Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 47 issue 6 (june 2024) : 1007-1010

Effect of Presowing Treatments on Seed and Seedling Quality Attributes of an Endemic Agroforestry Tree Acacia nilotica subsp. cupressiformis (J.L. Stewart) Ali and Faruqi

M.B. Noor mohamed1,*, A.K. Shukla1, R.S. Mehta1, A. Keerthika1, D.K. Gupta2
1ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali-Marwar-306 401, Rajasthan, India.
2ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Hazaribagh-825 301, Jharkhand, India.
  • Submitted03-03-2021|

  • Accepted20-05-2021|

  • First Online 27-05-2021|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4601

Cite article:- mohamed Noor M.B., Shukla A.K., Mehta R.S., Keerthika A., Gupta D.K. (2024). Effect of Presowing Treatments on Seed and Seedling Quality Attributes of an Endemic Agroforestry Tree Acacia nilotica subsp. cupressiformis (J.L. Stewart) Ali and Faruqi . Legume Research. 47(6): 1007-1010. doi: 10.18805/LR-4601.
Background: Acacia nilotica var. cupressiformis is an evergreen multipurpose leguminous tree species which is suitable to agroforestry purposes and mainly distributed in Western parts of Rajasthan in India particularly Pali and its adjoining areas. The species has many advantages, however the natural germination in wild is very limited due to its hard seed coat dormancy.  

Methods: The experiment was conducted to study the effect of presowing treatment on seed coat of A. nilotica var. cupressiformis seeds with ten treatments in Completely Randomized Block Design at ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali Marwar. The treatments were replicated thrice. 

Result: Among the treatments, maximum germination and higher values was obtained in sand paper scarification with water soaking for 12hrs (T2) followed by mechanical scarification with sand paper (T1), acid scarification (50% for 20 min) (T7) and acid scarification (98% for 10 min) (T5). Further, the present study aims to initiate the research areas for conservation and utilization of A. nilotica var. cupressiformis in Western parts of Rajasthan and other parts of India.
Acacia nilotica is one of the best multipurpose leguminous trees which belongs to the subfamily Mimosoideae of the family Fabaceae. It is indigenous to the Indian Sub-continent and also distributed in many countries. In India, it is distributed naturally in Maharashtra, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Haryana and Karnataka (Abhishek et al., 2015). Though A. nilotica subsp. cupressiformis has also been reported from Punjab and Gujarat, in Rajasthan, it is endemic to the semi-arid region. Four of the nine recognized subspecies (A. nilotica indica (Benth.) Brenan, A. nilotica subalata (Vatke) Brenan, A. nilotica cupressiformis (J. Stewart) Ali and Faruqi and A. nilotica adstringens (Schumach. and Thonn.) Roberty) occur in India (Dwivedi 1993). Among them, A. nilotica indica is the most prevalent subspecies occurring throughout the country. Two subspecies (A. nilotica indica and A. nilotica cupressiformis) co-occur in Rajasthan in India.
       
A. nilotica var. cupressiformis is a tall evergreen tree with acute angle branching pattern which result into compact conical shape crown. This species is mainly distributed in western Rajasthan in India particularly in Pali and its adjoining areas. There is no shade effect on adjoining crops and it doesn’t allow the birds or animals to build the nest in this tree due to its compact and narrow crown pattern. Ultimately it leads to less damage to the agricultural crops by birds and animals.  This tree fulfills all the criteria of agroforestry such as leguminous tree, fast vertical growth, narrow crown, few branches, straight and clean bole, deep taproot system, and high proportion of main stem, loose canopy permitting transmittance of light and less interference with crop and adding nutrients to the soil. This characteristics of the tree leads to prefer to grow on agricultural lands. Besides to that the tree is used for live fencing, its pods are eaten by goats, its timber is used for making doors, cots, etc. and its branches and twigs are used for fuel purposes. Acacia is also found in the silvipastoral system of wastelands. Tree is lopped during the winter season for fodder to feed goats and sheep. The leaves are used as fodder and relished by the goats. The trees are producing considerable amount of gums during summer season. The average green fodder per plant is approximated to be 15-20 kg. Each plant gives about 5 to 10 kg pods, it is fed to the animals. One tree provides 20 to 40 kg fuel wood and 20 to 40 kg fencing material for protection of field (Malhotra et al., 1985).
               
Besides, the species is of considerable importance in agro-forestry and wasteland management for its ability to grow fast and fix atmospheric nitrogen in hot semi-arid region of Rajasthan. Even though it has many advantages, there is no much information available about its botany, distribution, propagation and regeneration. Natural regeneration of this species is quite difficult and rarely seen in field it may be due to its seed coat dormancy that act as mechanical barrier limiting water and oxygen permeability. The tree is having many importance and suitable to agroforestry, however it is rarely seen growing in wild and fastly reducing in quantity in Western Rajasthan. And also, good crop stand can be obtained by improving the performance of seed germination through presowing treatment even in the adverse soil and atmospheric condition (Krishna Devi et al., 2021). Many seed presowing treatments were conducted mainly in Acacia including scarification, as well as soaking in tap water, boiling or hot water, acids, organic solvents and alcohols (Bonner et al., 1974; Clemens et al., 1977; Delwaulle, 1979; Cavanagh, 1980; ISTA, 1981; Ren and Tao, 2004; Patane and Gresta, 2006; Okunomo and Bosah, 2007; Kassa et al., 2010). But there is no information on the presowing treatment and seed germination of A. nilotica var. cupressiformis. Therefore, we have intervened to save this important multipurpose tree from extinction, the studies on seed germination as a preliminary step in its conservation and utilization of this species in the hot semi-arid region of western Rajasthan.
The study was conducted with ten treatments and three replications in Completely randomized block design (CRD) in hot semi-arid environment of India, at Research farm of ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station (Pali-Marwar, Rajasthan). The seeds were collected from healthy A. nilotica var. cupressiformis tree at Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali Marwar (Rajasthan) during the summer month (May-June), 2019. The collected seeds were manually graded and good quality seeds were used for the presowing treatments. Twenty-five seeds were sown in pot with sand, soil and FYM mixture in the ratio of 1:2:1 and it replicated thrice. Pots were kept in shade throughout the experiment and watering was done manually once in a day. The germination was observed for 30 days with emergence of cotyledon leaves above the surface was counted as germinated. Germination parameters were recorded and calculated. Vigour index was also calculated as germination (%)x total length of seedling (shoot length and root length) (Abdul Baki and Anderson, 1973) Table 1.

Table 1: Treatment detail of presowing treatment on A. nilotica var. cupressiformis seeds.

The germination parameters of Acacia nilotica var. cupressiformis seeds shown significant differences among the different presowing treatments (Table 2). The maximum germination percentage was recorded in mechanical scarification with sand paper + water soaking treatment (T2) (100%) followed by mechanical scarification with sand paper (T1) (85%), acid scarification (50% for 20 min) (66.66%) and acid scarification (98% for 10 min) (56.66%) (Table 2 and Fig 1). Nikoleave (1977) suggested that the seed coat dormancy may be overcome by peeling off or disrupting the seed coat. The process of hydrolysis could commence to release simple sugars that could be readily utilized in protein synthesis where the seed coat is softened. And also, the release of auxins and ethlyne could increase the nucleic acid metabolism and protein synthesis (Irwin, 1982 and Jackson, 1994). The minimum germination percentage obtained in control (T10) (10%) followed by normal water soaking (T9) and hot water boiling (80oC for 10 min) (T3) (Table 2 and Fig 1). The speed of germination and mean daily germination also followed the same trend which recorded maximum in mechanical scarification with sand paper + water soaking treatment (T2) (7.733 and 1.333) followed by mechanical scarification with sand paper (T1) (6.233 and 1.133), acid scarification (50% for 20 min) (3.888 and 0.888) and acid scarification (98% for 10 min) (3.855 and 0.755) while minimum in control (T10) (0.266 and 0.133) followed by normal water soaking (T9) and hot water boiling (80oC for 10 min). Other treatments also shown the poor germination percentage, speed of germination and mean daily germination values. The highest germination value expressed by mechanical scarification with sand paper + water soaking (T2) (24.44) followed by mechanical scarification with sand paper (T1) while the lowest were in control (T10) (0.244) followed by normal water soaking (T9).
 

Table 2: Effect of presowing treatments on seed germination attributes in A. nilotica var. cupressiformis.


 

Fig 1: Effect of presowing treatments on seed germination percentage on different time interval in A. nilotica var, cupressiformis.


 
The hot water treatment significantly reduced the germination ability of seeds which may destroy the embryo due to overheat. Aliero (2004) inferred that Parkia biglobosa seeds germination decreased when seeds were soaked more than 4 seconds in boiling water and concluded that embryo gets destroyed. Other researchers also concluded that sudden dip of dry seeds in boiling water may lead to the rapture of the coat wall allowing water to permeate the seed tissues causing physiological changes and subsequent germination of the embryo (Sabongari, 2001: Ramesha, 2016). And the acid treatment (98%+5 min and 50%+5min) also led to poor germination of seeds which may be due to the less disruption of the seed coat. The results of this study were supported by Mohamed Ahmed and Khalil (2014) which the seeds of Acacia nilotica subspecies tomentosa and subspecies adstingens took fewer days for breaking dormancy with the increase in emersion length in sulfuric acid. Kheloufi et al., (2017) also reported that sulphuric acid with 60 to 120 min soaking time is favourable for the seeds of A. cyanophylla and Acacia farnesiana which increases the germination rate index. Goda (1987) reported that seeds of Acacia nilotica when treated with H2SO4 for 90 minutes produced vigorous seedlings and higher per cent germination. Parameswari et al., (2001) also reported that the seeds scarified with commercial sulphuric acid @ 200 ml kg for 15 minutes maximized the seed germination by reducing both the abnormal seedling and hard seed.
               
Significant differences were observed in morphometric parameters of Acacia nilotica var. cupressiformis seedlings among the pre sowing treatments (Table 3). The maximum shoot and root length registered in mechanical scarification with sand paper + water soaking treatment (T2) (7.83 cm and 6.03 cm) followed by mechanical scarification with sand paper (T1) while minimum was in control (T10) (3.76 and 2.00 cm) followed by normal water soaking (T9). And also, the highest vigor index was recorded in T2 (1386.6) followed by T1, T7 and T5. The lowest vigor index was registered in control (T10) (48.00) followed by T9, T3, T4, T6.
 

Table 3: Effect of presowing treatments on growth parameter of A. nilotica var. cupressiformis seedlings.

From the study, it is concluded that seed coat scarification is prerequisite to break seed coat dormancy and quick germination. Scarification with sand paper combined with water soaking for 12 hrs followed by scarification with sand paper was found effective in influencing the germination process and registered higher germinability when compared with control and other treatments. In acid treatments, acid scarification (50% for 20 min) and acid scarification (98% for 10 min) was given moderate germination. Further trails may be conducted on acid treatment with different time periods which may influence the higher rate of germination and growth in Acacia nilotica var. cupressiformis.
 
All authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.

  1. Abdul Baki, A. A. and Anderson, J. D. (1973). Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop science. 13: 630-633.

  2. Aliero, B.L. (2004). Effects of sulphuric acid, mechanical scarification and wet heat treatments on germination of seeds of African locust bean tree, Parkia biglobosa. African Journal of Biotechnology. 3(3): 179-181.

  3. Bonner, F.T., McLemore, B.F. and Barnett, J.P. (1974). Pre-sowing treatment of seed to speed germination in ‘Seeds of Woody Plants in the United States’. Agric. Handbook No. 450. Forest Service, Washington. D.C. pp. 126-35.

  4. Cavanagh, A.K. (1980). A review of some aspects of the germination of Acacias. Proc., R. Soc., Vict. 91(1-2): 161-80.

  5. Clemens, J., Jones, P.G. and Gilbert, N.H. (1977). Effect of seed treatments on germination in Acacia. Australian J. Bot. 25: 269-76.

  6. Delwaulle, J.C. (1979). Forest plantations in dry tropical Africa. Revue Bois et Foret des Tropiques 187: 117-44.

  7. Dwivedi, A.P. (1993). Babul (Acacia nilotica): A Multipurpose Tree of Dry Areas. Scientific Publishers: Jodhpur.

  8. Goda S.E. (1987). Effect of pre-sowings treatment on germination of Acacia nilotica seeds, The Indian Forester. 113(17): 443-445.

  9. Irwin, P.T. (1982). Plant Physiology. Addision-Wesley Pub. Co. Inc. U.S.A, pp. 501- 540.

  10. ISTA. (1981). Amendments to International Rules for Seed Testing 1976. Intern. Seed Test. Assoc. (Zurich: Switzerland).

  11. Jackson, M.B. (1994). Root-to-shoot communication in flooded plants. Involvement of Abscisic acid, ethylene and 1-aminocy clopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Agron. J. 86(5): 775-781.

  12. Kassa, A., Alia, R., Tadesse, W., Pando, V. and Bravo, F. (2010). Seed germination and viability in two African Acacia species growing under different water stress levels. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 4(9): 353-359.

  13. Kheloufi, A., Mansouri, L.M. and Boukhatem, F.Z. (2017). Application and use of sulphuric acid pretreatment to improve seed germination of three acacia species, Reforesta. 3: 1-10. 

  14. Krishna Devi, Baura, P.K. and Baura, M. (2021). Integrated effect of pre-sowing seed treatment, sowing windows and seasons on seed yield and quality of greengram. Legume Research- An International Journal. 44(8): 956-961. doi: 10.18805/ LR-4174.

  15. Mohamed Ahmed and Khalil, A. (2014). Causes and variation of seed coat dormancy Between Acacia nilotica subspecies tomentosa and adstringens, M.Sc. thesis, University of Khartoum.

  16. Malhotra, S.P., Trivedi, H.S. and Mathur, Y.N. (1985). Agroforestry- A judicious use of desert ecosystem by man. CAZRI, publication, Jodhpur. Pp. 24-26.

  17. Nikoleave, M.G. (1977). Factors controlling seed dormancy pattern. North Holland publishing Co, Amsterdam. pp. 51-74.

  18. Okunomo, K and Bosah, B.O. (2007). Germination response of Acacia senegal (Linn.) seeds to various presowing treatments in the nursery. Agric. J. 2(6): 681-684.

  19. Parameswari, K., Srimathi, P. and Maiarkodi, K. (2001). Standardisation of dormancy breaking treatment in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) seeds. Legume Research - An International Journal. 24(1): 60-62.

  20. Patane, C and Gresta, F. (2006). Germination of Astragalus hamosus and Medicago orbicularis as affected by seed-coat dormancy breaking techniques. J. Arid Environ. 67: 165-173.

  21. Ramesha, M.N., Patil, S.L., Ratha Krishnan, P. and Seshadri, B.N. (2016). Effect of pre-sowing treatments on Prosopis pallida seed germination attributes. Range Mgmt. and Agroforestry. 37 (1): 104-107.

  22. Ren, J and Tao, L. (2004). Effects of different pre-sowing seed treatments on germination of 10 Calligonum species. For. Ecol. Manage. 195: 291- 300.

  23. Raj, A., Haokip, V. and Chandrawanshi, S. (2015). Acacia nilotica: a multipurpose tree and source of Indian gum Arabic. South Indian Journal of Biological Sciences. 1(2): 66-69.

  24. Sabongari, S. (2001). Effect of Soaking duration on germination and seedling establishment of selected varieties of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Biological Sciences, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria.

Editorial Board

View all (0)