Growth attributes
The growth characteristics of green gram was influenced significantly on application of the biofertilisers along with RDF (Table 1). At 40 and 80 days after sowing (DAS), the highest plant height (46.9 and 60.35 cm), dry matter accumulation (DMA) (89.67 and 277.1g/m
2) and crop growth rate (CGR) (7.8 and 1.54g/m
2/day) was recorded in T7 treated plants. Dual inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB on green gram was also studied by
Patel et al., (2016), who stated that increased plant height and growth characters might be due to improved atmospheric N fixation and enhanced insoluble phosphorus availability in available form.
During both the growth stages, T7 treated plants showed improved plant height (9.53% and 10.07%) and DMA (17.84% and 17.89%), as compared to T4. In comparison to carrier-based inoculants, liquid biofertilisers showed significantly positive result in groundnut, chick pea and soybean (
Hegde, 2002).
Trimurtulu et al., (2014) also reported similar improvement in growth of maize, red gram and some other leguminous crops with application of 75% RDF along with liquid bioinoculants. There was no significant difference in plant height, DMA and CGR of green gram plants treated with T2, T3, T5, T6, T8 and T9 treatments. Biofertilisers secrete organic substances, such as auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, ethylene and abscisic acid and these bio-active compounds play a stimulating role to influence physiological process resulting in better growth and higher dry matter accumulation
(Muley et al., 2016).
It was evident from the experimental findings that LAI, number of leaves per plant of green gram improved with seed treatment by Rhizobium and PSB at 40 and 60 DAS with significant highest values recorded in T7 treated plants. Overall improvement in the crop growth under the influence of bio inoculants i.e.; Rhizobium, PSB and Rhizobium + PSB seems to be on account of their impact on nutritional availability in soil and improvement in various physiological processes in the plant system which are considered to be pre-requisites for growth of the crop
(Nadeem et al., 2018). Nodulation of green gram improved effectively in all the treated plants, with highest nodule number (51.33) in T7 treated plants at 40 DAS (Table 1). This may be because of increased P availability due to PSB and better atmospheric N fixation due to rhizobium. Synergism in Rhizobium and PSB might be the outcome of better nodulation and dual inoculation was reported to be more effective single inoculation
(Amit et al., 2010).
Yield attributes and yield
The effects of liquid and carrier based inoculants applied along with RDF had beneficial effect on yield attributes and yield of green gram over T1. Number of seeds per pod (10.11), seed yield (1276.98 kg/ha), stalk yield (2737.51 Kg/ha) and husk yield (483.37 kg/ha) was superior in T7, biofertiliser treated plants, but was at par with T4 plants (Table 2). Seed and stalk yield of green gram were increased by 35.64% and 39.04% with the T7 application as compared to T1. The increase in yield due to application of bio inoculants may be due to increased availability of N and P in soil for better plant uptake and their growth promoting activities. Crops which received T8 and T9 recorded significantly higher yield than RDF treated plants. The harvest index was superior in crop applied with T7 but was statistically at par with all other treatments.
Increment of seed yield by using liquid inoculants was also observed by
Biswas and Bhowmick (2007) in black gram and
Trimurtulu and Rao, (2014) in maize. Application of microbial inoculants like Rhizobium + PSB was reported to be beneficial in improving nodule number, yield and yield attributes in chick pea and summer green gram
(Tagore et al., 2013); Dongare et al., 2016).
Nutrient dynamics
Application of T7 in crops, have led to higher nutrient uptake compared to all other treatments (125.09 kg/ha, 14.83 kg/ha and 54.81 kg/ha of N, P and K respectively) (Fig 1). The higher uptake of NPK in plants treated with dual liquid inoculants might be due to good establishment of crop rhizosphere and ample supply of native soil nutrients (
Trimurtulu and Rao, 2014). In green gram, the association between the PSB and Rhizobium culture along with inorganic fertiliser improved plant growth due to synergistic effect and the dual inoculation increased the uptake of N and P content in plant
(Amit et al., 2010). It was also noticed that T9 treatment showed significantly better uptake than crops treated with T1. Dual inoculation helped in better absorption of N, P and K in plant and utilization of all the plant nutrients due to more availability of nutrient in soil
(Nadeem et al., 2018).
Protein content
The significantly higher protein content in green gram seed (24.83%) was observed from the plants which received, T7 (Table 2).
Singh et al., (2006) and
Murugan et al., (2011) also observed significant positive changes in seed protein content on biofertiliser application in chickpea and black gram, respectively.
Post-harvest soil characteristics
Dual application of rhizobium and PSB enhances soil N and P content. Seed treatment with liquid biofertilisers, T7, improved soil physio-chemical properties, organic carbon (0.46%), available N (285 kg/ha), available P (46.63 kg/ha), over other treatments (Table 3). These results were in close conformity with the findings of
Virendra and Shivay (2010) who revealed that integrated use of biofertilisers and chemical fertilisers significantly improved the available N, P and K contents compared to sole application of chemical fertilisers. The soil application of PSB, solubilised inorganic phosphates in soil
(Barroso et al., 2006) while rhizosphere rhizobium colonies helped in nodule development, energy transformation during nitrogen fixation in root nodules
O'hara et al. (1988).
Economics
The crop which received treatment, T7 recorded the highest gross return (₹ 90712.00), net return (₹ 65061.00) and return per rupees invested (2.54), on the other hand minimum economic return was recorded from the T10 treated crop (Table 4). Net return of T7 treated plots was 49.65% higher than RDF (T1) and 14.27% greater than carrier based biofertiliser (T4) plot. These results are in conformity with
Patel et al., (2016). Return per rupee invested for plants treated with T9 was found statistically at par with T4, T5 and T6 treated crops.