The results revealed that the significant difference was found among the different harvesting and threshing methods. The highest seed recovery was recorded in manual harvesting and manual threshing (78 per cent) followed by harvesting and threshed by combine harvester (77.8 per cent) and the lowest seed recovery was obtained in manual harvesting and mechanical threshing (70 per cent) (Table 1).
The different method of harvesting and threshing had significant effect on hard seed characters. The highest hard seed percentage was recorded in seeds harvested and threshed by tractor treading (72 per cent) followed by seeds harvested and threshed by manually (67 per cent). Seeds harvested and threshed by combine had 28 per cent hard seed and the lowest hard seed (19 per cent) was recorded in seeds harvested by manual and threshed by thresher. The mechanical harvesting and threshing methods recorded minimum number of hard seeds. The above may be due to rubbing action of the rotating roller leads to softening of seed coat during separation of seeds by mechanical mode. So, mechanically threshed seeds were scarified and devoid of seed coat dormancy and ready to germinate with good seedling vigour
(Masilamani et al., 2017) (Table 2).
Seeds harvested and threshed by manual method recorded the highest germination of 85 per cent followed by seeds har
vested manually and threshed by thresher (84 per cent) and seeds harvested manually and threshed by tractor treading (80.5 per cent). The lowest germination of 80.0 per cent recorded in seeds harvested and threshed by combine.
The highest mechanical damage of 20 per cent was recorded in seed harvested manually and threshed by thresher followed by harvesting and threshed by combine 15 per cent and manual threshing and manual harvesting 8 per cent. The lowest mechanical damage of 5 per cent was recorded in seeds harvested manually and threshed by tractor treading. The highest root length of 10.27 cm was recorded in seeds harvested manually and threshed by thresher followed by seeds harvested manually and threshed by tractor (9.43 cm) and seeds harvested and threshed by combine harvester (9.18 cm). The lowest root length of 7.6 cm was recorded in seeds harvested and threshed by manual method. The highest shoot length of 7.37 cm was recorded in harvesting and threshing by combine harvester followed by seeds harvested manually and threshed by tractor (7.35 cm), seeds harvested manually and threshed by mechanical thresher (6.97 cm) and the lowest shoot length was recorded in seeds harvested and threshed by manual (5.28 cm). Significantly higher dry matter production was recorded (0.094g/10 seedlings) in harvesting and threshing by combine harvester followed by seeds harvested and threshed by manual and mechanical thresher (0.089g/10 seedlings) and the lowest dry matter production was recorded in seeds harvested and threshed by tractor treading. The highest vigour index I was recorded in seeds harvested manually and threshed by mechanical thresher (1448) followed by seeds harvested and threshed by tractor treading (1350) and harvesting and threshing by combine (1315). The lowest vigour index I was recorded in seeds harvested and threshed by manual (1094). The highest vigour index II was recorded in seeds harvested and threshed by manual (7.56) followed by mechanical thresher (7.47) and combine harvester and the lowest vigour index II was recorded in seeds harvested and threshed by tractor treading (6.68) (Table 3, Fig 2-3).
Seeds harvested and threshed by manual method had higher germination when compared to all other methods, whereas higher vigour index was associated with manual harvesting and mechanical threshing. Manual harvesting and threshing may not be economical since it is labouries, seed loss (spillage) during harvesting, bundling and transporting from field to threshing floor, more time consuming and lower threshing efficiency. Combine harvesting and threshing is a time saving in a single operation both harvesting and separation of seeds completed. Which reduces the manual effort and ultimately the land can be put into sowing of next crop in a very short duration. In addition to above advantages, field subjected to seed harvesting by combine, incorporated with the plant debris in the same field itself without any wastage of plant debris like that of other method followed in this experiment. Seeds harvested by combine initially found to be green in colour with more moisture content (17%) and a week after shade drying the colour was changed from green to brown with reduction in moisture content (12.0%) (Fig 4). Due to indeterminate type of maturity except combine harvester process, in the other method followed in these plants were harvested, bundled and stacked for 2-3 days at threshing floor. This stacking facilitated to ensure immature pod to attain maturity. During stacking lot of chances are derived for development mold and loss of seed quality. In combine harvester aided harvesting, the mature and immature seeds also harvested and threshed without any loss of seeds. After harvesting, seeds were dried under shade condition. During drying the immature seed colour also become green to brown and moisture content reached the level of 12%. During processing in the cleaner cum grader all the immature and insect infected seeds were discarded.
Green et al., (1996) stated that the soyabean seeds harvested by combine at lower rpm significantly improves germination and also feeding rate is an important factor with respect to seed losses
(Andrews et al., 1993). Masilamani et al., (2017) reported that combine harvester is best suited for harvesting sunn hemp at 21.5 per cent moisture content without impairing germination and seedling vigour.
In manual harvesting/manual threshing and manual harvesting/mechanical threshing, harvested crops were bundled and transported to a threshing location, by employing++ huge labour. During transportation matured pods that are available in the harvested plants get dehisced and seed get lossed. Combines provide an enclosed system which greatly reduces the loss of seeds and also provided a sophisticated cleaning system. Threshing and cleaning operations are complex but combine harvester operates on proven physical principles using impact, acceleration and gravity to thresh, separate and clean seeds. During threshing, separation and cleaning of the seeds by combine recorded extremely low level of seed loss. If the operator drives slow enough to not slug feed the cylinder/rotor, losses will be very low
(Paulsen et al., 2015). Since combine harvester is designed for paddy etc, necessary adjustments have to be made to increase the efficiency. When thresher or combine is used, care must be taken to thoroughly check the machinery for previous crop remnants to avoid seeds admixture. The mechanical damage estimated by the ferric chloride test shows minimum damage irrespective of the treatments tried (6 to 9%) and it has hard seed coat, it escapes from mechanical impact and damage under different harvesting and threshing methods adopted in this experiment. Lowest damage (6%) was recorded in the crop harvested and threshed by mechanically and the highest (9%) was in the manual harvest and threshed by tractor treading. Presence of hard seed coat in dhaincha is an added advantage in the perspective of mechanical harvesting and threshing. Any seed coat softens that were occurred during mechanical harvesting and threshing reduces the seed coat dormancy and enhanced the germination and seedling growth.
Seed moisture play an important role in harvesting of the seed crop through combine. If crop moisture increases, combine requires higher peripheral threshing velocity to thresh. As crops dry, crop material is easier to thresh and peripheral velocity should be reduced. When the seeds have higher moisture content, outer hull, pericarp and seed coat of seed is usually soft, so that peripheral threshing velocity will be determining to quality of threshed seeds (
Alizadeh and Khodabakhshipour, 2010). Rate of feeding of crop into the combine need to regulates, if faster rate of feeding leads to loss of fully matured seeds in the field itself during harvesting
(Paulsen et al., 2014). Andrews et al., (1993) studied the effects of combine harvesting in rice on crop quality and losses. In this study, they endorsed be negative effect of rate of feeding on seed loss during harvesting.