Selection of high-yielding, high-tech varieties of field pea (Pisum sativum L.)

DOI: 10.18805/LR-474    | Article Id: LR-474 | Page : 615-619
Citation :- Selection of high-yielding, high-tech varieties of field pea (Pisum sativum L.).Legume Research-An International Journal.2019.(42):615-619
D.S. Ayupov, F.A. Davletov, I.G. Asylbaev, I.Yu. Kuznetsov, I.I. Akhmadullina, A.M. Dmitriev, R.K. Vakhitova, M.Yu. Satarov, F.F. Avsakhov and R.Sh. Irgalina
Address : Bashkir State Agrarian University, Ufa, 34, st. 50 let Oktyabrya, Republic of Bashkortostan, 450001, Russia.
Submitted Date : 25-12-2018
Accepted Date : 8-03-2019


One of the major challenges facing the selection of leguminous crops, and pea in particular, is to increase their technological properties and yield.  An important problem is also the increase of protein content in the seeds. The aim of this work was to create a high-tech variety of field peas with a short growing period. By repeated individual selection from the hybrid population of the Chishminsky 95 × Usach field pea, a precocious, highly productive PamyatiHangildina variety of pea (leafless) was obtained. The combination of new mutant traits in one plant (seed shedding - def gene, leafless type - af gene) and elements of productivity structure with optimal level of their development allowed the variety to successfully pass all tests and in 2012 it was included in the State Register of Selection Achievements of the Russian Federation . For an average of 5 years of competitive testing, the variety had a seed yield of 1.62 t/ha, exceeding the standard (control) by 0.67 t/ha. The created variety has a short growing period and a high content of protein in the seeds. The research results could be successfully used in the selection of improved peas.


Field peas Gene Individual selection Selection Variety Yield.


  1. Ayeh, K.O., Lee, Y.K., Ambrose, M.J., Hvoslef-Eide, A.K. (2009). Characterization and structural analysis of wild type and a non-    abscission mutant at the development funiculus (Def) locus in Pisum sativum L. BioMed Central Plant Biology, 9: 76.
  2. Burstin, J., Marget, P., Huart, M., Moessner, A., Mangin, B., Duchene, C., Desprez, B., et al., (2007). Developmental genes have pleiotropic effects on plant morphology and source capacity, eventually impacting on seed protein content and productivity in pea. Plant Physiology, 144(2): 768-781.
  3. Dahl, W.J., Foster, L.M., Tyler, R.T. (2012). Review of the health benefits of peas (Pisum sativum L.). British Journal of Nutrition, 108: 3-10.
  4. Davletov, F.A., Gajnullina, K.P. (2013). Study of the polymorphism of microsatellite loci of pea seed (Pisum sativum L.). Bulletin of the Bashkir State Agrarian University, 2 (26): 10.
  5. Davletov, F.A., Gajnullina, K.P., Ashiev, A.R. (2011). Peculiarities of growth and development of varieties and pea lines of different morphotypes in the conditions of the Southern Urals. Grain Economy of Russia, 5: 22-31.
  6. Fuchs, J. G., Wilbois, K. P., Conder, M.,Weidmann, G. (2017). Testing peas for legume fatigue.    Legume-fatique_final_QR.pdf.
  7. Gajnullina, K.P. (2013). Genetic diversity of the starting material for pea breeding (Pisum sativum L.) in the conditions of the Pre-Ural steppe of Bashkortostan: dis. cand. Sciences. SPb. pp. 59.
  8. Gautam, K. K., Syamal, M. M., Singh, A. K., and Gupta, N. (2017). Variability, character association and path coefficient analysis of green pod yield and its related traits in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Legume Research, 40(5): 818-823.
  9. GOST 13496.4-93. Feed, feed, feed raw materials. Methods for determination of nitrogen and crude protein content [Electronic resource] - access ModeÃÎÑÒ%2013496.4-93 free.
  10. Jensen, E. S.,Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. (2003). How can increased use of biological N 2 fixation in agriculture benefit the environment? Plant and Soil, 252(1): 177-186.
  11. Jermyn, W. A., Armstrong,S. D., Russell,A. C. (1996). ‘Mega’ field pea (Pisum sativum L.). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 39: 117-119. 
  12. Kuznetsov, I., Akhiyarov, B., Asylbaev, I., Davletov, F., Sergeev, V., Ab-dulvaleyev, R., et al., (2018). The Effect of Sudan Grass on the mixed field chemical composition of annual forage crops. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13: 6558-6564.
  13. Marullo, R., Ravazzi, G. (2016). The first micropterous species of the southern European genus Kakothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Zootaxa, 4067 (4): 460-462.
  14. Methodical instructions of the All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources named after N.I. Vavilov on the study of leguminous crops. (1975). L. pp. 40.
  15. Methods of State Crop Testing (1985). M. Issue 1. pp. 269.
  16. Obuhova, A.V., Popolzuhina, N.A., Omel’janjuk, L.V., Kadermas, I.G. (2012). Donors in the breeding of a pea-mustache morphotype for high seed productivity. Omsk Scientific Herald, 2 (114): 164-167.
  17. Rungruangmaitree,R., Jiraungkoorskul, W. (2017). Pea, Pisum sativum, and its anticancer activity. Pharmacognosy Review, 11 (21): 39-40.
  18. Russell, A. C., Ovenden,G. E., Duchene,C. (1995). ‘Rex’, a new white field pea (Pisum sativum L.) for Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 23: 475-476.
  19. Singh, S. K., Singh, V. P., Srivastava, S., Singh, A. K., Chaubey, B. K., and Srivastava, R. K. (2018). Estimation of correlation coefficient among yield and attributing traits of field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Legume Research, 41(1): 20-26.
  20. Smýkal, P., Aubert, G., Burstin, J., Coyne, C.J., Ellis, N.T.H., Flavell, A.J., Ford, R., Hýbl, M., et al., (2012). Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the genomic era. Agronomy, 2 (2): 74-115.
  21. Tar’an, B., Warkentin, T., Somers, D.J., Miranda, D., Vandenberg, A., Blade, S., Bing, D. (2004). Identification of quantitative trait loci for grain yield, seed protein concentration and maturity in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica, 136 (3): 297-298.
  22. Ton, A., Karaköy, T., Anlarsal, A. E., and Türkeri, M. (2018). Investigation of grain yield and yield components of some field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes in Mediterranean climate conditions. Legume Research: An International Journal, 41(1): 41-47.
  23. Vahitova, R.K. (2015). Formation of a crop of pea seed depending on the elements of the cultivation technology in the conditions of the Pre-Urals of the Republic of Bashkortostan: authoreferat of the dissertation… cand.agricult.sciences. Ufa, 2015. pp.18.
  24. Wilson, D., Russell, A., McCallum, J., Lakeman, M., Murray, S., Butler, R., Frew, T., et al., (2005). Linkage mapping of QTL for seed yield, yield components, and developmental traits in pea. Crop Science, 45 (4): 1336-1337.
  25. WoŸniak, A., Formela, M., Bilman, P., Grzeœkiewicz, K., Bednarski, W., Marczak, £., et al., (2017). The dynamics of the defense strategy of pea induced by exogenous nitric oxide in response to aphid infestation.International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18 (2): 329.
  26. Zhang, C., Tar’an, B., Warkentin’, T., Tullu, A., Bett, K.E., Vandenberg, B., Somers, D.J. (2006). Selection for lodging resistance in early generations of field pea by molecular markers. Crop Science, 46 (1): 321-322. 

Global Footprints