Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 47 issue 2 (february 2024) : 284-290

Bio-efficacy of Plants based Formulations for the Management of Cowpea Aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch.)

Sunil Kumar Ghosh1,*
1Department of Agricultural Entomology, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya Agricultural University, AINP on Acarology, Directorate of Research, Kalyani, Nadia-741 235, West Bengal, India.
  • Submitted15-04-2021|

  • Accepted23-07-2021|

  • First Online 11-08-2021|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4636

Cite article:- Ghosh Kumar Sunil (2024). Bio-efficacy of Plants based Formulations for the Management of Cowpea Aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch.) . Legume Research. 47(2): 284-290. doi: 10.18805/LR-4636.

Background: The cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) is damaged by various insect pests of which cowpea aphid (Aphis craccivora) causes heavy damage to the tender leaves of the plant and reduces its yield. Two plant based formulation (prepared in the Chemistry Laboratory) viz. Polygonum hydropiper floral parts and Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaf, were used for safe management.

Methods: The studies were done during 2019-2020 in BCKV, Kalyani, West Bengal, India for controlling of cowpea aphid by using plant based formulation. For preparing wettable powder formulation from Polygonum hydropiper floral parts and tobacco leaf the different ingredients are required viz. china clay, silica gel, wetting agent, dispersing agent etc. Physico-chemical analysis was done for preparation of accurate Wettable Powder formulation.

Result: Cowpea aphid causes damage the tender leaves of the plant. It was revealed that imidacloprid (Confidor 17.8 SL) @ 1.0 ml/3L was found the most effective treatment against aphids giving more than 80% control followed by tobacco leaf (50 WP) @ 8 g/L of water (more than 70% control), fipronil (Regent 5% SC) @ 2.5 ml/L of water and Polygonum floral parts (50 WP) @ 8 g/L of water (more than 65% control both). The quality parameters of WP (50%) formulation was satisfactory as per the FAO specifications in terms of wet sieved test, wettability, foaming and suspensibility performed on the 0-day and also after 15th day at room temperature, at 65°C and at freezing temperature conditions.

The cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), an annual herbaceous legume, is grown as vegetable crop in the semiarid regions. It is also grown for its edible legumes. In addition to their use as a protein-rich food crop, cowpeas are extensively grown as a hay crop and as a green manure or cover crop. Aphid (Aphis craccivora) directly feeds on legume crops and also causes damage by transmits viral diseases. This insect pest multiplies rapidly in late spring and its population increases with the increase in temperature (Singh et al., 2000). Severe infestations of this pest cause stunting, crinkling and curling of leaves, delayed flowering which results in reduction of yield. Aphid secretes honey dew which favours the growth of sooty mould on leaves as well as on climbers and reduces the photosynthetic efficiency. It is very difficult to control virus diseases because of complex interrelationships among virus, host (Sorensen and Baker, 1983).
               
Farmers are dependent on chemical pesticides to which pests develop resistance (Osteen and Szmedra,1989). A. craccivora develops resistance to most of the pesticides (Mokbel and Mohamed, 2009). The indiscriminate use of pesticides has lead to problems of pesticide resistance, resurgence and contamination of the environment (Dhaliwal and Kour, 2010). Plant extracts act in different ways for pest control viz. feeding deterrents, insect growth regulators (IGR), repellents and confusants (Schmutterer, 1990). Polygonum is a well known weed in West Bengal, India locally known as “Biskanthali” (Sarkar and Mukherjee, 2005). Badshah et al., (2005) reported that crude leaf and flower extracts of Polygonum hydropiper were responsible for mortality rates 10 days after feeding of 28% and 52% for Heterotermes indicola. Generally, tobacco plant (Nicotiana tabacum L.) contain the chemical, nicotine varies from 5-10% in the leaves (Thacker, 2002). Nicotine, an alkaloid extracted from Nicotiana tabacum, is well known plant based insecticide (Ujvary, 1999). Its efficacy against soft-bodied insects viz.  Aphids, whitefly, thrips is well known. Nicotine was found to be toxic to eggs and neonate larvae of Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura and also effective against whitefly (Dhaliwal and Arora, 2001). The Polygonum extracts and tobacco extracts were moderately effective against aphids providing 63.49% and 60.54% control respectively (Ghosh, 2017). Imidacloprid 30.5 SC @ 160 ml/ha resulted 88.73% aphid control (Thakoor et al., 2019). Immidacloprid provided more than 80% aphid (Aphis craccivora) control on som plant (Machilus bombycina)  followed by Polygonum hydropiper flower extract (>60% suppression) (Ghosh et al., 2016). Acharya et al., (2002) reported that the bio-efficacy of imidacloprid was safer to beneficial insects. Hence, the objective of the research is preparation of plant based formulation from locally available plants and to evolve a safe pest management programme.
Study period and location
 
The field experiment was conducted in the farm of BCKV-Agriculture University, Kalyani, West Bengal, India in pre-kharif during 2019-2020. The geographical details of the site are 23° N latitude, 89° E longitude and 9.75 meter above mean sea level (Thakoor et al., 2020). The soil was typically gangetic alluvial (Entisol) with sandy clay loam texture, neutral in reaction and moderate in fertility. Soil PH ranges 5.75 to 6.5 (Priyadarsini et al., 2019). The climate of this zone is subtropical humid. The formulation was prepared in the Chemistry Laboratory of BCKV.
 
Development of wettable powder formulation (50% WP) from polygonum and tobacco
 
Wettable powders are finely-divided solid pesticide formulations which are applied after dilution and suspension in water. The process for preparation of wettable powder formulations of botanicals comprises a number of steps. Collected the botanicals from crops field and then dried up in a shaded area. Grinding the botanicals plant and mixing the inert filler under slow mixing in a blender. Adding wetting, dispersing, antifoaming agents and fillers and micronizing the powder by a grinder. Sieving the product in the range 75 um mesh size to get wettable powder.
 
Compositions of wettable powder formulation (50% WP) from polygonum and tobacco
 
For preparing wettable powder formulation of herbal pesticide from Polygonum hydropiper floral parts and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaf the different ingredients are required viz. china clay, silica gel, wetting agent, dispersing agent etc. Compositions of wettable powder formulation (50% WP) from Polygonum and tobacco are presented in Table 1 and Table 2 respectively.

Table 1: Compositions of wettable powder formulation (50% WP) from Polygonum.



Table 2: Compositions of wettable powder fsormulation (50% WP) from tobacco.


 
Physico-chemical analysis
 
Identity
 
50% WP formulation of Polygonum and tobacco will be in the form of a fine powder free from visible extraneous matter and hard lumps.
 
Particle size: (Wet sieve test and Particle size distribution)
 
Pre weighted (2 g) powder of botanical sample was taken in a previously weighted 75 µm sieve and placed under tap water with gentle flow for 60 second. Then it was dried in a hot air oven (70°C) for 24 hours and weight taken. Difference of these two weights should be below 2% according to FAO specification.
       
Particle size of the WP formulation of the botanical sample was analyzed by particle size analyzer (Malvern, Mastersizer 2000, Version 5.60, serial no MAL1029349, UK) from Institute of Pesticide Formulation Technology (Gurugram, Haryana, India).
 
Wettability test
 
WP formulation of botanical sample (1 g) was taken in beaker containing 100 mL hard water. The time to get wet all powder in water was noted.
 
Foaming test
 
Pre weighted WP taken in a 100 mL Measuring cylinder with a stopper containing 100 mL standard hard water (342 ppm). Then the cylinder was inversed 180° for 30 times within 2 minutes. Then foam height at the top layer was taken after 1 minute.
 
Suspensibility test
 
After taken foam height cylinder was left undisturbed for 30 minutes. After removing the top 90 mL suspension with the help of suction pump, the precipitate was taken in a pre weighted beaker and dried at 70°C to constant weight.
 
 

Where,
M = Initial weight of WP formulation.
m = Weight of precipitated WP formulation.
 
Storage stability
 
After storage at three condition at below 10°C, at room temperature (25°C) and at 54 ± 2°C for 14th days, the determined average active ingredient content must not be lower than 97% relative to the determined average content found before storage and the formulation should meet again same result for wet sieve test, suspensibility, wettability, etc.
 
Bio efficacy evaluation of plant based formulation against aphid (Aphis craccivora)
 
Cultivation practices
 
These two years study was done against cowpea aphid in rice-wheat cropping system after harvesting of wheat and before rice sowing. Cowpea variety “Kashi Kanchan” was grown under recommended fertilizers and cultural practices. Spacing was taken as 20 cm × 30 cm in 5 m × 5 m sized plots with three replications. The 1st season study during pre-kharif-2019 was done as, date of showing on 02/02/2019 and the 2nd season study during pre- kharif-2020 was done as, date of showing on 20/2/2020.
 
Treatments details
 
Two botanical formulation (prepared in the Chemistry Laboratory), Polygonum hydropiper floral parts and Tobacco leaf, three treatments for both cases were evaluated and compared with the chemical insecticides, Fipronil (Regent 5% SC) and Imidacloprid (Confidor 17.8 SL).

Treatments details are as follows:
 

Data recording
 
There were three sprays at 12 day intervals in this study. Aphid population was recorded at 3, 7 and 11 days after spraying. Five plants were selected randomly from each plot. Aphid population per leaf from bottom, middle and top leaves was recorded. The results were presented as pest population suppression per cent with comparison to densities on the controlled plot by following the Abbott’s formula (Abbott, 1925):
 
 
  
Randomized block design (RBD) were followed in this study. Data were analyzed by using INDO-STAT- software for analysis of variance. Treatment means were separated by applying CD Test (critical difference) at 5% level of significance.
Bio-efficacy evaluation of plant based formulation against aphid (Aphis craccivora)
 
Among the treatments studied (Table 3), imidacloprid (Confidor 17.8 SL) @ 1.0 ml/L of water seemed most effective against aphid recording 81.43% suppression, closely followed by tobacco leaf (Nicotiana tabacum) (50 WP) @ 8 g/ L of water providing 71.09% suppression. It was also found that fipronil (Regent 5% SC) @ 2.5 ml/L provided better control of aphid population (68.29% suppression) closely followed by Polygonum floral parts (50 WP) @  8 g/L of water providing 65.51% suppression. From over all observation it was found that plant based formulation tobacco leaf (50 WP) @ 4 g/L of water and Polygonum floral parts (50 WP) @  4 g/L of water, provided moderate results, recording about 53.11% and 51.25% aphid suppression respectively. Least effectiveness against aphids was found from tobacco leaf (50 WP) @ 2 g/L of water and Polygonum floral parts (50 WP) @ 2 g/L of water. These findings are supported by Ghosh et al., (2016) and they reported that imidacloprid was the most effective treatment in providing more than 80% aphid suppression on som plant followed by Polygonum extract (>60% suppression).
 

Table 3: Overall efficacy of plant based formulation against Aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch.) on cowpea (Grand mean of 2019 and 2020).


       
Three days after spraying (Table 3), imidacloprid (Confidor 17.8 SL) @ 1.0 ml/3L of water seemed most effective against aphids providing 79.66% suppression, closely followed by tobacco leaf (50 WP) @ 8 g/L of water providing 73.11% suppression. There were no significant differences among these two treatments. Fipronil (Regent 5% SC) @ 2.5 ml/L also provided better control of aphid population (71.61% suppression) closely followed by Polygonum floral parts (50 WP) @  8 g/L of water providing 64.27% suppression. There were no significant differences among these two treatments. Seven days after spraying, imidacloprid seemed superior insecticide (83.56% suppression) closely followed tobacco leaf (50 WP) @ 8 g/L of water providing 73.83% suppression. There were no significant differences among these two treatments. There were no significant differences among the three treatments of tobacco leaf (50 WP) @ 8 g/ L of water, Polygonum floral parts (50 WP) @ 8 g/L of water and fipronil (Regent 5% SC) @ 2.5 ml/L recording 73.83%, 70.96% and 69.67% suppression respectively. Eleven days after spraying, also imidacloprid was found to be most effective treatment (81.04% suppression) against aphids. There were no significant differences among the three treatments of tobacco leaf (50 WP) @ 8 g/ L of water, Polygonum floral parts (50 WP) @  8 g/ L of water and fipronil (Regent 5% SC) @ 2.5 ml/L recording 66.32%, 63.56% and 61.46% suppression respectively.
       
In the year 2019, (Table 4) imidacloprid (Confidor 17.8 SL) @ 1.0 ml/3L of water seemed most effective against aphids providing 82.49% suppression, followed by tobacco leaf (50 WP) @ 8 g/L of water (72.66% suppression), fipronil (Regent 5% SC) @ 2.5 ml/L (69.36% suppression) and Polygonum floral parts (50 WP) @  8 g/ L of water (66.24% suppression. In the year 2020, (Table 4) imidacloprid (Confidor 17.8 SL) @ 1.0 ml/3L of water seemed most effective against aphids providing 80.36% suppression, followed by tobacco leaf (50 WP) @ 8 g/L of water (69.52% suppression), fipronil (Regent 5% SC) @ 2.5 ml/L (67.22 % suppression) and Polygonum floral parts (50 WP) @  8 g/L of water (64.77% suppression.
 

Table 4: Efficacy of plant based formulation against Aphid (Aphis craccivora) on cowpea (2019 and 2020).


       
From the overall observations of the studies it was revealed that imidacloprid (Confidor 17.8 SL) @ 1.0 ml/3L was found the most effective treatment against aphids giving more than 80% control followed by tobacco leaf (50 WP) @ 8 g/ L of water (more than 70% control), fipronil (Regent 5% SC) @ 2.5 ml/L and Polygonum floral parts (50 WP) @ 8 g/ L of water (more than 65% control both). Tobacco and Polygonum are bio-pesticides; plant based formulation and may be used as alternative of chemical pesticides. The treatments Polygonum plant extracts and tobacco extracts were effective against aphids providing 63.49% and  60.54%, control respectively (Ghosh, 2017). But imidacloprid and fipronil both are toxic synthetic chemical insecticide, so there is every possibility to contaminate vegetables with the toxic chemicals. As cowpea is vegetables and consumed after little cooking faces problems for using of chemical pesticides. So we can avoid the use of toxic insecticides like imidacloprid, fipronil and other chemical insecticides. Das et al., (2010)  reported that a rapid degradation was found in imidacloprid and neem oil. So imidacloprid as small amount may be recommended mixing with plant based insecticides for general use of aphid control in cowpea for its higher efficacy and rapid degradation. Rahardjo et al., (2020) reported that the application of plant extract that has an insecticidal effect is considered as one promising alternative in reducing the negative effects of synthetic pesticides.
 
Test result of physico-chemical properties of plant based formulation of tobacco WP (50%) and Polygonum WP (50%)
 
An attempt has been made to prepare wettable powder (WP) formulation of Polygonum hydropiper floral parts and Tobacco leaf. Solid active ingredients with high melting points are used for WP formulations which are suitable for dry grinding through a mechanical grinder such as a hammer or pin type mill. WP usually contains dry surfactants such as powder wetting and dispersing agents and inert carriers or fillers. They frequently contain more than 50% active ingredient and the upper limit is usually determined by the amount of inert material such as silica required to prevent the active ingredient particles aggregating together during processing in the dry grinding mills. Inert filler such as kaolin or talc is also needed to prevent the formulated product from caking or aggregating during storage.
       
Wettable Powder formulation of Polygonum floral parts and Tobacco leaf (50% WP) was prepared by adsorbing it in precipitated silica. However, the quality of the formulation did not accurately satisfy the FAO specification for wettable powder formulation in terms of wet sieved test, wettability, foaming and suspensibility as shown in Table 1 and Table 2. Therefore, wettable powder formulationof Polygonum floral parts was prepared by using 50% Polygonum floral parts powder and  8% precipitated silica to absorb the material properly along with 26% china clay used as diluents, 7% wetting agent and 9% dispersing agent. The results of qualitative and quantitative tests performed on 50% WP formulation are presented in Table 1. The wettable powder formulation of tobacco leaf was prepared by using 50% tobacco leaf powder and  9% precipitated silica to absorb the material properly along with 28% china clay used as diluents, 7% wetting agent and 6% dispersing agent. The results of qualitative and quantitative tests performed on 50% WP formulation are presented in Table 2. The quality parameters of WP (50%) formulation was satisfactory as per the FAO specifications in terms of wet sieved test, wettability, foaming and suspensibility performed on the 0-day and also after 15th day at room temperature, at 65°C and at freezing temperature conditions as shown in Table 5.
 

Table 5: Test results of the physico-chemical properties of WP (50%) formulation.


               
Particle size distribution of the formulation (50% WP) on 15th day was measured by Particle Size Analyser (Malvern, Mastersizer). About 90% of the particles were observed under 73.422 µm, 50% particle under 13.373 µm and 10% particle under 2.898 µm well within the specification of 75 µm (WHO).
An attempt has been made to prepare wettable powder (WP) formulation of Polygonum hydropiper floral parts (locally available weeds) and Tobacco leaf. The quality of the formulation satisfies the FAO specification in terms of wet sieved test, wettability, foaming and suspensibility. So this procedure may be followed for preparation of the plant based formulation of wettable powder (WP). Tobacco leaf formulation (50 WP) @ 8 g/ L of water gave more than 70% control and Polygonum floral parts formulation (50 WP) @ 8 g/ L of water gave more than 65% control. Tobacco and Polygonum are bio-pesticides; may be used as alternative of chemical pesticides for eco-friendly management of insect pest.
All authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.

  1. Abbott, W.S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ Entomol.18: 265-267.

  2. Acharya, S., Mishra, H.P. and Dash, D. (2002). Efficacy of insecticides against okra jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula). Annals of Plant Protection Science.10: 230-232. 

  3. Badshah, H., Khan, A.S., Farid, A. and Khan, A. (2005). Toxic effect of palpoluck (Polygonum hydropiper) plant extract against termites (Heterotermes indicola and Coptotermes heimi). Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 27: 705-10.

  4. Das, K., Biswas. S., Chakraborty, G. and Ghosh, S.K. (2010). Efficacy of insecticides against Iassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttuka Ishida) on okra in terai agro-ecology of West Bengal. Journal of Applied Zoological Research. 21: 33-35.

  5. Dhaliwal, G.S. and Arora, R. (2001). Role of phytochemicals in integrated pest management. In: Kour, O. and Dhaliwal, G.S. (Eds.) Phytochemical Biopesticides. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Pp. 97- 117.

  6. Dhaliwal, G.S., Kour, O. (2010). Quest for Pest Management: From Green Revolution to Gene Revolution. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.

  7. Ghosh, S.K. (2017). Seasonal Incidence of aphid (Aphis gossypii) Infesting tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) and their management by using botanical pesticides. International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Tecnology. 5: 14-17.

  8. Ghosh, S.K., Mandol, T. and Chakraborty, K. (2016). Population fluctuation of aphid (Aphis craccivora) infesting Som plant leaves (Machilus bombycina) and its management. Journal of Entomological Research.40: 235-241.

  9. Mokbel, El-Sayed S. Azza, I Mohamed. (2009). Development of resistance in field strain of Aphis craccivora to the donotefuran insecticides from the new class neonicotinoids and its effects on some enzymes control. Egypt Acad J. Biolog Sci. 1: 65-69.

  10. Osteen, C.D., Szmedra, P.I. (1989). Agricultural Pesticide Use Trends and Policy Issues. Agricultural Economic Report No. 622, Deptt. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., U.S.

  11. Priyadarshini, S., Ghosh, S.K. and Nayak, A.K. (2019). Field screening of different chilli cultivars against important sucking pests of chilli in West Bengal. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences. 8: 134-140.

  12. Rahardjo, I.B., Marwoto, B. and Budiato, K. (2020). Efficacy of selected plant extracts to control leaf-miner in chrysanthemum. Agrivita, Journal of Agricultural Science. 42: 2245-2256.   

  13. Sarkar, A. and Mukherjee, P.K. (2005). Ecology of Polygonum: a predominant weed in terai Agro-climatic region of West Bengal. Ann.  Agric. Res. 26: 462-463.

  14. Schmutterer, H. (1990). Properties and potential of natural pesticides from the neem tree (Azadirachta indica). Ann. Rev. Entomol. 35: 271-297.

  15. Singh, R.N., Samson, M.V. and Dutta, R.K. (2000). Pest management in sericulture. Indian Publishers Distribution pp 50-270.

  16. Sorensen, K.A. and Baker, J.R. (1983). Insects and Related Pests of Vegetables. The North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service. Publication AG-295, 173.

  17. Thacker, J.R.M. (2002). An Introduction to Arthropod Pest Control. Cambridge University Press.

  18. Thakoor, P., Ghosh, S.K., Nihal, R. and Ramya, Sri, N. (2019). Effect of abiotic factors on seasonal incidence and bio-efficacy of some newer insecticides against aphid (Aphis gossypii) in tomato. Journal of Entomology and Zoology studies. 7: 513-516.

  19. Thakoor, P., Ghosh, S.K. and Bala, S.C. (2020). Effect of abiotic factors on seasonal incidence and bio-efficacy of some newer insecticides against white fly on tomato crop in West Bengal. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 8: 267-271.

  20. Ujvary, I. (1999). Nicotine and other insecticidal alkaloids. In: Nicotinoid Insecticide and the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor, [I. Yamamoto and J.E. Casida (Eds.)] Springer- Verlag, Tokyo, Pp. 229-269.

Editorial Board

View all (0)