicides
In mothbean due to Cercospora leaf spot disease often causes considerable yield losses. Presently, the cultural practices along with biological control and resistant varieties considerably reduced the incidence of disease. Similarly, the systemic and contact fungicides also prevent the infection of disease but regularly application may lead to resistance against pathogen. Hence, a field trial on fungicidal control of disease was carried out for
kharif, 2019.
Based on efficacy of different fungicides evaluated under laboratory conditions, nine fungicides were used against Cercospora leaf spot of mothbean under field conditions. The results of experiment presented in (Table 2) revealed that there was significantly reduction in the disease intensity and increase mothbean yield was recorded compared to the untreated control plots. Ten days after the first spray, maximum per cent disease control (72.71 %) with minimum PDI (15.51%) and maximum 8.10 q ha
-1 mothbean yield was recorded by application of trifloxystrobin 25% + tebuconazole 50% WG (0.15%) as foliar spray. This was followed by the application of carbendazim12% + mancozeb 63% WP (0.20%) as foliar spray resulted in 17.68 per cent disease intensity and 68.90 per cent disease control and 7.64 q ha
-1 crop yield. The application of propiconazole 25% EC (0.20%) foliar spray in plots also effective and resulted 20.44 per cent disease intensity and 64.04 per cent disease control and 7.48 q ha
-1. Application of fluopyram 250 SC + trifloxystrobin 250 SC (0.15%) foliar spray showed 21.45 per cent disease intensity that accounted 62.26 per cent efficacy of disease control and 7.32 q ha
-1 followed by mancozeb 50% WP (0.20%) as foliar spray showed 22.28 PDI with 60.80 per cent disease control and 7.18 q ha
-1 followed by application of hexaconazole 4% + zineb 68% WP (0.20%) as foliar spray resulted in 25.40 per cent disease intensity and 55.32 per cent efficacy of disease control and 6.55 q ha
-1 crop yield. Similarly, pyraclostrobin 20% WG + azoxystrobin 23% SC (0.15%) and thiophanate methyl 15% + copper oxychloride 40% WP (0.15%) were no more effective as foliar spray resulted per cent disease inensity (25.76% and 27.63%) and efficacy of disease control (54.68% and 51.39%) with mothbean yield (6.27 q ha
-1 and 6.15 q ha
-1) respectively. Among all the treatments, chlorothalonil 75% (0.20 %) WP showed lowest disease control (36.79%) and 5.85 q ha
-1 yield with highest per cent disease intensity (35.93%).
These results are comparable with findings of
Banyal et al., (2019) reported that two sprays at 10 days interval of trifloxystrobin 25% +tebuconazole 50% (Nativo 75 WG) at 350 g/ha were significantly effective in controlling both the diseases
i.e. leaf spot and powdery mildew and gave 77.1 and 67.2 per cent disease control with a maximum average increase in the grain yield
i.e. 20.2 and 19.5 per cent, respectively over the check. Also revealed with findings of
Yadav et al., (2014) reported that two foliar sprays of two foliar sprays of carbendazim (0.1%) was found most effective with minimum disease intensity (14.45%) followed by topsin-M (15.49%), propiconazole (17.85%), mancozeb (21.67%), copper oxychloride (23.40%) and thiram (28.59%) as compared to control plot (61.57%). These studies are confirmatory to our results.