Technological intervention on cluster basis
KVK and farmers made efforts in collaborative manner for enhancing production and productivity of chickpea. The recommended packages of practices were followed to conduct the FLDs at the farmers’ fields. Improved chickpea variety
viz., JAKI 9218, JG 14 was demonstrated at farmers’ fields. The technological interventions were seed treatment, line sowing, weeding, need based plant protection and balanced nutrient management. The difference between demonstrated practices and farmers practices is given in Table 2. Use of improved varieties, seed treatment, line sowing, timely sowing, balanced use of fertilizers, integrated pest management as suggested by
Chattopadhyay et al., (2003) were used as technological interventions.
Performance of seed yield
The data (Table 3) showed that the seed yield of chickpea fluctuated successively over the years in demonstration plots. During 2017-18, maximum and minimum yield of variety JAKI 9218 was recorded 18.00 and 16.20 q/ha, respectively. Moreover, maximum and minimum yield of variety JG 14 during 2019-20 was 19.54 and 16.65 q/ha, respectively.
The average yield of two years under demonstration and farmers’ practice was 17.60 and 13.92 q/ha, respectively. The yield increment was 2.90 and 4.47 q/ha during 2017-18 and 2019-20, respectively with an average (two years) of 3.68 q/ha over the farmers practice. The yield of varieties JAKI 9218 and JG 14 increased by 20.42% and 32.80% during the year 2017-18 and 2019-20, respectively with an average increase of 26.44% over the farmers’ practices. The yield enhancement under the technology demonstration was due to the need based use of improved and disease resistant varieties, balanced use of nutrients, efficient weed management and insect pest management practices. The results were in conformity with the findings of
(Narwale et al., 2009) who reported higher yield under FLD as compared to farmers practice in demonstration studies.
Economic performance of chickpea cultivation
Data pertaining to cultivation costs incurred in demonstration and famers’ practice, net return and benefit cost ratio is presented in Table 4. The economics of chickpea cultivation and its feasibility in demonstration was calculated considering the existing prices of inputs and production costs over farmers’ practice. The cost of production with the improved variety JAKI 9218 was Rs. 20450/ha in 2017-18 with an average cultivation cost of Rs. 22306/ha as compared to Rs. 19550/ha under farmers practice. The additional cost incurred with JAKI 9218 was Rs.900/ha during 2017-18 with the average (two years) of Rs. 507/ha over farmer practice. Under JG 14 variety demonstration, the cultivation cost was Rs. 24163/ha during 2019-20 and additional cultivation cost was Rs. 113/ha as compared to the farmer practice (Rs. 24050/ha). The additional cost incurred in the demonstration practice was mainly due to cost involved in fertilizers for balanced nutrient application and herbicide for weed management. The net return in chickpea cultivation was noticed to be remarkably higher under demonstration practice in variety JG 14 was Rs. 75868/ha as compared to farmers practice Rs.38898/ha with the additional of Rs. 36971/ha. Similarly the net return under demonstration practices in variety JAKI 9218 was Rs. 42370/ha with the additional Rs. 10820/ha as compared to the farmers practice of Rs. 31550. The results were in agreement with the findings of
(Chandra et al., 2012; Mahadik and Talathi, 2016;
Meena and Dudi, 2012;
Rathore et al., 2016 and
Sreelakshmi et al., 2012) who reported FLD farmers had more benefit as compared to existing practices in pulse crops like gram, moong, pigeonpea and cluster bean in different areas. Further, results revealed that additional net return of Rs.10820/ha generated with variety JAKI 9218 was less as compared to Rs. 36971/ha with variety JG 14 over the farmers practices. Similarly, variety JG 14 gave higher net return as compared to JAKI 9218 over the farmers’ practice. Besides, FLD resulted in higher benefit cost ratio for JAKI 9218 and G 14 over the farmers practice. An average incremental B: C ratio of 1.03 was noticed over the farmers practice.