Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 45 issue 7 (july 2022) : 883-887

 ​Morphophenological Characters and Productivity of Pigeon Pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as Influenced by Crop Geometry and Plant Growth Regulators

S.U. Pawar1,*, W.N. Narkhede2, H.S. Garud3, B.V. Asewar1
1Department of Agronomy, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani-431 402, Maharashtra, India.
2AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani-431 402, Maharashtra, India.
3Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Khamgaon, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani-431 402, Maharashtra, India.
  • Submitted03-01-2022|

  • Accepted02-05-2022|

  • First Online 06-06-2022|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4861

Cite article:- Pawar S.U., Narkhede W.N., Garud H.S., Asewar B.V. (2022). ​Morphophenological Characters and Productivity of Pigeon Pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as Influenced by Crop Geometry and Plant Growth Regulators . Legume Research. 45(7): 883-887. doi: 10.18805/LR-4861.
Background: Intensive cultivation with suitable crop geometry for optimum utilization of resources is one of the possible ways for increasing productivity of pigeonpea. Plant growth regulators have the capacity to stimulate and inhibit physiological processes, which directly or indirectly might affect crop yield and quality. This investigation was planned to study the influence of crop geometry and foliar application of plant growth regulators on production potential of pigeonpea.

Methods: The field experiment was conducted at experimental farm of Agronomy Department, V.N.M.K.V., Parbhani, during kharif season of 2018 and 2019. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with four main plot treatments and five sub plot treatments. The main plot treatments comprised of four crop geometries while thesub plot treatments were five treatments on foliar application of plant growth regulatorsalongwith control. 

Result: Various crop geometries shown remarkable effect on growth and developement of pigeonpea. The crop geometry of 60-120 cm × 20 cm and 90 cm × 20 cm recorded maximum plant height of pigeonpea as compared to other wider crop geometries. While in case of all the other growth attributes viz. number of functional leaves plant-1, leaf area, number of branches plant-1 and dry matter accumulation plant-1 crop geometry of 120 cm × 20 cm and 75-150 cm × 20 cm were found superior as compared to other treatments and were at par with each other. The yield per hectare was increased at closer crop geometry 60-120 cm × 20 cm as the lower per plant yield was compensated by higher plant population. The crop geometry 60-120 cm × 20 cm produced significantly higher seed yield (1661, 1982 and 1821 kg ha-1 during 2018, 2019 and pooled mean respectively) over crop geometry of 120 cm × 20 cm and crop geometry 75-150 cm × 20 cm, but it was found at par with crop geometry 90 cm × 20 cm. Among the foliar application of plant growth regulators, growth characters viz., plant height, number of functional leaves, leaf area, number of branches and dry matter accumulation plant-1 as well as chlorophyll content were enhanced with the foliar application of Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm and application of NAA @ 40 ppm during both the years of study. Foliar application of Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm also recorded early flower initiation and significantly highest seed yield (1742, 2018 and 1880 kg ha-1 during 2018, 2019 and in pooled data, respectively), while it was at par with foliar application of NAA @ 40 ppm. 
Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] is a versatile deep rooted legume crop, well known for its drought tolerance under Kharif rainfed upland ecosystem (Emefiene et al., 2013). It is an important protein rich annual pulse crop, grown throughout the tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world.
       
Choice of a suitable geometry for a particular genotype is one of the important factors among the different agronomic techniques in deciding the yield of pigeon pea. Adaptation of proper planting geometry to a particular genotype will go a long way in making efficient use of limited growth resources and to stabilize yield. Pigeonpea being highly branching and having indeterminate growth habit responds very well to crop geometry. Hence to achieve potential yields, it is important to maintain optimum plant population which can effectively utilize available moisture, nutrients and solar radiation.
       
Microclimate coupled with physiological process may include internal hormonal imbalance and may result in abscission of flowers and immature pods and drastic reduction in yield of pigeon pea. Plant growth regulators have the capacity to stimulate and inhibit physiological processes, which directly or indirectly might affect crop yield and quality. The plant growth regulators are also known to enhance the source sink relationship and stimulate the translocation of photo assimilates, thereby increase the productivity. Brassinosteroids (BRs) are a group of steroidal plant hormones that play pivotal roles in a wide range of developmental phenomenon in plants including cell division and cell elongation in stems and roots, photomorphogenesis, reproductive development, leaf senescence and stress responses (Clouse and Sasse 1998). There is limited information on the influence of plant growth regulators on growth, development and productivity of pigeon pea. 
       
Thus scientific manipulation by synchronizing plant growth through growth regulating chemicals in pigeonpea is needed, which can check the excessive vegetative growth, thereby creating proper balance between source and sink for enhanced crop yield and also to optimize the plant density to exploit yield potential. Keeping these views, the present investigation was carried out with an objectivesto enhance yield through proper planting geometry and foliar sprays of plant growth regulators, at experimental farm, Department of Agronomy, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani.
Present research experiment was conducted at research farm of Department of Agronomy, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (MS) during kharif season of 2018 and 2019. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with the treatments consisted of twenty treatment combinations comprising four crop geometry in main plot and five foliar applications of plant growth regulators in sub plot and replicated thrice. The main plot treatments comprised of four crop geometries as 90 cm × 20 cm, 120 cm × 20 cm 60-120 cm × 20 cm and 75-150 cm × 20 cm whiles sub plot treatments were five treatments on  foliar application of plant growth regulators i.e. NAA @ 40 ppm, Mepiquat chloride @ 50 g a.i ha-1, Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm,  Chlormequat chloride @ 75 g a.i ha-1 and control.
       
The onset of monsoon started from 23rd standard meteorological week and with total rainfall of 781.4  mmduring first year while during second year (2019) the total quantity of rainfall received was 928.9 mm. During first and second year of experimentation sowing was accomplished on 26th June 2018 and 28th June 2019 respectively. Periodical observations on growth and yield contributing characters of pigeonpea along with the yield data were recorded and statistically analyzed to evaluate the effect of different treatments. Data on seed yield and straw yield were further subjected to calculations on harvest index, economic analysis and rain water use efficiency.
The data on morpho-phonologicalparameters viz. number of functional leaves plant-1, leaf area, number of branches plant-1 and dry matter accumulation plant-1, along with the seed yield of pigeonpeaas influenced by crop geometry and foliar application of plant growth regulators during the course of investigation are critically interpreted and results are presented below.
 
Effect of crop geometry on growth, phenological parameters, yield and net returns of pigeonpea
 
Various crop geometries shown remarkable effect on growth of pigeonpea. The crop geometry of 60-120 cm × 20 cm and 90 cm × 20 cm recorded maximum plant height of pigeonpea as compared to other wider crop geometries (Table 1). While in case of all the other growth attributes viz. number of functional leaves plant-1, leaf area andnumber of branches plant-1 dry matter accumulation plant-1, crop geometry of 120 cm × 20 cm and 75-150 cm × 20 cm were found superior as compared to other. The crop geometry of 120 cm × 20 cm and 75-150 cm × 20 cm were at par with each other, this might be due to better availability of growth factors like moisture, space etc. for enhanced development of individual plant. Similar results were obtained by Waghmare et al., (2016). Maximum mean dry matter production plant-1 of pigeonpea was recorded with crop geometry of 120 cm × 20 cm (S2), it was at par with crop geometry of 75-150 cm × 20 cm (S4) and significantly superior over crop geometry of  90 cm × 20 cm (S1) and 60-120 × 20 cm (S3). The increased dry matter accumulation plant-1 of pigeonpea plants at wider spacing may be attributed to less competition between plants  and greater availability of growth resources for each plant which might have increased production and accumulation of photosynthates resulting in more dry matter accumulation. The above findings are in line with those reported by Pavan et al., (2011) and Sujatha et al., (2018). The mean duration for flower initiation and 50% flowering of pigeonpea was delayed during 2019 as compared to during 2018 (Table 2). The flower initiation and 50% flowering of pigeonpea were earlier in crop geometry 60-120 × 20 cm (S3) and 90 cm × 20 cm (S1) as compared to crop geometry of 120 cm × 20 cm (S2). The data on mean chlorophyll content was not influenced significantly by different crop geometry during both the years of investigation.

Table 1: Mean plant height (cm), number of functional leaves plant-1, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), number of branches plant-1, dry matter accumulation plant-1 (g) of pigeonpea as influenced by different treatments during 2018 and 2019.



Table 2: Days to flower initiation and days to 50% flowering of pigeonpea as influenced by different treatments during 2018 and 20


       
Different crop geometries had significant influence on the seed yield of pigeonpea. The crop geometry 60-120 cm × 20 cm (S3) produced significantly higher seed yield (1661, 1982 and 1821 kg ha-1) as well as net returns over crop geometry of 120 cm × 20 cm (S2) and crop geometry 75-150 cm × 20 cm (S4), but  it was found at par with crop geometry 90 cm × 20 cm (S1). The percent increase in seed yield of pigeonpea recorded with crop geometry 60-120 cm × 20 cm (S3) over crop geometry of 120 cm × 20 cm (S2) and crop geometry 75-150 cm × 20 cm (S4) was 22.85 and 10.82 per cent, respectively on pooled basis. The probable reason behind this increase in the seed yield at closer crop geometry as compared to wider might be that, though the closer spacings showed lower values of attributes per plant like seed weight per plant, pods per plant as a result of intra row competition, the total yield was increased at closer spacing as the lower per plant yield was compensated by higher plant population per unit area. Also suitable planting geometry with crop geometry of 60-120 cm × 20 cm (S3) helped in optimum and efficient utilization of the available resources and ultimately enhanced the yield.
 
Effect of foliar application of plant growth regulators on morpho-phenological parameters yield and net returns of pigeonpea
 
Foliar application of plant growth regulators showed a remarkable influence on various growth attributes of pigeonpea. (Table 1) Growth characters viz., plant height, number of functional leaves, leaf area, number of branches and dry matter accumulation plant-1 were enhanced with the foliar application of Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm  and application of NAA @ 40 ppm during both the years and was significantly higher than  control, foliar application of Mepiquat chloride @ 50 g a.i ha-1 (G2) and Chlormequat chloride @ 75 g a.i ha-1 (G4). Decrease in plant height of pigeonpea sprayed with Mepiqaut chloride might be due to the interference in gibberellic acid biosynthetic pathway as the reduced amount of gibberellins in the plant system affects the growth and decrease plant height. These results correlates with the findings of Kshirsagar et al., (2008) and Kashid et al., (2010) who reported decreac se in plant height with foliar application of mepiquat chloride and cycocel treated plants. Sumathi et al., (2016) also reported that, use of Giberellic acid (GA3) and Brassinosteroid (BR) significantly increased plant height in pigeonpea.
       
Among the plant growth regulators, foliar application of Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm and foliar application of NAA @ 40 ppm recorded numerically higher values of chlorophyll content over other treatments. The data presented in Table 3 indicated that the foliar application of Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm (G3) recorded higher seed yield as well net returns (Table 3) and was at par with foliar application of NAA @ 40 ppm (G1) and significantly superior over other treatments, during both the years of experimentation and in pooled analysis. The magnitude of increase in seed yield recorded under the foliar application of Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm (G3) over foliar application of Mepiquat chloride @ 50 g a.i ha-1 (G2), Chlormequat chloride @ 75 g a.i ha-1 (G4) and control (G5) on pooled basis was 20.75 per cent, 25.70 per cent and 36 per cent respectively. The maximum yield recorded by Brassinosteroids might be due to better vegetative growth, enhanced pod number, pod clusters, pod weight and seed yield per plant. These results are in line with findings reported by Kashyap et al., (2002), Ramesh and Ramprasad (2013),  Sumathi et al., (2016).

Table 3: Mean chlorophyll content (SPAD), seed yield (kg ha-1), harvest index and net returns(Rs. ha-1) of pigeonpea as influenced by different treatments during 2018, 2019 and pooled mean.


 
Interaction effect
 
It was observed that interaction between crop geometry 60-120 cm × 20 cm (S3) with foliar application of Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm (G3) recorded  higher seed yield (Table 4) and net returns, (Table 5) it was at par with interaction between crop geometry 60-120 cm × 20 cm (S3) with foliar application of NAA @ 40 ppm (G1) and interaction between crop geometry 90 cm × 20 cm (S1) with foliar application of Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm (G3).

Table 4: Interaction effect of crop geometry and plant growth regulators on seed yield (kg ha-1) of pigeonpea in pooled analysis.



Table 5: Interaction effect of crop geometry and plant growth regulators on net returns of pigeonpea in pooled analysis.

Based on the two years findings of present investigation, it can be concluded that, crop geometry of 60-120 cm × 20 cm and 90 cm × 20 cm for pigeonpea were found to be productive and remunerative, as compared to other crop geometries. While among the different plant growth regulators, foliar application of Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm or foliar application of NAA @ 40 ppm (02 sprays at  bud initiation and flowering) was found to be beneficial in improving morpho-phenological pa rameters along with chlorophyll content, early flower initiation, seed yield and net returns of pigeonpea, as compared to other plant growth regulators.
None.

  1. Clouse, S.D., Sasse, J.M. (1998). Brassinosteroids: Essential regulators of plant growth and development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 49(1): 427-451.

  2. Emefiene, M.E., Slaudeen, A.B. and Yaroson, A.Y. (2013). The use of pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp] for drought mitigation in Nigeria. International Letters of Natural Scieces. 1: 6-16.

  3. Kashid, D.A., Doddamani, M.B., Chetti, M.B., Hiremath, S.M., Arvindkumar, B.N. (2010). Effect of growth retardants on morpho-physiological traits and yield in sunflower. Karnataka Journal Agriculture Science. 23(2): 347-349.

  4. Kashyap, T.L., Shrivastava, G.K., Lakpale, R. and Chaubey, N.K. (2002). Productivity potential of pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Mill sp.] genotypes in response to growth regulators under Vertisols of Chhatisgarh plains. Ann. Agric. Res. 24(2): 449-452.

  5. Kshirsagar, S.S, Chavan, B.N., Sawargaonkar, G.L. and Ambhore, S.S. (2008). Effect of cycocel on growth parameters of greengram (Vigna radiata) cv. BPMR-145. International Journal of Agriculture Science. 4(1): 346-347.

  6. Pavan A.S., Nagalikar, V.P., Pujari, B.T., Halepyati, A.S. (2011). Influence of planting geometry on the growth characters, seed yield and economics of transplanted pigeonpea Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 24(3): 390-392.

  7. Ramesh, R. and Ramprasad, E. (2013). Effect of Plant growth regulators on morphological, physiological and biochemical parameters of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill.]. Helix. 6: 441-447.

  8. Saritha K.S., Pujari, B.T., Basavarajappa, R., Naik, M.K., Rameshbabu, Desai, B.K. (2012).  Effect of irrigation, nutrient and planting geometry on yield, yield attributes and economics of pigeon pea. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 25(1): 131-133. 

  9. Singh, V.K., Sindhu, P.S. and Singh, S. (2004). Relationship of morphophysiological traits with yield and its components for identifying efficient plant type in pigeon pea. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 41(2): 175-182.

  10. Sujatha, H.T., Babalad, H.B., Chandranath, H.T. and Patil, P.L. (2018). Growth and performance of pigeonpea as influence by crop geometry, transplanting and intercropping systems. J. Soils Crops. 28(2): 289-294.

  11. Sumathi A., Babu Rajendra Prasad, V. and Mallika Vanangamudi (2016). Influence of plant growth regulators on yield and yield components in pigeon pea. Legume Research. LR-3637 [1-7].

  12. Waghmare Y.M., Gokhale, D.N. and Chavan, A.S. (2016). Production potential of Pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as influenced by plant geometry and irrigation schedules. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 8(16): 1287-1289. ISSN: 0975-3710 and E-ISSN: 0975- 9107.

Editorial Board

View all (0)