Banner

Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.32, CiteScore: 0.906

  • Impact Factor 0.8, Q3

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 42 issue 5 (october 2019) : 666-670

Effects of different mixture ratios of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) on quality of silage

Seyithan Seydosoglu
1Siirt University, Faculty of Agriculture, Field Crops Department, Siirt, Turkey.

  • Submitted27-11-2018|

  • Accepted27-03-2019|

  • First Online 24-05-2019|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-468

Cite article:- Seydosoglu Seyithan (2019). Effects of different mixture ratios of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) on quality of silage. Legume Research. 42(5): 666-670. doi: 10.18805/LR-468.

ABSTRACT

The study was aimed to determine the properties of silages obtained by growing different mixture ratios of grass pea and barley harvested in the flowering and spike period, respectively. The research was carried out in the experimental field of the GAP International Agricultural Research and Training Center during 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 growth seasons during two years. “Kendal” barley variety and GAP Mavisi grass pea variety were used as material.The treatments viz.,100% barley, 100% grass pea, 75% grass pea + 25% barley, 50% grass pea + 50% barley and 25% grasspea + 75% barley mixtures were used for different silage preperations. Silages were prepared with 4 replications in 3 liters plastic jars, which were mixed and compressed uniformly and sealed thight. Crude protein, crude ash, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber and lactic acid ratios of silages were determined. According to 2-year average results; all applications were found statistically significant.

REFERENCES

  1. Alcicek, A.,Ozkan, K. (1997). A Study on determination of silage quality by chemical and physical analysis in the fermantated silage. Turkey I. Congress of silage. 19 September 1997. Bursa. pp: 241-246
  2. Altinok, S. (2002). A Research on determination of quality properties of barley, vetch and hairy vetch in different mixing ratios. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8 (3): 232-237.
  3. Aydogan, S.,Sahin M., Gocmen Akcacýk A., Ayranci, R. (2011). Determination of high yield and high quality barley genotypes according to Konya conditions. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 25: 10-16.
  4. Aykan, Y. (2018). Determination the properties of silage feed peas (Pisum sativum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mixtures at different rates under Diyarbakýr conditions. Dicle University, Institute of Science and Technology. Master Thesis, Diyarbakýr.
  5. Baghdadi, A., Halim, R.A., Ghasemzadeh, A., Ebrahimi, M., Othman, R., and Yusof, M.M. (2016). Effect of intercropping of corn and soybean on dry matter yield and nutritive value of forage corn. Legume Research, 39(6): 976-981.
  6. Bulgurlu, S., and Ergul, M.(1978). Physical, chemical and Biological Analysis Methods of Feeds. Ege University Publication Number: 127, Ýzmir. 176s.
  7. Carr, P.M., Horsley, R.D., Poland, W.W.(2004). Barley, oat and cereal–pea mixtures as dryland forages in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal.96(3): 677–684
  8. Comberg,G.(1974). Gärfutter: Betriebswirtschaft, Erzeugung, Verfütterung, Verlag Eugen Ulmer Stuttgart, Gerokstraße 19, Printed in Germany, ISBN:3-8001-4321-6, 260s
  9. Demirel, R., Saruhan, V., Baran, M. S., Andic, N., Demirel, D.S. (2010). Determination of silage properties of barley and barley in different mixing ratios. YYU Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20(1): 26-31.
  10. Ergun, A., Tuncer, S.D., Colpan, I., Yalcin, S., Yildiz,G., Kucukersan, M.K., Kucukersan, S., Sehu, A., Sacakli, P. (2013). Feed, Feed Hygiene And Technology. Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Faculty, Ankara. 448s
  11. Filya, I. (2002). Effects of lactic acid bacterial inoculants on fermentation, aerobic stability and in situ rumen degradability characteristics of corn and sorghum silages. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 26:815-823.
  12. Gelir, G. (2018). Determination of silage quality characteristics of forage pea (Pisum sativum subs arvense L.), triticale and mixtures grown in diyarbakýr conditions. Dicle University, Institute of Science and Technology. Master Thesis, Diyarbakýr.
  13. Geren, H. (2014). A study on the determination of the quality characteristics of the silages prepared with different mixtures of some leguminous forage crops and the pennisetum. Ege Univ. Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 51:209-217.
  14. Gocmen, N., Ozaslan Parlak, A. (2017). Determination of mixing ratio of barley, oat and triticale with feed peas. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Faculty of Agriculture Journal. 5: 119–124.
  15. Kalayci M. (2005). Use of Jump with Examples and Variance Analysis Models for Agricultural Research, Anatolian Agricultural Research Institute Publications, Issue No: 21
  16. Kaplan, M., Kokten, K., Akcura, M. (2014). Determination of silage characteristics and nutritional values of some triticale genotypes. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 1: 102–107.
  17. Kilic, A. (1986). Silo Feed Teaching, Learning and Application Suggestions. Bilgehan Printing House, Ýzmir.
  18. Korkmaz, Y., Aykanat, S., Yucel, H., Avci, M., Yucel, C., Hatipoglu, R. (2016). A Research on yield and silage quality of silage corn    varieties to be cultured as second crop in çukurova conditions. General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies, Final Report, Adana.
  19. Oliveria, J.S., Lanes, E.C.M., Lopez, F.C.F., Almeida, E.J.D, Carno, S.G. (2010). Nutritional value of the forage, fermentation patterns and silage quality of triticale (X Triticosecale Wittimack) at six cutting ages. Ciênc. agrotec., Lavras, 34: 765-772.
  20. Petterson, K. (1988). Ensiling of forages: Factors affecting silage fermantation and quality. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition And Management, Uppsala, 46p.
  21. Ross, S.M., King, J.R., O’Donovan, J.T., Spaner, D., (2004). Forage potential of ýntercropping berseem clover with barley, oat or triticale. Agronomy Journal. 96:1013–1020.
  22. Sulas, C., Ruda, P., Salis, M., Atzori, A.S., Correddu, F., Cannas, A., Carroni, A.M. (2012). Legume-cereal mixtures ensiling in Sardinia. Options Meiterraneennes, 102: 489-492.
  23. Tan M, Serin Y (2013). Legume Forage Crops. Atatürk University Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Publication No:190 222s 
  24. Varoglu, H. Degirmenci, R. Korkmaz, Y. Inal, I. Aykanat, S. (2016). Investigations on Determination of Yield and Some Quality Characteristics of Silage Corn Cultivars Cultivated as Second Crop in North Cyprus Conditions. General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies, Final Report, Cyprus.
  25. Yucel, C., Inal, I., Yucel, D., and Hatipoglu, R. (2018). Effects of mixture ratio and cutting time on forage yield and silage quality of intercropped berseem clover and italian ryegrass. Legume Research: An International Journal, 41. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)