Of the newest technological innovations, nanotechnology offers an important opportunity and occupies a prominent position improving the existing crop management strategies and food production practices
(Nair et al., 2010). The nano scale ZnO particles with mean diameter of 25 nm are crystalline as revealed by the high magnification image and the lattice of ZnO is clearly seen.
Zhu et al., 2009 also reported lattice spacing of 0.26 nm to 0.28 nm of WURTZITE ZnO.
Application of nano-ZnO promoted melatonin synthesis and increased the antioxidant enzyme system, which reduces drought-induced damage to mitochondria and chloroplast in corn (
Luying Sun et al., 2020). In the current study, water stress (WS) regime from 40 to 80 days after sowing (DAS)
i.e., from pegging to pod formation stage, reduced soil moisture content by 42 % at 0-5 cm soil depth and 40 % at 15-30 cm soil depth compared to well watered (WW) plot where moisture level was maintained optimum throughout the crop growth period. Irrespective of the foliar treatments, the mean activity of SOD, POD and CAT increased significantly by 31.2%, 12.0 and 28.0% respectively under WS compared to WW (Table 1).
Kusvuran and Yildiz Dasgan (2017) in bean and Koushik
Chakraborty et al., (2015) in peanut reported higher activity of antioxidant enzymes under moistures stress compared to control conditions. Under WS conditions, the activity of SOD, POD and CAT increased by 11%, 12% and 6.0% respectively in chelated ZnSO
4 @ 1000 ppm treatment compared to unsprayed control. SOD value increased significantly even with ZnSO
4 spraying denotes the stimulating action of Zn as it is one of the cofactors of SOD (Cu/Zn SOD). Zinc may act as a scavenger of oxygen free radical production for mitigating the injury on biomembranes under salt stress and hence, treatment with zinc could reduce the effects of salinity stress in soybean plants and adequate zinc also prevents uptake and accumulation of Na in shoot, by increasing membrane integrity of root cells (
Weria Weisany et al., 2012).
In the present study, among the different concentrations of nanoscale ZnO, significantly highest SOD, POD and CAT activity recorded in nanoscale ZnO @ 50 ppm treatment compared to unsprayed control and chelated bulk ZnSO4 under WW conditions. Similarly, foliar spray of nanoscale ZnO @ 50 ppm significantly recorded highest SOD, POD and CAT activity and increased by 25.1, 27.4 and 25.5 % respectively compared to unsprayed control whereas SOD, POD and CAT activity increased by 11.9, 13.7 and 22.6 % respectively compared to chelated bulk ZnSO
4 respectively under WS conditions (Table 1; Fig 1). Drought results in accumulation of ROS, leading to lipid peroxidation of the cell membrane system, which is mainly due to the production of malondialdehyde.
Luying et al., (2020), documented that, nano-ZnO significantly increased the activities of SOD, CAT and APX, which reduced the accumulation of H
2O
2 under drought and in agreement with this, the relative transcript abundance of Fe/Mn SOD, Cu/Zn SOD, APX and CAT in nano-ZnO plants was significantly up-regulated higher than that of non ZnO treatment plants under drought.
Biomass accumulation improved in the ZnO nanoparticle treated Chickpea seedlings and this response was associated with lower activity of prominent antioxidant enzymes, compared to control
(Burman et al., 2013). The study by
García-López et al., (2018) on the effects of suspensions of zinc oxide nanoparticles on germination of
Capsicum chinense seeds resulted in increased activities of peroxidase and catalase.
Vigna mungo seeds treated with different concentrations of ZnO nano particles showed significant induction of the activities of Glutathione reductase, Guaiacol peroxidase and Catalase activity
(Pavani et al., 2020).
Sharifi et al., (2012) reported that the tolerant wheat lines revealed high activity of POD and CAT enzyme under drought conditions with higher yields, thus showing positive correlation between enzyme activity and yield in drought conditions.
Prasad et al., 2012 reported that, ZnO in the nanoscale form is absorbed by plants to a larger extent unlike bulk ZnSO
4 and these particles proved effective in enhancing plant growth, development and yield.
The inherent small size and the associated large surface area of nanoscale ZnO fertilizer may increase the uptake of Zn. All these factors may be responsible to give higher yields for nanoscale ZnO compared to chelated ZnSO
4.
The present study reveals that, shoot biomass and pod yields recorded highest under WW compared to WS conditions. Shoot biomass and pod yields decreased by 37% under WS compared to WW conditions. Chelated ZnSO
4 foliar treatment recorded 5.0% increase in shoot biomass under both WW and WS conditions compared to unsprayed control whereas Chelated ZnSO
4 foliar treatment recorded 10.0% and 7.0% enhanced pod yields under WW and WS conditions compared to unsprayed control (Table 1). Under various stressed conditions, optimum Zn concentrations enhanced the plant growth. The lower dry weight in the control treatments may be due to water limited stress as water limited stress have been known to severely reduce the growth of plants
(Adrees et al., 2020). In the present study, significantly highest shoot biomass and pod yields were recorded at foliar spray treatment of nanoscale ZnO @ 50 ppm compared to unsprayed control and chelated bulk ZnSO
4 under WW conditions. Foliar spray of nanoscale ZnO @ 50 ppm significantly recorded highest shoot biomass and pod yields and increased by 35.0 and 32.3 % respectively compared to unsprayed control increased by 17.6 and 23.8 % respectively compared to chelated bulk ZnSO
4 under WS conditions (Table 1).
Adrees et al., (2021) also reported that, the shoot, root and grain dry weights enhanced more under water deficit stress compared to normal water conditions where 100 mg l
-1 ZnO NPs were applied, over their respective control treatments.
The study by Hesham
Alharby et al., (2016) reveals that, lower concentration of nanoscale ZnO was beneficial compared to the higher concentration of nanoscale ZnO, at both salinity levels. The current study also observed that the nanoparticles at higher concentrations exhibit inhibitory effects on plants in terms of enzymatic activity and promontory activity at lower concentrations. At 1000 ppm, the antioxidant enzyme activity, shoot weight and pod yield significantly decreased compared to unsprayed control under both WW and WS conditions respectively in terms of plant growth showing phytotoxicity (Table 1).