Influence of endophyte on plant biomass under salt stress
Endophytes are recognized as hidden world within plant and their importance for the host benefit are reported by numerous researchers. Endophytes help to plant through secretion of phytohormone hormone, phosphate solublization, nitrogen fixation, sidrophore production and also help during abiotic and biotic stresses (
Khandel et al., 2017). The morphology of normal seedling observed better than the endophyte free seedling at each salt concentration (Fig 1). At 0mM control, the control seedling biomass and endophyte free seedling biomass was 331±7.11 and 253.6±8.02 mg/plant respectively (Fig 2). Plant biomass was decreasing with increasing salt concentration in both normal and endophyte free seedling. At 50mM, control and endophyte free seedling biomass was decreased by 11.6% and 14.3% respectively (Fig 2a,b). At 100mM, control seedling biomass was decreased by 23.2% while in case of endophyte free seedling decreased by 17.2% than their respective control (Fig 2a,b). However, at 100mM control seedling and endophyte free seedling biomass was decreased by 28 % and 31.2% respectively to their respective control (Fig 2a,b). In both seedling, salt treatment was influencing in similar fashion but normal seedling was having more biomass at each salt concentration than endophyte free seedling (Fig 2a,b). Previously, 22 endophytic bacteria were isolated from
Vigna radiata roots and some of bacteria were retaining plant growth promoting activity
(Bhutani et al., 2018). Among abiotic stress, salt stress is very common; alleviating salt concentration in soil day by day as well as saline affecting area increasing worldwide is a big problem (
Shrivastava and Kumar, 2015). Therefore, the colonization endophyte
Serendipita indica (formerly
Piriformospora indica) with Arabidopsis helps to grow under salinity stress
(Lanza et al., 2019).
Recently, 25 endophytic microbes were reported from the root of
Vigna radiata and some of them showed growth promoting characteristic
(Gujar et al., 2019). When other sources are compared for the endophytes, the seed is one heritable source which carried from one generation to the next (
Shahzad et al., 2018). Previous study showed that through direct and indirect mechanism endophytes help in germination and promotion of plant growth (
Walitang et al., 2019). In present study, biomass was decreasing with increasing salt concentration, but biomass decreasing rate observed higher in endophyte free seedling as compared to control. Of course, in control seedling endophyte was present and might be helping plant to resist in salt condition. Rather than the plant surfaces the internal tissues of plant provide a protective environment for the endophytes where temperature, osmotic pressure and UV radiation does not affect the surviving of the bacteria in such extreme environmental conditions (
Thamiz Vendan and Balachandar, 2021). Seed endophyte bacterial community also depends on the genotype of plant and salt stress trigger the dominant of important class of bacteria to help under stress condition
(Walitang et al., 2018).
Influence of endophyte on shoot and root length under salt stress
Salt stress is negatively influenced on morphology, physiology, plant biomass and yield (
Gupta et al., 2014). But the application of endophytic bacteria has been recognized for adaptation under salt stress condition
(Vaishnav et al., 2019). Shoot and root length of control seedling was higher than endophyte free seedling at each salt treatment (Fig 3). Shoot length of control seedling and endophyte free was 5.5±0.5 and 1.6±0.15 (cm/plant) at 0mM salt concentration (Fig 3a,b). As the salt concentration was increasing, the shoot length was decreasing by 45.4, 78.8 and 89.6% at 50, 100 and 150mM respectively in control seedling (Fig 3a). In case of endophyte free seedling, shoot length was decreasing by 14.1, 42.7 and 71.3 % at 50, 100 and 150mM salt concentration respectively (Fig 3b). With increasing the salt concentration, shoot length decreasing rate was higher in control seedling plant than endophyte free seedling (Fig 3a,b).
Root length was higher in control seedling as compared with endophyte free at every salt concentration. At 0mM, root length of control seedling and endophyte free seedling were 10.8±0.72 and 3.73±0.25 cm/plant respectively,
i.e. endophyte free seedling length was 65.7% less than control seedling (Fig 3b,c). In control seedling, root length was 24, 45.9 and 57.4% decreased at 50, 100 and 150mM respectively comparedwith their 0mM control (Fig 3c). However, root length of endophyte free seedling was decreased by 22.2, 33.8, 80.3% at 50, 100 and 150mM respectively than their control plant (Fig 3d). At 100mM, endophyte free seedling was not able to grow properly and their root length was very less than control seedling root length. In present finding, the control seedling was retaining higher root length, shoot length and plant biomass as compared with endophyte free seedling at 0mM and higher salt. Previously reported that, the application of bacterial endophyte
Gordonia terrae KMP456-M40 has been enhanced the root length of mangrove seedlings and the biomass of salt-stressed rice under axenic conditions up to 65% and 62%, respectively (
Soldan et al., 2019). The highest seedling length, dry weight and germination percentage was observed in the green grams inoculated with isolate KHDEB5 under salt stress varying upto a wide range of salt concentration (upto 500mM NaCl)
(Das et al., 2020). From same leguminaceae family plant, four endophytes,
Bacillus cereus NUU1,
Achromobacter xylosoxidans NUU2,
Bacillus thuringiensis NUU3 and
Bacillus subtilis NUU4 were isolated from
Cicer arietinum root, however only
B. subtilis NUU4 significantly improved plant growth, symbiotic relation with rhizobia and yield under saline
soil condition (Egamberdieva
et_al2017).
Proline content in control and endophyte free seedling under salt stress
Proline is very important osmolyte to protect plant under abiotic stress condition and increasing content with increasing salt concentration upto certain extent (
Kaur and Asthir, 2015). At 0mM salt concentration, the proline content in shoot was not significant difference between control and endophyte free seedlings (Fig 4a,b). Proline content in control seedling shoot at 50 and 100mM was increased by 69.2% and 115.4% respectively compared with 0mM salt treatment (Fig 4a). Proline content was not increasing with increasing salt, because at 150mM proline content in control seedling was increased by 54.7% as compared with 0mM salt (Fig 4a). In endophyte free seedling shoot, proline content was maximum at 50mM salt then followed by decreasing with increasing salt (Fig 4b). At 50, 100 and 150mM salt concentration, proline content was increased by 85.9, 35.1 and 29.6% as compared with 0mM salt of endophyte free seedling shoot (Fig 4b).
In saline soil condition (100mM),
Cicer arietinum treated with
Mesorhizobium ciceri strain IC53 alone or along with endophyte
B. subtilis NUU4, have been in increased the proline content in root by 11% and 29% respectively (
Egamberdieva et al., 2017). In this study, proline content was maximum at 100mM in control seedling shoot, while in case of endophyte free seedling, proline content was reached maximum early at 50mM. This result revealed that, endophyte free seedlings were not adaptive in salt condition as compared with control seedlings.
Proline content in control and endophyte free seedling root was increasing with increasing salt concentration (Fig 4c, d). At 0mM salt concentration, proline content was 0.0078±0.00043 and 0.0064±0.00017 (µmol/mg) in control and endophyte free seedling root respectively (Fig 4c,d).In control seedling root, the proline content at 50, 100 and 150mM salt concentration was increased by 43.2, 114.6 and 166.7% than 0mM salt concentration (Fig 4c). However, in endophyte free seedling root, the proline content at 50, 100 and 150mM salt concentration was increased by 42.3, 88.8 and 149% than 0mM salt concentration (Fig 4d).Plant synthesized proline content in root and shoot tissue at low level for development and growth, albeit shoot synthesize more proline than root in normal condition
(KaviKishor et al., 2015). During seed formation proline accumulated more in seed, however in salt stress condition induced more in root and shoot to tolerate salt stress
(Mattioli et al., 2009).
Glycine betaine content in control and endophyte free seedling under salt stress
Glycine betaine (GB) is an amphoteric quaternary ammonium compound and is ubiquitously reported in microorganism, animal and from plant. GB is non-toxic, soluble in water and remainselectrical neutral at wide range of pH (
Gupta et al., 2014). GB content in root and shoot tissue was increased upto 100mM, afterward decreased at 150mM salt concentration (Fig 5). Either in shoot or root, the GB content was higher in control seedling than endophyte free seedling plant (Fig 5). In control seedling, the GB was 91.5 and 198.4% higher in shoot at 50 and 100mM as compared with 0mM salt (Fig 5a). But at 150mM GB in shoot decreased and it was only 37.6% higher than 0mM salt concentration (Fig 5a). GB content in endophyte free seedling shoot was also following same pattern. At 50 and 100mM, GB content was 27.5 and 61% higher in endophyte free seedling shoot respectively as compared with 0mM salt, while at 150mM GB content was 36.9% higher than 0mM salt concentration (Fig 5b).
In abiotic stress condition, spatio-temporal accumulation of GB provides osmotic adjustment, stabilizes proteins and protects the photosynthetic apparatus
(Annunziata et al., 2019). Salt stress damage to photosynthetic pigment and apparatus, accumulation of GB during salt stress and foliar spray of GB led to pigment stabilization and increase in photosynthetic rate and growth of plant (
Cha-Um and Kirdmanee, 2010). Transgenic wheat (betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase,
BADH ) was accumulated upto 42 mmol L
-1, showed higher net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance over control at 200mM salt concentration (
Umar et al., 2018,
Tian et al., 2016).
In root, GB content was induced maximum at 100mM salt concentration in both control and endophyte free seedling. In control seedling root, GB content was 95.3 and 153.2% higher at 50 and 100mM salt concentration respectively than 0mM salt, while at 150mM it was 52.1% higher than 0mM salt (Fig 5c). In case of endophyte free seedlings, GB content was 41.3 and 72.2% higher at 50 and 100mM salt concentration respectively than 0mM salt, however at 150mM, it was only 10.6% higher than 0mM salt (Fig 5d). In present study, GB content in root and shoot was increasing with increasing salt upto 100mM. But GB was higher in shoot as compared with root at each salt concentration as support the previous finding spatio-temporal accumulation of GB
(Annunziata et al., 2019). Abide to GB and proline, the external spay of polyamines (putrescine, spermidine and spermine) help to salt tolerance by enhanced the contents of glutathione and ascorbate, increased activities of antioxidant enzymes (dehydroas corbatereductase, glutathione reductase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase) and glyoxalase enzyme (glyoxalase II) in moong seedling
(Nahar et al., 2016).