Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 46 issue 10 (october 2023) : 1366-1369

Influence of Plant Growth Regulators on Growth, Yield and Yield Components in Garden Pea

Rajesh Choudhary1,*, B.K. Singh2, Ashok Choudhary3, S.K. Jat4, Anita Choudhary1, R. Bajia5
1Department of Horticulture, SKN Agriculture University, Jobner-303 328, Rajasthan, India.
2Department of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221 005, Uttar Pradesh, India. 
3Department of Horticulture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, Uttarakhand, India. 
4Department of Plant Protection, Agriculture University, Kota-324 005, Rajasthan, India.
5Department of Agriculture, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur- 303 012, Rajasthan, India. 
  • Submitted24-01-2022|

  • Accepted21-05-2022|

  • First Online 15-07-2022|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4880

Cite article:- Choudhary Rajesh, Singh B.K., Choudhary Ashok, Jat S.K., Choudhary Anita, Bajia R. (2023). Influence of Plant Growth Regulators on Growth, Yield and Yield Components in Garden Pea . Legume Research. 46(10): 1366-1369. doi: 10.18805/LR-4880.
Background: Garden pea is one of the most important legume crop which require proper crop management practices. Crop regulation is an important practices which enhancing the productivity of garden pea with higher economic return. This can be done by adopting proper application of PGRs. Therefore, the present study was designed to assess the effect of PGRs on growth and yield of garden pea.

Methods: The present study was laid out on garden pea (Pisum sativum subsp. hortense) cv. Azad Pea-3 in a randomized block design with three replications and ten treatments comprising different levels NAA, GA3 and Salicylic acid at various stages. The data on growth and yield were recorded and analyzed statistically applying the analysis of variance technique.

Result: Results revealed that the plants treated with 120 ppm gibberellic acid showed 45.39% 38.55%, 40.60% and 32.84% increment in plant height, length of pod, width of pod and number of seeds per pod and taken lowest number of days to 50% flowering over control, respectively. The use of 40 ppm NAA exhibited maximal enhancement in number of pods per plant (57.43-68.02%), seed weight per pod and Pod yield per hectare (50.62-60.26%) over remaining treatments. Conclusively, the results suggest that foliar application of PGRs favors the growth and yield of garden pea.
Garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) (2n=14) belongs to the Leguminosae family is widely cultivated as a vegetable crop in various temperate and subtropical region of the world. Green pods of garden pea have unique flavor, sweetness and freshness due to this ability its local consumption and exportation increases day by day. It is an important winter vegetable in plains of north, north western and as a summer crop in high part of hills in India (Pandey et al., 2006). The major garden pea growing states are Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Gujarat. Garden pea is considered as one of the most important sources of nutrition throughout the world which contains high amount of digestible protein and carbohydrates (Hussein et al., 2006). Nutritionally, garden pea contains approximately protein (5.4 /100 g) carbohydrates (14.5 /100 g), fiber (5.1 /100 g), sugar (6/100 g), sodium (5/100 m), potassium (244/100 g), iron (1.5 mg/100 g), vitamin A (38 ug/100 g), vitamin C (40 mg/100 g), zinc (1.2 mg/100 g) and some little amount of other   minerals (Bhat et al., 2013 and Dhall, 2017). Beside these, it has a unique  ability of biological nitrogen fixation, mobilization of insoluble soil nutrients which brings the qualitative changes in soil property. There are a number of factors which are responsible for lower growth, development and productivity of garden pea such as crop regulation, planting method, water and fertilizer managements. Among these, crop regulation is an important practices which enhancing the productivity of garden pea with higher profitability. This can be done by adopting proper application of PGRs. 
       
The plant growth regulators (PGRs) play an important role in the cultivation of garden pea because their small amount promote or inhibits or quantitatively modifies the growth and development of crop. Gibberellic acid has proved to be very effective in manipulating the growth, flowering and yield of garden pea (Shraiy and Hegazi, 2009). Beside these, it play an important role in stem elongation, fruit development and regulation of gene expression in various crops. Similarly, NAA enhance the cell elongation and division by promoting the DNA synthesis in the cell. It reduced the juvenile phase due to increase in photosynthesis and respiration with enhanced CO2 fixation in the plant (Murugan et al., 2020). The another plant growth regulator is salicylic acid (SA) which is considered as a phenolic antioxidant compound, messenger, or signaling molecule and growth regulator which support the plant growth and performance under different stressors. It helps plants to withstand various stressors by raising the plant’s antioxidant capacity and suppressing ROS overproduction by playing important roles in regulating some processes related to plant physiology and biochemistry.
               
The selection of right hormones with appropriate concentration, time and method of application are most essential in effective crop production as because the same growth regulator in different concentrations brings about different results (Mukhtar and Singh, 2006). Therefore, the present study was conducted to assess the growth and yield of garden pea under different levels of PGRs.
The present research was carried out at Vegetable Research Farm, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, B.H.U., Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh), during the winter season 2017- 2018. The geographical reference of the study area is 25°31'N latitude and 83o03’E longitude, with a height of 123.23 meters above mean sea level. The climate of experimental field is humid subtropical with large variation in the summer and winter temperature i.e., extreme of hot weather in summer and cold in winter. Soil of experimental area was light sandy loam having pH value of 6.5, available nitrogen (282.4 kg ha-1), available phosphorus (20.16 kg ha-1) and potassium (168 kg ha-1). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design (RBD) with three replications and 10 treatments combination, comprising three different plant growth regulators (PGRs), viz. T1 - distilled water, T2 - Salicylic acid @ 100 ppm, T3 - Salicylic acid @ 150, T4 - Salicylic acid @ 200 ppm, T5 - NAA @ 20 ppm, T6 - NAA @ 30 ppm, T7 - NAA @ 40 ppm, T8 - GA3 @ 40 ppm, T9 - GA3 @ 80 ppm and T10 - GA3 @ 120 ppm at 30, 45 and 90 days after sowing. The healthy and disease free seed of garden pea cultivar Azad pea-3 was collected from Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi (ICAR-IIVR). Prior to sowing, the experimental field was ploughed and fairly leveled and the recommended dose of fertilizer was supplied to each plot. Sowing of garden pea seed done by dibbling method on well prepared raised beds (4-3 m) at 4 cm depth with 30 and 10 cm row to row and plant to plant distance, respectively. Seedlings emergence were observed on a daily basis and sowing was done again in case of any dead or week seedlings.
               
The observations on plant height, days taken for 50% flowering were recorded manually on ten randomly selected representative plants from each treatment of each replication. The length of pod (cm), width of pod (cm) was measured using measuring scale and seed weight per pod and weight of pod was weighed using digital weighing balance. Yield attributes were also recorded at physiological maturity stage. The data obtained from various parameters during experiment were analyzed by the method of analysis of variance.
Growth and flowering attributes
 
The plant height and flowering of garden pea was significantly affected by foliar application of plant growth regulators (Table 1). Among the different treatments, the maximum plant height was observed in the treatment T10 which was 45.39 per cent higher over control. Similarly, the treatment T10 take lowest days to 50 per cent flowering as compared to other treatment which was 1.41- fold lower than the control plot. Similar finding was reported by Singh et al., (2015) in pea. Emongor (2007) reported that the foliar application of GA3 improved the growth and flowering in vegetable cowpea as compared to control. Vadeo (2018) observed that application of GA3 @ 20 ppm produced maximum plant height and earliest 50 per cent flowering in pea. Foliar application of GA3 increased the growth of garden pea as compared to other treatments might be due to enhanced cell division, cell enlargement, increased plasticity of cell, promotion of protein synthesis and apical dominance which increased the auxin level of the tissue and the conversion of tryptophan to IAA (Emongor, 2007). The earliest days taken to 50 per cent flowering with GA3 application might be due to increased translocation of food  materials, photosynthesis, respiration and synthesis of florigen hormone which stimulate flowering (Datta and Nanda, 1985).
 

Table 1: Effect of plant growth regulators on plant height and days taken to 50 per cent flowering.


 
Yield attributes
 
The yield attributes of garden pea was increased with increasing level of GA3 NAA and SA (Table 2,3). The foliar application of GA3 @ 120 exhibited 38.55% increase in pod length of garden pea as compared to control plot, respectively. Maximum width of garden pea (1.87 cm) was recorded with spraying of NAA @ 40 ppm as compared to other treatments. The plants of garden pea treated with NAA @ 40 ppm enhanced the seed weight per pod by 1.40-fold comparing to untreated plants. Similarly, plants receiving foliar application of GA3 @ 120 ppm and SA @ 200 ppm exhibited up to a 27.30 and 17.67 per cent increase in seed weight per pod of garden pea as compared to control but 8.83 and 17.74 per cent lower than the NAA @ 40 ppm, respectively. The maximum pod weight of garden pea was observed with the application of NAA @ 40 ppm as compared to other treatments and closely followed by NAA @ 30 and 20 ppm. The maximum shelling percentage of garden pea was observed with GA3 @ 120 ppm as compared to remaining treatments and closely followed by SA @ 200 ppm. The application of GA3 @ 120 ppm gave 32.84 per cent higher number of seeds per pod as compared to control plot. Maximum number of pods per plant (26.33) was observed under NAA @ 40 ppm as compared to other treatments.
 

Table 2: Effect of plant growth regulators length of pod, width of pod, seed weight per pod, weight of per pod and shelling.


 

Table 3: Effect of plant growth regulators on number of seeds per pod, number of pods per plant and yield per hectare.


       
These results could be attributed mainly to the stimulatory effect of GA3 on plant growth, which resulted in higher rates of biosynthesis and therefore higher amounts of assimilates available for distribution to the pods (Shraiy and Hegazi, 2009). Enhanced photosynthetic activity, efficient translocation and the use of photosynthesis, resulting in rapid cell division, cell elongation and cell differentiation at the leaf growth region of the plant, which stimulated growth. Results are in conformity with earlier reports of Zewail et al., (2011) and Singh et al., (2015) in pea. Mohandoss and Rajesh (2003) observed that spraying of GA3 increased length of pod, shelling percentage and numberof seeds per pod in cowpea. Improved yield attributing due to foliar application of NAA could be attributed to increase in the rate of respiration resulting in production of metabolic energy which would have been utilized by plants for cellular expansion and tissue growth (Chattopadhyay and Sen, 1974). The application of NAA could be attributed to more efficient use of plant growth regulators for reproductive growth, better source and sink relationship, plant growth, transpiration and respiration, increased translocation and accumulation of sugar and other metabolites (Balraj et al., 2002). The maximum yield of green gram was recorded with foliar application at NAA (Medhi et al., 2014). Ayanle and Ahmed (2019) observed that application of NAA improved the yield attributes of garden pea. Kumar et al., (2020) reported foliar spraying of NAA improved number of seeds per pod and number of pods per plant of cowpea. Similar results were also reported by Kokare et al., (2006) in okra and Netam and Sharma (2014) in brinjal.
 
Yield
 
The highest pod yield per hectare (157.19 q/ha) of garden pea was observed with NAA @ 40 ppm over other treatments and closely followed by NAA @ 30 ppm while, minimum value (98.04 q/ha) was found in untreated plot. The increment in pod yield of garden pea with NAA @ 40 ppm over control was 60.33 per cent and 59.15 q/ha (Table 3). Similar findings were reported by Ayyub et al., (2013) in okra and Singh et al., (2015) in garden pea var. Arkal. Kumar et al., (2020) observed that the application of NAA increased yield per hectare in cowpea.
               
The increase in the yield of garden due to foliar application of NAA might be due to the reduction in flower and fruit drop, increase in vegetative growth, fruit length and fruit thickness (Choudhary et al., 2002). Similar results have also been reported by Rathod et al., (2015) in French bean, Tripathi and Kumar (2006) and Singh et al., (2015) in pea.
The results obtained during the present investigation revealed that use of various levels of PGRs improved the growth, yield and yield attributes of garden pea. The foliar spray of GA3 @ 120 ppm substantially increased vegetative growth and flowering. In case of yield and yield attributes spraying of NAA @ 40 ppm was found effective. Therefore, the application of GA3 @ 120 ppm and NAA @ 40 ppm can be recommended for garden pea cultivation after further investigation.
None.

  1. Ayanle, S.H. and Ahmed, A. (2019). Growth yield and quality of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) as influenced by plant growth hormone at different growth stages. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 76: 102-110

  2. Ayyub, C.M., Manan, A., Ashraf, M.I., Afzal, M., Ahmed, S. and Shoab-ur-Rehman, M.M. (2013). Foliar feeding with gibberellic acid a strategy for enhanced growth and yield of okra. African Journal. 825: 3299-3302.

  3. Balraj, R., Kurdikeri, M.B. and Revanappa (2002). Effect of growth regulators on growth and yield of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) at different pickings. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 591: 84-88.

  4. Bhat, T.A., Gupta, M., Ganai, M.A., Ahanger, R.A. and Bhat, H.A. (2013). Yield soil health and nutrient utilization of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) as affected by phosphorus and bio-fertilizers under subtropical conditions of Jammu. International journal of modern plant and animal science. 11:1-8.

  5. Chattopadhyay, J.K. and Sen, S.K. (1974). Studies on the effect of different growth regulators on reproductive physiology and morphology of chilli, Vegetable Science. 1: 41-46.

  6. Choudhary, B.R., Fageria, M.S. and Dhaka, R.S. (2002). Role of growth hormones in chillies - review.  Agriculture Research. 232: 145-148.

  7. Datta, K.S. and Nanda, K.K. (1985). Effect of some phenolic compounds and gibberellic acid on growth and development of Cheena Millet (Panicum miliaceum). Indian Journal of Plant Physioloy. 28: 298-302.

  8. Dhall, R.K. (2017). Pea cultivation-Punjab Agriculture University-Ludhaina. ISSBN-978-938626-375.

  9. Emongor, V.E. (2007). Gibberellic acid influence on vegetative growth, nodulation and yield of cowpea. Journal of Agronomy. 64: 509-517.

  10. Hussain, K., Hussain, M., Majeed, A., Nawaz, K., Nisar, M.F. and Afghan, S. (2006) Morphological response of scurf pea (Psoralea corylifolia L.) to indole acetic acid (IAA) and nitrogen (N). World Applied Sciences Journal. 8: 1220-1225.

  11. Kokare, R.T., Bhalerao, R.K., Prbhu, T., Chavan, S.K., Bansode, A.B. and Kachare, G.S. (2006). Effect of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench). Agriculture Science Digestive. 263: 178-181.

  12. Kumar, D., Chahar, S.S. and Singh, A.K. (2020). Effect of naphthalene acetic acid on yield attributes of cowpea cultivars. Plant Archives. 201: 1553-1556.

  13. Medhi, A.K., Dhar, S.,  Roy, A. (2014). Effect of different growth regulators and phosphorous levels on nodulation, yield and quality components in green gram. Indian Plant Physiology. 19: 74-78.

  14. Mohandoss, M. and Rajesh, V. (2003). Effect of GA3 and 2,4-D on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Legume Research. 263: 229-230.

  15. Mukhtar, F.B. and Singh B.B. (2006). Influence of photoperiod and gibberellic acid (GA3) on the growth and flowering of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp], Journal of Food Agriculture and Environmental science. 42: 201-203.

  16. Murugan, V.T., Manivannan, K., Nanthakumar, S. (2020). Studies on the effect of plant growth regulators on growth, flowering and xanthophyll content of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 9: 3767-3771.

  17. Netam, J.L. and Sharma, R. (2014). Efficacy of plant growth regulators on growth characters and yield attributes in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) cv. Brinjal-3112. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science. 77: 27-30.

  18. Pandey, A.K., Tiwari, S.K., Singh, P.M. and Rai, M. (2006). Effect of GA3 and NAA on vegetative growth, yield and quality of garden pea (Pisum sativum L. ssp. hortense). Vegetable  Science. 311: 63-65.

  19. Rathod, R.R., Gore, R.V., Bothikar, P.A. (2015). Effect of growth regulators on growth and yield of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Var. Arka Komal. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science. 85: 36-39.

  20. Shraiy, A.M.E., Hegazi, A.M. (2009). Effect of acetylsalicylic acid, indole-3- bytric acid and gibberellic acid on plant growth and yield of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science. 3: 3514-3523.

  21. Singh, M., John, S.A., Rout, S., Patra, S.S. (2015). Effect of GA3 and NAA on growth and quality of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Arkel. The Bioscan. 103: 381383.

  22. Tripathi, D.K. and Kumar, M. (2006). Response of the growth of growth, yield and protein content of pea seeds (Pisum sativum L.). Farm Science Journal. 15: 80-81.

  23. Vadeo, T. (2018). Effects of gibberellic acid and auxins on growth and yield on pea. International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology. 62: 2321-8991.

  24. Zewail, R.M., Y., Khder, Z.M.A. and Mady, M.A. (2011). Effect of potassium, some antioxidants, phosphoric acid and napthalen acetic acid (NAA) on growth and productivity of pea. Annals Agriculture Science. 491: 53-64.

Editorial Board

View all (0)