Morphological characterization
The Cercospora isolates were grown in PDA medium in petri plates for 30days to evaluate the growth rate. The growth of the fungal colonies was very slow but the radial growth took place between 15 to 21 days of re-culture. The average radial growth of the BBS1 isolate was recorded as 4.2-5.5 cm diameter whereas, BAM1 about 2.8-4.3 cm diameter. The BBS1 fungal colony was marked by white fluffy cottony appearance with a radish brown outer border. Whereas, the BAM1 had a less fluffy growth with pale cream colour and was not marked with red or brown border but had a feathery growth at the margin (Fig 1a,b). Both the isolates had a very slow growth on the artificial medium but did not produce spore on the PDA medium. But the isolates sporulated on sorghum grains and the spores were characterized with the conidia and branched conidiophore, pale olivaceous, straight to slightly bent and multi-septate.
Cercospora canescens with slight stroma often with dense fascicle bearing conidiophores which were generally branched, straight, geniculate, bearing few to many septa, pale to medium dark brownin colouration
(Videira et al., 2017).
Pathogenicity test
Leaf spots formation initiated after 10 days after inoculation. The findings showed that the inoculated plants showed typical lesions on the leaves which were irregularly circular with dark reddish-brown outer margin with palecentre. The smaller spots further coalesced together to form irregular lesions of yellow chlorotic halo around the brown margin and on maturity formed a greyish centre with spores. The susceptible plants showed higher incidence of the disease with a greater number of spots with greyish centres on the leaves which further led to the infection of the pods.
Molecular characterization
Molecular analysis showed that the amplicons separated on agarose gel through electrophoresis showed a similar banding pattern under UV trans-illumination (Fig 1c). The sequence of the fungal isolates BBS1 and BAM1 were deposited in NCBI gene bank and assigned the accession numbers
viz. MZ475049 and MZ475050 respectively. The evolutionary history was inferred using the phylogenetic comparison was based on the ITS sequences of the two isolates of
Cercospora in the present study and the sequences of other related species available in the NCBI GenBank database to infer the genetic relationships among the isolates and establish the level of genetic diversity (Fig 2A). The phylogenetic analyses were performed based on alignments and comparisons of the sequences using ClustalX integrated into MEGA 7 software. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree
(Videira et al., 2017). The evolutionary distances were computed using the number of differences method (
Nei and Kumar, 2000). The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) to assess the clade stability are shown next to the branches (
Felsenstein, 1985). The dendrogram based on the neighbour joining method in MEGA 7.0 establishing the relationships between different species of
Cercospora depicts that the species can be delineated into four broad groups namely Group-I, II, III and IV of related species. Among the 4 groups, most of the
Cercospora canescens isolates are constituted under the group II and IV.The isolate BBS1 (Acc. No. MZ475049) falls under group IV and BAM1 (Acc.No. MZ475050) under group II (Fig 2B). Based on the phylogenetic tree representing the relationships among different
Cercospora species and other closely related genera, it is implied that genus Cercospora shares common ancestors with other genera like
Septoria, Pseudocercospora, Exutisphaerella, Neodeightoniella, Ramulariaetc (Fig 3). The genera
Cercospora and
Septoria were found to share a and more immediate ancestor than between
Cercospora and
Pseudocercospora (
To-Anun et al., 2011). These genera are clustered into 5 different groups based on their relatedness and
Cercospora species clearly fall under group IV and V (Fig 3). It is evident from the secondary structure model of
Cercospora genus derived from ITS region with variable sites and parsimony informative sites of the genus (Table 1) that the related species can be distinguished into four different groups in phylogenetic analysis, which implies that species differ from one another based on transitional substitution of thiamine (T) and cytosine (C) (Fig 3). New
Cercospora isolates, BBS1(MZ475049) falls under group IV and BAM1 (MZ475050) falls under group II.