A field experiment was laid out during
rainy, winter and
late winter seasons of 2015-16 and 2016-17 at the research farm of Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dhar, M.P. The soil of the experimental site was clay loam in texture, pH 7.60 with normal electrical conductivity (0.58 dS/m) and medium organic carbon content
i.e. 0.59%. The experimental field was analysed and found values of major available nutrients
i.e. N (236 kg/ha) low in available, P (11.60 kg/ha) medium in available and K (350 kg/ha) high in available contents. In these 16 cropping sequences, soybean was sequenced with feasible
winter crops
viz. wheat (
Triticum aestivum and
Triticum durum L.), chick pea (
Cicer arietinum L.), garlic (
Allium sativum L.
), onion (
Allium cepa L.), potato (
Solanum tuberosum L.) and garden pea (
Pisum sativum L.) with inclusion of garlic (
Allium sativum L.
), onion (
Allium cepa L.) in
late winter and tested in randomized block design with 4 replications.
Only soybean was grown during rainy season with two varieties
i.e. JS 95-60 early duration (82-87 days) and JS 93-05 medium duration (90-95 days) under all cropping sequences. Different varieties as per their feasibility to accommodate the succeeding crop under present investigation were cultivated under different need based diversified cropping sequences. The variety used for winter crops was like wheat (HI-1544) aestivum, wheat (HI-8663) durum, chickpea (JG-130)
desi, chickpea (RVKG-101)
kabuli, potato (Kufri jyoti), garden pea (Arkel) and garlic (G-282) and onion (AFLR) during
late winter, respectively. Sowing of rainy, winter and
late winter season crops were done on 21.06.15 and 26.06.16; 17.10.15 and 21.10.16 and 02.01.16 and 03.01.17 during two consecutive years, respectively. The recommended dose of N:P:K (kg/ha) for soybean 20:80:20, wheat 120:60:40, chickpea 20:60:20, garlic 100:50:50, onion 100:75:50, potato 120:50:100 and garden pea 20:60:20 was applied. On going through the above facts, water use efficiency of 16 soybean based cropping sequences including existing soybean - wheat and soybean - chickpea systems were evaluated under present investigation. The observations of experiment were recorded as per standard procedure. The experimental data was statistically analysed given by
Gomez and Gomez (1984). The differences among treatments were calculated by using ‘F’ test and critically differences at 5% probability.
The methods of calculation of various cropping system indices with their references are as follows:
Soybean equivalent yield (SEY)
The cropping sequences were evaluated in terms of soybean-equivalent yield as suggested by
Yadav and Newaj (1990):
Consumptive use of water
The consumptive use of water under different treatments was computed with the help of following equation as suggested by
Dastane (1972).
Where,
Cu = Consumptive use of water (mm).
E
p = Pan evaporation value (mm) from the USWB class A pan for the interval from the date of irrigation to the date of sampling after irrigation.
0.8 = A constant factor used to get E
t value by multiplying E
p value for a given period.
M
1i = Moisture per cent of i
th layer on the date of sampling after irrigation.
M
2i = Moisture per cent of i
th layers on the date of sampling before irrigation.
db
i = Bulk density of i
th layer (mg/m
3).
D
i = Depth of 1
st layer of soil (cm).
E
R = Effective rainfall (mm) if any during the period in consideration.
n = Number of soil layers.
N = Number of days from irrigation to sampling after irrigation.
Note: The values pertaining to irrigation varied depending on the crop and quantity of irrigation water used.
Water use efficiency
The water productivity is expressed in the productivity of a crop/crop-sequence per unit area with per unit quantity of water. It can also said to be water productivity (WUE). It was determined by using the formula as suggested by
Dastane (1972).