Effect on growth attributes
Foliar nutrition of macro and micro nutrients had significant effect on growth attributes
viz., number of branches per plant and DMP per plant. Compared to POP, foliar nutrition treatments registered higher values for number of branches per plant and DMP per plant. The treatment T
12 recorded the highest number of branches per plant both at 60 DAS and at final harvest. At 60 DAS higher dry matter production was recorded in treatment T
2 which was on par with T
5 and T
8. At final harvest T
5 registered higher DMP and was statistically at par with T
8, T
13 and T
12. Better expression of growth attributes in these treatments might be due to the quick access of plants to nutrients due to foliar application
(Dey et al., 2017). Increased availability and uptake of nutrients might have resulted in enhanced photosynthesis and translocation of photosynthates from source to the growing plant parts leading to better expression of growth attributes in these treatments. The results obtained are in consonance with the observations of
Haleema et al., (2018) who observed that foliar application of Zn and B resulted in enhanced vegetative growth due to increase in photosynthetic and metabolic activity, cell division and cell elongation.
Elhindi et al., (2016) reported that foliar application of KNO
3 improved the plant growth by enhancing the physiological process
viz., osmoregulation, stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, protein synthesis, solute transport and nitrate metabolism. Significant increase in dry matter production was observed in chilli owing to foliar application of water-soluble fertilizers (
Muthumanickam and Anburani, 2017).
Banasode and Math (2018) opined that foliar application of water-soluble fertilizers significantly influenced the uptake of nutrients. Better uptake of nutrients increased the physiological process like photosynthesis, chlorophyll formation, protein synthesis, nitrate metabolism and carbohydrate synthesis which ultimately results in increased DMP. Foliar application of solubor also contributed to higher DMP in T
5. Boron plays an important role in increasing the permeability of cell membrane which led to better transportation of sugars and carbohydrates ultimately leading to higher DMP
(Thakur et al., 2019).
Effect on yield attributes
Compared to POP recommendation of fertilizers (T
1), foliar application of macro and micro nutrients had significant effect on pods per plant and individual pod weight.
Fageria (1992) opined that number of pods per plant is the most important yield determining character in pulses. Rapid availability of nutrients under foliar application leads to accelerated rate of physiological processes which ultimately improved the plant growth and number of pods per plant
(Khanda et al., 1999). Krishna and Kaleeswari (2018) opined that foliar application of macro and micro nutrients increased the number of flower buds and their retention by maintaining optimum bio-physiological conditions compared to control (without foliar application). Treatment T
5 recorded the highest number of pods per plant and it was statistically on par with T
2, T
6 and T
11.
Premsekhar and Rajashree (2009) reported that foliar application of 19:19:19 significantly enhanced the number of fruits per plant in tomato. Higher number of pods per plant observed in T
5 and T
11 was also due to the favorable influence of B in enhancing the fruit setting percentage by enhancing the pollen viability
(Praveena et al., 2018), pollen germination and elongation of pollen tube
(Narayanamma et al., 2009). Better expression of growth attributes (Table 2) and higher availability (Table 4) and uptake of nutrients also contributed to higher number of pods per plants in treatments T
5, T
2, T
6 and T
11.
Meena et al., (2017) opined that foliar application of nutrients improved the source-sink relation leading to less intra plant competition for nutrients.
Foliar application of macro and micro nutrients had significant effect on individual pod weight. Treatment T
2 recorded significantly higher pod weight and it was on par with T
5, T
6, T
8, T
9, T
10, T
11 and T
13. Higher pod weight recorded in these treatments might be due to better partitioning of assimilate from source to sink. This was clearly evident from the data on harvest index (Table 3).
Guievence and Badem (2000) reported that foliar application of nutrients promotes better uptake of nutrients and water leading to improvement in photosynthesis and better partitioning of assimilates to the edible parts. Better sugar translocation triggered by the foliar application of B (
Meena, 2010) might have contributed to higher pod weight in T
5, T
6 and T
11. The increase in pod weight observed in T
5, T
6 and T
11 are in consonance with the results of
Pandav et al., (2016) in brinjal and
Harris et al., (2018) in chilli.
Haque et al., (2011) opined that higher levels of B resulted in better uptake of water, synthesis of sugars and translocation of metabolites to sink tissues. Favourable effect of Zn in sugar translocation (
Singh and Tiwari, 2013), IAA synthesis
(Shnain et al., 2014) and reduction in flower drop
(Ali et al., 2008) also contributed to higher individual pod weight in T
6, T
10 and T
13.
Foliar application of macro and micro nutrients did not contribute significantly to pod length and pod girth. This might be due to the fact that these characters are highly associated with the genetic makeup of the variety.
Effect on yield and harvest index
Foliar application of macro and micro nutrients significantly enhanced the pod yield compared to POP recommendation (T
1). Among the treatments, the highest pod yield was recorded in the treatment T
5 which was statistically on par with T
2, T
6 and T
11. Higher pod yield registered in these treatments was due to the production of higher number of pods per plant and pods with higher weight (Table 3). Foliar nutrition of 19:19:19 resulted in increased availability and assimilation of major nutrients
(Singhal et al., 2015) and the favourable influence of B in various physiological processes
viz., calcium metabolism, auxin synthesis, sugar metabolism, translocation of solutes and protein synthesis
(Thakur et al., 2019) led to the formation of higher number of pods per plant which finally contributed to higher pod yield in T
5.
Tariq and Mott (2007) revealed that B deficiency during flowering prevents the growth of the pollen tube leading to pollen sterility, flower drop and poor seed setting. Foliar nutrition of P enhances cell division
(Reddy et al., 2017) leading to production of higher number of branches (Table 2) and pods per plant which finally contributed to higher yield in T
2. Yield enhancement in T
11 might be due to the favourable influence of K and B. Potassium promotes the water use efficiency of plants and assimilate translocation towards sink
(Zhao et al., 2001). Vekaria et al., (2013) revealed that foliar nutrition of KNO
3 0.4 per cent significantly increased the grain yield of green gram by 18.4 per cent compared to control. Higher yield registered in T
6 was due to the better expression of growth and yield attributes (Table 2 and 3). Similar observations were also made by
Wasaya et al., (2017) in maize and
Ali et al., (2015) in tomato.
Foliar application of macro and micro nutrients also had significant effect on haulm yield and the highest haulm yield was registered by T
13, whereas the lowest haulm yield was recorded in T
1. Compared to T
1, all the foliar nutrition treatments registered higher haulm yield. This might be due to the fact that foliar application of primary nutrients along with Zn and B enhanced the crop growth (
Krishna and Kaleeswari, 2018). Adequate availability of N favours vegetative growth and formation of dark green leaves which would actively participate in photosynthesis
(Thakur et al., 1991). Favourable influence of boron on meristematic activity and cell division also contributed to higher dry matter production. In addition, B increases the permeability of cells thereby permitting increased translocation of sugars and carbohydrates
(Thakur et al., 2019). Zinc had a major role in the synthesis of auxin, a plant growth promoter crucial for better growth (
Singh and Tiwari, 1989). Reduced Zn availability leads to shortened internodes and chlorosis of leaves which reduces assimilatory surface area available for photosynthesis
(Yadav et al., 2014).
The highest HI was recorded in treatment T
7. This was due to lower haulm yield registered in the treatment compared to other foliar treatments (Table 3). Enzyme activation and biosynthesis of enzymes, growth hormones mediated by Zn also helped in better vegetative growth of plants (
Rout and Das, 2003) which in turn led to the synthesis of greater proportion of carbohydrates through photosynthesis.
Arora et al., (1990) has described the physiological role of Zn in effecting translocation of assimilates towards sink tissues. Deficiency of Zn causes accumulation of carbohydrates in plant leaves (
Marshner and Cakmak, 1989). Boron plays a key role in translocation of sugars from leaves to pods
(Thakur et al., 2019). Better partitioning of assimilates due to B application might have led to higher HI. Adequate supply of N, P and K through 19:19:19 and Zn and B led to better utilization of photosynthates for reproductive growth instead of excessive vegetative growth (
Muthumanickam and Anburani, 2017).
Effect on post-harvest nutrient status
Foliar application of macro and micro nutrients significantly influenced the available nutrients in the post-harvest soil. All the foliar nutrition treatments registered higher availability of N compared to T1 might be due to enhanced biological N fixation as a result of better vegetative growth. The treatments T
1, T
3 and T
9 registered higher P availability. The reason for the increased availability of P observed in T
3 and T
9 might be due to the better root growth which would enable the crop to tap nutrients from the deeper soil layers. Addition of organic matter through FYM and decomposition of fallen leaves from the cowpea plant also paved for better availability of nutrients. Similar observations were also made by
Raj (2019) in cowpea. Lower P uptake by the crop resulted in higher post-harvest P status in T
1. The treatment T
6 recorded the lowest available K might be due to higher K uptake by the crop. Similar results of reduced availability of K due to increase in uptake was reported by
Kuwar et al., (2014) in water melon.
Foliar application of macro and micro nutrients significantly enhanced the availability of Zn and B in soil. The highest available Zn was reported in T
11 and was statistically on par with T
8, T
9 and T
10. The highest available B was registered by the treatment T
2 and was statistically comparable with T
5, T
6, T
7, T
10, T
11 and T
12. Similar results of increased availability of Zn and B in the soil was reported by
Mini and Mathew (2019) following the foliar application of micro nutrient mixture in okra. Application of 0.25 per cent borax at flowering and fruit initiation stages of tomato recorded the highest soil available boron
(Sathya et al., 2013).
Effect on economics
Foliar nutrition of water-soluble macro and micronutrient fertilizers brought significant increase in net return and benefit cost (B:C) ratio. Foliar nutrition of water-soluble macro and micronutrient fertilizers along with RDF resulted in an increase in net return of Rs 13,852 to 49,712 ha
-1. Among the treatments, treatment T
5 registered the highest net return (82,651 Rs ha
-1) which was statistically on par with T
2, T
6 and T
11. Benefit cost ratio was found to be the highest in T
5 and it was statistically on par with T
2, T
6 and T
11. Higher net return and B:C recorded in these treatments was owing to higher green pod yield registered in the treatment (Table 5).
Singhal et al., (2015) reported that foliar feeding of water-soluble nutrients significantly improved the okra yield and recorded higher net income.
Saravaiya et al., (2014) observed an increase in net income and B:C ratio due to foliar application of B 100 mg L
-1 in tomato. The control treatment (T
1) registered the lowest net return and B:C ratio due to lesser pod yield recorded in the treatment.