Estimating genotypic variability in an irradiated population would tell how much of the total variation is heritable.
Johnson et al., (1955) stated that the GCV provided the mean to study the genetic variability generated in quantitative traits. However, the GCV alone isn’t enough to determine the level of heritable variability. In addition, to determine the heritable part of total variation and the level of genetic gain expected for effective selection, an assessment of heritability and genetic advance as a percentage of mean is necessary. Since heritability in broad sense encompasses both additive and epistatic gene effects, it will be reliable if it is accompanied by a high level of genetic advancement (
Burton, 1952). Heritability estimations combined with genetic advance, according to
Johnson et al., (1955), are more useful than heritability values alone. This is because genotype–environment interactions affect heritability estimates, according to
Kaul and Kumar (1983). Furthermore, under a suitable selection system, genetic advance indicates the level of stability and genetic advancement for a particular trait.
Here, thirteen polygenically controlled traits were recorded in the progenies raised in M
5 generation.
The analysis of variance for all the characters studied is given in the Table 2. It indicated high significant difference for all the thirteen characters studied when 15 genotypes were evaluated. Hence, there is wider genetic variation for all the characters studied on the cluster bean mutant genotypes along with the parent. Since the genetic variability is secured, the nest task is the separation of heritable portion of variability from the non- heritable part for better planning of the breeding program. This gives an opportunity to improve the traits with high heritability through selection.
The
per se performances of the accessions were calculated (Table 3). Among the 14 non-segregating lines, ACMC-020-10 (500 Gy gamma rays) was identified as the best determinate accession with respect to pod yield per plant (253.83 gm), number of pods per cluster (10.22), total number of pods per plant (117.70), pod length (16.35 cm), pod girth (2.94 cm) and pod weight (2.09 g). ACMC-020-04 (200 Gy electron beam) was the tallest of the accessions (75.86cm), whereas, ACMC-020-014 (500 Gy gamma rays) was the shortest (46.26 cm) one. The earliest flowering mutant was ACMC-020-11 (200 Gy electron beam) which took approximately 22 days for opening of the first flower, whereas ACMC-020-09 (400 Gy gamma rays) was identified as the late flowering genotype which took 25 days to initiate flowering. Also, ACMC-020-11 (200 Gy electron beam) along with ACMC-020-08 (500 Gy electron beam) completed their life cycle within the shortest time period (8.40) when compared to the parent MDU-1 which took 100.8 days to complete the life cycle. Number of clusters per plant were highest in 500 Gy gamma irradiated treatments, ACMC-020-07 (11.50) and ACMC-020-10 (11.10), while, ACMC-020-14 (500 Gy gamma rays) produced only 5.80 clusters on an average. Even if ACMC-020-04 (200 Gy electrons beam) had the highest per pod weight (2.30 g) and protein content (2.83%), the galactomannan content (28.05%) was observed to be the least in it. ACMC-020-08 (500 Gy gamma rays) exhibited superiority with respect to number of seeds per pod (10.10) and also produced the pods with maximum weight (2.30 g) along with ACMC-020-10 and ACMC-020-04.
Magnitude of genetic variance for all the characters studied is given in Table 4. GCV and PCV observe the amount of variation in the available population. PCV value was observed to be higher that GCV value for all the studied characters, indicating the environmental effect on the characters studies. The environmental effect was negligible in all the characters studied as difference between GCV and PCV was not very prominent. Both the GCV and PCV values were found to be higher in characters like plant height (35.60%, 35.60%), number of clusters per plant (35.40%, 35.80%), total number of pods per plant (38.80%, 38.80%), number of pods per cluster (30.40%, 30.50%) and pod yield (38.40%, 38.50%), indicating higher variation in the studied genotypes for all these characters. All the studied characters expressed high broad sense heritability coupled with high genetic advance, indicating the dependence of these characters on additive genes, which made selection possible in the early generations. Similar observation was in mutants of cluster bean variety Pusa Navbahar, irradiated using gamma rays and EMS for plant height, number of pods per plant, number of pods per cluster, number of clusters per plant and pod yield per plant by
Babariya et al., (2008). Days to first flowering and galactomannan content in the seed endosperm reported high heritability (83.09%, 99.59%) but PCV (3.45%, 1.59%), GCV (3.15%, 1.59%) and genetic advance as percentage of mean (5.91%, 3.26%) for these traits were low, indicating that these characters were under the control of non-additive genes and selection was not rewarding. The characters like pod length, pod girth and pod weight expressed moderate values for PCV and GCV and had a high heritability and genetic gain values. Hence these characters were controlled by additive genes and could be used for forwarding these traits to next generations. Number of seeds per pod, days to maturity and seed protein content had low PCV and GCV and genetic gain values even if heritability values were high. Hence these traits could not be improved through simple selection methods. Similar observations in cluster bean were reported by
Santhosha et al., (2017), Meghana et al., (2019), Deepashree et al., (2021) and
Singh et al., (2021) and in black gram by
Kurularasan et al., (2018).
Based on the studies in M
5 generation, five determinate mutant accessions
viz. ACMC-020-04, ACMC-020-07, ACMC-020-08, ACMC-020-10 and ACMC-020-11 with higher yield were identified and forwarded to future generation for stability check (Table 5). These five mutants were evaluated for per day productivity with the parent MDU-1. ACMC-020-10 had per day productivity of 216.93 kg/ha/day against 210.85 kg/ha/day of MDU-1, which is a strong indication of the better performance of the mutant over the parent MDU-1.