Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Review Article

Legume Research, volume 47 issue 4 (april 2024) : 511-518

​Recent Advances in Application of Biofertilizers in Pulses: A Review

Harpreet Kaur Virk1, Guriqbal Singh1, Ramanjit Kaur2,*
1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India.
2Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012, India.

  • Submitted05-10-2021|

  • Accepted24-03-2022|

  • First Online 23-05-2022|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4808

Cite article:- Virk Kaur Harpreet, Singh Guriqbal, Kaur Ramanjit (2024). ​Recent Advances in Application of Biofertilizers in Pulses: A Review . Legume Research. 47(4): 511-518. doi: 10.18805/LR-4808.

ABSTRACT

Globally, India is the largest producer and consumer of pulses. Biofertilizers, a low cost input, help in increasing the crop productivity by way of biological nitrogen fixation, increased availability or uptake of nutrients through solubilization or increased stimulation of plant growth through the synthesis of growth promoting substances such as indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellins, auxins, ammonia, hydrogen cyanide and siderophore production. Furthermore, biofertilizer inoculation helps to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers. These are environmentally friendly and play a significant role in boosting the pulse crop production. In this review paper, literature regarding different types of biofertilizers and their effect on different pulse crops has been studied. The effect of application of biofertilizer inoculation on biological nitrogen fixation, growth, symbiotic traits, productivity, quality, soil fertility, residual effect and economic benefit has been reviewed and summarized under different headings. Application of biofertilizers increases the plant growth, symbiotic traits (nodule number, nodule weight) and grain yield over no inoculation in different pulse crops without producing any adverse effect on the environment. Moreover, seed inoculation with biofertilizers provides economic benefits over without inoculation. Furthermore, single or dual inoculations of biofertilzers improve the nutrient status of soil and ultimately increase the nutrient uptake by crop along with improvement in protein content. Seed inoculation with biofertilizers also increases organic carbon, available nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium and microbial count in the soil after the crop harvest over un-inoculated control. The nitrogen amounts fixed as a result of inoculation leave a net positive N balance in the soil. Thereby, biofertilizers inoculation helps in achieving higher profits while maintaining the agricultural sustainability.

INTRODUCTION

India is the world’s largest producer and consumer of pulses. In India during 2019-20, pulses were cultivated on an area of 27.9 million hectares with a production of 23.0 million tones and productivity of 823 kg/ha (INDIASTAT, 2021). India plays a key role in the area (42.6%) and production (28.34%) of pulses globally. Among major pulses grown and produced globally, Indian share is maximum for pigeonpea in the area (73%) and production (67%) followed by chickpea (68% area and 66% production), dry beans (37% area and 18% production), lentil (29% area and 18% production) and dry peas (12% area and 6% production) in total pulses production (FAOSTAT, 2021). The major pulse crops grown and produced in India are chickpea (35% area and 44% production), pigeonpea (15% area and 17% production), urdbean (18% area and 14% production), mungbean (14% area and 8% production), lentil (5% area and 6% production) and fieldpea (1% area and 4% production) in different agro-ecological regions. The major pulse crops grown and produced globally are dry beans (57% area and 48% production), chickpea (17% area and 17% production), pigeonpea (10% area and 10% production), dry peas (9% area and 17% production) and lentil (7% area and 8% production) (Anonymous, 2018). The major pulse producing states in the country are Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, which together contribute to about 75% of the total pulses production in the country.
       
Nowadays, agrochemicals are extensively applied to obtain higher yields. The intensive application of agrochemicals leads to several agricultural problems. Farmers use more chemical fertilizers than the recommended levels for many crops. Excessive use of chemical nitrogen fertilizer leads to soil acidification, contaminating groundwater and the atmosphere. Successful crop husbandry to a great extent depends upon how successfully one could manage these factors to favour crop production (Kaur et al., 2015).
       
In the present scenario of the degradation of natural resources, the beneficial effect of pulse crops in improving soil health and sustaining productivity is very important. Pulses have the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen thereby improving soil fertility and sustaining crop productivity. Moreover, the use of biofertilizers in pulses may help in increasing the productivity of pulses and improving soil health. Biofertilizers are a cost-effective, eco-friendly and renewable source of plant nutrients to supplement chemical fertilizers in the sustainable agricultural system. Biofertilizers are also ideal input for reducing the cost of cultivation which is a helpful parameter in increasing the farm income.
       
Biofertilizer refers to a preparation containing live microbes which help in enhancing the soil fertility either by fixing atmospheric nitrogen, solubilization of phosphorus or decomposing organic wastes or by augmenting plant growth by producing growth hormones with their biological activities. Biofertilizers play a very significant role in fixing atmospheric nitrogen, both, in association with plant roots and without roots (Liu et al., 2011), solubilizing insoluble soil phosphates (Alori et al., 2017) and producing plant growth substances (Masciarelli et al., 2014; Oteino et al., 2015) in the soil. Annually, pulses fix about 2.95 Tg nitrogen through biological nitrogen fixation (Herridge et al., 2008). Biofertilizers play many important roles in pulses (Singh and Singh, 2018a; Singh and Singh, 2018b). In order to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers, biofertilizers can play a crucial role by increasing the availability of soil nutrients and also sustain crop production.
 
Types of biofertilizers
 
There are different types of biofertilizers (Table 1). Some of them fix nitrogen, some solubilize fixed phosphorus by producing organic acids and enzymes and make them available to the crops. Apart from fixing nitrogen, they are also known to release growth promoting substances such as IAA, gibberellins, pantothenic acid, thiamine and niacin which promote root proliferation, plant growth and yield.
 

Table 1: Different types of biofertilizers.


 
Role of biofertilizers in pulse crops
 
Biological nitrogen fixation
 
Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) can act as a renewable and environmentally sustainable source of nitrogen in pulses. Nitrogen is provided through symbiotic fixation of atmospheric N2 by nitrogenase in rhizobial bacteroids (Hayat et al., 2010). The availability and uptake of nitrogen is very important for plant growth and development. Its use can mitigate the need for fertilizer nitrogen. Nitrogen obtained through the process of BNF is used directly by the plant and so is less susceptible to volatilization, denitrification and leaching losses. BNF is a kind of beneficial plant-microbe interaction that provides plants with nitrogen. Significant amount of nitrogen is fixed through the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis.
       
Inoculation with Rhizobium increased nitrogen fixation in mungbean crop (Hussain et al., 2012). Similarly, co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. and PGPR enhanced the nodulation and N2-fixation in cowpea (Verma et al., 2013). Rhizobium inoculation of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) had a significant influence on the amount of fixed nitrogen. Inoculation significantly increased the N fixed in different tissues of the plant such as roots, shoots, pods and whole plants of Phaseolus vulgaris grown both in the greenhouse and in the field (Bambara et al., 2010). Seed inoculation with biofertilizer containing Bradyrhizobium strains (B. japonicum SAY3-7 and B. elkanii BLY3-8) and Streptomyces griseoflavusP4 promoted nodulation and thereby increased nitrogen fixation in soybean and mungbean (Htwe et al., 2019).
       
Thus, inoculation with biofertilizers improved the N nutrition and resulted in more plant growth and crop grain yield.
 
Phosphate solubilization and production of growth promoting substances
 
Application of biofertilizers produces growth promoting substances such as indole acetic acid, gibberellins, auxins etc. Bacillus spp. strains B-20 and B-24 produced higher IAA equivalents as compared to Pseudomonas spp. (Saini and Khanna, 2012). Mesorhizobium sp. strain BHURC02, Pseudomonas fluorescens BHUPSB06, Acetobacter chroococcum and Bacillus megaterium BHUPSB14 were found to be positive for NH3 and IAA production and Pseudomonas fluorescens BHUPSB06 was found to be positive for HCN, siderophore production and inhibition of growth of soil-borne phytopathogens (Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani) (Verma et al., 2012).
       
Kaur and Sharma (2013) reported that significant amount of IAA was produced by PGPR-3 (70.05 µg/ml) and PGPR-2 (66.79 µg/ml) as compared to PGPR LK 884 (61.58 µg/ml). Furthermore, PGPR-3 (13.45 mg/100 ml) and PGPR-2 (13.15 mg/100 ml) solubilized phosphorus also. Similarly high level of IAA production was recorded in Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus sp., Rhizobium and Mesorhizobium sp. by other workers (Verma et al., 2012; Verma et al., 2013). Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus sp., Azotobacter sp. and Mesorhizobium ciceri were reported as good phosphate solubilizers (Verma et al., 2013). Isolates of Pseudomonas sp. PGPR-2 and PGPR-3 also produced siderophores, HCN, NH3 and improved seed germination in kabuli and desi chickpea (Kaur and Sharma, 2013). Similarly, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is also capable of siderophore and HCN production in chickpea (Verma et al., 2013). In Pisum sativum, use of endophytic Pseudomonas strains (L111, L228 and L321) solubilized the insoluble phosphates by producing gluconic acid and also promoted the plant growth (Oteino et al., 2015). In chickpea, seed inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri synthesized indole-3-acetic-acid (IAA), 1-amino cyclopropane 1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, siderophores, exopolysaccharides (EPS), hydrogen cyanide, ammonia and solubilised inorganic phosphate. Moreover, microbial seed inoculation also had the ability to tolerate fungicide by decreased the levels of stressor molecules (proline and malondialdehyde) and antioxidant defense enzymes viz. ascorbate peroxidise, guaiacol peroxidise, catalase and peroxidises of plants (Shahid et al., 2021). It can be concluded that biofertilizers stimulate the synthesis of growth promoting substances such as indole acetic acid, gibberellins, auxins, NH3, HCN and siderophore production.
 
Effect on plant growth, symbiotic traits and productivity
 
In plants, nitrogen and phosphorus play an important role in growth, development and finally determine the yield of the crops. Nitrogen is an important nutrient to plant growth and development as it is building blocks of protein. Phosphorus is a fundamental component of the substances that are building blocks of genes and chromosomes. Application of biofertilizers positively affects the plant growth, nodule number, nodule weight and grain yield. Biofertilizers make available nitrogen and phosphorus to the plants, as discussed above and thereby influence the plants.
       
In chickpea, Rhizobium inoculation significantly improved symbiotic traits, number of pods and grain yield over uninoculated control (Singh et al., 2011). Seed inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri significantly increased the length of plants (41%), total dry matter (18%), carotenoid content (9%), leghaemoglobin content (21%), root nitrogen (9%), shoot phosphorus (11%) and pod yield (15%) over control in chickpea (Shahid et al., 2021). Similarly, microbial inoculant Anabaena laxa biofilm formulation significantly enhanced leghaemoglobin content of nodules, plant growth, yield parameters, grain yield and nutrient uptake as compared to uninoculated control (Bidyarani et al., 2016).
       
Inoculation of seed with Mesorhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) alone and their combination significantly enhanced shoot and root dry matter (Singh et al., 2017b), symbiotic traits, chlorophyll content and grain yield of chickpea than uninoculated control (Sharma et al., 2013). Similarly, combined and alone inoculation of Rhizobium, phospho-solubilizing bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) significantly improved growth parameters, yield attributes and grain yield of chickpea over uninoculated control (Praminik and Bera, 2012). In another study also, PGPR alone or in combination with bioinoculants (Mesorhizobium and PSB) reduced plant mortality and increased grain yield of chickpea. Combined inoculation of chickpea seed with  PSB+Rhizobium gave significantly higher number of nodules, fresh and dry weight of nodules, grain, straw and biological yields compared to uninoculated and PSB or Rhizobium inoculation alone (Singh et al., 2014). Similarly, significant increases in nodule number, dry matter and nutrient content of chickpea were recorded in co-inoculation of Mesorhizobiumsp. BHURC02 and Pseudomonas fluorescens BHUPSB06 followed by co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp., Azotobacter chroococcum and Bacillus megatrium BHUPSB14 over uninoculated control (Verma et al., 2012). Co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. and PGPR (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) was found significantly better for nodulation (62 and 86%), plant growth [dry weight of root (44 and 57%) and shoot (26 and 45%)] over uninoculated control in pot and field condition, respectively and grain yield (32%) and straw yield (41%) of chickpea over uninoculated control in field condition (Verma et al., 2013). The recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with 1 g ammonium molybdate/kg seed+Rhizobium +PSB, RDF with 2 g ammonium molybdate+1 g FeSO4/kg seed+Rhizobium and PSB recorded the highest number of nodules/plant, pods/plant and grain yield of chickpea (Gangwar and Dubey, 2012). The inoculation of seed with biofertilizers such as Rhizobium and PSB increases the yield because the soil bacteria and fungi possess the ability to bring insoluble phosphate in soil into soluble forms by secreting various organic acids namely formic, acetic, propionic, lactic etc. These acids lower the pH and bring about the dissolution of bound form of phosphate. Hence, supplementation of micronutrients along with Rhizobium and PSB inoculation in chickpea may increase biological nitrogen fixation and phosphorus availability and thereby its productivity. In the controlled environment and in the field trials, single, dual and triple inoculations of chickpea seed with Rhizobium, N2-fixing Bacillus subtilis (OSU-142) and phosphorus solubilizing Bacillus megaterium (M-3) significantly increased plant height, shoot, root and nodule dry weight, pod number, grain yield and total biomass yield compared with the control, equal to or higher than N, P and NP treatments. In the field integrated use of 12.5 kg N/ha along with Rhizobium inoculation was better for nodulation than the use of Rhizobium alone in mungbean (Singh et al., 2021a). Seed inoculation with Mesorhizobium also enhanced grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of chickpea (Doaei et al., 2020). Seed inoculation with Mesorhizobium sp. ciceri (LGR-33) alone or in combination with PGPRs [RB-1 (Pseudomonas argentinensis) and RB-2 (Bacillus aryabhatta)] improved the growth, symbiotic properties, yield attributes and yield of chickpea due to its P solubilizing property (Singh et al., 2021b).
       
In lentil, Saini and Khanna (2012) reported that inoculation of seed with Rhizobium alone and its combination with different strains of PGPR enhanced the symbiotic parameters and grain yield of lentil to the tune of 13.6% (Rhizobium+P-1), 14.6% (Rhizobium+KB-133) and 14.9% (Rhizobium+B-40) over the control. Treatment of integrated use of seed inoculation with PSB+PGPR along with recommended fertilizers+25 kg ZnSO4/ ha-1+1.0 g ammonium molybdate/ kg seed provided the highest grain yield of lentil (34.0% higher over control) (Singh et al., 2019).
 
It also gave the highest and significantly more nodule occupancy at 45 and 90 days after sowing (DAS) than Rhizobium sp. alone inoculation and also recorded a significant increase in grain yield and straw yield over Rhizobium sp. and PSB alone inoculations. The symbiotic traits and productivity (Singh et al., 2018), gross returns, net returns and BC ratio in lentil (Singh et al., 2017a) increased significantly with Rhizobium inoculation over uninoculated control, which further increased with the dual inoculation of Rhizobium+PGPR.
       
In pigeonpea, application of 80 kg/ha P2O5 and 60 kg/ha sulphur with PSB inoculation significantly improved growth and yield attributes and grain yield. Combined inoculation of Rhizobium, PSB and PGPR significantly increased grain yield of pigeonpea (Goud and Kale,  2010). Similar beneficial effect of PSB on grain yield of pigeonpea was also reported by Sathe et al., (2011). Inoculation of pigeonpea seed with Rhizobium alongwith 50% RDF significantly increased branches, pods/plant and grain yield (Reddy et al., 2011). Rhizobium strain and the dual inoculation with either Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescens or Bacillus cereus resulted in a significant increase in plant growth, nodulation and enzyme activity over Rhizobium inoculated and uninoculated control plants of pigeonpea (Tilak et al., 2006).
       
Inoculation of greengram seed with Rhizobium and PSB alone and their combination recorded significantly higher nodules/plant, yield attributing characters and grain yield than control (Kumawat et al., 2010). Patel et al., (2013) also recorded significantly higher grain yield of greengram inoculated with PSB than uninoculated and it also gave the highest net returns. The seed yield increased with the inoculation of biofertilizers, however, combined inoculation of Rhizobium and PGPR produced significantly higher seed yield over single inoculations and control in summer mungbean (Kaur and Sharma, 2016). Single or dual inoculations of bacterial strains (Pseudomonas fluorescens BAM-4, Burkholderia cepcia BAM-6 and Burkholderia cepcia (BAM-12) enhanced the growth of greengram plants in comparison with uninoculated control (Jha et al., 2012a). The seed inoculation of cowpea with Rhizobium and PSB alone and their combination increased grain yield significantly (Khan et al., 2013). Seed inoculation with biofertilizer containing Brady rhizobium strains (B. japonicum SAY3-7 and B. elkanii BLY3-8) and Streptomyces griseoflavus improved plant growth, nodulation and seed yield of soybean and mungbean (Htwe et al., 2019).
       
It can be concluded that seed inoculation with biofertilizer treatments influence the nodulation, growth and grain yield significantly over no inoculation. Furthermore, dual or triple inoculation of Rhizobium, PSB and PGPR improves these parameters over single or dual inoculations only.
 
Nutrient uptake and nutritional quality
 
Biofertilizers improve the quality of produce. Co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed significant uptake of nitrogen (65%) and phosphorus (58.9%) by grain of chickpea over control. The co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium sp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa enhanced the acquisition of phosphorus and iron in chickpea (Verma et al., 2013). Inoculation of chickpea seed with Rhizobium and PSB alongwith RDF and ammonium molybdate improved the uptake of N and P by the crop and also increased the protein content in the chickpea seed (Gangwar and Dubey, 2012). Combined inoculation of chickpea seed with PSB+Rhizobium recorded significantly higher nutrient uptake compared to uninoculated and PSB or Rhizobium inoculation alone (Singh et al., 2014).
       
Seed inoculation with Rhizobium+PSB recorded significantly higher nutrient uptake (N and P2O5) over Rhizobium alone and uninoculation in pigeonpea (Goud and Kale, 2010). As Rhizobium+PSB inoculation increased the availability of N and P in the soil, it resulted in higher N and P uptake and improved the content (N and P nutrient) in the seed. This is mainly due to the reason that Rhizobium inoculation fixes nitrogen through nodules of the plant and PSB solubilizes native phosphorous, bringing more phosphorus to the soil solution. Combined inoculation of Rhizobium+PSB+PGPR recorded the highest and significantly more N, P, K and S uptake than the other treatments due to their additive effects (Prasad et al., 2002). Uptake of N, P, K and S also increased with PSB inoculation in pigeonpea (Sathe et al., 2011). N, P and K content in the grains and straw were significantly enhanced where recommended nitrogen was applied in combination with seed inoculation, basal application of ZnSO4 and seed treatment with 1 g ammonium molybdate than their single applications in lentil (Singh et al., 2019).
       
Dual inoculation of Glomus fasciculatum and Rhizobium enhanced the chlorophyll, nitrogen and phosphorus contents of pigeonpea (Bhattacharjee and Sharma, 2012). Inoculation of pulses with Rhizobium increases the nodulation, thereby causing more nitrogen fixation and making it available for the plants. Moreover, it also increases rhizospheric microflora viz. acid producers and phosphate solubilizers, causing more availability of phosphorus. In soybean also, dual inoculation of Bradyrhizobium and PGPR significantly increased the population of Bradyrhizobium and PGPR in soil after harvest (Virk et al., 2017a).
       
The improvement in nodulation with inoculation using phosphorus-solubilising organisms may have resulted in higher nitrogen fixation and hence higher nitrogen availability to plants, whereas solubilisation of fixed phosphorus by PSB probably resulted in increased content and uptake of phosphorus by plants. Marko et al., (2013) reported significantly higher nutrient uptake by blackgram under dual and individual inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB than control. Bahadur and Tiwari (2014) recorded significantly higher N and P uptake and quality parameters like sulphur content, protein content and methionine content in mungbean under dual inoculation with Rhizobium+PSB than control. Seed inoculation with biofertilizer containing Bradyrhizobium strains (B. japonicum SAY3-7 and B. elkanii BLY3-8) and Streptomyces griseoflavus P4 enhanced nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake in soybean and mungbean (Htwe et al., 2019).
       
The increased leaf N uptake might have increased the amino acid synthesis and thereby could have improved the grain protein content via their translocation to grains. Further, the inoculation with P biofertilizer might have increased P availability and its subsequent utilization for the formation of carbon skeletons and the synthesis of amino acids and adenosine triphosphate (ATP). That, in turn, might have led to an enhanced synthesis of protein during grain development.
       
Therefore, single or dual or triple inoculation of biofertilzer(s) improve the nutrient uptake, nutrient content and protein content, thereby the quality of the grain. 
 
Soil fertility
 
All the living diazotrophs fix atmospheric nitrogen in the soil and lower the C:N ratio, which in turn enhances mineralization of N. Several biofertilizers containing microorganisms secrete growth promoting substances like IAA, gibberellic acid (GA), cytokinin etc. Single or dual inoculations of bacterial strains (Pseudomonas fluorescens BAM-4, Burkholderia cepcia BAM-6 and Burkholderia cepcia (BAM-12) were able to solubilize the insoluble inorganic phosphorus in mungbean (Jha et al., 2012a). 
       
Seed inoculation with biofertilizers significantly influences the available N and P in the soil. Seed inoculation with Rhizobium+PSB+PGPR and Rhizobium alone recorded significantly higher available N in the soil over seed inoculation with PSB alone and uninoculated control (Goud and Kale, 2010). Biofertilizers enhance soil fertility by solubilizing unavailable sources of elemental nitrogen and bound phosphate into available forms in order to facilitate the plant to absorb them (Singh and Yadav, 2008). Khan et al., (2013) reported that seed inoculation of cowpea with Rhizobium and PSB significantly increased organic carbon, available nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium than uninoculated control. In chickpea, microbial inoculant Anabaena laxa biofilm formulation increased nitrogen fixation and soil available nitrogen (Bidyarani et al., 2016).
       
Seed inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB increased the microbial count in soil after the harvest of mungbean (Bahadur and Tiwari, 2014). An increase in the population of total bacteria by Rhizobium inoculation may be due to higher availability of available nitrogen and carbon, which act as food for these microbes. PSB inoculation increased the phosphorus availability by solubilizing the fixed P in the soil, which provides the energy to the microbes for their better proliferation. Therefore, seed inoculation with biofertilizers improve organic carbon, available nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium and microbial count over uninoculated control and thus improve soil health.
 
Residual effect
 
Seed inoculation with biofertilizers such as Rhizobium leaves a net positive N balance in the soil due to biological nitrogen fixation. Under satisfactory N-fixation conditions, the N fixed as a result of inoculation leave a net positive N balance in the soil. It is a general observation that under such conditions, symbiotic nitrogen-fixing systems satisfy a major portion of their N requirement from atmospheric nitrogen and additional fixed N, as expected, will be contributed to soil reserves for the succeeding crops. The quantity of N fixed depends on the species of pulses, location, yield level and also the effectiveness of the specific Rhizobium strain.
       
Dual biofertilizers (Rhizobium+PSB) resulted in maximum N-balance in the soil (230.5 kg/ha) after pigeonpea (Ahirwar et al., 2016). The biological N-fixation was also found the highest in dual biofertilizers (Rhizobium+PSB) treatment (84.5 kg/ha) (Ahirwal et al., 2016).
 
Economic benefit
 
Economic evaluation of crop responses to biofertilizers application is an important aspect to assess the profitability of their use. Such an assessment is carried out by studying the gross returns, net returns and the benefit:cost ratio. Rhizobium+PSB inoculation of pigeonpea seed recorded higher net returns and B:C ratio over control (Singh et al., 2013). The cost of Rhizobium+PSB and Rhizobium is very low in comparison to the added output. Similarly, combined inoculation of Bradyrhizobium and PGPR recorded the highest gross returns, net returns and benefit: cost ratio in soybean (Virk et al., 2017b). Reddy et al., (2011) reported that 50% RDF+seed inoculation with Rhizobium recorded the highest net returns followed by 50% RDF+dual inoculation with Rhizobium and PSB. Patel et al., (2013) recorded higher net returns of greengram inoculated with PSB than uninoculated control. The net returns and B:C ratio of combined inoculation of Rhizobium and PGPR was maximum in summer mungbean (Kaur and Sharma, 2016) and in chickpea (Singh et al., 2021b). Treatment of integrated use of seed inoculation with PSB+PGPR along with recommended fertilizers+25 kg ZnSO4/ ha+1.0 g ammonium molybdate/kg seed provided the highest gross returns (34.0%) and net returns (54.8% higher over control) in lentil (Singh et al., 2019). Seed inoculation with biofertilizers resulted in marked yield increase and thus higher net returns over uninoculation.

CONCLUSION

This review focused on the potential role of biofertilizers in pulses with respect to growth, nitrogen fixation, nutrient uptake, soil fertility and grain yield of pulses. The results from different studies showed that biofertilizer inoculation had positive effects on all parameters measured, suggesting the important role of biofertilizers in increasing pulse production. Therefore, use of biofertilizers(s) inoculants is the best option in improving pulses yield, reducing dependence on chemical fertilizers and also for sustainable soil health and the environment.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES


  1. Acharya, C., Kar, R.N. and Sukla, L.B. (2002). Bioleaching of low grade Mn ore with Penicillium citrinum. The European Journal of Mineral Processing and Environmental Protection. 2: 197-204. 

  2. Acharya, C., Kar, R.N., Sukla, L.B. and Misra, V.N. (2004). Fungal leaching of manganese ore. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals. 57: 501-508.

  3. Ahirwar, R.P., Mishra, U.S., Mitra, N.G. and Sirothia, P. (2016). Effect of phosphorus and biofertilizers on phosphorus use efficiency, biological N-fixation and yield of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology. 9: 1039-1043.

  4. Alori, E.T., Glick, B.R. and Babalola, O.O. (2017). Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8: 971. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971

  5. Anonymous. (2018). Annual Report 2017-18. DES, Ministry of Agri. and FW (DAC and FW), Govt. of India.

  6. Bahadur, I., Maurya, B.R., Meena, V.S., Saha, M., Kumar, A. and Aeron, A. (2017). Mineral release dynamics of tricalcium phosphate and waste muscovite by mineral-solubilizing rhizobacteria isolated from Indo-Gangetic Plain of India, Geomicrobiology Journal. 34(5): 454-466. 

  7. Bahadur, L. and Tiwari, D.D. (2014). Nutrient management in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) through sulphur and biofertilizers. Legume Research 37: 180-187. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-0571.37.2.027.

  8. Bambara, S. and Ndakidemi, P.A. (2010). Phaseolus vulgaris response to Rhizobium inoculation, lime and molybdenum in selected low pH soil in Western Cape, South Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 5: 1804-1811.

  9. Basu, A., Prasad, P., Das, S.N., Kalam, S., Sayyed, R.Z., Reddy, M.S. and El Enshasy, H. (2021). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: recent developments, constraints and prospects. Sustainability. 13: 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031140

  10. Bhattacharjee, R. and Dey, U. (2014). Biofertilizer, a way toward organic agriculture: A review. African Journal of Microbiological Research. 8: 2332-2342.

  11. Bhattacharjee, S. and Sharma, G.D. (2012). Effect of dual inoculation of Arbuscular mycorrhiza and Rhizobium on the chlorophyll, nitrogen and phosphorus contents of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). Advances in Microbiology. 2: 561-564.

  12. Bidyarani, N., Prasanna, R., Babu, S., Hossain, F. and Saxena, K. (2016). Enhancement of plant growth and yields in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) through novel cyanobacterial and biofilmed inoculants. Microbial Research. 188-189: 97-105.

  13. Das, J. and Pradhan, M. (2016). Potassium-solubilizing Microorganisms and Their Role in Enhancing Soil Fertility and Health. In: Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture. [Meena VS, Maurya BR, Verma JP, Meena RS (eds) ] Springer, New Delhi, pp. 281-291.

  14. Deshwal, V.K. and Kumar, P. (2013). Production of plant growth promoting substance by Pseudomonads. Journal of Academia and Industrial Research. 2: 221-225.

  15. Doaei, F., Moghaddam, A.N., Karizaki, A.R. and Aldaghi, M. (2020). Environmental and nutritional effects on yield and nitrogen efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a warm and semi-arid climate of Iran. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 43: 2610-2621, DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2020.1793177.

  16. FAOSTAT. (2021). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.

  17. Gangwar, S. and Dubey, M. (2012). Effect on N and P uptake by chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as influenced by micronutrients and biofertilizers. Legume Research. 35: 164-168.

  18. Goud, V.V. and Kale, H.B. (2010). Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea under different sources of nutrients in rainfed condition of central India. Journal of Food Legumes, 23: 212-217.

  19. Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., Ahmed, I. (2010). Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review. Annals of Microbiology. 60: 579-598. 

  20. Herridge, D.F., Peoples, M.B. and Boddey, R.M. (2008). Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant and Soil. 311: 1-18.

  21. Htwe, A.Z., Moh, S.A., Soe, K.M., Moe, K. and Yamakawa, T. (2019). Effects of biofertilizer produced from Bradyrhizobium and Streptomyces griseoflavus on plant growth, nodulation, nitrogen fixation, nutrient uptake and seed yield of mung bean, cowpea and soybean. Agronomy. 9: 77, DOI: 10.3390 /agronomy9020077.

  22. Hussain, A., Ali, A., Noorka, I.R. (2012). Effect of phosphorus with and without Rhizobium inoculation in nitrogen and phosphorus concentration and uptake by mungbean (Vigna radiata L). Journal of Agricultural Research. 50: 49-57.

  23. INDIASTAT. (2021). https://www.indiastat.com

  24. Jha, A., Sharma, D. and Saxena, J. (2012a). Effect of single and dual phosphate-solubilizing bacterial strain inoculations on overall growth of mung bean plants. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 58: 967-981. 

  25. Jha, M.N., Kumar, P. and Chourasia, S.K. (2012b). Hope, hype and reality of biofertilizer. Fertilizer Technology. 121: 448-480.

  26. Kaur, N. and Sharma, P. (2013) Screening and characterization of native Pseudomonas sp. as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) rhizosphere. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 7: 1465-1474. 

  27. Kaur, N. and Sharma, P. (2016) Response of summer mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) to Rhizobium and PGPR inoculation under different planting methods. Annals of Agricultural Research. 37: 87-90. 

  28. Kaur, Ramanjit, Choudhary, A.K., Singh, K., Deol, J.S. and Dass, A. (2015). Possibilities of improving performance of direct seeded rice using plant growth regulators: A review. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. DOI 10.1007/ s40011-015-0551-8.

  29. Khan, V.M., Manohar, K.S., Kumawat, S.K. and Verma, H.P. (2013). Effect of vermicompost and biofertilizers on yield and soil nutrient status after harvest of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) W.]. Agriculture and Sustainable Development. 1: 79-81.

  30. Kumar, A., Meena, V.S., Maurya, B.R., Raghuwanshi, R., Bisht, J.K. and Pattanayak, A. (2017a). Towards the biological nitrogen fixation and nitrogen management in legume under sustainable agriculture. Applied Soil Ecology. 117-118: 221-222.

  31. Kumar, A., Maurya, B.R., Raghuwanshi, R., Meena, V.S. and Islam, M.T. (2017b). Co-inoculation with enterobacter and rhizobacteria on yield and nutrient uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the alluvial soil under Indo-Gangetic Plain of India. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 36: 608-617. 

  32. Kumawat, A., Pareek, B.L. and Yadav, R.S. (2010). Response of greengram (Vigna radiata) to biofertilizers under different fertility levels. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 80: 655-657.

  33. Liu, Y., Wu, L., Baddeley, J.A. and Watson, C.A. (2011). Models of biological nitrogen fixation of legumes - A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 31:155-172.

  34. Marko, G.S., Kushwaha, H.S., Singh, S., Namdeo, K.N. and Sharma, R.D. (2013). Effect of sulphur and biofertilizers on nutrient contents and uptake of blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.). Crop Research. 45: 179-182.

  35. Masciarelli, O., Llanes, A. and Luna, V. (2014). A new PGPR co- inoculated with Brady rhizobium japonicum enhances soybean nodulation. Microbiological Research. 169: 609-615. 

  36. Ndakidemi, P.A., Bambara, S. and Makoi, J.H.J.R. (2011). Micronutrient uptake in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as affected by Rhizobium inoculation and the supply of molybdenum and lime. Plant Omics Journal. 4: 40-52.

  37. Oteino, N., Lally,R.D., Kiwanuka, S., Lloyd, A., Ryan, D., Germaine, K.J. and Dowling, D.N. (2015). Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Frontiers in Microbiology. 6: 745.

  38. Patel, H.R., Maheriya, V.D. and Dodia, I.N. (2013). Response of kharif greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] to sulphur and phosphorus fertilization with and without biofertilizer application. Bioscan. 8: 149-152.

  39. Praminik, K. and Bera, A.K. (2012). Response of biofertilizers and phytohormone on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Crop and Weed. 8: 45-49.

  40. Prasad, H., Chandra, R., Pareek, R.P. and Kumar, N. (2002). Synergism among phosphate solubilizing bacteria, rhizobacteria and Rhizobium with urdbean. Indian Journal of Pulses Research. 15: 131-135.

  41. Reddy, A.S.R., Babu, J.S., Reddy, M.C.S., Khan, M.M. and Rao, M.M. (2011). Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). International Journal of Applied Biology Pharmaceutical Technology. 2: 467-470.

  42. Ryan, M.H. and Angus, J.F. (2003). Arbuscular mycorrhizae in wheat and field pea crops on a low P soil: Increased Zn-uptake but no increase in P-uptake or yield. Plant and Soil. 250:  225-239.

  43. Saini, P. and Khanna, V. (2012). Evaluation of native rhizobacteria as promoters of plant growth for increased yield in lentil (Lens culinaris). Recent Research in Science and Technology. 4: 5-9.

  44. Sathe, H.D., Khawale, V.S., Patil, D.B. and Chavan, N.H. (2011). Effect of plant geometry and phosphate management on yield attributes and phosphorus uptake of semi rabi pigeonpea. Journal of Soils and Crops. 21: 139-142.

  45. Shahid, M., Khan, M.S., Syed A., Marraiki, N. and Elgorban, A.M. (2021). Mesorhizobium ciceri as biological tool for improving physiological, biochemical and antioxidant state of Cicer aritienum (L.) under fungicide stress. Scientific Reports. 11: 9655.

  46. Sharma, P., Khanna, V., Kaur, N., Dhillon, G., Singh, G., Sharma, S., Kaur, H. and Saxena, A.K. (2013). Effect of dual inoculation of Pseudomonas argentinensis LPGPR 1 and Mesorhizobium on growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Research Punjab Agricultural University. 50: 1-4.

  47. Singh, G., Sekhon, H.S. and Sharma, P. (2011). Effect of irrigation and biofertilizer on water use, nodulation, growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 57: 715-726. 

  48. Singh, G., Virk, H.K., Aggarwal, N. and Gupta, R.K. (2021a). Growth, symbiotic traits, productivity and nutrient uptake as influenced by dose and time of nitrogen application and Rhizobium inoculation in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 44: 1982-1992.

  49. Singh, G., Virk, H.K., Aggarwal, N., Gupta, R.K. and Khanna, V. (2019). Symbiotic parameters, growth, nutrient accumulation, productivity and profitability as influenced by integrated nutrient management in lentil (Lens culinaris). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 65: 411-420. DOI: 10.1080/ 03650340.2018.1506102.

  50. Singh, N. and Singh, G. (2018a). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and Rhizobium combinations are the key to reduce dependence on phosphorus fertilizers in lentil-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 39: 76-81. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-1740.

  51. Singh, N., Singh, G. and Aggarwal, N. (2017a). Economic analysis of application of phosphorus, single and dual inoculation of Rhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus). Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 9: 1008-1011.

  52. Singh, N., Singh, G., Aggarwal, N. and Khanna, V. (2018). Yield enhancement and phosphorus economy in lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) with integrated use of phosphorus, Rhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 41: 737-748.

  53. Singh, R., Malik, J.K., Thenua, O.V.S. and Jat, H.S. (2013). Effect of phosphorus and bio-fertilizer on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) +mungbean (Phaseolus radiatus) intercropping system. Legume Research. 36: 41-48.

  54. Singh, R.S. and Yadav, M.K. (2008). Effect of phosphorus and biofertilizers on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of long duration pigeonpea under rainfed condition. Journal of Food Legumes. 21: 46-48.

  55. Singh, Y., Singh, B. and Kumar, D. (2014). Effect of phosphorus levels and biofertilizer on yield attributes, yield and nutrient uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under rainfed condition. Research on Crops. 15: 90-95.

  56. Singh, Z. and Singh, G. (2018b). Role of Rhizobium in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) production-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 39: 31-39. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-1699.

  57. Singh, Z., Singh, G. and Aggarwal, N. (2017b). Effect of Mesorhizobium, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and phosphorus on plant biometry and growth indices of desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 9: 1422-1428.

  58. Singh, Z., Singh, G., Aggarwal, N., Virk, H.K. and Sharma, P. (2021b). Symbiotic efficiency vis-à-vis chickpea performance as affected by seed inoculation with Mesorhizobium, phosphorus- solubilizing bacteria and phosphorus application. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 45: 246-258. DOI: 10.1080/01904167. 2021.1943435.

  59. Swarnalakshmi, K., Yadav, V., Tyagi, D., Dhar, D.W., Kannepalli, A. and Kumar, S. (2020). Significance of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in grain legumes: growth promotion and crop production. Plants. 9: 1596.

  60. Tian, J., Ge, F., Zhang, D., Deng, S. and Liu, X. (2021). Roles of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms from managing soil phosphorus deficiency to mediating biogeochemical P Cycle. Biology. 10: 158.

  61. Tilak, K.V.B.R, Ranganayaki, N. and Manoharachari, C. (2006). Synergistic effects of plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria and Rhizobium on nodulation and nitrogen fixation by pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). European Journal of Soil Science. 57: 67-71.

  62. Tilak, K.V.B.R., Ranganayaki, N., Pal, K.K., De, R., Saxena, A.K., Shekhar, N.C., Mittal, S., Tripathi, A.K., Johri, B.N. (2005). Diversity of plant growth and soil health supporting bacteria. Current Science. 89: 136-150.

  63. Verma, J.P., Yadav, J. and Tiwari, K.N. (2012). Enhancement of nodulation and yield of chickpea by co-inoculation of indigenous Mesorhizobium spp. and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in eastern Uttar Pradesh. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 43: 605-621.

  64. Verma, J.P., Yadav, J., Tiwari, K.N. and Kumar, A. (2013). Effect of indigenous Mesorhizobium spp. and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on yields and nutrients uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under sustainable agriculture. Ecological Engineering. 51: 282-286.

  65. Virk, H.K., Singh, G. and Sharma, P. (2017a). Effect of tillage, wheat crop residues and biofertilizers on chemical and biological properties of soil in soybean-wheat cropping system. Agricultural Research Journal. 54: 342-346.

  66. Virk, H.K., Singh, G. and Sharma, P. (2017b). Productivity, nutrient uptake, energy indices and profitability of soybean (Glycine max) as influenced by planting methods, Brady rhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 62: 341-347.

  67. Wang, H., Shen, L., Li-mei, Z., Ji-zong, Z., Tia-nzi, R., Bin-quan, F. and Hong-bin, L. (2014). Preparation and utilization of phosphate biofertilizers using agricultural waste. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 14: 158-167.

  68. Zafar, M., Abbas, M.K., Khan, M.A., Khaliq, A., Sultan, T. and Aslam, M. (2012). Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on growth, nodulation and nutrient accumulation of lentil under controlled conditions. Pedosphere. 22: 848-859.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)